Prediction of Surface Microstructure, Grain Size, Martensite Content, and Microhardness of 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel in Surface Mechanical Grinding Treatment Process
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface mechanical grinding treatment (SMGT) is a promising surface strengthening technique by exerting gradient microstructure, phase transformation, and work hardening on the surface layer. However, due to the large strain and high strain rate, it is difficult to evaluate the microstructure attributes of the SMGT-processed surface. In the present work, an analytical model is developed to correlate the SMGT processing parameters to the surface microstructure, grain size, martensite content, and microhardness. Firstly, the processing force and distributions of stress and strain are identified by developing a multi-physics framework for SMGT process. Afterward, the surface grain refinement induced by dynamic recrystallization (DRX) is modeled by cellular automata (CA) method. The grain size along with the depth of cross section is predicted by Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov (JMAK) DRX model. The martensite content is evaluated according to the strain-induced martensitic transformation kinetics. Ultimately, accounting for both microstructure alteration and phase transformation, the microhardness variation is predicted. To verify the results derived by analytical model, series of confirmatory experiments were carried out on 316L austenitic stainless steel. The SEM was utilized to observe the surface microstructure of the processed samples. The martensitic transformation was characterized by EBSD and XRD methods. The microhardness measurements were taken on an automatic Vickers hardness tester. It was obtained from the results that the surface microstructure, gradient grain size, phase content, and microhardness distribution derived from predictive model were consistent well with the experimental measurements. The confirmed simulation model is further utilized to understand how the process factors, i.e., ball size and penetration depth, influence the evolution of microstructure. It is found that the finer grain structure, higher martensite content, and microhardness can be obtained by adopting smaller ball and larger penetration depth.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. T. Nairong and L. Ke, Preparation Techniques for Nano-Structured Metallic Materials via Plastic Deformation, Acta Metall. Sin., 2014, 50(2), p 141–147.
2. C. Sun, Y. Hong, S. Xiu, L. Ma, D. Wang, C. Xu and W. Feng, Surface Strengthening Mechanism of the Active Grinding Carburization, Tribol. Int., 2023, 185, p 108569.10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108569 ↗
3. Y. Sun, Z. Luo, X. Li and K. Lu, Effects of Stacking Fault Energy on Deformation Induced Grain Boundary Relaxation in Nanograined Cu Alloys, Acta Mater., 2022, 239, p 118256.10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118256 ↗
4. H. Zhang, K. Shen, J. Lan, S. Xu, H. Chen, A. Fu, J. Lin, H. Cao and G. Zheng, Surface Nanocrystallization and Biomedical Performance of Ti-Ta Laminated Composite Processed by Surface Mechanical Grinding Treatment, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2023, 623, p 157051.10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157051 ↗
5. H. Kai, L. Xiaoqiang, L. Xiaochun, Z. Jinxin, H. Weiwei and C. Junzhou, Integrated Modeling of the Gradient Structure Evolution During Surface Mechanical Grinding Treatment: Formation Mechanism and Mechanical Properties, Mater. Des., 2023, 230, p 111979.10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111979 ↗
6. X. Chen, Z. Han and K. Lu, Friction and Wear Reduction in Copper with a gradient Nano-Grained Surface Layer, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10(16), p 13829–13838.10.1021/acsami.8b01205 ↗
7. P. Wang, Z. Han and K. Lu, Enhanced Tribological Performance of a Gradient Nanostructured Interstitial-Free Steel, Wear, 2018, 402, p 100–108.10.1016/j.wear.2018.02.010 ↗
