Selection of Bio-implant Materials Based on Metal Additive Manufacturing using Integrated SWARA and WASPAS MCDM Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Sumayli, Recent trends on bioimplant materials: A review, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 46(2021), p 2726–2731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.39510.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.395 ↗
2. S. Bose, M. Roy and A. Bandyopadhyay, Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds, Trends Biotechnol., 2012, 30(10), p 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 ↗
3. H. Narayan, S. Agrawal, and A. M. Kuthe, “Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 146, no. August, p. 106061, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106061.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106061 ↗
4. P. Chocholata, V. Kulda and V. Babuska, Fabrication of scaffolds for bone-tissue regeneration, Materials, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1204056810.3390/ma12040568 ↗
5. R. Davis, A. Singh, M.J. Jackson, R.T. Coelho, D. Prakash, C.P. Charalambous, W. Ahmed, L.R.R. da Silva and A.A. Lawrence, A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2022, 120(3), p 1473–1530.10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8 ↗
6. S. E. Harandi and R. K. Singh Raman, “Corrosion fatigue of a magnesium alloy under appropriate human physiological conditions for bio-implant applications,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 186, 134–142, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.031.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.031 ↗
7. P. Kumar, D.K. Rajak, M. Abubakar, S.G.M. Ali and M. Hussain, 3D printing technology for biomedical practice: a review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(7), p 5342–5355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05792-310.1007/s11665-021-05792-3 ↗
8. X. Shi, S. Ma, C. Liu, Q. Wu, J. Lu, Y. Liu and W. Shi, Selective laser melting-wire arc additive manufacturing hybrid fabrication of Ti-6Al-4V alloy: microstructure and mechanical properties, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 684, p 196–204.10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.065 ↗
9. E. Liverani, G. Rogati, S. Pagani, S. Brogini, A. Fortunato and P. Caravaggi, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials mechanical interaction between additive-manufactured metal lattice structures and bone in compression: implications for stress shielding of orthopaedic implants, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2021, 121, p 104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10460810.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104608 ↗
10. A. Heimbrook, C. Kelly and K. Gall, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials effects of 3d printed surface topography and normal force on implant expulsion, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2022, 130, p 105208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10520810.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105208 ↗
11. K. Ransikarbum, S. Ha, J. Ma and N. Kim, Multi-objective optimization analysis for part-to-Printer assignment in a network of 3D fused deposition modeling, J. Manuf. Syst., 2017, 43, p 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.01210.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.012 ↗
12. R. Punukollu, Selection of bio-implant materials using entropy and analytic hierarchy process, Res. Rev. A J. Bioinforma., 2017, 4(3), p 15–21.
13. M. Kumar, R. Kumar and S. Kumar, Coatings on orthopedic implants to overcome present problems and challenges: a focused review, Mater. Today Proc, 2021, 45, p 5269–5276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.83110.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.831 ↗
14. S.R. Paital and N.B. Dahotre, Calcium phosphate coatings for bio-implant applications: materials, performance factors, and methodologies, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports, 2009, 66(1–3), p 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2009.05.00110.1016/j.mser.2009.05.001 ↗
15. K. Porsch, B. Piloseno, M. Presley, B.P. Croom, J. Rettaliata and E.B. Gienger, Stability of Ti-6Al-4V mechanical properties across laser powder bed fusion vendors and platforms: insights on material maturity, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09718-710.1007/s11665-024-09718-7 ↗
16. Y. Sun, W. Hu, C. Wu, H. Kuang, J. Wang, S. Zhang, T. Yan and Q. Wang, Research progress on mechanical properties of 3D printed biomedical titanium alloys, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023, 32(21), p 9489–9503.10.1007/s11665-023-08248-y ↗
17. J. Li, X. Cui, G. J. Hooper, K. S. Lim, and T. B. F. Woodfield, “Rational design, bio-functionalization and biological performance of hybrid additive manufactured titanium implants for orthopaedic applications: A review,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 105, no. January, p. 103671, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103671.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103671 ↗
