Performance, Durability and Life Cycle Impacts of Concrete Produced with CO2 as an Admixture
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Monkman, S.; Lee, B. E. J.; Grandfield, K.; MacDonald, M.; and Raki, L., “The Impacts of In-Situ Carbonate Seeding on the Early Hydration of Tricalcium Silicate,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 136, 2020, Article No. 106179. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.10617910.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106179 ↗
2. Miller, S. A.; Horvath, A.; and Monteiro, P. J. M., “Readily Implementable Techniques Can Cut Annual CO2 Emissions from the Production of Concrete by Over 20%,” Environmental Research Letters, V. 11, No. 7, 2016, Article No. 074029. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/07402910.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074029 ↗
3. IEA and CSI, “Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry,” International Energy Agency, Paris, France, and Cement Sustainability Initiative, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018, 66 pp.
4. UN Environment; Scrivener, K. L.; John, V. M.; and Gartner, E. M., “Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 114, 2018, pp. 2-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015 ↗
5. Favier, A.; De Wolf, C.; Scrivener, K.; and Habert, G., “A Sustainable Future for the European Cement and Concrete Industry: Technology Assessment for Full Decarbonisation of the Industry by 2050,” ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2018, 96 pp.
6. PCA, “Roadmap to Carbon Neutrality,” Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2021, 73 pp.
7. Ashraf, W., “Carbonation of Cement-Based Materials: Challenges and Opportunities,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 120, 2016, pp. 558-570. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.080 ↗
8. Xie, H.; Yue, H.; Zhu, J.; Liang, B.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Xie, L.; and Zhou, X., “Scientific and Engineering Progress in CO2 Mineralization Using Industrial Waste and Natural Minerals,” Engineering, V. 1, No. 1, 2015, pp. 150-157. doi: 10.15302/J-ENG-201501710.15302/J-ENG-2015017 ↗
9. Berger, R. L.; Young, J. F.; and Leung, K., “Acceleration of Hydration of Calcium Silicates by Carbon Dioxide Treatment,” Nature Physical Science, V. 240, No. 97, 1972, pp. 16-18.10.1038/physci240016a0 ↗
10. Monkman, S.; Kenward, P. A.; Dipple, G.; MacDonald, M.; and Raudsepp, M., “Activation of Cement Hydration with Carbon Dioxide,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, V. 7, No. 3, 2018, pp. 160-181. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2018.144385410.1080/21650373.2018.1443854 ↗
11. Monkman, S., and MacDonald, M., “On Carbon Dioxide Utilization as a Means to Improve the Sustainability of Ready-Mixed Concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 167, 2017, pp. 365-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.19410.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.194 ↗
12. Monkman, S., “Sustainable Ready Mixed Concrete Production Using Waste CO2: A Case Study,” Recent Advances in Concrete Technology and Sustainability Issues - Proceedings: Fourteenth International Conference, Beijing, China, SP-330, T. Sui, T. C. Holland, Z. Wang, and X. Zhao, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2018, pp. 163-174.
13. Monkman, S.; Grandfield, K.; and Langelier, B., “On the Mechanism of Using Carbon Dioxide as a Beneficial Concrete Admixture,” Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete - Proceedings: Twelfth International Conference, Beijing, China, SP-329, J. Liu, Z. Wang, T. C. Holland, J. Huang, and J. Plank, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2018, pp. 415-428.
14. Monkman, S.; Sargam, Y.; Naboka, O.; and Lothenbach, B., “Early Age Impacts of CO2 Activation on the Tricalcium Silicate and Cement Systems,” Journal of CO2 Utilization, V. 65, 2022, Article No. 102254.10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102254 ↗
15. AASHTO T 358-17, “Standard Method of Test for Surface Resistivity Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2017.
16. ASTM C1202-19, “Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 8 pp.
17. ASTM G109-07(2013), “Standard Test Method for Determining Effects of Chemical Admixtures on Corrosion of Embedded Steel Reinforcement in Concrete Exposed to Chloride Environments,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2007, 6 pp.
18. Schiessl, P.; Bamforth, P.; Baroghel-Bouny, V.; Corley, G.; Faber, M.; Forbes, J.; Gehlen, C.; Helene, P.; Helland, S.; Ishida, T.; Markeset, G.; Nilsson, L.-O.; Rostam, S.; Siemes, A. J. M.; and Walraven, J., “fib Bulletin No. 34: Model Code for Service Life Design,” International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2006, 116 pp.10.35789/fib.BULL.0034 ↗
19. ASTM C494/C494M-19, “Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 15 pp.
20. ASTM C403/C403M-16, “Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Concrete Mixtures by Penetration Resistance,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 7 pp.
21. ASTM C78/C78M-21, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021, 5 pp.
22. ASTM C157/C157M-17, “Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 8 pp.
23. ASTM C666/C666M-15, “Standard Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 7 pp.
24. Garvey, M. D., “New Sources Onstream – More Strategic Sources Needed,” gasworld US Edition, Apr. 1, 2020.
25. fib Task Group 8.7, “fib Bulletin No. 70: Code-Type Models for Structural Behaviour of Concrete: Background of the Constitutive Relations and Material Models in the fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010: State-of-Art Report,” International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2013, 196 pp.
26. Damineli, B. L.; Kemeid, F. M.; Aguiar, P. S.; and John, V. M., “Measuring the Eco-Efficiency of Cement Use,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 32, No. 8, 2010, pp. 555-562. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.00910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.009 ↗