A Novel Approach to Predict the Process-Induced Mechanical Behavior of Additively Manufactured Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The grain structure and texture of additively manufactured materials depend strongly on the local temperature gradients during the solidification of the material. These grain structures and textures influence the mechanical behavior, ranging from isotropy to transversal and orthotropic symmetry. In the present contribution, a cellular automaton is used to model the grain growth during selective electron beam melting. The resulting grain structures and textures serve as input for a mesoscopic mechanical model. The mechanical behavior on the mesoscale is modeled by means of gradient-enhanced crystal plasticity, applying the finite element method. Computational homogenization is applied to determine the resulting macroscopic elastic and plastic properties of the additively manufactured metals. A general orthotropic yield criterion is identified by means of the initial yield loci computed with mesoscopic simulations of representative volume elements. The numerical results are partly validated with experimental data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. W.E. Frazier, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23, 1917–1928 (2014)10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
2. C. Körner, H. Helmer, A. Bauereiß, R.F. Singer, MATEC Web Conf. 14, 08001 (2014)10.1051/matecconf/20141408001 ↗
3. M. Markl, C. Körner, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 46, 93–123 (2016)10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032158 ↗
4. S. Chandra et al., in Proceedings of the International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing 2018-May (2018), pp. 427–432
5. E. Chauvet, C. Tassin, J.-J. Blandin, R. Dendievel, G. Martin, Scripta Mater. 152, 15–19 (2018)10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.041 ↗
6. J.A. Koepf, M.R. Gotterbarm, M. Markl, C. Körner, Acta Mater. 152, 119–126 (2018)10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.030 ↗
7. J. Koepf et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 162, 148–155 (2019)10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.03.004 ↗
8. D. Arndt et al., J. Numer. Math. 28, 131–146 (2020)10.1515/jnma-2020-0043 ↗
9. C. Körner, M. Markl, J.A. Koepf, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 51, 4970–4983 (2020)10.1007/s11661-020-05946-3 ↗
10. X. Wang et al., J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28, 657–665 (2019)10.1007/s11665-018-3620-3 ↗
11. X. Ao, H. Xia, J. Liu, Q. He, Mater. Des. 185, 108230 (2020)10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108230 ↗
12. O. Zinovieva, A. Zinoviev, V. Ploshikhin, Comput. Mater. Sci. 141, 207–220 (2018)10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.018 ↗
13. X. Li, W. Tan, Comput. Mater. Sci. 153, 159–169 (2018)10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.019 ↗
14. T. Gatsos, K.A. Elsayed, Y. Zhai, D.A. Lados, JOM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03913-x10.1007/s11837-019-03913-x ↗
15. M. Baiker, P. Jan, D. Helm, NAFEMS Mag. 43, 52–58 (2017)
16. J.A. Newman et al., Characterization of Titanium Alloys Produced by Electron Beam Directed Energy Deposition, Tech. Rep. (M’ (MPRIME) Lab; Materials PRognosis from Integrated Modeling and Experiment, 2018), https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26158.15684.10.13140/RG.2.2.26158.15684 ↗
17. S.A.H. Motaman, F. Roters, C. Haase, Acta Mater. 185, 340–369 (2020)10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.003 ↗
18. A. Kergaßner, J. Mergheim, P. Steinmann, Comput. Math. Appl. 78 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.05.01610.1016/j.camwa.2018.05.016 ↗
19. M.E. Gurtin, L. Anand, S.P. Lele, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 1853–1878 (2007)10.1016/j.jmps.2007.02.006 ↗
20. M.E. Gurtin, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56, 640–662 (2008)10.1016/j.jmps.2007.05.002 ↗
21. C. Miehe, S. Mauthe, F. Hildebrand, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 268, 735–762 (2014)10.1016/j.cma.2013.08.022 ↗
22. P. Steinmann, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 34, 1717–1735 (1996)10.1016/S0020-7225(96)00062-6 ↗