18. M. Vignesh, G. Ranjith Kumar, M. Sathishkumar, M. Manikandan, G. Rajyalakshmi, R. Ramanujam and N. Arivazhagan, Development of biomedical implants through additive manufacturing: a review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(7), p 4735–4744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05578-710.1007/s11665-021-05578-7 ↗
19. A. Aherwar, A. Patnaik and M. Bahraminasab, Effect of molybdenum content on structure and properties of a Co-Cr biomedical alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28(10), p 6340–6353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04356-w10.1007/s11665-019-04356-w ↗
20. G. Herranz, C. Berges, J. A. Naranjo, C. García, and I. Garrido, “Mechanical performance, corrosion and tribological evaluation of a Co–Cr–Mo alloy processed by MIM for biomedical applications,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 105, no. February, p. 103706, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103706.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103706 ↗
21. A. Awasthi, K.K. Saxena and R.K. Dwivedi, An investigation on classification and characterization of bio materials and additive manufacturing techniques for bioimplants, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 44, p 2061–2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.17610.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.176 ↗
22. M. Somasundaram, “Multi response optimization of EDM process parameters for biodegradable AZ31 magnesium alloy using TOPSIS and grey relational analysis,” Sādhanā, vol. 0123456789, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-01908-0.10.1007/s12046-022-01908-0 ↗
23. T.O. Olugbade, B.O. Omiyale and O.T. Ojo, Corrosion, corrosion fatigue, and protection of magnesium alloys: mechanisms, measurements, and mitigation, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31(3), p 1707–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06355-210.1007/s11665-021-06355-2 ↗
24. V. Manakari, G. Parande, and M. Gupta, Selective laser melting of magnesium and magnesium alloy powders: A review, vol. 7, no. 1. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/met701000210.3390/met7010002 ↗
25. M.B. Kannan, C. Moore, S. Saptarshi, S. Somasundaram, M. Rahuma and A.L. Lopata, Biocompatibility and biodegradation studies of a commercial zinc alloy for temporary mini-implant applications, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7(1), p 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15873-w10.1038/s41598-017-15873-w ↗
26. R. Shishir, U. Nasiruddin, P. Manojkumar, E. Lokeshkumar, V. Ponnilavan, E.V. Parfenov, R.Z. Valiev, and N. Rameshbabu, 2023. Zinc as a potential bio-degradable temporary implant material. Materials Today: Proceedings.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.009 ↗
27. P. Wen, M. Voshage, L. Jauer, Y. Chen, Y. Qin, R. Poprawe and J.H. Schleifenbaum, Laser additive manufacturing of Zn metal parts for biodegradable applications: processing, formation quality and mechanical properties, Mater. Des., 2018, 155, p 36–45.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.057 ↗
28. A. Pandey, A. Awasthi and K.K. Saxena, Metallic implants with properties and latest production techniques: a review, Adv. Mater. Process. Technol., 2020, 6(2), p 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.173123610.1080/2374068X.2020.1731236 ↗
29. M. Chandra, F. Shahab, V. KEK, and S. Rajak, “Selection for additive manufacturing using hybrid MCDM technique considering sustainable concepts,” Rapid Prototyp. J., 28, 71297–1311, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2021-0155.10.1108/RPJ-06-2021-0155 ↗
30. K. Ransikarbum and P. Khamhong, Integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution for additive manufacturing printer selection, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(9), p 6481–6492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05816-y10.1007/s11665-021-05816-y ↗
31. M. Palanisamy, A. Pugalendhi and R. Ranganathan, Selection of suitable additive manufacturing machine and materials through best–worst method (BWM), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 107(5–6), p 2345–2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05110-610.1007/s00170-020-05110-6 ↗
32. M. B. Anand and S. Vinodh, Application of fuzzy AHP – TOPSIS for ranking additive manufacturing processes for microfabrication, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2016-0160.10.1108/RPJ-10-2016-0160 ↗
33. I. Peko, N. Gjeldum and B. Bilić, Application of AHP, fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE method in solving additive manufacturing process selection problem, Teh. Vjesn., 2018, 25(2), p 453–461. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-2017012409290610.17559/TV-20170124092906 ↗
