Surface and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Biocompatible ABS Polymers
Source abstract
Abstract
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is a commonly used copolymer. It is widely employed, especially in additive manufacturing (AM), a newly developed and open-ended production method. It can be used in medical applications due to its biocompatible behaviour and performance characteristics. Though there are a few disadvantages of the AM, improving the sample`s mechanical properties are possible by applying pre-processing to the filament (dehumidification) or choosing the correct printing parameters. Nevertheless, surface quality is limited regardless of the mechanical properties and printing parameters. For this reason, finishing, called post-processing, is often preferred. ABS post-process application is made with an acetone vapour atmosphere. However, this application is a chemical process. This chemical process could change the properties of the ABS sample. This paper investigates the effect of post-processing on the ABS sample. According to reference samples, the change in porosity values was measured from 30 to 60%. In addition, as the post-processing time increased, the hue of the samples shifted from yellow to blue and from dark to light. Further, increased acetone vapour exposure decreased the bending and tensile test results. The impact of acetone vapour exposure on the toughness of ABS polymer has yielded conflicting results.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. K.A. Hamzah, C.K. Yeoh, M.M. Noor, P.L. Teh, Y.Y. Aw, and S.A. Sazali, Mechanical Properties and Thermal and Electrical Conductivity of 3D Printed ABS-Copper Ferrite Composites via 3D Printing Technique, J. Thermoplast Compos. Mater., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571986940510.1177/0892705719869405 ↗
2. R. Zou, Y. Xia, S. Liu, P. Hu, W. Hou, and Q. Hu, Isotropic and Anisotropic Elasticity and Yielding of 3D Printed Material, Compos. Part B Eng., 2016, 99, p 506–13.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.009 ↗
3. C.C. Kuo, L.C. Liu, W.F. Teng, H.Y. Chang, F.M. Chien, and S.J. Liao, Preparation of Starch/Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Copolymers (ABS) Biomass Alloys and Their Feasible Evaluation for 3D Printing Applications, Compos. Part B Eng., 2016, 86, p 36–9.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.005 ↗
4. S. Dul, L. Fambri, and A. Pegoretti, Fused Deposition Modelling with ABS-Graphene Nanocomposites, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2016, 85, p 181–191.10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.013 ↗
5. T. Maciag, J. Wieczorek, and W. Kalsa, Surface Analysis of ABS 3d Prints Subjected to Copper Plating, Arch. Metall. Mater., 2019, 64(2), p 639–646.10.24425/amm.2019.127592 ↗
6. V.D. Sagias, K.I. Giannakopoulos, and C. Stergiou, Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymer Specimens, Procedia StructIntegr., 2018, 10, p 85–90.
7. N.P. Levenhagen and M.D. Dadmun, Interlayer Diffusion of Surface Segregating Additives to Improve the Isotropy of Fused Deposition Modeling Products, Polymer (Guildf)., 2018, 152, p 35–41.10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.031 ↗
8. M.R. Skorski, J.M. Esenther, Z. Ahmed, A.E. Miller, and M.R. Hartings, The Chemical, Mechanical, and Physical Properties of 3D Printed Materials Composed of TiO2-ABS Nanocomposites, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 2016, 17(1), p 89–97.10.1080/14686996.2016.1152879 ↗
9. M. Kariz, M.K. Kuzman, and M. Sernek, Adhesive Bonding of 3D-Printed ABS Parts and Wood, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2017, 31(15), p 1683–1690.10.1080/01694243.2016.1268414 ↗
10. S.A. Raj, E. Muthukumaran, and K. Jayakrishna, A Case Study of 3D Printed PLA and its Mechanical Properties, Mater. Today Proc., 2018, 5(5), p 11219–11226.10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.146 ↗
11. E.J. McCullough and V.K. Yadavalli, Surface Modification of Fused Deposition Modeling ABS to Enable Rapid Prototyping of Biomedical Microdevices, J. Mater. Process Technol., 2013, 213(6), p 947–954.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.015 ↗
12. N.L. Carutasu, I. Simion, G. Carutasu, G. Jiga, and A.F. Arion, Experimental Test for Elastic and Mechanical Evaluation of ABS Plastic Used in 3D Printing, Mater. Plast., 2015, 52(3), p 397–401.
13. S. Jamiolahmadi and A. Barari, Surface Topography of Additive Manufacturing Parts Using a Finite Difference Approach, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2014 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402858510.1115/1.4028585 ↗
14. A.A. Chaudhari, A.M. Godase, J. Ravindra, and N. Abhijit, Acetone Vapor Smoothing: A Postprocessing Method for 3D Printed ABS Parts, Int. J. Res. Sci. Innov., 2017, 4, p 123–127.
