journal article·2025-12

Experimental Investigation of CuO Nanofluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication Grinding Process

Rahul Chakule, Sharad Chaudhari, Kailas Chandratre, Poonam Talmale

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. R.R. Chakule, S.S. Chaudhari, and P.S. Talmale, Modelling and Optimization of Nanocoolant Minimum Quantity Lubrication Process Parameters for Grinding Performance, Int. J. Exp. Design Process Optim., 2021, 6(4), p 333–348.10.1504/IJEDPO.2021.123111 ↗
2. A.K. Singh, Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids, Def. Sci. J., 2008, 58(5), p 600–607.10.14429/dsj.58.1682 ↗
3. W. Yu, D.M. France, J.L. Routbort, and S.U.S. Choi, Review and Comparison of Nanofluid Thermal, Conductivity and heat Transfer Enhancements, Heat Transfer Eng., 2008, 29(5), p 432–460.10.1080/01457630701850851 ↗
4. S.S. Sonawane, R.S. Khedkar, and K.L. Wasewar, Effect of Sonication Time on Enhancement of Effective Thermal Conductivity of Nano TiO2–Water, Ethylene Glycol, and Paraffin oil Nanofluids and Models Comparisons, J. Exp. Nanosci., 2015, 10(4), p 310–322.10.1080/17458080.2013.832421 ↗
5. C.H. Li, and G.P. Peterson, Experimental Studies of Natural Convection Heat Transfer of Al2O3/DI Water Nanoparticle Suspensions (Nanofluids), Adv. Mech. Eng., 2009, 2010(742739), p 1–10.
6. P.C. Mishra, S. Mukherjee, S.K. Nayak, and A. Panda, A brief Review on Viscosity of Nanofluids, International Nano Letters, 2014, 4, p 109–120.10.1007/s40089-014-0126-3 ↗
7. D.K. Devendiran, and V.A. Amirtham, A Review on Preparation, Characterization, Properties and Applications of Nanofluids, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2016, 60, p 21–40.10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.055 ↗
8. S.S. Chaudhari, R.R. Chakule, and P.S. Talmale, Experimental study of heat transfer characteristics of Al2O3 and CuO nanofluids for machining application, 2019, Materials Today: Proceedings, 18:3, p788-797.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.499 ↗
9. L. Godson, B. Raja, D. Mohan Lal, and S. Wongwises, Enhancement of Heat Transfer Using Nanofluids-An Overview, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2010, 14(2), p 629–641.10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.004 ↗
10. A.K. Sharma, A.K. Tiwari, and A.R. Dixit, Progress of nanofluid application in machining: a review, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2015, 30(7), p 813–828.10.1080/10426914.2014.973583 ↗
11. C. Mao, H. Zou, X. Zhou, Y. Huang, H. Gan, and Z. Zhou, Analysis of suspension stability for nanofluid applied in minimum quantity lubricant grinding, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 71, p 2073–2081.10.1007/s00170-014-5642-9 ↗
12. R. Saidur, K.Y. Leong, and H.A. Mohammed, A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2011, 15(3), p 1646–1668.10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.035 ↗
13. R. Raghav, and R.S. Mulik, Effects of temperature and concentration of nanoparticles on rheological behavior of hexagonal boron nitride/coconut oil nanofluid, Int J of Colloids and surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2024, 694, p 134142.
14. H.J. Kim, K.J. Seo, K.H. Kang, and D.E. Kim, Nano-Lubrication: A review, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 2016, 17(6), p 829–841.10.1007/s12541-016-0102-0 ↗
15. P.-H. Lee, S.W. Lee, S.-H. Lim, S.-H. Lee, H.S. Ko, and S.-W. Shin, A Study on Thermal Characteristics Of Micro-Scale Grinding Process Using Nanofluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL), Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 2015, 16, p 1899–1909.10.1007/s12541-015-0247-2 ↗
16. R. Chakule, S. Chaudhari, and P. Talmale, Recent Advancement for green and Sustainable Manufacturing Grinding Process: A Review, J. Nanosci. Techn., 2019, 5(5), p 857–861.10.30799/jnst.290.19050509 ↗
17. C. Vila, H.R. Siller, C.A. Rodriguez, G.M. Bruscas, and J. Serrano, Economical and Technological Study of Surface Grinding Versus Face Milling In Hardened AISI D3 Steel Machining Operations, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2012, 138(2), p 273–283.10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.028 ↗
18. R.R. Chakule, S.S. Chaudhari, K.V. Chandratre, and P.S. Talmale, Nanofluids, Micro-Lubrications and Machining Process Optimizations- A Review, Manuf. Rev., 2023, 10(1), p 1–20.