34. R. Yadav, M. Singh, A. Meena, S.Y. Lee and S.J. Park, Selection and ranking of dental restorative composite materials using hybrid Entropy-VIKOR method: an application of MCDM technique, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2023, 147, p 106103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10610310.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106103 ↗
35. J. Raigar, V.S. Sharma, S. Srivastava, R. Chand and J. Singh, A decision support system for the selection of an additive manufacturing process using a new hybrid MCDM technique, Sadhana - Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01338-w10.1007/s12046-020-01338-w ↗
36. K. Ransikarbum, R. Pitakaso, N. Kim, and J. Ma, “Multicriteria decision analysis framework for part orientation analysis in additive manufacturing,” vol. 8, no. June, pp. 1141–1157, 2021.10.1093/jcde/qwab037 ↗
37. D. Ren, J.K. Choi and K. Schneider, A multicriteria decision-making method for additive manufacturing process selection, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2022, 28(11), p 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2021-030210.1108/RPJ-11-2021-0302 ↗
38. J. Borah, M. Chandrasekaran and L. Selvarajan, Taguchi-based experimental investigation and modeling of 3D-printed PEEK parts as biomedical implants using fused deposition modeling for improving mechanical strength and surface quality, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-09036-410.1007/s11665-023-09036-4 ↗
39. Y. Chowdary, P. Naga, and S. Krishna, “Evaluation and Prioritizing of Biomaterials for the application of implantation in human body using Fuzzy AHP AND TOPSIS Sai ram Vakkalagadda Arizona State University,” no. January, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316643579
40. C. A. F. Salvador, H. P. Van Landeghem, and R. A. Antunes, “Selection of Ti Alloys for Bio-Implants: An Application of the Ashby Approach with Conflicting Objectives,” vol. 2301169, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202301169.10.1002/adem.202301169 ↗
41. L.X. Phung, T. Do, P. Tran and T.K. Nguyen, Development of a fuzzy-AHP system to select the printing method for polycaprolactone (PCL)-based scaffolds, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2022, 121(9–10), p 5971–5990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09655-610.1007/s00170-022-09655-6 ↗
42. M. A. Sofuog, A new biomaterial selection approach using reference ideal method, vol. 0123456789, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01559-7.10.1007/s12046-021-01559-7 ↗
43. R. Kumar, R. Dubey, S. Singh, S. Singh, and C. Prakash, “Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for,” 2021.
44. B. Uzer, S.M. Toker, A. Cingoz, T. Bagci-onder, G. Gerstein and H.J. Maier, An exploration of plastic deformation dependence of cell viability and adhesion in metallic implant materials, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2016, 60, p 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.001 ↗
45. M.H. Mobarak, M.A. Islam, N. Hossain, M.Z. Al Mahmud, M.T. Rayhan, N.J. Nishi and M.A. Chowdhury, Recent advances of additive manufacturing in implant fabrication–a review, Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv., 2023, 18, 100462.10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100462 ↗
46. M. Prakasam, J. Locs, K. Salma-Ancane, D. Loca, A. Largeteau and L. Berzina-Cimdina, Biodegradable materials and metallic implants-a review, J. Funct. Biomater., 2017, 8(4), p 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb804004410.3390/jfb8040044 ↗
47. Mordyuk, B. N., Voloshko, S. M., Zakiev, V. I., Burmak, A. P., Skoryk, M. A., Mohylko, V. V. & Lesyk, D. A. (2024). Wear and Friction Performance of Alumina-Reinforced Composite Coating on Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Produced by Combining Ultrasonic Impact Treatment and Air-Oxidation. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 1-22.10.1007/s11665-024-09979-2 ↗
48. E. Davoodi, H. Montazerian, A.S. Mirhakimi, M. Zhianmanesh, O. Ibhadode, S.I. Shahabad and E. Toyserkani, Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials, Bioactive Mater., 2022, 15, p 214–249.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.027 ↗
49. P. Bansal, G. Singh and H.S. Sidhu, Plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite-strontium coating for improved corrosion resistance and surface properties of biodegradable AZ31 mg alloy for biomedical applications, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(3), p 1768–1779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05490-010.1007/s11665-021-05490-0 ↗
50. Ş Kasman, I.C. Uçar and S. Ozan, The effects of laser surface texturing parameters on the surface characteristics of biomedical-grade stainless steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2024, 33(12), p 5793–5806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08374-710.1007/s11665-023-08374-7 ↗
51. A.W. Hashmi, H.S. Mali, A. Meena, K.K. Saxena, S. Ahmad, M.K. Agrawal, B. Sagbas, A.P.V. Puerta and M.I. Khan, A comprehensive review on surface post-treatments for freeform surfaces of bio-implants, J. Market. Res., 2023, 23, p 4866–4908.
