Quantitative Characterization of Metal Powder Morphology, Size Distribution, and Flowability for Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
The properties of the powder utilized in powder bed-based additive manufacturing are crucial in determining both the process parameters and the final quality of the fabricated components. Therefore, it is essential to assess powder characteristics, particularly particle morphology, size distribution (PSD), and rheological properties. This study aims to quantitatively characterize the PSD, morphology, and flowability of metal powders commonly used in additive manufacturing, such as AlSi10Mg, Inconel-718, Ti6Al4V, titanium, and stainless steel. To achieve this, we utilize a range of PSD models to accurately fit the measured size distributions based on volume and number, followed by conducting statistical analyses to determine the best-fitting models. Furthermore, we conducted a shape analysis using the elliptic Fourier series to characterize particle morphology quantitatively. Additionally, we examined the correlations between the powder rheological properties, measured by a Hall flowmeter, tapped density tester, and FT4 powder rheometer, and the PSD and shape indices using Spearman`s coefficient test.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. N. Tuncer, and A. Bose, Solid-State Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review, JOM, 2020, 72, p 3090–3111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04260-y10.1007/s11837-020-04260-y ↗
2. P. Gradl, D.C. Tinker, A. Park, O.R. Mireles, M. Garcia, R. Wilkerson and Ch. Mckinney, Robust Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development for Aerospace Components, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31, p 6013–6044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06850-010.1007/s11665-022-06850-0 ↗
3. T.S. Jang, D.E. Kim, G. Han, C.B. Yoon and H.D. Jung, Powder Based Additive Manufacturing for Biomedical Application of Titanium and its Alloys: A Review, Biomed. Eng. Lett., 2020, 10, p 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-020-00177-210.1007/s13534-020-00177-2 ↗
4. A. Strondl, O. Lyckfeldt, H. Brodin and U. Ackelid, Characterization and Control of Powder Properties for Additive Manufacturing, JOM, 2015, 67, p 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1304-0(2015)10.1007/s11837-015-1304-0(2015) ↗
5. M. Mitterlehner, H. Danninger, Ch. Gierl-Mayer, H. Gschiel, C. Martinez, M. Tomisser, M. Schatz, S. Senck, J. Auer and C. Benigni, Comparative Evaluation of Characterization Methods for Powders Used in Additive Manufacturing, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30, p 7019–7034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06113-410.1007/s11665-021-06113-4 ↗
6. S.K. Kennedy, A.M. Dalley and G.J. Kotyk, Additive Manufacturing: Assessing Metal Powder Quality Through Characterizing Feedstock and Contaminants, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 728–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3841-510.1007/s11665-018-3841-5 ↗
7. D. Sassaman, T. Phillips, C. Milroy, M. Ide and J. Beaman, A Method for Predicting Powder Flowability for Selective Laser Sintering, JOM, 2022, 74, p 1102–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-05050-w10.1007/s11837-021-05050-w ↗
8. J. Zegzulka, D. Gelnar, L. Jezerska, R. Prokes and J. Rozbroj, Characterization and Flowability Methods for Metal Powders, Sci. Rep., 2020, 10, p 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77974-310.1038/s41598-020-77974-3 ↗
9. I.E. Anderson, E.M.H. White and R. Dehoff, Feedstock Powder Processing Research Needs for Additive Manufacturing Development, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mat. Sci., 2018, 22, p 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2018.01.00210.1016/j.cossms.2018.01.002 ↗
10. P. Avrampos and G.C. Vosniakos, A Review of Powder Deposition in Additive Manufacturing by Powder Bed Fusion, J. Manuf. Process., 2022, 74, p 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.02110.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.021 ↗
11. K. Kikuchi, Y. Tanifuji, W. Zhou, N. Nomura and A. Kawasaki, Experimental Characterization and Computational Simulation of Powder Bed for Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Trans., 2022, 63, p 931–938. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MT-Y202100510.2320/matertrans.MT-Y2021005 ↗
12. R. Groarke, C. Danilenkoff, S. Karam, E. McCarthy, B. Michel, A. Mussatto, J. Sloane, A. O’Neill, R. Raghavendra and D. Brabazon, 316L Stainless Steel Powders for Additive Manufacturing: Relationships of Powder Rheology, Size, Size Distribution to Part Properties, Mater., 2020, 13(23), p 5537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1323553710.3390/ma13235537 ↗
