Optimization of Process Parameters to Investigate the Fatigue Behavior of Fused Deposition Modeling-Fabricated ABS Parts Using Hybrid Tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. C. Fragassa, Lightening structures by metal replacement: From traditional gym equipment to an advanced fiber-reinforced composite exoskeleton, Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng., 2021, 19(2), p 155–174. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME201215043F10.22190/FUME201215043F ↗
2. A.A. Rashid, S.A. Khan, S.G. Al-Ghamdi, and M. Koç, Additive manufacturing of polymer nanocomposites: needs and challenges in materials, processes, and applications, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, 14, p 910–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.016.210.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.016.2 ↗
3. S. Kim, H. Seong, Y. Her, and J. Chun, A study of the development and improvement of fashion products using a FDM type 3D printer, Fash. Text., 2019, 6(1), p 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-018-0162-010.1186/s40691-018-0162-0 ↗
4. E. Macdonald, R. Salas, D. Espalin, M. Perez, E. Aguilera, D. Muse, and R.B. Wicker, 3D printing for the rapid prototyping of structural electronics, IEEE Access, 2014, 2, p 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.231181010.1109/ACCESS.2014.2311810 ↗
5. J.P. Greene, Design aspects in automotive plastics and composites, Automotive plastics and composites. Elsevier, The Netherlands, 2021, p 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818008-2.00017-910.1016/B978-0-12-818008-2.00017-9 ↗
6. N.C. Paxton, J. Zhao, and E. Sauret, Polymer 3D printing in perspective: assessing challenges and opportunities in industrial translation against the metal benchmark, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2024, 133, p 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13744-z10.1007/s00170-024-13744-z ↗
7. B. Gong, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, Y. Sun, and Q. Ding, Strain-Controlled Fatigue Behaviors of Porous PLA-Based Scaffolds by 3D-Printing Technology, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 2017, 28(18), p 2196–2204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2017.138899310.1080/09205063.2017.1388993 ↗
8. M.D. Do, M. Kim, D.H. Nguyen, S. Han, V.H. Pham, and H.-J. Choi, Multistep Workpiece Localization with Automated Symmetry Identification for Aerospace Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic Components, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol., 2022, 9, p 1133–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00352-510.1007/s40684-021-00352-5 ↗
9. S.C. Kosloski-Oh, and M.E. Fieser, From Source to Disposal: Cracking the Code for Sustainable Polymers, One Earth, 2023, 6(6), p 587–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.02110.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.021 ↗
10. A. Samir, F.H. Ashour, A.A.A. Hakim, and M. Bassyouni, Recent Advances in Biodegradable Polymers for Sustainable Applications, NPJ Mater. Degrad., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-022-00277-710.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 ↗
11. D. Popescu, A. Zapciu, C. Amza, F. Baciu, and R. Marinescu, FDM Process Parameters Influence Over the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Specimens: A Review, Polym. Test., 2018, 69, p 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
12. L. Zhou, J. Miller, J. Vezza, M. Mayster, M. Raffay, Q. Justice, Z.A. Tamimi, G. Hansotte, L.D. Sunkara, and J. Bernat, Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review, Sensors, 2024, 24, p 2668. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2409266810.3390/s24092668 ↗
13. F. Bahr and E. Westkamper, Correlations Between Influencing Parameters and Quality Properties of Components Produced by Fused Deposition Modelling, Proc. CIRP, 2018, 72, p 1214–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.04810.1016/j.procir.2018.03.048 ↗
14. M. Domingo-Espin, J.A. Travieso-Rodriguez, R. Jerez-Mesa, and J. Lluma-Fuentes, Fatigue Performance of ABS Specimens Obtained by Fused Filament Fabrication, Materials, 2018, 11, p 2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1112252110.3390/ma11122521 ↗
15. R. Jerez-Mesa, J.A. Travieso-Rodriguez, J. Llumà-Fuentes, G. Gomez-Gras, and D. Puig, Fatigue Lifespan Study of PLA Parts Obtained by Additive Manufacturing, Proc. Manuf., 2017, 13, p 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.14610.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.146 ↗
16. G. Gomez-Gras, R. Jerez-Mesa, J.A. Travieso-Rodriguez, and J. Lluma-Fuentes, Fatigue Performance of Fused Filament Fabrication PLA Specimens, Mater. Des., 2018, 140, p 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.07210.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.072 ↗
