Enhanced Low Cycle Fatigue Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy by Post-treatment Technology of Pulse High-Intensity Magnetic Field
Source abstract
Abstract
To improve the service safety of titanium alloys in complex environments, the influence of pulse magnetic treatment (PMT) on the low cycle fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy was investigated. The results revealed that the average low cycle fatigue life of the treated Ti-6Al-4V specimens is increased by over 30% under all five strain amplitudes from 0.4 to 1.2%. Furthermore, the fatigue threshold of Ti-6Al-4V alloy is increased by 7.8%, and the crack growth rate is decreased at low-stress intensity factors after PMT. The scanning electron microscope equipped with electron backscatter diffraction was used to analyze the fracture surface, crack propagation path, and the microstructure of the crack tip. It indicated that the improvement of fatigue property by PMT is attributed to the decrease in the size and density of the intragranular dislocation wall. Finally, the potential micro-mechanism of the effect of PMT on metallic materials is further discussed.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. M. Hourmand, A.A.D. Sarhan, M. Sayuti, and M. Hamdi, A Comprehensive Review on Machining of Titanium Alloys, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2021, 46(8), p 7087–7123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05420-110.1007/s13369-021-05420-1 ↗
2. L.C. Zhang, L.Y. Chen, and L.Q. Wang, Surface Modification of Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Technologies, Developments, and Future Interests, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2020, 22(5), p 37. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20190125810.1002/adem.201901258 ↗
3. L.C. Zhang and L.Y. Chen, A Review on Biomedical Titanium Alloys: Recent Progress and Prospect, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2019, 21(4), p 29. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20180121510.1002/adem.201801215 ↗
4. I.S. Cho, J. Park, and Y. Jeon, Fatigue Behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy under Combined Low and High Cycle and Ultrasonic Loading, Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol., 2014, 48(1–4), p 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmpt.2014.05903110.1504/ijmpt.2014.059031 ↗
5. N. Hou, M.H. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, and C. Song, Insights into the Fatigue Property of Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V in Aero-engine from the Subsurface Damages Induced by Milling: State of the Art, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, 113(5–6), p 1229–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06749-510.1007/s00170-021-06749-5 ↗
6. P.J. Golden, R. John, and W.J. Porter, Variability in Room Temperature Fatigue Life of Alpha Plus Beta Processed Ti-6Al-4V, Int. J. Fatigue, 2009, 31(11–12), p 1764–1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.005 ↗
7. Y.Z. Xing, G. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y.N. Chen, and M. Dargusch, Development in Plasma Surface Diffusion Techniques of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Review, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 92(5–8), p 1901–1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0302-510.1007/s00170-017-0302-5 ↗
8. V. Oliveira, M.O.H. Cioffi, M.J.R. Barboza et al., Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation (PIII) Influence on Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: Frequency Effect, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 109, p 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.016 ↗
9. G. Ongtrakulkij, A. Khantachawana, J. Kajornchaiyakul, and K. Kondoh, Effects of the Secondary Shot in the Double Shot Peening Process on the Residual Compressive Stress Distribution of Ti-6Al-4V, Heliyon, 2022, 8(1), p 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e0875810.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08758 ↗
10. S.J. Laine, K.M. Knowles, P.J. Doorbar, R.D. Cutts, and D. Rugg, Microstructural Characterisation of Metallic Shot Peened and Laser Shock Peened Ti-6Al-4V, Acta Mater., 2017, 123, p 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.04410.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.044 ↗
11. T.X. Wang, X.M. Zha, F.B. Chen, J. Wang, Y.S. Li, and F. Jiang, Mechanical Impact Test Methods for Hard Coatings of Cutting Tools: A Review, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, 115(5–6), p 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07219-810.1007/s00170-021-07219-8 ↗
12. Y.L. Song and L. Hua, Mechanism of Residual Stress Reduction in Low Alloy Steel by a Low Frequency Alternating Magnetic Treatment, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, 28(9), p 803–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1005-0302(12)60134-010.1016/s1005-0302(12)60134-0 ↗
13. S. Akram, A. Babutskyi, A. Chrysanthou, D. Montalvao, and N. Pizurova, Effect of Alternating Magnetic Field on the Fatigue Behaviour of EN8 Steel and 2014-T6 Aluminium Alloy, Metals, 2019, 9(9), p 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/met909098410.3390/met9090984 ↗
14. G.R. Li, Y.M. Li, F.F. Wang, and H.M. Wang, Microstructure and Performance of Solid TC4 Titanium Alloy Subjected to the High Pulsed Magnetic Field Treatment, J. Alloy. Compd., 2015, 644, p 750–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.19110.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.191 ↗
15. A.V. Pokoev and J.V. Osinskaya, Manifestation of Magnetoplastic Effect in Some Metallic Alloys, Defect Diffus. Forum (Switzerland), 2018, 383, p 180–4. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.383.18010.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.383.180 ↗