19. S. Chinchanikar, S.S. Kore, and P. Hujare, A Review on Nanofluids in Minimum Quantity Lubrication Machining, J Manuf Processes, 2021, 68, p 56–70.10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.028 ↗
20. Y. Wang, C. Li, Y. Zhang, M. Yang, X. Zhang, N. Zhang, and J. Dai, Experimental Evaluation on Tribological Performance of the Wheel/Workpiece Interface in Minimum Quantity Lubrication Grinding With Different Concentrations of Al2o3 Nanofluids, J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 142(4), p 3571–3583.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.110 ↗
21. Y. Wang, C. Li, Y. Zhang, B. Li, M. Yang, X. Zhang, S. Guo, and G. Liu, Experimental Evaluation of the Lubrication Properties of the Wheel/Workpiece Interface in MQL Grinding with Different Nanofluids, Tribol. Int., 2016, 99, p 198–210.10.1016/j.triboint.2016.03.023 ↗
22. X. Bai, J. Jiang, C. Li, L. Dong, H.M. Ali, and S. Sharma, Tribological Performance of Different Concentrations of Al2O3 Nanofluids on Minimum Quantity Lubrication Milling, Chinese J. Mech. Eng., 2023, 36(11), p 1–12.
23. D. Zhang, C. Li, Y. Zhang, D. Jia, and X. Zhang, Experimental Research on the Energy Ratio Coefficient and Specific Grinding Energy in Nanoparticle Jet MQL Grinding, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, 78, p 1275–1288.10.1007/s00170-014-6722-6 ↗
24. A. Sravan Kumar, S. Deb, and S. Paul, Tribological Characteristics and Micromilling Performance of Nanoparticle Enhanced Water Based Cutting Fluids in Minimum Quantity Lubrication, J. Manufact. Process., 2020, 56, p 766–776.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.032 ↗
25. E. Kilincarslan, S.K. Kilincarslan, and M.H. Cetin, Evaluation of The Clean Nano-Cutting Fluid by Considering the Tribological Performance and Cost Parameters, Tribol. Int., 2021, 157, p 1–19.10.1016/j.triboint.2021.106916 ↗
26. S. Paul, A.K. Singh, and A. Ghosh, Grinding of Ti-6Al-4V under Small Quantity Cooling Lubrication Environment Using Alumina and MWCNT Nanofluids, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2017, 32(6), p 608–615.10.1080/10426914.2016.1257797 ↗
27. P.B. Patole, and V.V. Kulkarni, Experimental Investigation and Optimization of Cutting Parameters with Multi Response Characteristics In MQL Turning of AISI 4340 Using Nanofluid, Cogent Eng., 2017, 4(1), p 1–14.10.1080/23311916.2017.1303956 ↗
28. A. Yucel, C.V. Yildirim, M. Sarikaya, S. Sirin, T. Kivak, M.K. Gupta, and I.V. Tomaz, Influence of MoS2 Based Nanofluid-MQL on Tribological and Machining Characteristics in Turning of AA2024 T3 Aluminum Alloy, J. Mater. Tech., 2021, 15, p 1688–1704.
29. K. Manoj Kumar, and A. Ghosh, On Grinding Force ratio, Specific Energy, G-Ratio and Residual Stress in SQCL Assisted Grinding Using Aerosol of MWCNT Nanofluid, Int. J. Mach. Sci. Tech., 2021, 25(4), p 585–607.10.1080/10910344.2021.1903920 ↗
30. M.K. Sinha, R. Madarkar, S. Ghosh, and P.V. Rao, Application of Eco-Friendly Nanofluids during Grinding of Inconel 718 through Small Quantity Lubrication, J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 141, p 1359–1375.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.212 ↗
31. D. Setti, M.K. Sinha, S. Ghosh, and P.V. Rao, Performance Evaluation of Ti-6Al-4V Grinding Using Chip Formation and Coefficient of Friction under the Influence of Nanofluids, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2015, 88, p 237–248.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.10.005 ↗
32. R.L. Virdi, S.S. Chatha, and H. Singh, Processing Characteristics of Different Vegetable oil-Based Nanofluid MQL for Grinding of Ni-Cr Alloy, Adv. Mater. Process. Tech., 2020, 8(1), p 210–223.
