journal article·2023-12Open access

Micromechanical Modeling of the Deformation and Damage Behavior of Al6092/SiC Particle Metal Matrix Composites

Shakir Gatea, Tahseen Jwad, Fei Chen, Hengan Ou

Abstract

To enhance the performance and design of metal matrix composites, it is extremely important to gain a better understanding of how the microstructure influences the deformation and damage behavior of metal matrix composites under different loading conditions. Finite element (FE) analysis can be used to collect certain micromechanical information of composites that is difficult to obtain from experiments. In this work, the effect of the distance between the SiC particles and the loading conditions on the deformation and damage behavior of Al6092/SiC particle composites is investigated under different strain rates (i.e., 1 × 10–4, 2 × 10–4, and 4 × 10–4 s−1). A program is developed to generate the 2D micromechanical FE model with 17.5 vol.% SiC particles. Based on the scanning electron microscopy images, the FE model contains four SiC particle sizes (3.1, 4.46, 6.37, and 9.98 μm) with various percentages, which are randomly distributed in the micromechanical Al6092 alloy matrix. User-defined field subroutine was developed and implemented through ABAQUS/Standard based on maximum principal stress and Rice-Tracey triaxial damage indicator to evaluate the formability of the aluminum matrix composite and to predict the brittle and ductile fracture of the SiC particles and the aluminum matrix, respectively, under tensile and shear loads. The results showed that the distribution of SiC particles in Al matrix has a significant effect on the mechanical properties of Al6092/SiC 17.5 particle composites. The formability and damage behavior of composites improve as particle distance increases and strain rate decreases under tensile and shear loading. The fracture initiation toughness of fine SiC particles is higher than that of coarse SiC particles.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. S. Gatea, H. Ou, and G. McCartney, Deformation and Fracture Characteristics of Al6092/SiC/17.5 p Metal Matrix Composite Sheets due to Heat Treatments, Mater. Charact., 2018, 142, p 365–376.10.1016/j.matchar.2018.05.050 ↗
2. C. Chen, S. Qin, S. Li, and J. Wen, Finite Element Analysis About Effects of Particle Morphology on Mechanical Response of Composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 278(1–2), p 96–105.10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00603-6 ↗
3. H. Huang and M. Bush, Finite Element Analysis of Mechanical Properties in Discontinuously Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites with Ultrafine Micro Structure, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, 232(1–2), p 63–72.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00092-0 ↗
4. R. Pandorf and C. Broeckmann, Numerical Simulation of Matrix Damage in Aluminium Based Metal Matrix Composites, Comput. Mater. Sci., 1998, 13(1–3), p 103–107.10.1016/S0927-0256(98)00050-0 ↗
5. S. Schmauder, U. Weber, and E. Soppa, Computational mechanics of heterogeneous materials: influence of residual stresses. In IUTAM Symposium on Computational Mechanics of Solid Materials at Large Strains. 2003. Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-0297-3_29 ↗
6. E. Soppa, S. Schmauder, G. Fischer, J. Brollo, and U. Weber, Deformation and Damage in Al/Al2O3, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2003, 28(3–4), p 574–586.10.1016/j.commatsci.2003.08.034 ↗
7. L. Mishnaevsky Jr., K. Derrien, and D. Baptiste, Effect of Microstructure of Particle Reinforced Composites on the Damage Evolution: Probabilistic and Numerical Analysis, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2004, 64(12), p 1805–1818.10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.013 ↗
8. V. Ganesh and N. Chawla, Effect of Particle Orientation Anisotropy on the Tensile Behavior of Metal Matrix Composites: Experiments and Microstructure-Based Simulation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 391(1–2), p 342–353.10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.017 ↗
9. G. Tursun, U. Weber, E. Soppa, and S. Schmauder, The Influence of Transition Phases on the Damage Behaviour of an Al/10 vol.% SiC Composite, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2006, 37(1–2), p 119–133.10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.12.018 ↗
10. L.L. Mishnaevsky Jr., Functionally Gradient Metal Matrix Composites: Numerical Analysis of the Microstructure-Strength Relationships, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2006, 66(11–12), p 1873–1887.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.09.003 ↗
