journal article·2026-02

Sustainable Lubrication Strategies in Eco-friendly Machining of AISI 4140 Steel: Performance and Environmental Impact Analysis Using Machine Learning

Mustafa Kuntoğlu, Havva Demirpolat, Rüstem Binali, Mehmet Erdi Korkmaz, Mayur Makhesana, Kübra Kaya

Publisher page

Abstract

This study encompasses extensive analysis for different aspects of industrially important 4140 steel during dry and minimum quantity lubrication-assisted turning operations. Surface roughness, tool wear, cutting forces, chip morphology and cutting temperatures were considered as technological parameters while carbon emissions and energy consumption were handled as the ecological parameters. The environmental analysis indicates that increased cutting speeds and greater depths of cut result in a substantial rise in energy consumption, with levels reaching up to 50% higher than those seen in alternative configurations. In the case of high cutting speeds, carbon emissions can potentially increase by as much as 60%. Conversely, at low cutting speeds and parameters, energy consumption emissions decrease by 42%. In terms of carbon emissions, dry machining offers a distinct advantage over MQL. Machine learning (decision tree model) is utilized to model the effects of input and output parameters to determine the optimum values of these parameters. It has provided the relationship between the dependent variables and the independent variables for sustainable machining of an industrially important material. The decision tree ML model for cutting force results showed that RMSE values are 8.7 and 11.89 for dry and MQL environments, while it was 6.83 and 1.15 for cutting temperature in dry and MQL environments, respectively. Finally, RMSE values of surface roughness are 0.19 and 0.16 for dry and MQL environments, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (92)

Show source-provided references
1. R. Suresh et al., State-of-the-art Research in Machinability of Hardened Steels, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2013, 227(2), p 191–209.10.1177/0954405412464589 ↗
2. A. Pandiyan, G. Arunkumar, and A. Patel, Design and Optimization of Crankshaft for Single Cylinder 4-Stroke Spark Ignition Engine using Coupled Steady-State Thermal Structural Analysis, Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., 2018, 9(7), p 135–145.
3. C.E. Ventura et al., The Influence of the Cutting Tool Microgeometry on the Machinability of Hardened AISI 4140 steel, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 90, p 2557–2565.10.1007/s00170-016-9582-4 ↗
4. S.R. Das, D. Dhupal, and A. Kumar, Experimental Investigation into Machinability of Hardened AISI 4140 Steel using TiN Coated Ceramic Tool, Measurement, 2015, 62, p 108–126.10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.008 ↗
5. M. Özdemir et al., Analysis and Optimisation of the Cutting Parameters based on Machinability Factors in Turning AISI 4140 Steel, Can. Metall. Q., 2022, 61(4), p 407–417.10.1080/00084433.2022.2058154 ↗
6. G.S. Goindi and P. Sarkar, Dry Machining: A Step Towards Sustainable Machining–Challenges and Future Directions, J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 165, p 1557–1571.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.235 ↗
7. M.J. Hadad et al., Temperature and Energy Partition in Minimum Quantity Lubrication-MQL Grinding Process, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2012, 54, p 10–17.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.11.010 ↗
8. Y.F. Yapan et al., Machining and Sustainability Performance Comparison for the Milling Process of Al6082 Alloy under Various Minimum Quantity Lubrication Conditions, Int. J. Precision Eng. Manuf. -Green Technol., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-024-00655-310.1007/s40684-024-00655-3 ↗