33. M. Seyedzavvar et al., Investigation on Tribological Performance of CuO Vegetable-oil Based Nanofluids for Grinding Operations.", Adv. Manuf., 2020, 8(3), p 344–360.10.1007/s40436-020-00314-1 ↗
34. M. Shabgard, M. Seyedzavvar, and M. Mohammadpourfard, Experimental Investigation into Lubrication Properties and Mechanism of Vegetable-Based CuO Nanofluid in MQL Grinding, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 92, p 3807–3823.10.1007/s00170-017-0319-9 ↗
35. R.R. Chakule, and S. Chaudhari, Experimental Study of Hardness Effects on Surface Roughness for Nanofluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication (NanoMQL) Technique Using Jaya Algorithm, Int. J. Data Network Sci., 2018, 2(3), p 71–78.10.5267/j.ijdns.2018.8.002 ↗
36. S.T. Prashantha Kumar, H.P. Thirtha Prasada, M. Nagamadhu, and C. Siddaraju, Investigate the Effects of Al2O3 and CuO Nano Cutting Fluids under MQL Technique in Turning of DSS-2205, Adv. Mater. Process. Tech., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2021.194870110.1080/2374068X.2021.1948701 ↗
37. P.A. Mane, A.N. Kallol, R.L. Doiphode, G.A. Manjunath, B. Saleh, M. Abbas, and I.M. Alarifi, Inconel 718 Turning Process Parameters Optimization with MQL Nanofluid Based on CuO Nanoparticles, J. Nanomater., 2022, 2022(1408529), p 1–18.
38. D.G. Subhedar, Y.S. Patel, B.M. Ramani, and G.S. Patange, An Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Al2O3/Cutting oil Based Nano Coolant for Minimum Quantity Lubrication Drilling of SS 304, Cleaner Eng Tech, 2021, 3, p 1–7.10.1016/j.clet.2021.100104 ↗
39. R.L. Virdi, S.S. Chatha, and H. Singh, Performance Evaluation of Nanofluid-Based Minimum Quantity Lubrication Grinding of Ni-Cr Alloy under the Influence of CuO Nanoparticles, Int. J. of Adv. Manuf, 2021, 9, p 580–591.10.1007/s40436-021-00362-1 ↗
40. Y.S. Dambatta, C. Li, M. Sayuti, A.A.D. Sarhan, M. Yang, B. Li, A. Chu, M. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Said, and Z. Zhou, Grindability Evaluation of Ultrasonic Assisted Grinding of Silicon Nitride Ceramic Using Minimum Quantity Lubrication Based Sio2 Nanofluid, Chinese J. Mech. Eng., 2024, 37(25), p 1–22.
41. R. Peng, J. Shen, X. Tang, L. Zhao, and J. Gao, Performances of a Tailored Vegetable Oil-Based Graphene Nanofluid in the MQL Internal Cooling Milling, J. Manuf. Process., 2025, 134, p 814–831.10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.12.063 ↗
42. M.T. Ngo, Effects of Machining Parameters on Total Cutting Force in Hard Turning Process of Hardened 90CrSi Steel Using Carbide Insert with MoS2 Nanofluid MQL, Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res., 2024, 13(1), p 169–174.
43. C. Mao, H. Zou, X. Huang, J. Zhang, and Z. Zhou, The influence of Spraying Parameters on Grinding Performance for Nanofluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2013, 64, p 1791–1799.10.1007/s00170-012-4143-y ↗
44. B.-X. Wang, L.-P. Zhou, and X.-F. Peng, A fractal Model for Predicting the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Liquid with Suspension of Nanoparticles, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2003, 46(14), p 2665–2672.10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00016-4 ↗
45. M.Y.A. Shdaifat, R. Zulkifli, K. Sopian, and A.A. Salih, Thermal and Hydraulic Performance of CuO/water Nanofluids: A Review, Micromachines, 2020, 11(416), p 1–19.
46. A. Tiwari, D. Agarwal, and A. Singh, Computational Analysis of Machining Characteristics of Surface Using Varying Concentration of Nanofluids (Al2O3, CuO and TiO2) with MQL, Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 42, p1262-1269.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.950 ↗
47. R. Saravanan, R. Pugazhenthi, and T. Gopalakrishnan, Experimental Investigation of En-31 Steel Surface Grinding Performance with Al2O3 and CuO nano Fluids, J. Adv. Microsc. Res., 2015, 10(4), p 284–291.10.1166/jamr.2015.1277 ↗
48. Y.B. Zhang, C.H. Li, D.Z. Jia, D.K. Zhang, and X.W. Zhang, Experimental Evaluation of MoS2 Nanoparticles in jet MQL Grinding with Different Types of Vegetable Oil as Base oil, J. Clean. Prod., 2015, 87, p 930–940.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.027 ↗
49. S. Agarwal, Optimizing Machining Parameters to Combine High Productivity With High Surface Integrity in Grinding Silicon Carbide Ceramics, Ceram. Int., 2016, 42, p 6244–6262.10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.008 ↗