23. C. Miehe, J. Schröder, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 50, 273–298 (2001)10.1002/1097-0207(20010120)50:2<273::AID-NME17>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
24. M.G. Moghaddam, A. Achuthan, B.A. Bednarcyk, S.M. Arnold, E.J. Pineda, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 703, 521–532 (2017)10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.087 ↗
25. T. Ohashi, M. Kawamukai, H. Zbib, Int. J. Plast. 23, 897–914 (2007)10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.10.002 ↗
26. S. Bargmann, B.D. Reddy, B. Klusemann, Int. J. Solids Struct. 51, 2754–2764 (2014)10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.010 ↗
27. M. Ekh, M. Grymer, K. Runesson, T. Svedberg, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 72, 197–220 (2007)10.1002/nme.2015 ↗
28. E. Husser, S. Bargmann, Materials 10, 289 (2017)10.3390/ma10030289 ↗
29. B. Reddy, P. Steinmann, A. Kergaßner, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 147, 104266 (2021)10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104266 ↗
30. M.E. Gurtin, A. Needleman, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 53, 1–31 (2005)10.1016/j.jmps.2004.06.006 ↗
31. D. Gottschalk et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 111, 443–459 (2016)10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.048 ↗
32. S. Wulfinghoff, T. Böhlke, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 468, 2682–2703 (2012)
33. J. Bishop, R. Hill, Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 42, 414–427 (1951)10.1080/14786445108561065 ↗
34. P. van Houtte, K. Mols, A. van Bael, E. Aernoudt, Textures Microstruct. 11, 23–39 (1989)10.1155/TSM.11.23 ↗
35. A. Mendelson, 353 (1968)
36. W. Hu, Int. J. Plast. 21, 1771–1796 (2005)10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.11.004 ↗
37. Q.S. Xia, M.C. Boyce, D.M. Parks, Int. J. Solids Struct. 39, 4053–4071 (2002)10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00238-X ↗
38. Y. Li, S.E. Stapleton, S. Reese, J.-W. Simon, Int. J. Solids Struct. 100–101, 286–296 (2016)10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.08.024 ↗
39. A.P. Karafillis, M.C. Boyce, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41, 1859–1886 (1993)10.1016/0022-5096(93)90073-O ↗
40. C.-A. Gandin, M. Rappaz, Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 2233–2246 (1994)10.1016/0956-7151(94)90302-6 ↗
41. C.A. Gandin, J.L. Desbiolles, M. Rappaz, P. Thévoz, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30, 3153–3165 (1999)10.1007/s11661-999-0226-2 ↗
42. D. Raabe, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 32, 53–76 (2002)10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.090601.152855 ↗
43. C.-A. Gandin, M. Rappaz, Acta Mater. 45, 2187–2195 (1997)10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00303-5 ↗
44. R. Trivedi, W. Kurz, in Science and Technology of the Undercooled Melt Vol. 34 (Springer, Dordrecht, 1986), pp. 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4456-5_2410.1007/978-94-009-4456-5_24 ↗
45. C.-A. Gandin, R. Schaefer, M. Rappax, Acta Mater. 44, 3339–3347 (1996)10.1016/1359-6454(95)00433-5 ↗
46. J. Nye, Acta Metall. 1, 153–162 (1953)10.1016/0001-6160(53)90054-6 ↗
47. P. Steinmann, A. Kergaßner, P. Landkammer, H.M. Zbib, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 132, 103680 (2019)10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103680 ↗
48. S. Saeb, P. Steinmann, A. Javili, Appl. Mech. Rev. 68, 050801 (2016)10.1115/1.4034024 ↗
49. R. Hill, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 357–372 (1963)10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
50. ISO, “Metallic materials—Sheet and Strip—Biaxial Tensile Testing Method using Cruciform Specimen”, ISO ISO 16842:2014(E) (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014)
51. R.W. Logan, W.F. Hosford, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 22, 419–430 (1980)10.1016/0020-7403(80)90011-9 ↗
52. H. Helmer, Ph.D. Thesis, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (2016)
53. D. Hübner et al., in Presented at the Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Additive Technologies, Maribor (October 10–11, 2018), pp. 102–111
54. F. Fritzen, T. Böhlke, E. Schnack, Comput. Mech. 43, 701–713 (2009)10.1007/s00466-008-0339-2 ↗
55. Z. Dong et al., Materials 11, 2463 (2018)10.3390/ma11122463 ↗