Optimization of Mechanical Properties in FDM 3D-Printed PLA Parts: Evaluating the Interaction of Key Parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. V.S. Jatti, S.V. Jatti, A.P. Patel, and V.S. Jatti, A Study On Effect Of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters On Mechanical Properties, Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 2019, 8(11), p 689–693.
2. N.A. Fountas, I. Papantoniou, J.D. Kechagias, D.E. Manolakos, and N.M. Vaxevanidis, Experimental Investigation on Flexural Properties of FDM-Processed PET-G Specimen Using Response surface Methodology, MATEC Web Conf, 2021, 349, p 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20213490100810.1051/matecconf/202134901008 ↗
3. B. Huang, S. Meng, H. He, Y. Jia, Y. Xu, and H. Huang, Study of Processing Parameters in Fused Deposition Modeling Based on Mechanical Properties of Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Filament, Polym. Eng. Sci., 2019, 59(1), p 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2487510.1002/pen.24875 ↗
4. A. Dey and N. Yodo, A Systematic Survey of FDM Process Parameter Optimization and Their Influence on Part Characteristics, J Manuf Mater Process, 2019, 3(3), p 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp303006410.3390/jmmp3030064 ↗
5. G. Nyiranzeyimana, J.M. Mutua, B.R. Mose, and T.O. Mbuya, Optimization of Process Parameters in Fused Deposition Modelling of Thermoplastics: A Review, Mate. Werkstofft, 2021, 52(6), p 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.20200019310.1002/mawe.202000193 ↗
6. D. Syrlybayev, B. Zharylkassyn, A. Seisekulova, M. Akhmetov, A. Perveen, and D. Talamona, Optimisation of Strength Properties of FDM Printed Parts: A Critical Review, Polymers, 2021, 13(10), p 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1310158710.3390/polym13101587 ↗
7. T.J. Gordelier, P.R. Thies, L. Turner, and L. Johanning, Optimising the FDM Additive Manufacturing Process to Achieve Maximum TENSILE strength: A State-of-the-Art Review, Rapid Prototyp J, 2019, 25(6), p 953–971. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2018-018310.1108/RPJ-07-2018-0183 ↗
8. A. Alafaghani, A. Qattawi, B. Alrawi, and A. Guzman, Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: A Design-for-Manufacturing Approach, Procedia Manuf., 2017, 10, p 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.07910.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079 ↗
9. C. Benwood, A. Anstey, J. Andrzejewski, M. Misra, and A.K. Mohanty, Improving the Impact Strength and Heat Resistance of 3D Printed Models: Structure, Property, and Processing Correlationships during Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Poly(Lactic Acid), ACS Omega, 2018, 3(4), p 4400–4411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0012910.1021/acsomega.8b00129 ↗
10. R. Hussin, S. Z. Abd. Rahim, A. abdellah el-hadj, I. Abd Rahim, ve K. Kamarudin, Optimization parameter effects on the strength of 3D-printing process using Taguchi method, c. 2129. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118162.10.1063/1.5118162 ↗
11. H. Gonabadi, A. Yadav, and S.J. Bull, The Effect of Processing Parameters on the Mechanical Characteristics of PLA Produced by a 3D FFF Printer, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 111(3–4), p 695–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06138-410.1007/s00170-020-06138-4 ↗
12. M. Heidari-Rarani, N. Ezati, P. Sadeghi, and M.R. Badrossamay, Optimization of FDM Process Parameters for Tensile Properties of Polylactic Acid Specimens Using Taguchi Design of Experiment Method, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2020, 35(12), p 2435–2452. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270572096456010.1177/0892705720964560 ↗
13. C.M.S. Vicente, T.S. Martins, M. Leite, A. Ribeiro, and L. Reis, Influence of fused deposition modeling parameters on the mechanical properties of ABS parts, Polym. Adv. Technol., 2020, 31(3), p 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.478710.1002/pat.4787 ↗
14. S.K. Mangla, Y. Kazancoglu, M.D. Sezer, N. Top, and I. Sahin, Optimizing Fused Deposition Modelling Parameters Based on the Design for Additive Manufacturing to Enhance Product Sustainability, Comput Indus, 2023, 145, p 103833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.10383310.1016/j.compind.2022.103833 ↗
15. A. Rodríguez-Panes, J. Claver, and A.M. Camacho, The Influence of Manufacturing Parameters on the Mechanical Behaviour of PLA and ABS Pieces Manufactured by FDM: A Comparative Analysis, Materials, 2018, 11(8), p 1333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1108133310.3390/ma11081333 ↗
16. J. Triyono, H. Sukanto, R.M. Saputra, and D.F. Smaradhana, The Effect of Nozzle Hole Diameter of 3D Printing on Porosity and Tensile Strength Parts Using Polylactic Acid Material, Open Eng, 2020, 10(1), p 762–768. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-008310.1515/eng-2020-0083 ↗