9. M.K. Gupta et al., Comparison Of Tool Wear, Surface Morphology, Specific Cutting Energy and Cutting Temperature in Machining of Titanium Alloys under Hybrid and Green Cooling Strategies, Int. J. Precision Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol., 2023, 10(6), p 1393–1406.10.1007/s40684-023-00512-9 ↗
10. V.S. Sharma, M. Dogra, and N. Suri, Cooling Techniques for Improved Productivity in Turning, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2009, 49(6), p 435–453.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.010 ↗
11. H. Gürbüz and Y.E. Gönülaçar, Experimental and Statistical Investigation of the Effects of MQL, Dry and Wet Machining on Machinability and Sustainability in Turning of AISI 4140 Steel, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. E J. Process Mech. Eng., 2022, 236(5), p 1808–1823.10.1177/09544089221076243 ↗
12. M. Hadad and B. Sadeghi, Minimum Quantity Lubrication-MQL Turning of AISI 4140 Steel Alloy, J. Clean. Prod., 2013, 54, p 332–343.10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.011 ↗
13. J.C. Aurich, T. Eyrisch, and M. Zimmermann, Effect of the Coating System on the Tool Performance when Turning Heat Treated AISI 4140, Procedia CIRP, 2012, 1, p 214–219.10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.037 ↗
14. B. Nikam, A. Khadtare, and R. Pawade, Machınabılıty Assessment of AISI 4140 Hardened steel USING cbn Inserts ın Hard Turnıng. Int. J. Modern Manuf. Technol. (IJMMT), (2021). 13(1)
15. S. Zare Chavoshi and M. Tajdari, Surface Roughness Modelling in Hard Turning Operation of AISI 4140 using CBN Cutting Tool, Int. J. Mater. Form., 2010, 3, p 233–239.10.1007/s12289-009-0679-2 ↗
16. S.R. Das, D. Dhupal, and A. Kumar, Study of Surface Roughness and Flank Wear in Hard Turning of AISI 4140 Steel with Coated Ceramic Inserts, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2015, 29, p 4329–4340.10.1007/s12206-015-0931-2 ↗
17. E. Aslan, N. Camuşcu, and B. Birgören, Design Optimization of Cutting Parameters when Turning Hardened AISI 4140 Steel (63 HRC) with Al2O3+ TiCN Mixed Ceramic Tool, Mater. Des., 2007, 28(5), p 1618–1622.10.1016/j.matdes.2006.02.006 ↗
18. P. Paengchit and C. Saikaew, Simulation of the Influence of Cutting Speed and Feed Rate on Tool Life in Hard Turning of AISI 4140 Steel, Mater. Sci.-Pol., 2023, 41(2), p 311–324.10.2478/msp-2023-0021 ↗
19. I. Asiltürk and H. Akkuş, Determining the Effect of Cutting Parameters on Surface Roughness in Hard Turning using the Taguchi Method, Measurement, 2011, 44(9), p 1697–1704.
20. M.K. Gupta et al., Ecological, Economical and Technological Perspectives based Sustainability Assessment in Hybrid-Cooling Assisted Machining of Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 2020, 26, p e00218.
21. W. Cai and K.-H. Lai, Sustainability Assessment of Mechanical Manufacturing Systems in the Industrial Sector, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2021, 135, p 110169.10.1016/j.rser.2020.110169 ↗
22. M.E. Korkmaz et al., Implementation of Green Cooling/Lubrication Strategies in Metal Cutting Industries: A State of The Art Towards Sustainable Future and Challenges, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 2023, 36, p e00641.
23. N.S. Ross et al., Carbon Emissions and Overall Sustainability Assessment in Eco-Friendly Machining of Monel-400 Alloy, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 2023, 37, p e00675.
24. K. Guo et al., Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in design of Mechanical Materials, Mater. Horiz., 2021, 8(4), p 1153–1172.10.1039/D0MH01451F ↗
25. N.S. Ross et al., A Novel Approach of Tool Condition Monitoring in Sustainable Machining of Ni Alloy with Transfer Learning Models, J. Intell. Manuf., 2024, 35(2), p 757–775.10.1007/s10845-023-02074-8 ↗
26. K. Singh and I.A. Sultan, A Computer-Aided Sustainable Modelling and Optimization Analysis of CNC Milling and Turning Processes, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2018, 2(4), p 65.
