Investigation of the Effects of the Number of Shells, Raster Angle, Extrusion Ratio, and Path Width on Printed Polylactic Acid Parts with Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. V. Taşdemir, Investigation of Dimensional Integrity and Surface Quality of Different Thin-Walled Geometric Parts Produced via Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(5), p 3381–3387.10.1007/s11665-021-05809-x ↗
2. R. Gopi Mohan, K. Santhosh, R.V. Iyer, L.K. John, and M. Ramu, Comparitive Analysis of Mechanical Properties of FDM Printed Parts Based on Raster Angles, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 47, p 4730–4734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.64910.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.649 ↗
3. W.E. Frazier, Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23(6), p 1917–1928.10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
4. M. Galeja, A. Hejna, P. Kosmela, and A. Kulawik, Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed ABS as a Function of Raster Angle, Materials (Basel), 2020, 13(2), p 297.10.3390/ma13020297 ↗
5. B. Yermurat, Ö. Seçgin, and V. Taşdemir, Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing: Investigation of the Combined Use of ABS and PLA in the Same Structure, Mater. Test., 2023, 65(7), p 1119–1126. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-036810.1515/mt-2022-0368 ↗
6. M. Taşçı, M.U. Erdaş, M. Kopar, B.S. Yıldız, and A.R. Yıldız, Optimum Design of Additively Manufactured Aerospace Components with Different Lattice Structures, Mater. Test., 2024, 2024, p 66.
7. M. Eryildiz, Comparison of Notch Fabrication Methods on the Impact Strength of FDM-3D-Printed PLA Specimens, Mater. Test., 2023, 65(3), p 423–430.10.1515/mt-2022-0306 ↗
8. H. Dedeakayogulları and A. Kacal, Experimental Investigation of Hole Quality in Drilling of Additive Manufacturing Ti6Al4V Parts Produced by Hole Features, J. Manuf. Process., 2022, 79, p 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.03910.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.039 ↗
9. Ö. Seçgin, E. Arda, E. Ata, and H.A. Çelik, Dimensional Optimization of Additive Manufacturing Process, J. Chinese Soc. Mech. Eng., 2022, 43(1), p 75–78.
10. M.S. Kamer, Ş Temiz, H. Yaykaşli, A. Kaya, and O.E. Akay, Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Tensile Test Specimens Produced with ABS and PLA Material at Different Printing Speeds in 3D Printer, J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., 2022, 37(3), p 1197–1211.
11. C. Dileep, L. Jacob, C. Muhammed Shebeeb, U. Rehan, and B. Haider, Review of Vat Photopolymerization 3D Printing of Photonic Devices, Addit. Manuf., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.10418910.1016/j.addma.2024.104189 ↗
12. H. Sharifi, A. Adib, Z. Ahmadi, E. Gemikonakli, and M. Shahedi Asl, Taguchi Optimization of Mask Stereolithographic 3D Printing Parameters for Tensile Strengthening of Functionally Graded Resins, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., 2024.10.1007/s12008-024-01839-6 ↗
13. Y. Song, Y. Ghafari, A. Asefnejad, and D. Toghraie, An Overview of Selective Laser Sintering 3D Printing Technology for Biomedical and Sports Device Applications: Processes, Materials, and Applications, Opt. Laser Technol., 2024, 171, p 110459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.11045910.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110459 ↗
14. R.J.N. Joshua, S.A. Raj, M.T. Hameed Sultan, A. Łukaszewicz, J. Józwik, Z. Oksiuta, K. Dziedzic, A. Tofil, and F.S. Shahar, Powder Bed Fusion 3D Printing in Precision Manufacturing for Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review, Materials (Basel), 2024, 17(3), p 1–30.10.3390/ma17030769 ↗
15. K. Li, C. Ji, S. Bai, B. Jiang, and F. Pan, Selective Laser Melting of Magnesium Alloys: Necessity, Formability, Performance, Optimization and Applications, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2023, 154, p 65–93.10.1016/j.jmst.2022.12.053 ↗
16. R. Nandhakumar and K. Venkatesan, A Process Parameters Review on Selective Laser Melting-Based Additive Manufacturing of Single and Multi-Material: Microstructure, Physical Properties, Tribological, and Surface Roughness, Mater. Today Commun., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10553810.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105538 ↗
17. K. Aydin, M. Karamolla, İ Karaağaç, A. Kaçal, and H. Doğan, The Effect of Heat Treatment on Laser-Welding Performance of Additive Manufactured Ti6Al4V Sheets, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., 2023, 129(7), p 473.10.1007/s00339-023-06757-0 ↗
18. R. Gupta and A. Narasimhulu, A Critical Review of Process Parameters in Laminated Object Manufacturing Process, Adv. Mater. Eng. Manuf. Processes Select Proc. ICFTMM., 2023, 33(8), p 31–39.