17. J.A. Travieso-Rodriguez, R. Jerez-Mesa, J. Llumà, O. Traver-Ramos, G. Gomez-Gras, and J.J. RoaRovira, Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printing Polylactic Acid Parts Subjected to Bending Stress and Fatigue Testing, Materials, 2019, 12, p 3859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1223385910.3390/ma12233859 ↗
18. F. He and M. Khan, Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fatigue Behaviour of 3D-Printed ABS Under Dynamic Thermo-Mechanical Loads, Polymers, 2021, 13, p 2362. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1314236210.3390/polym13142362 ↗
19. J. Lee and A. Huang, Fatigue Analysis of FDM Materials, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2013, 19(4), p 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254131132329010.1108/13552541311323290 ↗
20. S. Ziemian, M. Okwara, and C.W. Ziemian, Tensile and Fatigue Behavior of Layered Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2015, 21(3), p 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2013-008610.1108/RPJ-09-2013-0086 ↗
21. C.W. Ziemian, R.D. Ziemian, and K.V. Haile, Characterization of Stiffness Degradation Caused by Fatigue Damage of Additive Manufactured Parts, Mater. Des., 2016, 109, p 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.08010.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.080 ↗
22. C. Ziemian, M. Sharma, and S. Ziemian, Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling, Mech. Eng., 2012, 23, p 159–180. https://doi.org/10.5772/3423310.5772/34233 ↗
23. T. Corbett, T. Kok, C. Lee, S. Smith, V.G. Herminso, and J. Tarbutton, Identification of mechanical and fatigue characteristics of polymers fabricated by additive manufacturing process, In Proceedings of the 2014 ASPE Spring Topical Meeting, Berkeley, CA, USA, 13–16 April 2014, 57, p 186–189.
24. C.W. Ziemian and R.D. Ziemian, Residual Strength of Additive Manufactured ABS Parts Subjected to Fatigue Loading, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 134, 105455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10545510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105455 ↗
25. N.S.F. Jap, G.M. Pearce, A.K. Hellier, N. Russell, W.C. Parr, and W.R. Walsh, The Effect of Raster Orientation on the Static and Fatigue Properties of Filament Deposited ABS Polymer, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 124, p 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.04210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.042 ↗
26. M.F. Afrose, S. Masood, P. Iovenitti, M. Nikzad, and I. Sbarski, Effects of Part Build Orientations on Fatigue Behaviour of FDM-Processed PLA Material, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2016, 1, p 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-015-0002-310.1007/s40964-015-0002-3 ↗
27. R. Baptista and M. Guedes, Porosity and Pore Design Influence on Fatigue Behavior of 3D Printed Scaffolds for Trabecular Bone Replacement, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2021, 117, 104378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10437810.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104378 ↗
28. R. Baptista and M. Guedes, Fatigue Behavior of Different Geometry Scaffolds for Bone Replacement, Proc. Struct. Integrity, 2019, 17, p 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.07210.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.072 ↗
29. J.A. Travieso-Rodriguez, M.D. Zandi, R. Jerez-Mesa, and J. Lluma-Fuentes, Fatigue Behavior of PLA-Wood Composite Manufactured by Fused Filament Fabrication, J. Market. Res., 2020, 9(4), p 8507–8516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.00310.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.003 ↗
30. E. Kargar and A. Ghasemi-Ghalebahman, Experimental Investigation on Fatigue Life and Tensile Strength of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced PLA Composites Based on Fused Deposition Modelling, Sci. Rep., 2023, 13, p 18194. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45046-x10.1038/s41598-023-45046-x ↗
31. A. Yankin, G. Serik, S. Danenova, Y. Alipov, A. Temirgali, D. Talamona, and A. Perveen, Optimization of Fatigue Performance of FDM ABS and Nylon Printed Parts, Micromachines, 2023, 14(2), p 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1402030410.3390/mi14020304 ↗
32. X. Liang, J. Gao, W. Xu, X. Wang, Y. Shen, J. Tang, S. Cui, X. Yang, Q. Liu, and L. Yu, Structural Mechanics of 3D-Printed Poly(Lactic Acid) Scaffolds With Tetragonal, Hexagonal and Wheel-Like Designs, Biofabrication, 2019, 11(3), 035009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0f5910.1088/1758-5090/ab0f59 ↗
33. A. Dadashi and M. Azadi, Experimental Bending Fatigue Data of Additive-Manufactured PLA Biomaterial Fabricated by Different 3D Printing Parameters, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2023, 8, p 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00327-110.1007/s40964-022-00327-1 ↗