17. T.F. Abbas, K.K. Mansor, and H.B. Ali, The Effect of FDM Process Parameters on the Compressive Property of ABS Prints, J Hunan Univ Nat Sci, 2022, 49(7), p 154–162. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.49.7.1710.55463/issn.1674-2974.49.7.17 ↗
18. O.A. Mohamed, S.H. Masood, J.L. Bhowmik, M. Nikzad, and J. Azadmanjiri, Effect of Process Parameters on Dynamic Mechanical Performance of FDM PC/ABS Printed Parts Through Design of Experiment, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25(7), p 2922–2935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2157-610.1007/s11665-016-2157-6 ↗
19. S. Garzon-Hernandez, D. Garcia-Gonzalez, A. Jérusalem, and A. Arias, Design of FDM 3D Printed Polymers: An Experimental-Modelling Methodology for the Prediction of Mechanical Properties, Mater. Des., 2020, 188, p 108414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10841410.1016/j.matdes.2019.108414 ↗
20. O.A. Mohamed, S.H. Masood, and J.L. Bhowmik, Experimental Investigation for Dynamic Stiffness and Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Manufactured Part Using IV-Optimal Response surface DESIGN, Rapid Prototyp J, 2017, 23(4), p 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2015-013710.1108/RPJ-10-2015-0137 ↗
21. S. Wickramasinghe, T. Do, and P. Tran, FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments, Polymers, 2020, 12(7), p 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1207152910.3390/polym12071529 ↗
22. V. Mishra, S. Negi, S. Kar, A.K. Sharma, Y.N.K. Rajbahadur, and A. Kumar, Recent Advances in Fused Deposition Modeling Based Additive Manufacturing of Thermoplastic Composite Structures: A Review, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2023, 36(7), p 3094–3132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705722110285710.1177/08927057221102857 ↗
23. R. Teharia, R.M. Singari, and H. Kumar, Optimization of Process Variables for Additive Manufactured PLA Based Tensile Specimen Using Taguchi Design and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Technique, Mater Today: Proc, 2022, 56, p 3426–3432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.37610.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.376 ↗
24. H.M. Teng, S.K. Fan, C.H. Jiang, Q.W. Yang, F.H. Liu, and C.C. Tsao, Study on the Printing Quality of Fused Deposition Modeling Using Taguchi Method, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2022, 2345(1), p 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2345/1/01201410.1088/1742-6596/2345/1/012014 ↗
25. J. John, D. Devjani, S. Ali, S. Abdallah, and S. Pervaiz, Optimization of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Structures with Different Infill Patterns Using Taguchi-Grey Relational Analysis, Adv Indus Eng Polym Res, 2023, 6(1), p 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2022.06.00210.1016/j.aiepr.2022.06.002 ↗
26. C. Camposeco-Negrete, Optimization of Printing Parameters in Fused deposition Modeling for Improving Part Quality and Process Sustainability, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 108(7–8), p 2131–2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05555-910.1007/s00170-020-05555-9 ↗
27. P. Żur, A. Kołodziej, A. Baier, and G. Kokot, Optimization of Abs 3D-Printing Method and Parameters, Eur J Eng Sci Technol, 1970, 3(1), p 44–51. https://doi.org/10.33422/ejest.v3i1.16010.33422/ejest.v3i1.160 ↗
28. C. Abeykoon, P. Sri-Amphorn, and A. Fernando, Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Parameters for Improved PLA and ABS 3D Printed Structures, Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf, 2020, 3(3), p 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.00310.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003 ↗
29. D. Rahmatabadi, Development of Pure Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) with Excellent 3D Printability and Macro‐ and Micro‐Structural Properties, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20220056810.1002/mame.202200568 ↗
30. K. Chen, Y. Liguo, Y. Cui, M. Jia, and K. Pan, Optimization of Printing Parameters of 3D-Printed Continuous Glass Fiber Reinforced Polylactic Acid Composites, Thin-Walled Struct, 2021, 164, p 107717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.10771710.1016/j.tws.2021.107717 ↗
31. Md. Qamar Tanveer, G. Mishra, S. Mishra, and R. Sharma, Effect of Infill Pattern and Infill Density on Mechanical Behaviour of FDM 3D Printed Parts: A Current Review, Mater Today: Proc, 2022, 62, p 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.31010.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.310 ↗
32. T.J. Suteja and A. Soesanti, Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Product for Various Infill Design Parameters: A Review, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2020, 1569(4), p 042010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/04201010.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/042010 ↗
