Damage and Failure Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic-Matrix Composites with Different Fiber Preforms Under Stochastic Fatigue Load Spectrum
Source abstract
Abstract
Under cyclic fatigue loading, the stochastic stress occurs and affects the fatigue damage and failure of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs). In this paper, combining the stress and cyclic-dependent fatigue damage mechanisms and models, the damage parameter of fiber’s breakage probability is adopted to characterize fatigue damage and failure in fiber-reinforced CMCs. Two stochastic load spectrums with increasing or decreasing stochastic stress level occurring at different applied cycle number are considered. Relationships between the composite’s fatigue life, stochastic load spectrum, fiber’s breakage probability, and fatigue life degradation rate are established. Experimental fatigue life of 1D unidirectional, 2D cross-ply, 2D plain-woven, 2.5D woven, and 3D braided C/SiC composites subjected to different stochastic load spectrums are predicted. The fatigue damage and failure of CMCs under stochastic load spectrum are affected by the fiber’s volume fraction along the loading direction (i.e., the high fiber’s volume fraction along the loading directional indicating the high resistance of fatigue damage and failure subjected to stochastic loading), the strength degradation caused by fabrication process (i.e., hot pressing, chemical vapor infiltration, etc.), and also the fiber’s preform. Among different fiber’s preforms, the fatigue life degradation rate is the highest for 2D cross-ply C/SiC composite and is the lowest for 2.5D woven C/SiC composite. The fatigue life degradation rate under stochastic load spectrum of increasing stochastic stress level is much higher than that under stochastic load spectrum with decreasing stochastic stress level except for 2D cross-ply C/SiC composite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. R. Naslain, Design, Preparation and Properties of Non-oxide CMCs for Application in Engines and Nuclear Reactors: An Overview, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2004, 64, p 155–170.10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6 ↗
2. S. Schmidt, S. Beyer, H. Knabe, H. Immich, R. Meistring and A. Gessler, Advanced Ceramic Matrix Composite Materials for Current and Future Propulsion Technology Applications, Acta Astronaut., 2004, 55, p 409–420.10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.052 ↗
3. M.B. Ruggles-Wrenn, D.T. Christensen, A.L. Chamberlain, J.E. Lane and T.S. Cook, Effect of Frequency and Environment on Fatigue Behavior of a CVI SiC/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composite at 1200°C, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2011, 71, p 190–196.10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.008 ↗
4. E. Baranger, Building of a Reduced Constitutive Law for Ceramic Matrix Composites, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2013, 22, p 1222–1238.10.1177/1056789513482338 ↗
5. T. Skinner, A. Rai and A. Chattopadhyay, Multiscale Ceramic Matrix Composite Thermomechanical Damage Model with Fracture Mechanics and Internal State Variables, Compos. Struct., 2020, 236, p 111847.10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111847 ↗
6. L.B. Li, Thermomechanical Fatigue of Ceramic-Matrix Composites, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2019.10.1002/9783527822614 ↗
7. L.B. Li, Damage, Fracture and Fatigue of Ceramic-Matrix Composites, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore, 2018.10.1007/978-981-13-1783-5 ↗
8. L.B. Li, P. Reynaud and G. Fantozzi, Cyclic-dependent Damage Evolution in Self-healing Woven SiC/[Si-B-C] Ceramic-Matrix Composites at Elevated Temperatures, Materials, 2020, 13, p 1478.10.3390/ma13061478 ↗
9. S. Li, M. Wang, L. Jeanmeure, E. Sitnikova, F. Yu, Q. Pan, C. Zhou and R. Talreja, Damage Related Material Constants in Continuum Damage Mechanics for Unidirectional Composites with matrix cracks, Int. J. Damage Mech, 2019, 28, p 690–707.10.1177/1056789518783239 ↗
