Low-Velocity Impact Properties of SiC Hollow Sphere/Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. C. Liang, and Y. Zhao, Experimental and Analytical Study on Homogeneous and Layered Al Matrix Syntactic Foams Under Impact, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2021, 153, 103861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.10386110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103861 ↗
2. M. Su, H. Wang, and H. Hao, Compressive Properties of Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foams Prepared by Stir Casting Method, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2019, 21(8), p 1900183. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20190018310.1002/adem.201900183 ↗
3. S. Broxtermann, M. Taherishargh, I.V. Belova, G.E. Murch, and T. Fiedler, On the Compressive Behaviour of High Porosity Expanded Perlite-Metal Syntactic Foam (P-MSF), J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 691, p 690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.28410.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.284 ↗
4. A. Motaharinia, J.W. Drelich, J. Goldman, H.R. Bakhsheshi-Rad, S. Sharif, A.F. Ismail, and M. Razzaghi, Current Status and Recent Developments in Magnesium-Matrix Syntactic Foams: Preparation, Mechanical Properties, and Corrosion Behavior, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2024, 30, p 8316–8344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.19110.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.191 ↗
5. H. Qu, D. Rao, J. Cui, N. Gupta, H.Z. Wang, Y.B. Chen, A.M. Li, and L.W. Pan, Mg-Matrix Syntactic Foam Filled with Alumina Hollow Spheres Coated by MgO Synthesized with Solution Coating-Sintering, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2023, 24, p 2357–2371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.16010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.160 ↗
6. C. Li, E. Yang, L. Tang, Y. Li, and L. Xu, Compression Properties and Fabrication of Closed-Cell Metal Matrix Syntactic Foams Al2O3hs/AZ91D, Materials, 2022, 15(19), p 6873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1519687310.3390/ma15196873 ↗
7. Z. Liu, X. Liu, A. Qiao, and Y.L. Mu, Mechanical Properties and In Vitro Corrosion of Biodegradable Open-Cell Zn Alloy Foams, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023, 32(11), p P5221-5236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-07487-910.1007/s11665-022-07487-9 ↗
8. M.R. Farahani, H.R. Rezaei Ashtiani, and S. Elahi, Effect of Intermetallic Phases and Compounds on the Compressive Behavior and Fracture Mechanism of Al–Si–Zn Foams, Int. J. Metalcast., 2024, 18(1), p 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-01027-410.1007/s40962-023-01027-4 ↗
9. J. Weise, D. Lehmhus, J. Sandfuchs, M. Steinbacher, R. Fechte-Heinen, and M. Busse, Syntactic Iron Foams’ Properties Tailored by Means of Case Hardening via Carburizing or Carbonitriding, Materials, 2021, 14(16), p4358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1416435810.3390/ma14164358 ↗
10. D. Lehmhus, J. Weise, A. Szlancsik, and I.N. Orbulov, Fracture Toughness of Hollow Glass Microsphere-Filled Iron Matrix Syntactic Foams, Materials, 2020, 13(11), p2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1311256610.3390/ma13112566 ↗
11. I.N. Orbulov, and A. Szlancsik, On the Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foams, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2018, 20(5), p 1700980. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170098010.1002/adem.201700980 ↗
12. U.R. Hashim, A. Jumahat, M.H. Ismail, and R.N.M. Razali, Fabrication and Characterisation of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer Rods with Aluminium Foam Core, Mater. Res. Innovations, 2014, 18(S6), p S6204–S6208. https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891714Z.010.1179/1432891714Z.0 ↗
13. D.P. Mondal, M.D. Goel, V. Upadhyay, S. Das, M. Singh, and A.K. Barnwal, Comparative Study on Microstructural Characteristics and Compression Deformation Behaviour of Alumina and Cenosphere Reinforced Aluminum Syntactic Foam Made Through Stir Casting Technique, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2018, 71, p 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-017-1211-x10.1007/s12666-017-1211-x ↗
14. C. Kádár, P. Kubelka, and A. Szlancsik, On the Compressive Properties of Aluminum and Magnesium Syntactic Foams: Experiment and Simulation, Mater. Today Commun., 2023, 35, p106060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10606010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106060 ↗
15. J.E. Maróti, and I.N. Orbulov, Characteristic Compressive Properties of AlSi7Mg Matrix Syntactic Foams Reinforced by Al2O3 or SiC Particles in the Matrix, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2023, 869, p144817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.14481710.1016/j.msea.2023.144817 ↗
16. G.A.R. Rivero, B.F. Schultz, J.B. Ferguson, N. Gupta, and P.K. Rohatgi, Compressive Properties of Al-A206/SiC and Mg-AZ91/SiC Syntactic Foams, J. Mater. Res., 2013, 28(17), p 2426–2435. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2013.17610.1557/jmr.2013.176 ↗