33. G. Holcomb, E.B. Caldona, X. Cheng, and R.C. Advincula, On the Optimized 3D Printing and Post-Processing of PETG Materials, MRS Commun, 2022, 12(3), p 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-022-00188-310.1557/s43579-022-00188-3 ↗
34. C.K. Chua, C.H. Wong, and W.Y. Yeong, Roadmap on additive manufacturing standards, Standards, quality control, and measurement sciences in 3d printing and additive manufacturing. Elsevier, Cambridge, 2017, p 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813489-4.00002-710.1016/B978-0-12-813489-4.00002-7 ↗
35. V. Kuznetsov, A. Solonin, O. Urzhumtsev, R. Schilling and A. Tavitov, Strength of PLA Components Fabricated with Fused Deposition Technology Using a Desktop 3D Printer as a Function of Geometrical Parameters of the Process, Polymers, 2018, 10(3), p 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1003031310.3390/polym10030313 ↗
36. A. Sola, Open Challenges in Tensile Testing of Additively Manufactured Polymers: A Literature Survey and a Case Study in Fused Filament Fabrication, Polym. Test., 2023, 117, p 107859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10785910.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107859 ↗
37. A. García-Domínguez, J. Claver, A.M. Camacho, and M.A. Sebastián, Considerations on the Applicability of Test Methods for Mechanical Characterization of Materials Manufactured by FDM, Materials, 2019, 13(1), p 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1301002810.3390/ma13010028 ↗
38. A.S. Karad, P.D. Sonawwanay, M. Naik, and D.G. Thakur, Experimental Study of Effect of Infill Density on Tensile and Flexural Strength of 3D Printed Parts, J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-023-00273-x10.1186/s44147-023-00273-x ↗
39. N. Rajesh, G. Guru Mahesh, and P. Venkataramaiah, Study of Machining Parameters on Tensile strength and Surface Roughness of ABS Samples Printed by FDM, Adv Mater Process Technol, 2021, 8(sup3), p 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2021.194675810.1080/2374068X.2021.1946758 ↗
40. S. Demir and C. Yüksel, Evaluation of Effect and Optimizing of Process Parameters for Fused Deposition Modeling Parts on Tensile Properties Via Taguchi Method, Rapid Prototyp J, 2022, 29(4), p 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2022-020110.1108/RPJ-06-2022-0201 ↗
41. M. Petousis, N. Vidakis, N. Mountakis, E. Karapidakis, and A. Moutsopoulou, Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency, Polymers, 2023, 15(5), p 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1505123210.3390/polym15051232 ↗
42. A. Bayati, 3D Printed Elastomers with Superior Stretchability and Mechanical Integrity by Parametric Optimization of Extrusion Process Using Taguchi Method, Mater Res Express, 2025, 12(1), p 015301. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ada1a610.1088/2053-1591/ada1a6 ↗
43. D. Rahmatabadi, Shape Memory Performance Assessment of FDM 3D Printed PLA-TPU Composites by Box-Behnken Response Surface Methodology, Int J f Adv Manuf Technol, 2023, 127(1–2), p 935–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11571-210.1007/s00170-023-11571-2 ↗
44. L. Auffray, P.-A. Gouge, and L. Hattali, Design of Experiment Analysis on Tensile Properties of PLA Samples Produced by Fused Filament Fabrication, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2022, 118(11–12), p 4123–4137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08216-710.1007/s00170-021-08216-7 ↗
45. M. Naik, D. Thakur, and S. Salunkhe, Evaluation of Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Continuous Fiberglass Reinforced Thermoplastic Composite Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5398910.1002/app.53989 ↗
46. M.R. Khosravani, F. Berto, M.R. Ayatollahi, and T. Reinicke, Characterization of 3D-Printed PLA Parts with Different Raster Orientations and Printing Speeds, Sci. Rep., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05005-410.1038/s41598-022-05005-4 ↗
47. P. Rezaeian, M.R. Ayatollahi, A. Nabavi-Kivi, and N. Razavi, Effect of Printing Speed on Tensile and Fracture Behavior of ABS Specimens Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2022, 266, p 108393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10839310.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108393 ↗
48. M. Daly, M. Tarfaoui, M. Chihi, and C. Bouraoui, FDM Technology and the Effect of Printing Parameters on the Tensile Strength of ABS Parts, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2023, 126(11–12), p 5307–5323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11486-y10.1007/s00170-023-11486-y ↗
49. A. Sola, Materials Requirements in Fused Filament Fabrication: A Framework for the Design of Next-Generation 3D Printable Thermoplastics and Composites, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2022, 307(10), p 2200197. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20220019710.1002/mame.202200197 ↗
50. M. S. Said, J. A. Ghani, M. S. Kassim, S. H. Tomadi, C. Hassan, ve C. Haron, Comparison between Taguchi method and response surface methodology (RSM) In optimizing machining condition.