8. A.A. Tiamiyu, E.L. Pang, X. Chen, J.M. LeBeau, K.A. Nelson and C.A. Schuh, Nanotwinning-Assisted Dynamic Recrystallization at High Strains and Strain Rates, Nat. Mater., 2022, 21(7), p 786–794.10.1038/s41563-022-01250-0 ↗
9. R. Goetz and V. Seetharaman, Modeling Dynamic Recrystallization Using Cellular Automata, Scr. Mater., 1998, 38(3), p 405–413.10.1016/S1359-6462(97)00500-9 ↗
10. R. Ding and Z. Guo, Coupled Quantitative Simulation of Microstructural Evolution and Plastic Flow During Dynamic Recrystallization, Acta Mater., 2001, 49(16), p 3163–3175.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00233-6 ↗
11. L. Wang, G. Fang and L. Qian, Modeling of Dynamic Recrystallization of Magnesium Alloy Using Cellular Automata Considering Initial Topology of Grains, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2018, 711, p 268–283.10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.024 ↗
12. M. Fanfoni and M. Tomellini, The Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kohnogorov Model: A Brief Review, Il Nuovo Cimento D, 1998, 20, p 1171–1182.10.1007/BF03185527 ↗
13. C. Yang, X. Jiang, W. Zhang and X. Wang, Enhancing Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of Machined Surface via Surface Mechanical Grinding Treatment for AISI 316 L Stainless Steel, Mater. Charact., 2022, 194, p 112493.10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112493 ↗
14. R. Zaera, J.A. Rodríguez-Martínez, A. Casado, J. Fernandez-Saez, A. Rusinek and R. Pesci, A Constitutive Model for Analyzing Martensite Formation in Austenitic Steels Deforming at High Strain Rates, Int. J. Plast., 2012, 29, p 77–101.10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.08.003 ↗
15. H.C. Shin, T.K. Ha and Y.W. Chang, Kinetics of Deformation Induced Martensitic Transformation in a 304 Stainless Steel, Scr. Mater., 2001, 45(7), p 823–829.10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01101-0 ↗
16. T. Angel, Formation of Martensite in Austenitic Stainless Steels Effects of Deformation, Temperature, and Composition, J. Iron Steel Inst., 1954, 177, p 165–174.
17. M. Naghizadeh and H. Mirzadeh, Modeling the Kinetics of Deformation-Induced Martensitic Transformation in AISI 316 Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel, Vacuum, 2018, 157, p 243–248.10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.08.066 ↗
18. T. Özel and Y. Arisoy, Experimental and Numerical Investigations on Machining Induced Surface Integrity in Inconel-100 Nickel-Base Alloy, Procedia CIRP, 2014, 13, p 302–307.10.1016/j.procir.2014.04.051 ↗
19. H.T. Wang, N.R. Tao and K. Lu, Architectured Surface Layer with a Gradient Nanotwinned Structure in a Fe–Mn Austenitic Steel, Scr. Mater., 2013, 68(1), p 22–27.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.05.041 ↗
20. C. Sun, S. Xiu, Y. Hong, X. Kong and Y. Lu, Prediction on Residual Stress with Mechanical-Thermal and Transformation Coupled in DGH, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2020, 179, p 105629.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105629 ↗
21. M. Liu, J.-Y. Lin, C. Lu, K.A. Tieu, K. Zhou and T. Koseki, Progress in Indentation Study of Materials via Both Experimental and Numerical Methods, Crystals, 2017, 7(10), p 258.10.3390/cryst7100258 ↗
22. K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
23. Z. Pan, Y. Feng, X. Ji and S.Y. Liang, Turning Induced Residual Stress Prediction of AISI 4130 Considering Dynamic Recrystallization, Mach. Sci. Technol., 2018, 22(3), p 507–521.10.1080/10910344.2017.1365900 ↗
24. A. Franco Jr. and S. Roberts, Surface Mechanical Analyses by Hertzian Indentation, Cerâmica, 2004, 50, p 94–108.10.1590/S0366-69132004000200005 ↗
25. Y. Hua, Z. Liu, B. Wang and J. Jiang, Residual Stress Regenerated on Low Plasticity Burnished Inconel 718 Surface After Initial Turning Process, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404506010.1115/1.4045060 ↗
26. J. Rychlewski, On Hooke’s Law, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1984, 48(3), p 303–314.10.1016/0021-8928(84)90137-0 ↗