27. Z. Lei et al., A GAPSO-Enhanced Extreme Learning Machine Method for Tool Wear Estimation in Milling Processes based on Vibration Signals, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol., 2021, 8, p 745–759.10.1007/s40684-021-00353-4 ↗
28. C. Du, C.L. Ho, and J. Kaminski, Prediction of Product Roughness, Profile, and Roundness using Machine Learning Techniques for a Hard Turning Process, Adv. Manuf., 2021, 9(2), p 206–215.10.1007/s40436-021-00345-2 ↗
29. N. Singh et al., Machinability Investigation of Chromoly Steel using TiN/Al2O3/TiCN/TiOCN Multilayer Coated Tungsten Carbide Tool Inserts with Artificial Neural Network Methodology, Appl. Res., 2023, 2(4), p e202200082.10.1002/appl.202200082 ↗
30. M.E. Korkmaz et al., Prediction and Classification of Tool Wear and its State in Sustainable Machining of Bohler Steel with Different Machine Learning Models, Measurement, 2023, 223, p 113825.10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113825 ↗
31. N.S. Ross et al., A New Intelligent Approach of Surface Roughness Measurement in Sustainable Machining of AM-316L Stainless Steel with Deep Learning Models, Measurement, 2024, 230, p 114515.10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114515 ↗
32. A. Aslan, Machine Learning Models and Machinability Analysis for Comparison of Various Cooling and Lubricating Mediums during Milling of Hardox 400 Steel, Tribol. Int., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2024.10986010.1016/j.triboint.2024.109860 ↗
33. R. Binali, Experimental and Machine Learning Comparison for Measurement the Machinability of Nickel Based Alloy in Pursuit of Sustainability, Measurement, 2024, 236, p 115142.10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115142 ↗
34. T. Nagaraja, Investigation of Effect of Mechanical Properties and Influence of Heat Treatment on AISI 4140 Steel. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. (2021). IOP Publishing.10.1088/1757-899X/1013/1/012008 ↗
35. R.S. Rooprai et al., Analysis of the Wear Properties of Through Hardened AISI-4140 Alloy Steel using Taguchi Technique, Mater. Today Proc., 2022, 50, p 661–664.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.196 ↗
36. R. Binali et al., Machinability Investigations based on Tool Wear, Surface Roughness, Cutting Temperature, Chip Morphology and Material Removal Rate during Dry and MQL-Assisted Milling of Nimax Mold Steel, Lubricants, 2023, 11(3), p 101.10.3390/lubricants11030101 ↗
37. S.L. Kumar, Measurement and Uncertainty Analysis of Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate in Micro Turning Operation and Process Parameters Optimization, Measurement, 2019, 140, p 538–547.10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.029 ↗
38. M. Trifunović et al., Investigation of Cutting and Specific Cutting Energy in Turning of POM-C using a PCD Tool: Analysis and Some Optimization Aspects, J. Clean. Prod., 2021, 303, p 127043.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127043 ↗
39. C. Li et al., A Quantitative Approach to Analyze Carbon Emissions of CNC-Based Machining Systems, J. Intell. Manuf., 2015, 26, p 911–922.10.1007/s10845-013-0812-4 ↗
40. M. Ozdemir, S. Pehlivan, and M. Melikoglu, Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions using Linear and Logarithmic Models: A Scenario-Based Approach for Turkiye’s 2030 Vision, Energy Nexus, 2024, 13, p 100264.10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100264 ↗
41. S. Debnath, M.M. Reddy, and Q.S. Yi, Environmental Friendly Cutting Fluids and Cooling Techniques in Machining: A Review, J. Clean. Prod., 2014, 83, p 33–47.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.071 ↗
42. Q. Yan and T. Xia, Development Prospect of China’s Steel Scrap Industry under Low Carbon Trend, China Metal Scrap, 2010, 2, p 7–19.