19. M.R. Ayatollahi, A. Nabavi-Kivi, B. Bahrami, M. Yazid Yahya, and M.R. Khosravani, The Influence of In-Plane Raster Angle on Tensile and Fracture Strengths of 3D-Printed PLA Specimens, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2020, 237, p 107225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10722510.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107225 ↗
20. M. Kopar, M.U. Erdaş, and A.R. Yıldız, Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties of CF15PET and GF30PP Materials Produced with Different Raster Angles, Mater. Test., 2024, 66, p 847–855.10.1515/mt-2023-0226 ↗
21. C.P. Jiang, Y.C. Cheng, H.W. Lin, Y.L. Chang, T. Pasang, and S.Y. Lee, Optimization of FDM 3D Printing Parameters for High Strength PEEK Using the Taguchi Method and Experimental Validation, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2022, 28(7), p 1260–1271.10.1108/RPJ-07-2021-0166 ↗
22. L. Suárez and M. Domínguez, Sustainability and Environmental Impact of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Technologies, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 106(3–4), p 1267–1279.10.1007/s00170-019-04676-0 ↗
23. M.N. Nadagouda, M. Ginn, and V. Rastogi, A Review of 3D Printing Techniques for Environmental Applications, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng., 2020, 28, p 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.08.00210.1016/j.coche.2020.08.002 ↗
24. M. Gebler, A.J.M. SchootUiterkamp, and C. Visser, A Global Sustainability Perspective on 3D Printing Technologies, Energy Policy, 2014, 74(C), p 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.03310.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033 ↗
25. P. Ferretti, C. Leon-Cardenas, E. Ciotti, G.M. Santi, G. Donnici, and L. Frizziero, “FDM 3D Printing Parameters Optimization: The Key Role of Line Width,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, (Bangalore, India), 2021, p 921–929.10.46254/IN01.20210257 ↗
26. N. Mulcahy, K.J. O’Sullivan, A. O’Sullivan, and L. O’Sullivan, Preliminary Assessment on the Effects of Line Width, Layer Height and Orientation on Strength and Print Time for FDM Printing of Total Contact Casts for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Ann. 3D Print. Med., 2023, 11, p 100115.10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100115 ↗
27. W. Szot and M. Rudnik, Effect of the Number of Shells on Selected Mechanical Properties of Parts Manufactured by FDM/FFF Technology, Adv. Mater. Sci., 2024, 24(1), p 86–103.10.2478/adms-2024-0006 ↗
28. M. Hikmat, S. Rostam, and Y.M. Ahmed, Investigation of Tensile Property-Based Taguchi Method of PLA Parts Fabricated by FDM 3D Printing Technology, Results Eng., 2021, 11, p 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.10026410.1016/j.rineng.2021.100264 ↗
29. L. Yang, S. Li, Y. Li, M. Yang, and Q. Yuan, Experimental Investigations for Optimizing the Extrusion Parameters on FDM PLA Printed Parts, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28(1), p 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3784-x10.1007/s11665-018-3784-x ↗
30. N. Beattie, N. Bock, T. Anderson, T. Edgeworth, T. Kloss, and J. Swanson, Effects of Build Orientation on Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling Parts, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(7), p 5059–5065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05624-410.1007/s11665-021-05624-4 ↗
31. A.M. Appusamy, S. Karuppan, M. Subramaniyan, and B.A. Chinnappan, The Influence of Filler and FDM Printing Parameters on the Strength of PLA, Polimery, 2024, 69(2), p 92–102.10.14314/polimery.2024.2.3 ↗
32. M. Kopar and A.R. Yildiz, Experimental Investigation of Mechanical Properties of PLA, ABS, and PETG 3-d Printing Materials Using Fused Deposition Modeling Technique, Mater. Test., 2023, 65(12), p 1795–1804. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-020210.1515/mt-2023-0202 ↗
33. H.K. Dave, A.R. Prajapati, S.R. Rajpurohit, N.H. Patadiya, and H.K. Raval, Investigation on Tensile Strength and Failure Modes of FDM Printed Part Using In-House Fabricated PLA Filament, Adv. Mater. Process. Technol., 2022, 8(1), p 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.182995110.1080/2374068X.2020.1829951 ↗
34. J. Butt, R. Bhaskar and V. Mohaghegh, Investigating the Effects of Extrusion Temperatures and Material Extrusion Rates on FFF-Printed Thermoplastics, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, 117(9–10), p 2679–2699.10.1007/s00170-021-07850-5 ↗
35. S. Mahmood, A.J. Qureshi, and D. Talamona, Taguchi Based Process Optimization for Dimension and Tolerance Control for Fused Deposition Modelling, Addit. Manuf., 2018, 21, p 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.00910.1016/j.addma.2018.03.009 ↗
36. J. Butt, R. Bhaskar, and V. Mohaghegh, Investigating the Influence of Material Extrusion Rates and Line Widths on FFF-Printed Graphene-Enhanced PLA, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2022, 6(3), p 57.