17. H. Anantharaman, V.C. Shunmugasamy, O.M. Strbik III., N. Gupta, and K. Cho, Dynamic Properties of Silicon Carbide Hollow Particle Filled Magnesium Alloy (AZ91D) Matrix Syntactic Foams, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2015, 82, p 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.04.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.04.008 ↗
18. V. Manakari, G. Parande, M. Doddamani, and M. Gupta, Evaluation of Wear Resistance of Magnesium/Glass Microballoon Syntactic Foams for Engineering/Biomedical Applications, Ceram. Int., 2019, 45(7), p 9302–9305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.20710.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.207 ↗
19. K. Sun, L. Wang, Q. Zhang, B. Meng, Z.Y. Wei, H. Su, G.L. Wei, J.Y. Geng, and G.H. Wu, Boosting Energy Absorption Performance of Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam with Carbon Coated Glass Cenospheres, Compos. Commun., 2023, 43, p101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2023.10171810.1016/j.coco.2023.101718 ↗
20. H. Lu, X. Wang, T. Zhang, Z.J. Cheng, and Q.F. Fang, Design, Fabrication, and Properties of High Damping Metal Matrix Composites—A Review, Materials, 2009, 2(3), p 958–977. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma203095810.3390/ma2030958 ↗
21. I.N. Orbulov, and J. Ginsztler, Compressive Behaviour of Metal Matrix Syntactic Foams, Acta Polytech. Hung., 2012, 9(2), p 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170098010.1002/adem.201700980 ↗
22. S.K. Patel, V.P. Singh, S.K. Yadav, B. Kuriachen, and R. Nateriya, Microstructural and Compressive Deformation Behavior of Aluminum-Foam-Filled Sections, Soft Mater., 2019, 17(1), p 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445X.2018.152845710.1080/1539445X.2018.1528457 ↗
23. R. Thiyagarajan, and K.M. Senthil, A Review on Closed Cell Metal Matrix Syntactic Foams: A Green Initiative Towards Eco-sustainability, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2021, 36(12), p 1333–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.192869610.1080/10426914.2021.1928696 ↗
24. Y.J. Deng, L. Li, H.W. Zhang, X.G. Huang, Z.J. Ye, and Y. Yao, Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Ceramic Hollow Sphere-Reinforced Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foams, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08945-810.1007/s11665-023-08945-8 ↗
25. B. Katona, A. Szlancsik, T. Tábi, and I.N. Orbulov, Compressive Characteristics and Low Frequency Damping of Aluminium Matrix Syntactic Foams, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 739, p 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.01410.1016/j.msea.2018.10.014 ↗
26. K.S.M. Sonti, S. Vincent, and S.K.R. Narala, Effect of Single and Hybrid Hollow Sphere Reinforcement on the Deformation Mechanism of Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam at a Low Strain Rate, J. Alloys Compd., 2022, 901, 163573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16357310.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163573 ↗
27. K.S.M. Sonti, S. Vincent, and S.K.R. Narala, Quasi-static Compressive Response and Energy Absorption Properties of Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foams: Room Temperature and Elevated Temperature Conditions, Mater. Today Commun., 2023, 35, 105580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.018 ↗
28. K. Myers, B. Katona, P. Cortes, and I.N. Orbulov, Quasi-Static and High Strain Rate Response of Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foams Under Compression, Compos. Part, 2015, 79, p 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.018 ↗
29. D.D. Luong, O.M. Strbik III., V.H. Hammond, N. Gupta, and K. Cho, Development of High Performance Lightweight Aluminum Alloy/SiC Hollow Sphere Syntactic Foams and Compressive Characterization at Quasi-Static and High Strain Rates, J. Alloys Compd., 2012, 550, p 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.17110.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.171 ↗
30. J. Cox, D.D. Luong, V.C. Shunmugasamy, N. Gupta, O.M. Strbik, and K. Cho, Dynamic and Thermal Properties of Aluminum Alloy A356/Silicon Carbide Hollow Particle Syntactic Foams, Metals, 2014, 4(4), p 530–548. https://doi.org/10.3390/met404053010.3390/met4040530 ↗
31. M. Alteneiji, K. Krishnan, Z.W. Guan, W.J. Cantwell, Y. Zhao, and G. Langdon, Dynamic Response of Aluminium Matrix Syntactic Foams Subjected to High Strain-Rate Loadings, Compos. Struct., 2023, 303, 116289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11628910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116289 ↗
32. Ç. Bolat, İC. Akgün, and A. Göksenli, On the Way to Real Applications: Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foams, Eur. Mech. Sci., 2020, 4(3), p 131–141. https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.70361910.26701/ems.703619 ↗
33. S.F. Mattucci, J.A. Moulton, N. Chandrashekar, and D.S. Cronin, Strain Rate Dependent Properties of Younger Human Cervical Spine Ligaments, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed, 2012, 10, p 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.00410.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.004 ↗
34. M. Altenaiji, Z.W. Guan, W. Cantwell, W.J. Cantwell, Y. Zhao, and G. Langdon, Characterisation of Aluminium Matrix Syntactic Foams Dynamic Loading, Compos. Struct., 2014, 564, p 449–454.