11. W. Zhang, L. Li, and T. Wang, Interphase Effect on the Strengthening Behavior of Particle-Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2007, 41(2), p 145–155.10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.03.011 ↗
12. M. Song and D. Xiao, Modeling the Fracture Toughness and Tensile Ductility of SiCp/Al Metal Matrix Composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 474(1–2), p 371–375.10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.075 ↗
13. Z. Peng and L. Fuguo, Microstructure-Based Simulation of Plastic Deformation Behavior of SiC Particle Reinforced Al Matrix Composites, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2009, 22(6), p 663–669.10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60156-9 ↗
14. R. Ekici, M.K. Apalak, M. Yıldırım, and F. Nair, Effects of Random Particle Dispersion and Size on the Indentation Behavior of SiC Particle Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites, Mater. Des., 2010, 31(6), p 2818–2833.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.001 ↗
15. G. Sozhamannan, S.B. Prabu, and R. Paskaramoorthy, Failures Analysis of Particle Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites by Microstructure Based Models, Mater. Des., 2010, 31(8), p 3785–3790.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.025 ↗
16. M. Yuan, Y. Yang, C. Li, P. Heng, and L. Li, Numerical Analysis of the Stress–Strain Distributions in the Particle Reinforced Metal Matrix Composite SiC/6064Al, Mater. Des., 2012, 38, p 1–6.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.043 ↗
17. T. Tang, M. Horstemeyer, and P. Wang, Micromechanical Analysis of Thermoelastoplastic Behavior of Metal Matrix Composites, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 2012, 51, p 161–167.10.1016/j.ijengsci.2011.10.008 ↗
18. H. Qing, Automatic Generation of 2D Micromechanical Finite Element Model of Silicon–Carbide/Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites: Effects of the Boundary Conditions, Mater. Des., 2013, 44, p 446–453.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.011 ↗
19. H. Qing, 2D Micromechanical Analysis of SiC/Al Metal Matrix Composites under Tensile, Shear and Combined Tensile/Shear Loads, Mater. Des., 2013, 51, p 438–447.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.051 ↗
20. V. Kukshal, S. Gangwar, and A. Patnaik, Experimental and Finite Element Analysis of Mechanical and Fracture Behavior of SiC Particulate Filled A356 Alloy Composites: Part I, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., 2015, 229(2), p 91–105.
21. S. Rangaraj and K. Kokini, Influence of Particle Shape and Aspect Ratio on Thermally Activated Viscoplastic (Time-Dependent) Response of Ceramic (Zirconia)–Metal (NiCoCrAlY) Particulate Composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 366(2), p 356–366.10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.120 ↗
22. L. Qian, T. Kobayashi, H. Toda, and Z.-G. Wang, Dynamic Fracture Toughness of 6061Al Composites Reinforced with SiC Particulates, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, 318(1–2), p 189–196.10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01267-9 ↗
23. P. Cavaliere, E. Cerri, and P. Leo, Hot Deformation and Processing Maps of a Particulate Reinforced 2618/Al2O3/20p Metal Matrix Composite, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2004, 64(9), p 1287–1291.10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.007 ↗
24. G. Ganesan, K. Raghukandan, R. Karthikeyan, and B. Pai, Development of Processing Maps for 6061 Al/15% SiCp Composite Material, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 369(1–2), p 230–235.10.1016/j.msea.2003.11.019 ↗
25. J. Davis J, Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. ASM International, Handbook Committee, 1994.
26. C. Lu, R. Danzer, and F.D. Fischer, Fracture Statistics of Brittle Materials: Weibull or Normal Distribution, Phys. Rev. E, 2002, 65(6), p 067102.10.1103/PhysRevE.65.067102 ↗
27. A. Needleman, S.R. Nutt, S. Suresh, and V. Tvergaard, Matrix, reinforcement, and interfacial failure, Fundamentals of Metal-Matrix Composites (A 95-25875 06-24). Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham, MA, 1993, p 233–25010.1016/B978-0-08-052371-2.50017-1 ↗
28. J.R. Rice and D.M. Tracey, On the Ductile Enlargement of Voids in Triaxial Stress Fields, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1969, 17(3), p 201–217.10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
29. L.L. Mishnaevsky Jr., Computational Mesomechanics of Composites: Numerical Analysis of the Effect of Microstructures of Composites of Strength and Damage Resistance, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.