10. L.B. Li, Durability of Ceramic Matrix Composites, Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, 2020.
11. L. Marcin, J.F. Maire, N. Carrere and E. Martin, Development of a Macroscopic Damage Model for Woven Ceramic Matrix Composites, Int. J. Damage Mech, 2011, 20, p 939–957.10.1177/1056789510385259 ↗
12. E. Baranger, Accounting for Frictional Contact in an Anisotropic Damage Model Based on Compliance Tensorial Variables, Illustration on Ceramic Matrix Composites, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2019, 28, p 1150–1169.10.1177/1056789518812932 ↗
13. J. Christopher and B.K. Choudhary, Prediction of Long-Term Creep Behaviour of Grade 91 Steel at 873 K in the Framework of Microstructure-Based Creep Damage Mechanics Approach, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2019, 28, p 877–895.10.1177/1056789518796118 ↗
14. L.B. Li, Time-Dependent Mechanical Behavior of Ceramic-Matrix Composites at Elevated Temperatures, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore, 2020.10.1007/978-981-15-3274-0 ↗
15. J.C. McNulty and F.W. Zok, Low Cycle Fatigue of Nicalon-Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1999, 59, p 1597–1607.10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00019-6 ↗
16. J.M. Staehler, S. Mall and L.P. Zawada, Frequency Dependence of High-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of CVI C/SiC at Room Temperature, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2003, 63, p 2121–2131.10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00190-8 ↗
17. M.B. Ruggles-Wrenn and T.P. Jones, Tension-Compression Fatigue of a SiC/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composite at 1200oC in Air and in Steam, Int. J. Fatigue, 2013, 47, p 154–160.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.08.006 ↗
18. C. Mareau and F. Morel, A Continuum Damage Mechanics-Based Approach for the High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Metallic Polycrystals, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2019, 28, p 838–856.10.1177/1056789518795204 ↗
19. S. Matta, N.R. Kolanu, V. Chinthapenta, C.M. Manjunatha and M. Ramji, Progressive Damage Analysis of Adhesively Bonded Patch Repaired Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Specimen Under Compression Involving Cohesive Zone Model, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2019, 28, p 1457–1489.10.1177/1056789519832062 ↗
20. X. Yu, T. Yu, K. Song and B. Guo, Reliability Analysis of Mechanical Components Based on A Nonlinear Fatigue Damage Accumulation Model, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2019, 28, p 1135–1149.10.1177/1056789518815219 ↗
21. L.B. Li, Tension-Tension Fatigue Behavior of Unidirectional C/SiC Ceramic-Matrix Composite at Room and Elevated Temperature and 800°C in Air Atmosphere, Materials, 2015, 8, p 3316–3333.10.3390/ma8063316 ↗
22. L.B. Li, Damage Evolution and Life Prediction of Cross-Ply C/SiC Ceramic-Matrix Composite Under Cyclic Fatigue Loading at Room Temperature and 800°C in Air, Materials, 2015, 8, p 8539–8560.10.3390/ma8125474 ↗
23. S.F. Shuler, J.W. Holmes, X. Wu and D. Roach, Influence of Loading Frequency on the Room-Temperature Fatigue of a Carbon-fiber/SiC-Matrix Composite, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1993, 76, p 2327–2336.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb07772.x ↗
24. M. Wang and C. Laird, Tension-tension fatigue of a Cross-Woven C/SiC Composite, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, 230, p 171–182.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00018-X ↗
25. Yang F. Research on fatigue behavior of 2.5d woven ceramic matrix composites. Master Thesis, Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011.
26. V. Kostopoulos, L. Vellios and Y.Z. Pappas, Fatigue behavior of 3-D SiC/SiC composites, J. Mater. Sci., 1997, 32, p 215–220.10.1023/A:1018512223947 ↗
27. S.M. Du, S.R. Qiao, G.C. Ji and D. Han, Tension-Tension Fatigue Behavior of 3D-C/SiC Composite at Room Temperature and 1300°C, Mater. Eng., 2002, 9, p 22–25.
28. L.B. Li, Fatigue Life Prediction of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic-Matrix Composites at Room and Elevated Temperatures. Part II: Experimental Comparisons, Appl. Compos. Mater., 2015, 22, p 961–972.10.1007/s10443-014-9430-3 ↗
29. L.B. Li, Fatigue Life Prediction of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic-Matrix Composites at Room and Elevated Temperatures. Part I: Experimental Analysis, Appl. Compos. Mater., 2016, 23, p 101–117.10.1007/s10443-015-9446-3 ↗
30. L.B. Li, Fatigue Life Prediction of Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic-Matrix Composites with Different Fiber Preforms at Room and Elevated Temperatures, Materials, 2016, 9, p 207.10.3390/ma9030207 ↗
31. T. Suzuki, H. Mahfuz and M. Takanashi, A New Stiffness Degradation Model for Fatigue Life Prediction of GFRPs Under Random Loading, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 119, p 220–228.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.021 ↗
32. L.B. Li, Stress-Rupture Of Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic-Matrix Composites with Stochastic Loading at Intermediate Temperatures. Part I: Theoretical analysis, Materials, 2019, 12, p 3123.10.3390/ma12193123 ↗
33. L.B. Li, A Micromechanical Fatigue Limit Stress Model of Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic-Matrix Composites Under Stochastic Overloading Stress, Materials, 2020, 13, p 3304.10.3390/ma13153304 ↗
34. H.Y. Wei, P. Carrion, J. Chen, A. Imanian, N. Shamsaei, N. Iyyer and Y. Liu, Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction Under Random Spectrum Loadings, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 134, p 105.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105462 ↗
35. A.G. Evans, F.W. Zok and R.M. McMeeking, Fatigue of Ceramic Matrix Composites, Acta Metal. Mater., 1995, 43, p 859–875.10.1016/0956-7151(94)00304-Z ↗
36. W.A. Curtin, Multiple Matrix Cracking in Brittle Matrix Composites, Acta Metal. Mater., 1993, 41, p 1369–1377.10.1016/0956-7151(93)90246-O ↗
37. W.A. Curtin, Theory of Mechanical Properties of Ceramic-Matrix Composites, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1991, 74, p 2837–2845.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x ↗
38. S.S. Lee and W.W. Stinchcomb, Damage Mechanisms of Cross-Ply Nicalon/CAS-II Laminate Under Cyclic Tension, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 1994, 15, p 40–48.10.1002/9780470314500.ch5 ↗