52. M.A. Hussein, B.Y. Demir, A.M. Kumar and A.F. Abdelaal, Surface properties and in vitro corrosion studies of blasted and thermally treated ti6al4v alloy for bioimplant applications, Materials (Basel), 2022 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1521761510.3390/ma15217615 ↗
53. D. Fabris, M.C. Fredel, J.C.M.. Souza, F.S. Silva and B. Henriques, Biomechanical behavior of functionally graded S53P4 bioglass-zirconia dental implants: experimental and finite element analyses, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2021, 120, p 104565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10456510.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104565 ↗
54. J. F. Singh Raman, R.K.; Wen, C.; Löffler, “Human Body-Fluid-Assisted Fracture of Zinc Alloys as,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 4984, pp. 1–15, 202310.3390/ma16144984 ↗
55. G. Hong, J. Liu, S.F. Cobos, T. Khazaee, M. Drangova and D.W. Holdsworth, Effective magnetic susceptibility of 3D-printed porous metal scaffolds, Magn. Reson. Med., 2022, 87(6), p 2947–2956. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.2913610.1002/mrm.29136 ↗
56. V. Keršuliene, E.K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, Racionalaus ginču sprendimo būdo nustatymas taikant naujas kriterijų svorių nustatymo metodas, pagrįstas nuosekliu laipsnišku poriniu kriterijų santykinės svarbos lyginimu, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 2010, 11(2), p 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.1210.3846/jbem.2010.12 ↗
57. S.S. Goswami, D.K. Behera and S. Mitra, A comprehensive study of weighted product model for selecting the best laptop model available in the market, Brazil. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 2020, 17(2), p 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2020.01710.14488/BJOPM.2020.017 ↗
58. S. Vrtagić, E. Softić, M. Subotić, Ž Stević, M. Dordevic and M. Ponjavic, Ranking road sections based on mcdm model: new improved fuzzy swara (imf swara), Axioms, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms1002009210.3390/axioms10020092 ↗
59. D. Karabasevic, D. Stanujkic, S. Urosevic and M. Maksimovic, An approach to personnel selection based on Swara and Waspas methods, Bizinfo Blace, 2016, 7(1), p 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5937/bizinfo1601001k10.5937/bizinfo1601001k ↗
60. D. Karabasevic, D. Stanujkic and S. Urosevic, The MCDM model for personnel selection based on SWARA and ARAS methods, Manag. J. theory Pract. Manag., 2015, 20(77), p 43–52. https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2015.002910.7595/management.fon.2015.0029 ↗
61. V. Kumar, and O.J. Shukla, INTERNATIONAL PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL. Prof. Ashish Agrawal, 10(36), p.119
62. W. Chen, X. Lianyong, Y. Han, L. Zhao and H. Jing, Control of residual stress in metal additive manufacturing by low-temperature solid-state phase transformation: an experimental and numerical study, Add. Manuf., 2021, 42, p 102016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10201610.1016/j.addma.2021.102016 ↗
63. S. Dhiman, S.S. Sidhu, P.S. Bains and M. Bahraminasab, Mechanobiological assessment of Ti-6Al-4V fabricated via selective laser melting technique: a review, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2019, 25(7), p 1266–1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-005710.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0057 ↗
64. M. Sarraf, E. Rezvani Ghomi, S. Alipour, S. Ramakrishna and N. Liana Sukiman, A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications, Bio-Design Manuf., 2022, 5(2), p 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00170-310.1007/s42242-021-00170-3 ↗
65. P. Rajani and A.J. Babu, Selection of bio-implant materials using entropy and analytic hierarchy process, Res. Rev. A J. Bioinform., 2017, 4(3), p 15–21.
66. D. Petković, M. Madić, G. Radenković, M. Manić, and M. Trajanović, “Decision Support System for Selection of the Most Suitable Biomedical Material,” pp. 27–31, 2015.