journal article·2024-01

Hot Deformation Characteristics of 2024 Aluminum Alloy

Fuwei Kang, Jinlong Lu, Enhao Wang, Bing Wang, Shangzhuo Li, Xianyong Wang, Wei Jiang

Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, the isothermal thermal compression simulation test of 2024 aluminum alloy was carried out. The deformation temperature is 573-723 K, the strain rate is 0.01-10 s−1, and the deformation amount is 50%. The experimental results show that the change of flow stress is inversely proportional to the deformation temperature, but directly proportional to the strain rate. OM and TEM were used to observe the microstructure after thermal deformation, the increase of temperature and the decrease of strain rate contribute to the formation of recrystallization and the decrease of dislocation density, which is the main reason for dynamic softening. The thermal deformation activation energy of 2024 aluminum alloy is 201.62 kJ/mol. The experimental peak stress constitutive model is in good agreement with the calculated value. Based on the Prasad instability model and the dynamic material model, the hot working diagram of 2024 aluminum alloy is established to construct the true strain of 50%. The ideal deformation conditions are the deformation temperature of 573-673 K and strain rate of 0.01-0.1 s−1.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. J.G. Tang, X.X. Huang, and X.M. Zhang, Hot-Compression Behavior of Al Alloy 5182 Prediction of Limit Strains in Hot Forming of Aluminium Alloy Sheets, J. Cent. South Univ., 2012, 2073, p 19.
2. J.D. Bressan, S. Bruschi, and A. Ghiotti, Prediction of Limit Strains in Hot Forming of Aluminium Alloy Sheets, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2016, 115, p 702–710.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.040 ↗
3. S. Kamrani, A. Simchi, R. Riedel, and S. Reihani, Analysis and Porthole Die Design for A Multi-Hole Extrusion Process of A Hollow, Thin-Walled Aluminum Profile, Powder Metall., 2007, 50, p 276–282.10.1179/174329007X189621 ↗
4. Y.C. Lin, Y.C. Xia, Y.Q. Jiang, H.M. Zhou, and L.T. Li, Precipitation Hardening of 2024–T3 Aluminum Alloy During Creep Aging, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 565, p 420–429.10.1016/j.msea.2012.12.058 ↗
5. J.C. Shao, B.L. Xiao, Q.Z. Wang, Z.Y. Ma, Y. Liu, and K. Yang, Constitutive Flow Behavior and Hot Workability of Powder Metallurgy Processed 20 vol.%SiCP/2024Al Composite, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2010, 527, p 7865–7872.10.1016/j.msea.2010.08.080 ↗
6. M.R. Rokni, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, C.A. Widener, and P. Changizian, The Strain-Compensated Constitutive Equation for High Temperature Flow Behavior of an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23, p 4002–4009.10.1007/s11665-014-1195-1 ↗
7. A. Rudra, S. Das, and R. Dasgupta, Constitutive Modeling for Hot Deformation Behavior of Al-5083+SiC Composite, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 87–99.10.1007/s11665-018-3813-9 ↗
8. L. Deng, P. Zhou, X.Y. Wang, J.S. Jin, and T. Zhao, Microstructure Evolution and Modeling of 2024 Aluminum Alloy Sheets During Hot Deformation Under Different Stress States, Metals Mater. Int., 2018, 24, p 112–120.10.1007/s12540-017-7132-8 ↗
9. Y.C. Lin, M.S. Chen, and J. Zhong, Constitutive Modeling for Elevated Temperature Flow Behavior of 42CrMo Steel, Comp. Mater. Sci., 2008, 42, p 470–477.10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.08.011 ↗
10. G.L. Chen, N. Wang, and M.H. Chen, Research on Deformation Behavior of 2024 H18 Aluminum Alloy at Elevated Temperature, Adv. Mater. Manuf. Sci. Technol. XV, 2014, 770, p 329–334.
11. Y. Xiao, H.Q. Liu, D.Q. Yi, J.W. Le, H.W. Zhou, Y. Jiang, X.L. Zhao, Z.Q. Chen, J. Wang, and Q. Gao, High-Temperature Deformation Behavior of Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo Alloy with Lamellar Microstructure Under Plane-Strain Compression, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27, p 4941–4954.10.1007/s11665-018-3573-6 ↗
12. S. Wang, L.G. Hou, J.R. Luo, J.S. Zhang, and L.Z. Zhuang, Characterization of Hot Workability in AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy Using Activation Energy and 3-D Processing Map, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 225, p 110–121.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.018 ↗
13. Q.H. Zang, H.S. Yu, Y.S. Lee, M.S. Kim, and H.W. Kim, Hot Deformation Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of Annealed Al-7.9Zn-2.7Mg-2.0Cu (wt.%) Alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 763, p 25–33.10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.307 ↗
14. H.E. Hu, X.Y. Wang, and L. Deng, Comparative Study of Hot-Processing Maps for 6061 Aluminium Alloy Constructed from Power Constitutive Equation and Hyperbolic Sine Constitutive Equation, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30(11), p 1321–1327.10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000569 ↗
15. X. Peng, W. Su, D. Xiao, and G. Xu, Investigation on Hot Workability of Homogenized Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy Based on Activation Energy and Processing Map, JOM, 2018, 70, p 993–999.10.1007/s11837-017-2708-9 ↗
16. N. Nayan, S.V.S. Murty, S. Chhangani, A. Prakash, M.J.N.V. Prasad, and I. Samajdar, Effect of Temperature and Strain Rate on Hot Deformation Behavior and Microstructure of Al-Cu-Li Alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 723, p 548–558.10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.165 ↗
17. Y. Cai, C. Sun, L. Wan, D. Yang, Q. Zhou, and Z. Su, Study on the Dynamic Recrystallization Softening Behavior of AZ80 Magnesium Alloy, Acta Metall. Sin., 2016, 52(9), p 1123–1132.
18. F.W. Kang, J. Zhou, Z.W. Wang, X.M. Zhang, Y.C. Feng, and E.J. Guo, Constitutive Equation and Hot Processing Maps of Al-5Ti-1B Master Alloy, Rare Met., 2018, 37, p 668–674.10.1007/s12598-014-0426-9 ↗
19. F. Kang, S. Wei, E. Wang, S. Wang, J. Sun, F. Cao, and G. Zhang, Hot Deformation Characteristics of Ti43 5Al5Nb1V1Y Alloy by Hot Press Sintering, Mater. Res. Express, 2019, 6(12), p 126559.10.1088/2053-1591/ab57aa ↗