43. V.G. Costa and C.E. Pedreira, Recent Advances in Decision Trees: an Updated Survey, Artif. Intell. Rev., 2023, 56(5), p 4765–4800.10.1007/s10462-022-10275-5 ↗
44. I.D. Mienye and N. Jere, A Survey of Decision Trees: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications, IEEE Access, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.341683810.1109/ACCESS.2024.3416838 ↗
45. M. Elbah et al., Comparative Assessment of Wiper and Conventional Ceramic Tools on Surface Roughness in Hard Turning AISI 4140 Steel, Measurement, 2013, 46(9), p 3041–3056.10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.018 ↗
46. J. Herwan et al., Improving Sustainability Index of Grey Cast Iron Finish Cutting Through High-Speed Dry Turning and Cutting Parameters Optimization Using Taguchi-Based Bayesian Method, Int. J. Precision Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol., 2023, 10(3), p 729–745.10.1007/s40684-022-00457-5 ↗
47. P. Benardos and G.-C. Vosniakos, Predicting Surface Roughness in Machining: A Review, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2003, 43(8), p 833–844.10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00059-2 ↗
48. T. Batu, H.G. Lemu, and H. Shimels, Application of Artificial Intelligence for Surface Roughness Prediction of Additively Manufactured Components, Materials, 2023, 16(18), p 6266.10.3390/ma16186266 ↗
49. R. Mallick et al., Hard Turning Performance Investigation of AISI D2 Steel Under a Dual Nozzle MQL Environment, Lubricants, 2023, 11(1), p 16.10.3390/lubricants11010016 ↗
50. S. Khatai et al., Performance Assessment of the Multi-nozzle Injection MQL System for Cleaner Machining of Hardened AISI D2 Steel Concerning Power Consumption, Can. Metall. Q., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1080/00084433.2024.239353510.1080/00084433.2024.2393535 ↗
51. R.B.D. Pereira et al., Hybrid Cryogenic/MQL Helical Milling for Hole-Making of Inconel 718, Results Eng., 2025, 26, p 104776.10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104776 ↗
52. M. Abas et al., Optimization of Machining Parameters of Aluminum Alloy 6026–T9 under MQL-Assisted Turning Process, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2020, 9(5), p 10916–10940.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.071 ↗
53. M.I. Qazi et al., Experimental Investigation and Multi-Response Optimization of Machinability of AA5005H34 using Composite Desirability Coupled with PCA, Metals, 2021, 11(2), p 235.10.3390/met11020235 ↗
54. M. Castejón et al., On-line tool wear monitoring using geometric descriptors from digital images, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2007, 47(12–13), p 1847–1853.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.04.001 ↗
55. K. Agrawal, A. Panda, and A.K. Sahoo. Advancements in tool wear monitoring in turning operations: digital image processing and AI techniques. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2024. IOP Publishing.10.1088/1742-6596/2818/1/012040 ↗
56. A.K. Sahoo et al., Assessment of Sustainable dry and MQL-Assisted hard Machining using MTCVD Multilayered Coated Carbide (TiN/TiCN/Al2O3) insert: Évaluation de l’usinage dur durable à sec et assisté par MQL à l’aide d’une pastille en carbure à revêtement multicouche (TiN/TiCN/Al2O3) MTCVD, Can. Metall. Q., 2023, 62(4), p 651–664.10.1080/00084433.2022.2126579 ↗
57. N. Jouini et al., Optimized Machining Parameters for High-Speed Turning Process: A Comparative Study of Dry and Cryo+ MQL Techniques, Processes, 2025, 13(3), p 739.10.3390/pr13030739 ↗
58. M.A. Makhesana et al., Influence of MoS2 and Graphite-Reinforced Nanofluid-MQL on Surface Roughness, Tool Wear, Cutting Temperature and Microhardness in Machining of Inconel 625, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 2023, 41, p 225–238.10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.12.015 ↗