15. S. Chen, J. Lu, and J. Feng, 3D-Printable ABS Blends with Improved Scratch Resistance and Balanced Mechanical Performance, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57(11), p 3923–3931.10.1021/acs.iecr.7b05074 ↗
16. A.S. Alaboodi and S. Sivasankaran, Experimental Design and Investigation on the Mechanical Behavior of Novel 3D printed Biocompatibility Polycarbonate Scaffolds for Medical Applications, J Manuf. Process., 2018, 35, p 479–491.10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.035 ↗
17. D. Vlasceanu, F. Baciu, D. Popescu, A. Hadar, and R. Marinescu, Development and 3D Printing of an ABS Ergonomic Handle for Medical Use A case study, Mater Plast., 2018, 55(4), p 630–633.10.37358/MP.18.4.5090 ↗
18. E. Bartolomé, B. Bozzo, P. Sevilla, O. Martínez-Pasarell, T. Puig, and X. Granados, ABS 3D Printed Solutions for Cryogenic Applications, Cryogenics (Guildf)., 2017, 82, p 30–37.10.1016/j.cryogenics.2017.01.005 ↗
19. W. Zhang, C. Cotton, J. Sun, D. Heider, B. Gu, and B. Sun, Interfacial Bonding Strength of Short Carbon Fiber/Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Composites Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling, Compos. Part B Eng., 2018, 137, p 51–9.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.018 ↗
20. R. Bansal, Improving Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Parts Using Response Surface Methodology.B.Tech Thesis; 2011; 32.
21. B.D. Harris, S. Nilsson, and C.M. Poole, A Feasibility Study for using ABS Plastic and a Low-Cost 3D Printer for Patient-Specific Brachytherapy Mould Design, Australas Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 2015, 38(3), p 399–412.10.1007/s13246-015-0356-3 ↗
22. A. Lalehpour and A. Barari, Post Processing for Fused Deposition Modeling Parts with Acetone Vapour Bath, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016, 49(31), p 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.15910.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.159 ↗
23. A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, and S.S. Mahapatra, Improving Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling Processed Part Using Grey Taguchi Method, Mater. Des., 2009, 30(10), p 4243–4252.10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030 ↗
24. J.P. Kruth, M.C. Leu, and T. Nakagawa, Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 1998, 47(2), p 525–540.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5 ↗
25. T. Wohlers, Future Potential of Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing Around the World, Rapid Prototyp. J., 1995, 1(1), p 4–10.10.1108/13552549510146630 ↗
26. K.R. Hart and E.D. Wetzel, Fracture Behavior of Additively Manufactured Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Materials, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2017, 177, p 1–13.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.028 ↗
27. N. Aliheidari, J. Christ, R. Tripuraneni, S. Nadimpalli, and A. Ameli, Interlayer Adhesion and Fracture Resistance of Polymers Printed through Melt Extrusion Additive Manufacturing Process, Mater. Des., 2018, 156, p 351–361.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.001 ↗
28. K. Kalyan, J. Singh, G.S. Phull, S. Soni, H. Singh, and G. Kaur, Integration of FDM and Vapor Smoothing Process: Analyzing Properties of Fabricated ABS Replicas, Mater. Today Proc., 2018, 5(14), p 27902–27911.10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.029 ↗
29. A. Lalehpour, C. Janeteas, and A. Barari, Surface Roughness of FDM Parts After Post-Processing with Acetone Vapor Bath Smoothing Process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 95, p 1505.10.1007/s00170-017-1165-5 ↗
30. J.R.C. Dizon, A.H. Espera, Q. Chen, and R.C. Advincula, Mechanical Characterization of 3D-Printed Polymers, Addit Manuf., 2018, 20, p 44–67.
31. A. Garg, A. Bhattacharya, and A. Batish, On Surface Finish and Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Parts after Cold Vapor Treatment, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2016, 31(4), p 522–529.10.1080/10426914.2015.1070425 ↗
32. A. Chaudhari Aditya, M. GodaseAkshay, S. Jadhav Ravindra, V. NaikAbhijit, Acetone Vapor Smoothing: A Postprocessing Method for 3D Printed ABS Parts. Int. J. Res. Sci. Innov., 2017, 4(5)
33. R. Singh, H. Singh, I. Farina, F. Colangelo, and F. Fraternali, On the Additive Manufacturing of an Energy Storage Device from Recycled Material, Compos. B Eng., 2019, 156, p 259–265.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.080 ↗
34. A.M. Arefin, N.R. Khatri, N. Kulkarni, and P.F. Egan, Polymer 3D Printing Review: Materials, Process, and Design Strategies for Medical Applications, Polymers, 2021, 13(9), p 1499.10.3390/polym13091499 ↗
35. N. Hossain, M.A. Chowdhury, M.B.A. Shuvho et al., 3D-Printed Objects for Multipurpose Applications, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30, p 4756–4767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05664-w10.1007/s11665-021-05664-w ↗