16. M.D. Hou, K.J. Li, X.G. Li et al., Effects of Pulsed Magnetic Fields of Different Intensities on Dislocation Density, Residual Stress, and Hardness of Cr4Mo4V Steel, Crystals, 2020, 10(2), p 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1002011510.3390/cryst10020115 ↗
17. Y.L. Song, C. Yu, X. Miao, X.H. Han, D.S. Qian, and X. Chen, Tribological Performance Improvement of Bearing Steel GCr15 by an Alternating Magnetic Treatment, Acta Metall. Sin. Engl. Lett., 2017, 30(10), p 957–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-017-0587-210.1007/s40195-017-0587-2 ↗
18. R.A. Vorob’ev and V.N. Dubinskii, Effect of Treatment by a Pulsed Magnetic Field on the Hardness and Fracture Strength of a Hypereutectoid Tool Steel, Phys. Metals Metallogr., 2014, 115(8), p 805–808. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0031918x1408016x10.1134/s0031918x1408016x ↗
19. Z.P. Cai, H.Y. Zhao, L. Jian, and A.L. Lu, Plastic Deformation Caused by Pulsed Magnetic Treatment of Mid-carbon Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2007, 458(1–2), p 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.09810.1016/j.msea.2006.12.098 ↗
20. R.B. Morgunov and A.L. Buchachenko, Magnetic Field Response of NaCl: Eu Crystal Plasticity Due to Spin-Dependent Eu2+ aggregation, Phys. Rev. B, 2010, 82(1), p 9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.01411510.1103/PhysRevB.82.014115 ↗
21. X. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z.P. Cai, and J.L. Pan, Effects of Magnetic Field on the Residual Stress and Structural Defects of Ti-6Al-4V, Metals, 2020, 10(1), p 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1001014110.3390/met10010141 ↗
22. K. Fujiyama, K. Mori, D. Kaneko et al., Creep Damage Assessment of 10Cr-1Mo-1W-VNbN Steel Forging through EBSD Observation, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 2009, 86(9), p 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.04.01110.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.04.011 ↗
23. S.S. Rui, L.S. Niu, H.J. Shi, S.L. Wei, and C.C. Tasan, Diffraction-Based Misorientation Mapping: A Continuum Mechanics Description, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2019, 133, p 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2019.10370910.1016/j.jmps.2019.103709 ↗
24. H.L. Huang and N.J. Ho, The Study of Fatigue in Polycrystalline Copper under Various Strain Amplitude at Stage I: Crack Initiation and Propagation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2000, 293(1–2), p 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5093(00)01246-610.1016/s0921-5093(00)01246-6 ↗
25. T. Taniguchi, Y. Kaneko, and S. Hashimoto (eds.), ECCI Observations of Dislocation Structures around Fatigue Cracks in Ferritic Stainless Steel Single Crystals, in International Conference on the Fundamentals of Plastic Deformation (DISLOCATIONS), 2008 Oct 13–17, Hong Kong, Peoples R China. Bristol (Iop Publishing Ltd, 2009)10.1088/1757-899X/3/1/012020 ↗
26. V. Moorthy, B.K. Choudhary, S. Vaidyanathan, T. Jayakumar, K.B.S. Rao, and B. Raj, An Assessment of Low Cycle Fatigue Damage Using Magnetic Barkhausen Emission in 9Cr-1Mo Ferritic Steel, Int. J. Fatigue, 1999, 21(3), p 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(98)00079-610.1016/s0142-1123(98)00079-6 ↗
27. C. Schayes, J. Bouquerel, J.B. Vogt, F. Palleschi, and S. Zaefferer, A Comparison of EBSD Based Strain Indicators for the Study of Fe-3Si Steel Subjected to Cyclic Loading, Mater. Charact., 2016, 115, p 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2016.03.02010.1016/j.matchar.2016.03.020 ↗
28. M.C. Marinelli, M. Balbi, and U. Krupp, Influence of Plastic Deformation in Fatigue Crack Behavior in Bainitic Steel, Int. J. Fatigue, 2021, 143, p 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10601410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106014 ↗
29. J. Bannantine, J. Comer, and J. Handrock, Fundamentals of Metal Fatigue Analysis, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1990.
30. S.K. Paul, Numerical Models of Plastic Zones and Associated Deformations for a Stationary Crack in a C(T) Specimen Loaded at Different R-Ratios, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2016, 84, p 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.10.00810.1016/j.tafmec.2015.10.008 ↗
31. R.A. Schmidt and P.C. Paris, Threshold for fatigue crack propagation and the effects of load ratio and frequency, Progress in Flaw Growth and Fracture Toughness Testing. J.G. Kaufman, J.L. Swedlow, H.T. Corten, J.E. Srawley, R.H. Heyer, E.T. Wessel, G.R. Irwin Ed., ASTM International, Conshohocken, 1973
32. X. Zhang and Z.P. Cai, Effect of Magnetic Field on the Nanohardness of Monocrystalline Silicon and Its Mechanism, JETP Lett., 2018, 108(1), p 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136401813004010.1134/S0021364018130040 ↗
33. V.I. Alshits, E.V. Darinskaya, M.V. Koldaeva, and E.A. Petrzhik, Magnetoplastic Effect: Basic Properties and Physical Mechanisms, Crystallogr. Rep., 2003, 48(5), p 768–795. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.161259810.1134/1.1612598 ↗
34. Y.I. Golovin and R.B. Morgunov, Effect of a Weak Magnetic Field on the State of Structural Defects and the Plasticity of Ionic, J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 1999, 88(2), p 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.55880110.1134/1.558801 ↗
35. PKnutton, Tool Life Grows in Magnetic Fields, Mach. Prod. Eng., 1989, 147, p 78–9.
36. P.C. Miller, A Look at Magnetic Treatment of Tools and Wear Surfaces, Tool. Prod., 1990, 55(12), p 100–103.