Constitutive Modeling of 17-4PH Stainless Steel Sheet at Elevated Temperature and Statistical Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
The tensile flow behavior of 17-4PH stainless steel sheet was investigated from 650 °C to 850 °C at strain rates of 10−4 to 10−1 s−1. The result indicates that work hardening and dynamic recovery are exhibited in the tensile test in the temperature lower than 750 °C, and a steady stage of stress occurs higher than 750 °C because of dynamic recrystallization. After a step-by-step procedure for data analysis in the hot tensile test, the original constitutive model was given. Considering the strain compensation, several revised constitutive models of Arrhenius-type were constructed with statistical optimization and multi-strain correction. The comparison shows perfect accurate flow predictions through multi-strain modified models. Meanwhile, the flow behavior of random conditions is predicted accurately by a single correction model with Tikhonov regularization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. F. Fantechi and M. Innocenti, Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking of Precipitation Hardening S.S. Impellers in Centrifugal Compressor. Laboratory Investigations and Corrective Actions, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2001, 8(5), p 477–49210.1016/S1350-6307(00)00044-3 ↗
2. M.R.T. Shoushtari, M.H. Moayed, and A. Davoodi, Post-weld Heat Treatment Influence on Galvanic Corrosion of GTAW, Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2011, 46(4), p 415–42410.1179/174327809X409259 ↗
3. C. Chung and Y. Tzeng, Effects of Aging Treatment on the Precipitation Behavior of ε-Cu Phase and Mechanical Properties of Metal Injection Molding 17-4PH Stainless Steel, Mater. Lett., 2019, 237, p 228–23110.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.107 ↗
4. F. Stachowicz, T. Trzepiecinski, and T. Pieja, Warm Forming of Stainless Steel Sheet, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2010, 10(4), p 85–9410.1016/S1644-9665(12)60034-X ↗
5. T. Trzepiecinski, T. Pieja, T. Malinowski et al., Investigation of 17-4PH Steel Microstructure and Conditions of Elevated Temperature Forming of Turbine Engine Strut, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2018, 252, p 191–20010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.026 ↗
6. T. Trzepiecinski, T. Malinowski, and T. Pieja, Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Industrial Warm Forming of Stainless Steel Sheet, J. Manuf. Process., 2017, 30, p 532–54010.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.028 ↗
7. M. Aghaie-Khafri, S.H.M. Anijdan, and M. Amirkamali, Microstructural Evolution Under Ausforming and Aging Conditions in 17-4 PH Stainless Steel, Mater. Res. Express, 2019, 6(10), p 10653210. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab37e110.1088/2053-1591/ab37e1 ↗
8. S.A. Razavi, F. Ashrafizadeh, and S. Fooladi, Prediction of Age Hardening Parameters for 17-4PH Stainless Steel by Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2016, 675, p 147–15210.1016/j.msea.2016.08.049 ↗
9. H. Mirzadeh and A. Najafizadeh, Aging Kinetics of 17-4 PH Stainless Steel, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2009, 116(1), p 119–12410.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.02.049 ↗
10. J. Wang, H. Zou, C. Li et al., The Effect of Microstructural Evolution on Hardening Behavior of Type 17-4PH Stainless Steel in Long-Term Aging at 350 °C, Mater. Charact., 2006, 57(4–5), p 274–28010.1016/j.matchar.2006.02.004 ↗
11. H.J. Mcqueen and N.D. Ryan, Constitutive Analysis in Hot Working, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2002, 322(1), p 43–6310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01117-0 ↗
12. W. Lee and C. Liu, The Effects of Temperature and Strain Rate on the Dynamic Flow Behaviour of Different Steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2006, 426(1–2), p 101–11310.1016/j.msea.2006.03.087 ↗