27. W. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Hu and S. Wang, Predictive Modelling of Microstructure Changes, Micro-Hardness and Residual Stress in Machining of 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2018, 130–131, p 36–48.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.03.008 ↗
28. J.-C. Su, Residual stress modeling in machining processes. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2006
29. D. McDowell, An Approximate Algorithm for Elastic-Plastic Two-Dimensional Rolling/Sliding Contact, Wear, 1997, 211(2), p 237–246.10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00117-8 ↗
30. U. Kocks and H. Mecking, Physics and Phenomenology of Strain Hardening: The FCC Case, Prog. Mater Sci., 2003, 48(3), p 171–273.10.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-8 ↗
31. H. Mecking and U. Kocks, Kinetics of Flow and Strain-Hardening, Acta Metall., 1981, 29(11), p 1865–1875.10.1016/0001-6160(81)90112-7 ↗
32. H. Ji, Microstructure Prediction of 316LN Stainless Steel for Dynamic Recrystallization based on Cellular Automata Method, Ph. D. Thesis, (2013)
33. T. Takaki, A. Yamanaka and Y. Tomita, Multi-Phase-Field Simulations of Dynamic Recrystallization During Transient Deformation, ISIJ Int., 2011, 51(10), p 1717–1723.10.2355/isijinternational.51.1717 ↗
34. M. Qian and Z. Guo, Cellular Automata Simulation of Microstructural Evolution During Dynamic Recrystallization of an HY-100 Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 365(1–2), p 180–185.10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.025 ↗
35. E.I. Poliak and J. Jonas, A One-Parameter Approach to Determining the Critical Conditions for the Initiation of Dynamic Recrystallization, Acta Mater., 1996, 44(1), p 127–136.10.1016/1359-6454(95)00146-7 ↗
36. H. Pd, A Mathematical Model to Predict the Mechanical Properties of Hot Rolled C-Mn and Microalloyed Steels, ISIJ Int., 1992, 32(12), p 1329–1338.10.2355/isijinternational.32.1329 ↗
37. M. Pa, K. Lim, R. Ad and Y. Lee, Computational Exploration of Microstructural Evolution in a Medium C-Mn Steel and Applications to Rod Mill, ISIJ Int., 2003, 43(9), p 1421–1430.10.2355/isijinternational.43.1421 ↗
38. C. Sellars, Hot Rolling and Forming Processes,' edited by CM Sellars and GJ Davies, Met. Soc., London, (1980)
39. J.W. Christian, The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, Newnes, Southampton, 2002.
40. H. Mirzadeh and A. Najafizadeh, Aging Kinetics of 17–4 PH Stainless Steel, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2009, 116(1), p 119–124.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.02.049 ↗
41. H. Mirzadeh, J. Cabrera, A. Najafizadeh and P. Calvillo, EBSD Study of a Hot Deformed Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 538(236), p 245.
42. H. Ding and Y.C. Shin, Multi-Physics Modeling and Simulations of Surface Microstructure Alteration in Hard Turning, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2013, 213(6), p 877–886.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.016 ↗
43. M. Eskandari, A. Najafizadeh and A. Kermanpur, Effect of Strain-Induced Martensite on the Formation of Nanocrystalline 316L Stainless Steel After Cold Rolling and Annealing, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 519(12), p 46–50.10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.038 ↗
44. M. Naghizadeh and H. Mirzadeh, Microstructural Evolutions During Annealing of Plastically Deformed AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel: Martensite Reversion, Grain Refinement, Recrystallization, and Grain Growth, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2016, 47, p 4210–4216.10.1007/s11661-016-3589-1 ↗
45. M. Naghizadeh and H. Mirzadeh, Microstructural Evolutions During Reversion Annealing of Cold-Rolled AISI 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2018, 49, p 2248–2256.10.1007/s11661-018-4583-6 ↗
46. D. Umbrello, R. M’saoubi and J. Outeiro, The Influence of Johnson–Cook Material Constants on Finite Element Simulation of Machining of AISI 316L Steel, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2007, 47(3–4), p 462–470.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.006 ↗