35. A. Jung, A.D. Pullen, and W.G. Proud, Strain-Rate Effects in Ni/Al Composite Metal Foams from Quasi-Static to Low-Velocity Impact Behaviour, Compos. A, 2016, 85, p 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.031 ↗
36. W. Huang, W. Zhang, X.L. Huang, X.W. Jiang, Y. Li, and L. Zhang, Dynamic Response of Aluminum Corrugated Sandwich Subjected to Underwater Impulsive Loading: Experiment and Numerical Modeling, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2017, 109, p 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.002 ↗
37. Z. Zhang, H. Feng, T. Xu, W. Xin, J. Ding, N.N. Liu, Z. Wang, Y.J. Wang, X.C. Xia, and Y.C. Liu, Compression Performances of Integral-Forming Aluminum Foam Sandwich, Compos. Struct., 2022, 283, p 115090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11509010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115090 ↗
38. S. Feli, and M.R. Asgari, Finite Element Simulation of Ceramic/Composite Armor Under Ballistic Impact, Compos. B, 2011, 42(4), p 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.024 ↗
39. L. Licitra, D.D. Luong, O.M. Strbik III. and N. Gupta, Dynamic Properties of Alumina Hollow Particle Filled Aluminum Alloy A356 Matrix Syntactic Foams, Mater. Des., 2015, 66, p 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.04110.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.041 ↗
40. A. Kemény, B. Leveles, T. Bubonyi, and I.N. Orbulov, Effect of Particle Size and Volume Ratio of Ceramic Hollow Spheres on the Mechanical Properties of Bimodal Composite Metal Foams, Compos. A, 2021, 140, 106152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10615210.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106152 ↗
41. T. Miyoshi, M. Itoh, T. Mukai, H. Kanahashi, H. Kohzu, S. Tanabe, and K. Higashi, Enhancement of Energy Absorption in a Closed-Cell Aluminum by the Modification of Cellular Structures, Scr. Mater., 1999, 41(10), p 1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00255-910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00255-9 ↗
42. J.A. Santa Maria, B.F. Schultz, J.B. Ferguson, N. Gupta, and P.K. Rohatgi, Effect of Hollow Sphere Size and Distribution on the Quasi-Static and High Strain Rate Compressive Properties of Al-A380-Al2O3 Syntactic Foams, J. Mater. Sci., 2012, 49(3), p 1267–1278.10.1007/s10853-013-7810-y ↗
43. Y. Lin, Q. Zhang, F. Zhang, J. Chang, and G.H. Wu, Microstructure and Strength Correlation of Pure Al and Al-Mg Syntactic Foam Composites Subject to Uniaxial Compression, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 696, p 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.06010.1016/j.msea.2017.04.060 ↗
44. D.B. Newsome, B.F. Schultz, J.B. Ferguson, and P.K. Rohatgi, Synthesis and quasi-static compressive properties of Mg-AZ91D-Al2O3 syntactic foams, Materials, 2015, 8(9), p 6085–6095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma809529210.3390/ma8095292 ↗
45. I.N. Orbulov, Compressive Properties of Aluminium Matrix Syntactic Foams, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 555, p 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.03210.1016/j.msea.2012.06.032 ↗
46. F. García-Moreno, Commercial Applications of Metal Foams: Their Properties and Production, Materials, 2016, 9(2), p 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma902008510.3390/ma9020085 ↗
47. M. Su, H. Wang, H. Hao, and T. Fiedler, Compressive Properties of Expanded Glass and Alumina Hollow Spheres Hybrid Reinforced Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foams, J. Alloys Compd., 2020, 821, 153233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15323310.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153233 ↗
48. B. Zhang, Y. Lin, S. Li, D.X. Zhai, and G.H. Wu, Quasi-Static and High Strain Rates Compressive Behavior of Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foams, Compos. B, 2016, 98, p 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.034 ↗