Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Additive Manufactured Hybrid Auxetic Structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) of auxetic structure is gaining prominence for various fields ranging from structural material to biomaterials. This work proposes a novel design of the auxetic structure with regular honeycomb, i.e. hybrid auxetic structure. Additionally, a sharp corner of the auxetic structure is replaced with a fillet feature to stiffen the structure by suppressing the hinging mechanism. All models are fabricated in extrusion-based AM technique using Polylactic acid (PLA) material. A comparison study was carried out on 3D printed samples that were subjected to uniaxial tensile load. To understand the effect on functional and mechanical properties, a tool path strategy with single-pass and zigzag tool paths was proposed. Solid material properties were used in finite element analysis (FEA) to compare with experimental results. Experimental results indicate that hybrid structure takes more load than auxetic structure. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the hybrid structure was 32% more than that of the auxetic structure. The finite element results are in good agreement with the experimental results. The observation reported in this article will help frame design rules and selection of AM processes for applications ranging from structural protection sandwich constructions with low-density cores to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine scaffolds.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. M. Mir, M.N. Ali, J. Sami and U. Ansari, Review of Mechanics and Applications of Auxetic Structures, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2014, 2014, p 1–17.10.1155/2014/753496 ↗
2. A.A. Javadi, A. Faramarzi and R. Farmani, Design and Optimization of Microstructure of Auxetic Materials, Eng. Comput. (Swansea, Wales), 2012, 29(3), p 260–276.10.1108/02644401211212398 ↗
3. C. Yang, H.D. Vora and Y. Chang, Behavior of Auxetic Structures under Compression and Impact Forces, Smart Mater. Struct., 2018, 27(2), p 1–12.10.1088/1361-665X/aaa3cf ↗
4. D. Xiao, X. Chen, Y. Li, W. Wu and D. Fang, The Structure Response of Sandwich Beams with Metallic Auxetic Honeycomb Cores under Localized Impulsive Loading-Experiments and Finite Element Analysis, Mater. Des., 2019, 176, p 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10784010.1016/j.matdes.2019.107840 ↗
5. L. Yang, O. Harrysson, H. West and D. Cormier, Mechanical Properties of 3D Re-Entrant Honeycomb Auxetic Structures Realized via Additive Manufacturing, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2015, 69–70, p 475–490.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005 ↗
6. J.N. Grima, R. Gatt, P.S. Farrugia, A. Alderson, and K.E. Evans, Auxetic Cellular Materials and Structures, Proceedings of the ASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Aerospace. Orlando, Florida, USA. November 5–11, 2005, p 489-495.10.1115/IMECE2005-82260 ↗
7. M. Askari, D.A. Hutchins, P.J. Thomas, L. Astolfi, R.L. Watson, M. Abdi, M. Ricci, S. Laureti, L. Nie, S. Freear, R. Wildman, C. Tuck, M. Clarke, E. Woods and A.T. Clare, Additive Manufacturing of Metamaterials: A Review, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 36, p 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10156210.1016/j.addma.2020.101562 ↗
8. A. Ghaedizadeh, J. Shen, X. Ren and Y.M. Xie, Tuning the Performance of Metallic Auxetic Metamaterials by Using Buckling and Plasticity, Materials, 2016, 9(1), p 1–17.10.3390/ma9010054 ↗
9. M. Mohsenizadeh, F. Gasbarri, M. Munther, A. Beheshti and K. Davami, Additively-Manufactured Lightweight Metamaterials for Energy Absorption, Mater. Des., 2018, 139, p 521–530.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.037 ↗
10. M. Shruti, N.S. Hemanth, N.D. Badgayan and S.K. Sahu, Compressive Behavior of Auxetic Structural Metamaterial for Lightweight Construction Using ANSYS Static Structural Analysis, Mater. Today: Proc., 2020, 38, p 12–17.