13. A. Averardi, C. Cola, S.E. Zeltmann and N. Gupta, Effect of Particle Size Distribution on the Packing of Powder Beds: A Critical Discussion Relevant to Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Today Commun., 2020, 24, p 100964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10096410.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100964 ↗
14. W.A. de Morais, E.R. Nunes, D.L. Bayerlein, R.B. Falcao, E. Sallica-Leva, H.R. Oliveira, V.L. Chastinet and F.J. Landgraf, Comparing Spherical and Irregularly Shaped Powders in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Nb47Ti Alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(9), p 6557–6567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05916-910.1007/s11665-021-05916-9 ↗
15. V. Seyda, D. Herzog and C. Emmelmann, Relationship Between Powder Characteristics and Part Properties in Laser Beam Melting of Ti–6AL–4V, and Implications on Quality, J. Laser Appl., 2017, 29, p 022311. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.498324010.2351/1.4983240 ↗
16. C. Vipulanandan and H.G. Ozgurel, Simplified Relationships for Particle-Size Distribution and Permeation Groutability Limits for Soils, J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., 2009, 135, p 1190–1197. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.000006410.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000064 ↗
17. H. Bayat, M. Rastgou, A. Nemes, M. Mansourizadeh and P. Zamani, Mathematical Models for Soil Particle-Size Distribution and Their Overall and Fraction-Wise Fitting to Measurements, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 2017, 68, p 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.1242310.1111/ejss.12423 ↗
18. L. Colorado-Arango, J.M. Menéndez-Aguado and A. Osorio-Correa, Particle Size Distribution Models for Metallurgical Coke Grinding Products, Metals, 2021, 11, p 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1108128810.3390/met11081288 ↗
19. Y. Liu, X.H. Zhao, Y.J. Lai, Q.X. Wang, L.M. Lei and S.J. Liang, A Brief Introduction to the Selective Laser Melting of Ti6Al4V Powders by Supreme-Speed Plasma Rotating Electrode Process, Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int., 2020, 30, p 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2019.12.00410.1016/j.pnsc.2019.12.004 ↗
20. C. Meier, R. Weissbach, J. Weinberg, W.A. Wall and A.J. Hart, Critical Influences of Particle Size and Adhesion on the Powder Layer Uniformity in Metal Additive Manufacturing, J. Mat. Res. Technol., 2019, 266, p 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.03710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.037 ↗
21. S.A. Farzadfar, M.J. Murtagh and N. Venugopal, Impact of In718 Bimodal Powder Size Distribution on the Performance and Productivity of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process, Powder Technol., 2020, 375, p 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.07.09210.1016/j.powtec.2020.07.092 ↗
22. Z.Y. Han, P.X. Zhang, L.M. Lei, S.J. Liang, Q.X. Wang, Y.J. Lai and J.S. Li, Morphology and Particle Analysis of the Ni3Al-based Spherical Powders Manufactured by Supreme-speed Plasma Rotating Electrode Process, J. Mat. Res. Technol., 2020, 9, p 13937–13944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.10210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.102 ↗
23. J.H. Tan, W.L.E. Wong and K.W. Dalgarno, An Overview of Powder Granulometry on Feedstock and Part Performance in the Selective Laser Melting Process, dit, Manuf., 2017, 18, p 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.01110.1016/j.addma.2017.10.011 ↗
24. A. Mussatto, R. Groarke, A. O’Neill, M.A. Obeidi, Y. Delaure and D. Brabazon, Influences of Powder Morphology and Spreading Parameters on the Powder Bed Topography Uniformity in Powder Bed Fusion Metal Additive Manufacturing, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 38, p 101807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10180710.1016/j.addma.2020.101807 ↗
25. P. Kiani, U.S. Bertoli, A.D. Dupuy, K. Ma and J.M. Schoenung, A Statistical Analysis of Powder Flowability in Metal Additive Manufacturing, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2020, 22, p 2000022.10.1002/adem.202000022 ↗
26. D. Chen, B. Liu, W. Xu, C. Zhang, E. Guo, J. Lu, G. Sun, Y. Pan, J. Zhang and X. Lu, Effect of Particle Morphology on the Flowability of HDH Ti Powders Treated by High Temperature Ball Milling, Adv. Powder Technol., 2022, 33, p 103803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2022.10380310.1016/j.apt.2022.103803 ↗