13. M. Zhou, Y.C. Lin, J. Deng et al., Hot Tensile Deformation Behaviors and Constitutive Model of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloy, Mater. Des., 2014, 59, p 141–15010.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.052 ↗
14. D. Samantaray, S. Mandal, A.K. Bhaduri et al., Analysis and Mathematical Modelling of Elevated Temperature Flow Behaviour of Austenitic Stainless Steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(4), p 1937–194310.1016/j.msea.2010.11.011 ↗
15. B. Mcdonald, H. Bornstein, A. Ameri et al., Plasticity and Ductile Fracture Behaviour of Four Armour Steels, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2019, 176–177, p 135–14910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.05.013 ↗
16. D.M. Umbrello, R. Saoubi, and J.C. Outeiro, The Influence of Johnson–Cook Material Constants on Finite Element Simulation of Machining of AISI, 316L Steel, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2007, 47(3), p 462–47010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.006 ↗
17. N. Haghdadi, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, and H.R. Abedi, The Flow Behavior Modeling of Cast A356 Aluminum Alloy at Elevated Temperatures Considering the Effect of Strain, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2012, 535, p 252–25710.1016/j.msea.2011.12.076 ↗
18. N. Kotkunde, H.N. Krishnamurthy, P. Puranik et al., Microstructure Study and Constitutive Modeling of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy at Elevated Temperatures, Mater. Des. (1980–2015), 2014, 54, p 96–10310.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.006 ↗
19. D. Samantaray, S. Mandal, and A.K. Bhaduri, A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Elevated Temperature Flow Behaviour in Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2009, 47(2), p 568–57610.1016/j.commatsci.2009.09.025 ↗
20. H. Li, Y. Li, X. Wang et al., A Comparative Study on Modified Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict the Hot Deformation Behavior in 28CrMnMoV Steel, Mater. Des., 2013, 49, p 493–50110.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.083 ↗
21. Y.C. Lin and X. Chen, A Combined Johnson-Cook and Zerilli-Armstrong Model for Hot Compressed Typical High-Strength Alloy Steel, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2010, 49(3), p 628–63310.1016/j.commatsci.2010.06.004 ↗
22. A.S. Khan and R.Q. Liang, Behaviors of Three BCC Metal Over a Wide Range of Strain Rates and Temperatures: Experiments and Modeling, Int. J. Plast., 1999, 15(10), p 1089–110910.1016/S0749-6419(99)00030-3 ↗
23. S. Dey, T. Borvik, O.S. Hopperstad et al., On the Influence of Constitutive Relation in Projectile Impact of Steel Plates, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2007, 34(3), p 464–48610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.10.003 ↗
24. A.M. Lennon and K.T. Ramesh, The Influence of Crystal Structure on the Dynamic Behavior of Materials at High Temperatures, Int. J. Plast., 2004, 20(2), p 269–29010.1016/S0749-6419(03)00037-8 ↗
25. A.K. Gupta, V.K. Anirudh, and S.K. Singh, Constitutive Models to Predict Flow Stress in Austenitic Stainless Steel 316 at Elevated Temperatures, Mater. Des., 2013, 43, p 410–41810.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.008 ↗
26. W. Wang, J. Zhao, R.X. Zhai, R. Ma, Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Model and Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior of 20Cr2Ni4A Alloy Carburizing Steel, Steel Res. Int., 2017, 88(3), p 1600196. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20160019610.1002/srin.201600196 ↗
27. L. Wang, F. Liu, J.J. Cheng et al., Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Model for High Temperature Flow Stress in a Nickel-Based Corrosion-Resistant Alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25(4), p 1394–140610.1007/s11665-016-1986-7 ↗