11. X.C. Zhang, H.M. Ding, L.Q. An and X.L. Wang, Numerical Investigation on Dynamic Crushing Behavior of Auxetic Honeycombs with Various Cell-Wall Angles, Adv. Mech. Eng., 2015, 7(2), p 1–12.10.1155/2014/679678 ↗
12. H. Wan, H. Ohtaki, S. Kotosaka and G. Hu, A Study of Negative Poisson’s Ratios in Auxetic Honeycombs Based on a Large Deflection Model, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 2004, 23(1), p 95–106.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.10.006 ↗
13. A. Ingrole, A. Hao and R. Liang, Design and Modeling of Auxetic and Hybrid Honeycomb Structures for In-Plane Property Enhancement, Mater. Des., 2017, 117, p 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.06710.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.067 ↗
14. I.G. Masters and K.E. Evans, Models for the Elastic Deformation of Honeycombs, Compos. Struct., 1996, 35(4), p 403–422.10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
15. K. Meena and S. Singamneni, A New Auxetic Structure with Significantly Reduced Stress Concentration Effects, Mater. Des., 2019, 173, p 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10777910.1016/j.matdes.2019.107779 ↗
16. W. Yang, Z.M. Li, W. Shi, B.H. Xie and M.B. Yang, Review on Auxetic Materials, J. Mater. Sci., 2004, 39, p 3269–3279.10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026928.93231.e0 ↗
17. W. Tao and M. C. Leu, Design of Lattice Structure for Additive Manufacturing, International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA), Aug 1-3, 2016 (Cleveland, OH, USA), IEEE, 2016, p 325-332, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISFA.2016.779018210.1109/ISFA.2016.7790182 ↗
18. A. Bandyopadhyay and B. Heer, Additive Manufacturing of Multi-Material Structures, Mater. Sci. Eng. R, 2018, 129, p 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2018.04.00110.1016/j.mser.2018.04.001 ↗
19. Q. Liu, Literature Review: Materials with Negative Poisson’s Ratios and Potential Applications to Aerospace and Defence, Aust. Gov. Dep. Def., 2006, p 1–47.
20. T. Strek, B. Maruszewski, J.W. Narojczyk and K.W. Wojciechowski, Finite Element Analysis of Auxetic Plate Deformation, J. Non. Cryst. Solids, 2008, 354(35–39), p 4475–4480.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.087 ↗
21. K. Meena and S. Singamneni, The Role of Filleting on the Stressed State of a Square Grid Auxetic Structure, Procedia Manuf., 2019, 30, p 650–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.09210.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.092 ↗
22. X. Cao, D. Xiao, Y. Li, W. Wen, T. Zhao, Z. Chen, Y. Jiang and D. Fang, Dynamic Compressive Behavior of a Modified Additively Manufactured Rhombic Dodecahedron 316L Stainless Steel Lattice Structure, Thin-Walled Struct., 2020, 148, p 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.10658610.1016/j.tws.2019.106586 ↗
23. S. Chen and S.C. Ryu, Design and Characterization of Rounded Re-Entrant Honeycomb Patterns for Lightweight and Rigid Auxetic Structures, Smart Mater. Struct., 2017, 26(11), p 115026.10.1088/1361-665X/aa8d3c ↗
24. J. Jiang and Y. Ma, Path Planning Strategies to Optimize Accuracy Quality, Build Time and Material Use in Additive Manufacturing: A Review, Micromachines, 2020, 11(7), p 633.10.3390/mi11070633 ↗
25. A. Alomarah, D. Ruan, S. Masood, I. Sbarski and B. Faisal, An Investigation of In-Plane Tensile Properties of Re-Entrant Chiral Auxetic Structure, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 96(5–8), p 2013–2029.10.1007/s00170-018-1605-x ↗
26. P. Doungkom and K. Jiamjiroch, Analysis of Printing Pattern and Infiltration Percent over the Tensile Properties of PLA Printed Parts by a Fuse Deposition Modelling Printer, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 501(1), p 012028.10.1088/1757-899X/501/1/012028 ↗
27. B.M. Tymrak, M. Kreiger and J.M. Pearce, Mechanical Properties of Components Fabricated with Open-Source 3-D Printers under Realistic Environmental Conditions, Mater. Des., 2014, 58, p 242–246.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
28. T. Letcher and M. Waytashek, Material Property Testing of 3D-Printed Specimen in PLA on an Entry-Level 3D Printer, ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo. Proc., Nov 14-20, 2014 (Montreal, Quebec, Canada), 2014, 2A.10.1115/IMECE2014-39379 ↗
29. T. Yao, Z. Deng, K. Zhang and S. Li, A Method to Predict the Ultimate Tensile Strength of 3D Printing Polylactic Acid (PLA ) Materials with Different Printing Orientations, Compos. Part B, 2019, 163, p 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.025 ↗
30. K. Van De Velde and P. Kiekens, Biopolymers: Overview of Several Properties and Consequences on Their Applications, Polym. Test., 2002, 21(4), p 433–442.10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00107-6 ↗
31. S. Farah, D.G. Anderson and R. Langer, Physical and Mechanical Properties of PLA, and Their Functions in Widespread Applications — A Comprehensive Review, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 2016, 107, p 367–392.10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 ↗
32. S.A. Tronvoll, T. Welo and C.W. Elverum, The Effects of Voids on Structural Properties of Fused Deposition Modelled Parts: A Probabilistic Approach, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 97(9–12), p 3607–3618.10.1007/s00170-018-2148-x ↗
33. T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T.Q. Nguyen and D. Hui, Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing ): A Review of Materials Methods, Applications and Challenges, Compos. Part B, 2018, 143, p 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