59. M. Zhang et al., A Novel Cooling and Lubrication Approach: Device Development and Machining Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Vibration–Assisted MQL, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2024, 133(3), p 1667–1684.10.1007/s00170-024-13832-0 ↗
60. G. Hao and Z. Liu, The Heat Partition into Cutting Tool at Tool-Chip Contact Interface During Cutting process: A Review, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 108, p 393–411.10.1007/s00170-020-05404-9 ↗
61. T. Sathish et al., Temperature Distribution Analysis on Diffusion Bonded Joints of Ti-6Al-4V with AISI 4140 Medium Carbon Steel, Mater. Today Proc., 2020, 21, p 847–856.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.601 ↗
62. S. Ravi and M.P. Kumar, Experimental Investigations on Cryogenic Cooling by Liquid Nitrogen in the end Milling of Hardened Steel, Cryogenics, 2011, 51(9), p 509–515.10.1016/j.cryogenics.2011.06.006 ↗
63. D. Sarma et al., Material-Specific Machining Optimization of Ti6Al4V Alloy under MQL: A Sustainability-Centric Approach, Next Materials, 2025, 8, p 100586.10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100586 ↗
64. F. Xiuli et al., Morphology Evolution and Micro-Mechanism of Chip Formation During High-Speed Machining, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 98, p 165–175.10.1007/s00170-017-0411-1 ↗
65. T. Zhu et al., Study on Chip Formation in Grinding of Nickel-based Polycrystalline Superalloy GH4169, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2022, 121(1), p 1135–1148.10.1007/s00170-022-09386-8 ↗
66. G.N. Arka et al., Insight on Turning of Stainless Steel 431 and Modelling by ANN, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2023, 38(14), p 1854–1862.10.1080/10426914.2023.2217910 ↗
67. R.S. Pawade, D. Reddy, and G.S. Kadam, Chip Segmentation Behaviour and Surface Topography in High-Speed Turning of Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) with Eco-Friendly Water Vapour, Int. J. Mach. Machinability Mater., 2013, 13(2–3), p 113–137.
68. B.M. Pereira Guimaraes et al., Cutting Temperature Measurement and Prediction in Machining Processes: Comprehensive Review and Future Perspectives, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2022, 120(5), p 2849–2878.10.1007/s00170-022-08957-z ↗
69. M. Kuntoğlu et al., A Review of Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Systems and Decision-Making Methods in Turning: Critical Analysis and Trends, Sensors, 2020, 21(1), p 108.10.3390/s21010108 ↗
70. J. Hou et al., Influence of Cutting Speed on Cutting Force, Flank Temperature, and Tool Wear in end Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 70, p 1835–1845.10.1007/s00170-013-5433-8 ↗
71. S. Sulaiman, A. Roshan, and S. Borazjani, Effect of Cutting Parameters on Cutting Temperature of TiAL6V4 Alloy, Appl. Mech. Mater., 2013, 392, p 68–72.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.392.68 ↗
72. E. Salur et al., The Effects of MQL and Dry Environments on Tool Wear, Cutting Temperature, and Power Consumption during end Milling of AISI 1040 Steel, Metals, 2021, 11(11), p 1674.10.3390/met11111674 ↗
73. Ç.V. Yıldırım et al., The effect of Addition of hBN Nanoparticles to Nanofluid-MQL on Tool Wear Patterns, Tool Life, Roughness and Temperature in Turning of Ni-Based Inconel 625, Tribol. Int., 2019, 134, p 443–456.10.1016/j.triboint.2019.02.027 ↗
74. Ç.V. Yıldırım et al., Determination of MQL Parameters Contributing to Sustainable Machining in the Milling of Nickel-Base Superalloy Waspaloy, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2017, 42, p 4667–4681.10.1007/s13369-017-2594-z ↗
75. S. Subramani, R. Dhairiyasamy, and D. Gabiriel, Advancements in MQL Machining: a Comparative Study of Cutting Fluids on AISI 630 Steel. Int. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2025). 1-13.