28. A. Cingara and H.J. Mcqueen, New Formula for Calculating Flow Curves from High Temperature Constitutive Data for 300 Austenitic Steels, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1992, 36(1), p 31–4210.1016/0924-0136(92)90236-L ↗
29. H. Li, L. He, G. Zhao et al., Constitutive Relationships of Hot Stamping Boron Steel B1500HS Based on the Modified Arrhenius and Johnson–Cook Model, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2013, 580, p 330–34810.1016/j.msea.2013.05.023 ↗
30. X. Guo, X. Weng, Y. Jiang et al., Effects of Temperature and Strain Rate on Tensile Deformation Behavior of 9Cr-0.5Mo-1.8W-VNb Ferritic Heat-Resistant Steel, High Temp. Mater. Process., 2017, 36(9), p 913–92010.1515/htmp-2016-0065 ↗
31. S.A. Krishnan, C. Phaniraj, C. Ravishankar et al., Prediction of High Temperature Flow Stress in 9Cr-1Mo Ferritic Steel During Hot Compression, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2011, 88(11–12), p 501–50610.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.07.009 ↗
32. Y.C. Lin, M. Chen, and J. Zhong, Constitutive Modeling for Elevated Temperature Flow Behavior of 42CrMo Steel, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2008, 42(3), p 470–47710.1016/j.commatsci.2007.08.011 ↗
33. S. Mandal, V. Rakesh, P.V. Sivaprasad et al., Constitutive Equations to Predict High Temperature Flow Stress in a Ti-Modified Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2009, 500(1–2), p 114–12110.1016/j.msea.2008.09.019 ↗
34. H. Mirzadeh, A. Najafizadeh, and M. Moazeny, Flow Curve Analysis of 17-4PH Stainless Steel under Hot Compression Test, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, 40(12), p 2950–295810.1007/s11661-009-0029-5 ↗
35. H. Mirzadeh, A Simplified Approach for Developing Constitutive Equations for Modeling and Prediction of Hot Deformation Flow Stress, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2015, 46(9), p 4027–403710.1007/s11661-015-3006-1 ↗
36. C.M. Sellars and W.J. Mctegart, On the Mechanism of Hot Deformation, Acta Metall., 1966, 14(9), p 1136–113810.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-0 ↗
37. Y. Cao, H. Di, R.D.K. Misra et al., On the Hot Deformation Behavior of AISI, 420 Stainless Steel Based on Constitutive Analysis and CSL Model, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2014, 593, p 111–11910.1016/j.msea.2013.11.030 ↗
38. A. Mirzaei, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, N. Haghdadi et al., Constitutive Description of High Temperature Flow Behavior of Sanicro-28 Super-Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2014, 589, p 76–8210.1016/j.msea.2013.09.036 ↗
39. E. Pu, H. Feng, M. Liu et al., Constitutive Modeling for Flow Behaviors of Superaustenitic Stainless Steel 532654 during Hot Deformation, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2016, 23(2), p 178–18410.1016/S1006-706X(16)30031-0 ↗
40. Y.Q. Jiang, Y.C. Lin, X.-Y. Zhang et al., Isothermal Tensile Deformation Behaviors and Fracture Mechanism of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe Alloy in β Phase Field, Vacuum, 2018, 156, p 187–19710.1016/j.vacuum.2018.07.034 ↗
41. Y.C. Lin, H. Yang, Y. Xin et al., Effects of Initial Microstructures on Serrated Flow Features and Fracture Mechanisms of a Nickel-Based Superalloy, Mater. Charact., 2018, 144, p 9–2110.1016/j.matchar.2018.06.029 ↗
42. Y. Wang, K. Song, Y. Zhang et al., Microstructure Evolution and Fracture Mechanism of H13 Steel During High Temperature Tensile Deformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2019, 746, p 127–13310.1016/j.msea.2019.01.027 ↗
43. F.A. Slooff, J. Zhou, J. Duszczyk et al., Constitutive Analysis of Wrought Magnesium Alloy Mg–Al4–Zn1, Scr. Mater., 2007, 57(8), p 759–76210.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.023 ↗
44. P.C. Hansen, Regularization Tools: A Matlab Package for Analysis and Solution of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems, Numer. Algorithms, 1994, 6(1), p 1–3510.1007/BF02149761 ↗