27. P. Muthuswamy, Influence of Powder Characteristics on Properties of Parts Manufactured by Metal Additive Manufacturing, Lasers Manuf. Mater. Process., 2022, 9, p 312–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40516-022-00177-310.1007/s40516-022-00177-3 ↗
28. L. Xiong, A.C. Chuang, J. Thomas, T. Prost, E. White, I. Anderson and D. Singh, Defect and Satellite Characteristics of Additive Manufacturing Metal Powders, Adv. Powder Technol., 2022, 33, 103486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2022.10348610.1016/j.apt.2022.103486 ↗
29. A. Nouri and A. Sola, Metal Particle Shape: A Practical Perspective, Met. Powder Rep., 2018, 73, p 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mprp.2018.04.00110.1016/j.mprp.2018.04.001 ↗
30. L.C. Zhang, W.Y. Xu, Z. Li, L. Zheng, Y.F. Liu and G.Q. Zhang, Characterization of Particle Shape of Nickel-Based Superalloy Powders Using Image Processing Techniques, Powder Technol., 2022, 395, p 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.10.01310.1016/j.powtec.2021.10.013 ↗
31. P.M. Raj and W.R. Cannon, 2-D Particle Shape Averaging and Comparison Using Fourier Descriptors, Powder Technol., 1999, 104, p 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00046-710.1016/S0032-5910(99)00046-7 ↗
32. K. Shinohara, M. Oida and B. Golman, Effect of Particle Shape on Angle of Internal Friction by Triaxial Compression Test, Powder Technol., 2000, 107, p 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-5910(99)00179-510.1016/s0032-5910(99)00179-5 ↗
33. T. Ueda, Reproducibility of the Repose Angle, Porosity, and Coordination Number of Particles Generated by Spherical Harmonic-Based Principal Component Analysis Using Discrete Element Simulation, Powder Technol., 2023, 415, p 118143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.11814310.1016/j.powtec.2022.118143 ↗
34. L. Cordova, M. Campos and T. Tinga, Revealing the Effects of Powder Reuse for Selective Laser Melting by Powder Characterization, Jom, 2019, 71(3), p 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-3305-210.1007/s11837-018-3305-2 ↗
35. J.S. Weaver, J. Whiting, V. Tondare, C. Beauchamp, M. Peltz, J. Tarr, T.Q. Phan and M.A. Donmez, The Effects of Particle Size Distribution on the Rheological Properties of the Powder and the Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured 17–4 PH Stainless Steel, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 39, p 101851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10185110.1016/j.addma.2021.101851 ↗
36. M.A. Kaleem, M.Z. Alam, M. Khan, S.H.I. Jaffery and B. Rashid, An Experimental Investigation on Accuracy of Hausner Ratio and Carr Index of Powders in Additive Manufacturing Processes, Met. Powder Rep., 2021, 76, p S50–S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mprp.2020.06.06110.1016/j.mprp.2020.06.061 ↗
37. Y. Tan, J. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Xu and C.Y. Wu, Comprehensive Evaluation of Powder Flowability for Additive Manufacturing using Principal Component Analysis, Powder Technol., 2021, 393, p 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.06910.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.069 ↗
38. M. Habibnejad-korayem, J. Zhang and Y. Zou, Effect of Particle Size Distribution on the Flowability of Plasma Atomized Ti-6Al-4V Powders, Powder Technol., 2021, 392, p 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.02610.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.026 ↗
39. C.A. Schneider, W.S. Rasband and K.W. Eliceiri, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis, Nat. Methods, 2012, 9, p 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
40. H. Du, H. Lu, J. Tang and H. Liu, Characterization of Powder Flow Properties from Micron to Nanoscale Using FT4 Powder Rheometer and PT-X Powder Tester, Particuology, 2023, 75, p 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2022.05.01410.1016/j.partic.2022.05.014 ↗
41. R.E. Freeman, J.R. Cooke and L.C.R. Schneider, Measuring Shear Properties and Normal Stresses Generated within a Rotational Shear Cell for Consolidated and Nonconsolidated Powders, Powder Technol., 2009, 190, p 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2008.04.08410.1016/j.powtec.2008.04.084 ↗
42. T. Shibata, B. Golman, K. Shinohara, M. Otani and T. Uchiyama, Profile Analysis of Surfaces Lapped with Diamond Particles of Several Shapes, Wear, 2003, 254, p 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00251-510.1016/S0043-1648(03)00251-5 ↗
43. S. Nukiyama and Y. Tanasawa, Experiments on the Atomization of Liquids in an Air Stream, Trans. Soc. Mech. Eng. Jpn., 1939, 5, p 62–67.