34. H. Kuleyin, R. Gümrük, and S. Çalışkan, Fatigue Behavior of Polymethyl Methacrylate/Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Blends Including Blend Composition, Stress Ratio, Frequency, and Holding Pressure Effects, Int. J. Fatigue, 2024, 187, 108483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10848310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108483 ↗
35. M. Alagheband, Q. Zhang, and S. Jung, Investigating the Influence of Infill Patterns and Mesh Modifiers on Fatigue Properties of 3D Printed Polymers, Int. J. Fatigue, 2024, 187, 108463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10846310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108463 ↗
36. A. Bagheri, M.S.A. Parast, A. Kami, M. Azadi, and V. Asghari, Fatigue Testing on Rotary Friction-Welded Joints Between Solid ABS and 3D-Printed PLA and ABS, Eur. J. Mech.-A/Solids, 2022, 96, 104713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.10471310.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104713 ↗
37. S. Hassanifard and K. Behdinan, Fatigue Response of Multiscale Extrusion-Based Additively Manufactured Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene-Graphene Nanoplatelets Composites, Compos. B Eng., 2024, 279, 111464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11146410.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111464 ↗
38. J.K. Sahu, R.K. Sahu, J.K. Katiyar, and P.S. Kiran, Optimisation of Process Parameters for Dimensional Stability in FDM, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J Process Mech. Eng., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408923120680010.1177/09544089231206800 ↗
39. S. Deshwal, A. Kumar, and D. Chhabra, Exercising Hybrid Statistical Tools GA-RSM, GA-ANN and GA-ANFIS to Optimize FDM Process Parameters for Tensile Strength Improvement, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 2020, 31, p 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.05.00910.1016/j.cirpj.2020.05.009 ↗
40. H.H. Abdulridha, T.F. Abbas, and A.S. Bedan, Predicting Mechanical Strength and Optimized Parameters in FDM-Printed Polylactic Acid Parts Via Artificial Neural Networks and Desirability Analysis, Manag. Syst. Prod. Eng. Sciendo, 2024, 32(3), p 428–437. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2024-004010.2478/mspe-2024-0040 ↗
41. A. Ahlawat, A. Phogat, M. Yadav, R.K. Sahdev, A.K. Dhingra, and D. Chhabra, Fabrication and Analysis of ABS-HDPE-PC Composite Polymer Filament Used for FDM Printing Using Hybrid Algorithm, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM), 2023, 17(6), p 3199–3209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01389-310.1007/s12008-023-01389-3 ↗
42. M.H. Dehghani, M. Mostofi, M. Alimohammadi, G. McKay, K. Yetilmezsoy, A.B. Albadarin, B. Heibati, M. AlGhouti, N.M. Mubarak, and J.N. Sahu, High-Performance Removal of Toxic Phenol by Single-Walled and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Kinetics, Adsorption, Mechanism and Optimization Studies, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2016, 35, p 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.12.01010.1016/j.jiec.2015.12.010 ↗
43. T. Shojaeimehr, F. Rahimpour, M.A. Khadivi, and M. Sadeghi, A Modeling Study by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) on Cu2+ Adsorption Optimization Using Light Expended Clay Aggregate (LECA), J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2014, 20(3), p 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.01710.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.017 ↗
44. G.E.P. Box and N.R. Draper, Empirical model-building and response surfaces, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 1987.
45. R.H. Hesas, A. Arami-Niya, W.M.A.W. Daud, and J.N. Sahu, Preparation of Granular Activated Carbon From Oil Palm Shell By Microwave-Induced Chemical Activation: Optimisation Using Surface Response Methodology, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2013, 91(12), p 2447–2456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.06.00410.1016/j.cherd.2013.06.004 ↗
46. I. Rojek, Technological Process Planning by the Use of Neural Networks, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 2017, 31(1), p 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089006041600014710.1017/S0890060416000147 ↗
47. D. Jiang, F. Ning, and Y. Wang, Additive Manufacturing of Biodegradable Iron-Based Particle Reinforced Polylactic Acid Composite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2021, 289, 116952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11695210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116952 ↗
48. C.M. Ferreira, C.M.S. Vicente, M. Sardinha, M. Leite, and L. Reis, Characterization of 3D Printed ABS Specimens Under Static and Cyclic Torsional Loadings, Proc. Struct. Integr., 2021, 34, p 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2021.12.03010.1016/j.prostr.2021.12.030 ↗