51. R. Srinivasan, T. Pridhar, L.S. Ramprasath, N. Sree Charan, and W. Ruban, Prediction of Tensile Strength in FDM Printed ABS Parts Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Mater Today: Proc, 2020, 27, p 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.78810.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.788 ↗
52. A. El Magri, K. El Mabrouk, S. Vaudreuil, and M.E. Touhami, Experimental Investigation and Optimization of Printing Parameters of 3D Printed Polyphenylene Sulfide Through Response Surface Methodology, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4962510.1002/app.49625 ↗
53. ASTM committee, D638: Test method for tensile properties of plastics. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-14.10.1520/D0638-14 ↗
54. T.D. Harpool, Evaluation of the Infill Design on the Tensile Response of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Polymer, Materials, 2021, 14(9), p 2195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1409219510.3390/ma14092195 ↗
55. S. Ben Hadj Hassine, S. Chatti, B. Louhichi, and V.A. Seibi, Experimental Study of the Tensile Behavior of Structures Obtained by FDM 3D Printing Process, Polymers, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1611156210.3390/polym16111562 ↗
56. V. Arikan, Effects of Infill Patterns and Densities on Crack Propagation Behavior in Additive Manufactured Parts: A Comparative Study, Mater Test, 2023, 65(11), p 1609–1614. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-019210.1515/mt-2023-0192 ↗
57. M. Eryildiz, “UKRAINIAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SCIENCE”.
58. R. Moreno, D. Carou, D. Carazo-Álvarez, and M.K. Gupta, Statistical Models for the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed External Medical Aids, Rapid Prototyp J, 2020, 27(1), p 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2020-003310.1108/RPJ-02-2020-0033 ↗
59. Z. Ali, Y. Yan, H. Mei, L. Cheng, and L. Zhang, Effect of Infill Density, Build Direction and Heat Treatment on the Tensile Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Carbon-Fiber Nylon Composites, Compos. Struct., 2023, 304, p 116370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11637010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116370 ↗
60. B. Singaravel, S. Devaraj, T. Niranjan, B. Chakradhar, and P. Chaitanya, Effect of Material type and Process Parameters on Tensile Strength of 3D Printed Specimen, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2024, 2779(1), p 012077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2779/1/012077s10.1088/1742-6596/2779/1/012077s ↗
61. M. Ajay Kumar, M.S. Khan, and S.B. Mishra, Effect of Machine Parameters on Strength and Hardness of FDM Printed Carbon Fiber Reinforced PETG Thermoplastics, Mater Today: Proc, 2020, 27, p 975–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.29110.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.291 ↗
62. A. Elkaseer, S. Schneider, and S.G. Scholz, Experiment-Based Process Modeling and Optimization for High-Quality and Resource-Efficient FFF 3D Printing, Appl. Sci., 2020, 10(8), p 2899. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1008289910.3390/app10082899 ↗
63. A. Ouballouch, L. Lasri, I. Ouahmane, R. El alaiji, M. Sallaou, ve S. Ettaqi, Optimization of PLA parts manufactured by the fused deposition modeling technology, In: içinde 2018 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD), Kas. 2018, ss. 288-292. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMC.2018.8691133.10.1109/ITMC.2018.8691133 ↗
64. N.A. Fountas, P. Kostazos, H. Pavlidis, V. Antoniou, D.E. Manolakos, and N.M. Vaxevanidis, Experimental Investigation and Statistical Modelling for Assessing the Tensile Properties of FDM Fabricated Parts, Proced Struct Integr, 2020, 26, p 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.01710.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.017 ↗
65. N. Vidakis, M. Petousis, N. Mountakis, and V.E. Karapidakis, Box-Behnken Modeling to Quantify the Impact of Control Parameters on the Energy and Tensile Efficiency of PEEK in MEX 3D-Printing, Heliyon., 2023, 9(7), p e18363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1836310.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18363 ↗