44. A.H. Lefebvre and V.G. McDonell, Atomization and Sprays, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017, p 57–5810.1201/9781315120911 ↗
45. M. Alderliesten and M. Alderliesten, Mean Particle Diameters. Part VII. The Rosin-Rammler Size Distribution: Physical and Mathematical Properties and Relationships to Moment-Ratio Defined Mean Particle Diameters, Part. Part. Syst. Charact., 2013, 30, p 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/PPSC.20120002110.1002/PPSC.201200021 ↗
46. C.A. Dunbar and A.J. Hickey, Evaluation of Probability Density Functions to Approximate Particle Size Distributions of Representative Pharmaceutical Aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 2000, 31, p 813–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00557-110.1016/S0021-8502(99)00557-1 ↗
47. S.S. Yoon, Droplet Distributions at the Liquid Core of a Turbulent Spray, Phys. Fluids, 2005, 17, p 035103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.185257710.1063/1.1852577 ↗
48. T.A. Reddy and C. Garlapati, Dimensionless Empirical Model to Correlate Pharmaceutical Compound Solubility in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide, Chem. Eng. Technol., 2019, 42, p 2621–2630. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.20190028310.1002/ceat.201900283 ↗
49. G.K. Rajahmundry, C. Garlapati, P.S. Kumar, R.S. Alwi and D.V.N. Vo, Statistical Analysis of Adsorption Isotherm Models and Its Appropriate Selection, Chemosphere, 2021, 276, p 130176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.202110.1016/j.chemosphere.2021 ↗
50. A. Mostafaei, P.R. Vecchis, I. Nettleship and M. Chmielus, Effect of Powder Size Distribution on Densification and Microstructural Evolution of Binder-Jet 3D-Printed Alloy 625, Mater. Des., 2019, 162, p 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.05110.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.051 ↗
51. C.F. Gao, Z.Y. Xiao, H.P. Zou, Z.Q. Liu, J. Chen, S.K. Li and D.T. Zhang, Characterization of Spherical AlSi10Mg Powder Produced by Double-Nozzle Gas Atomization using Different Parameters, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2019, 29, p 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(19)64947-210.1016/S1003-6326(19)64947-2 ↗
52. P. Sun, Z.Z. Fang, Y. Zhang and Y. Xia, Review of the Methods for Production of Spherical Ti and Ti Alloy Powder, Jom, 2017, 69, p 1853–1860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2513-510.1007/s11837-017-2513-5 ↗
53. G.S. Altug-Peduk, S. Dilibal, O. Harrysson, S. Ozbek and H. West, Characterization of Ni–Ti Alloy Powders for Use in Additive Manufacturing, Russ. J. Non-Ferr. Met., 2018, 59, p 433–439. https://doi.org/10.3103/S106782121804003X10.3103/S106782121804003X ↗
54. F. Marinucci, A. Aversa, D. Manfredi, M. Lombardi and P. Fino, Evaluation of a Laboratory-Scale Gas-Atomized AlSi10Mg Powder and a Commercial-Grade Counterpart for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Processing, Mater., 2022, 15(21), p 7565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1521756510.3390/ma15217565 ↗
55. K. Riener, N. Albrecht, S. Ziegelmeier, R. Ramakrishnan, L. Haferkamp, A.B. Spierings and G.J. Leichtfried, Influence of Particle Size Distribution and Morphology on the Properties of the Powder Feedstock as well as of AlSi10Mg Parts Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF), Addit. Manuf., 2020, 34, p 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10128610.1016/j.addma.2020.101286 ↗
56. G. Yablokova, M. Speirs, J. Van Humbeeck, J.P. Kruth, J. Schrooten, R. Cloots, F. Boschini, G. Lumay and J. Luyten, Rheological Behavior of β-Ti and NiTi Powders Produced by Atomization for SLM Production of Open Porous Orthopedic Implants, Powder Technol., 2015, 283, p 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.05.01510.1016/j.powtec.2015.05.015 ↗
57. A.B. Spierings, M. Voegtlin, T. Bauer and K. Wegener, Powder Flowability Characterisation Methodology for Powder-Bed-Based Metal Additive Manufacturing, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2016, 1, p 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-015-0001-410.1007/s40964-015-0001-4 ↗
58. F. Chu, K. Zhang, H. Shen, M. Liu, W. Huang, X. Zhang, E. Liang, Z. Zhou, L. Lei, J. Hou and A. Huang, Influence of Satellite and Agglomeration of Powder on the Processability of AlSi10Mg Powder in Laser Powder Bed Fusion, J. Mat. Res., 2021, 11, p 2059–2073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.01510.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.015 ↗
59. S.E. Brika, M. Letenneur, C.A. Dion and V. Brailovski, Influence of Particle Morphology and Size Distribution on the Powder Flowability and Laser Powder Bed Fusion Manufacturability of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 31, p 100929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10092910.1016/j.addma.2019.100929 ↗
60. D. Langlais, V. Demers and V. Brailovski, Rheology of Dry Powders and Metal Injection Molding Feedstocks Formulated on their Base, Powder Technol., 2022, 396, p 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.10.03910.1016/j.powtec.2021.10.039 ↗