76. R. Binali, S. Yaldız, and S. Neşeli, Finite Element Analysis and Statistical Investigation of S960ql Structure Steel Machinability with Milling Method, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 2024, 46(5), p 260.10.1007/s40430-024-04842-w ↗
77. M.K. Gupta et al., Cutting Forces and Temperature Measurements in Cryogenic Assisted Turning of AA2024-T351 Alloy: An Experimentally Validated Simulation Approach, Measurement, 2022, 188, p 110594.10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110594 ↗
78. M. Kuntoğlu et al., Parametric Optimization for Cutting Forces and Material Removal rate in the Turning of AISI 5140, Machines, 2021, 9(5), p 90.10.3390/machines9050090 ↗
79. E. Salur et al., Optimization of Cutting Forces During Turning of Composite Materials, Acad. Platf. J. Eng. Sci., 2020, 8, p 423–431.
80. I. Shyha et al., Analysis of Microstructure and Chip Formation when Machining Ti-6Al-4V, Metals, 2018, 8(3), p 185.10.3390/met8030185 ↗
81. T.-B. Mac et al., Cutting Force Model for Thermal-Assisted Machining of Tool Steel Based on the Taguchi Method, Metals, 2018, 8(12), p 992.10.3390/met8120992 ↗
82. R. Binali and M. Kuntoğlu, Evaluation of Machining Parameters Affecting Cutting Forces in Dry Turning of GGG50 Ductile Cast Iron, Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, 2023, 12(2), p 55–60.10.46810/tdfd.1210013 ↗
83. A.K. Sharma, A.K. Tiwari, and A.R. Dixit, Effects of Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) in Machining Processes using Conventional and Nanofluid based Cutting Fluids: A Comprehensive Review, J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 127, p 1–18.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.146 ↗
84. Z. Tang et al., Modeling Energy Consumption Inside Cutting Deformation Zone to Predict the Stress Distributions, Temperature and Microstructure by Micro Irreversible Entropic Thermodynamics, J. Manuf. Process., 2023, 98, p 357–370.10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.05.029 ↗
85. S. Khatai et al., Sustainable Hard Machining under Zirconia Nano-Cutting Fluid: A Step Towards a Green and Cleaner Manufacturing Process, Measurement, 2025, 242, p 116087.10.1016/j.measurement.2024.116087 ↗
86. J. Hardell et al., Effect of Oxide Layers and Near Surface Transformations on Friction and Wear During Tool Steel and Boron Steel Interaction at High Temperatures, Wear, 2015, 330, p 223–229.10.1016/j.wear.2015.02.040 ↗
87. A. Hamdi et al., Investigation of MQL and CNC Turning Parameters on the Machinability of Unreinforced Polypropylene: Study of Surface Roughness, Temperature, and Specific Cutting Energy, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2024, 130(1), p 717–730.10.1007/s00170-023-12761-8 ↗
88. A. Şahinoğlu, Investigation of the Effects of MQL and Material Hardness on Energy Consumption, Vibration, and Surface Roughness in Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel for a Sustainable Manufacturing, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng., 2025, 239(1), p 308–320.10.1177/09544089231173257 ↗
89. D. Sarma, et al., Intelligent Machine Learning Strategies for Minimizing Machining Power in Minimum Quantity Lubrication Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. (2025). 1-14.10.1007/s11665-025-10989-x ↗
90. B. Wang et al., Proper Selection of Cutting Parameters and Cutting Tool Angle to Lower the Specific Cutting Energy during High Speed Machining of 7050–T7451 Aluminum Alloy, J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 129, p 292–304.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.071 ↗
91. M.E. Korkmaz et al., A Sustainable Cooling/lubrication Method Focusing on Energy Consumption and other Machining Characteristics in High-Speed Turning of Aluminum Alloy, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 2024, 40, p e00919.
92. M.R. Karim et al., Environmental, Economical and Technological Analysis of MQL-Assisted Machining of Al-Mg-Zr Alloy Using PCD Tool, Sustainability, 2021, 13(13), p 7321.10.3390/su13137321 ↗