Metaheuristic Approach to Enhance Wear Characteristics of Novel AA7178/nSiC Metal Matrix Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to enhance understanding of material wear behavior by investigating the microstructure and wear characteristics of AA7178 matrix alloy reinforced with varying wt.% (0, 1, 2, and 3%) of nano-SiC particles, fabricated through stir-casting. The research addresses deficiencies in current materials used in aerospace components, where wear resistance is crucial. These materials often suffer from inadequate wear resistance, surface damage susceptibility, and rapid degradation under abrasive conditions, resulting in increased maintenance costs, reduced component lifespans, and diminished system efficiency. To address these issues, the hypothesis posits that integrating nano-SiC particles into the AA7178 matrix alloy will enhance wear resistance and advance high-performance metal matrix composites. The dry sliding wear behavior of the nanocomposites was examined using a pin-on-disc wear test apparatus with EN31 steel as the counterbody material. Systematic variations in sliding velocity (1, 2, 3, and 4 m/s), distance (500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 m), and load (10, 20, 30, and 40 N) were conducted. Employing the L16 Taguchi method, experimental research and wear analysis revealed that the most influential factor affecting wear rate was the applied load (67.39%), followed by the SiC wt.% (30.85%), with an R2 value of 99.80%. Optimization of wear process parameters was achieved through metaheuristic techniques, encompassing the Rao-1, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithms. The Rao-1 technique demonstrated robustness at approximately 98%, displaying higher efficiency in parameter optimization. Optical microscope analysis identified micro-cutting and micro-ploughing as the primary wear mechanisms. Under specific conditions—9.81 N applied load, 4 m/s sliding speed, 500 m wear distance, and a 3% SiC wt.%—the AA7178/SiC composites exhibited optimal wear resistance, measuring 1.7088*10−3 mm3/m. These findings offer critical guidance for engineering high-performance metal matrix composites, effectively addressing the inherent deficiencies in aerospace component materials.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. A.H. Badran, T. Alamro, R.W. Bazuhair, A.A. El-Mawla, S.Z. El-Adben, and A. Fouly, Investigation of the Mechanical Behavior of Synthesized Al6061/TiO2 Microcomposites Using an Innovative Stir Casting Method, Nanomaterials, 2022, 12, p 1646.10.3390/nano12101646 ↗
2. N.M. Kumar and L.A. Kumaraswamidhas, Characterization and Tribological Analysis on AA 6061 Reinforced with AlN and ZrB2 in Situ Composites, J. Market. Res., 2019, 8(1), p 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.00810.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.008 ↗
3. M.M. Khan, A. Dey, and M.I. Hajam, Experimental Investigation and Optimization of Dry Sliding Wear Test Parameters of Aluminum Based Composites, Silicon, 2022, 14(8), p 4009–4026.10.1007/s12633-021-01158-5 ↗
4. A.M. Sadoun, A.F. Meselhy, and A.W. Abdallah, Microstructural, Mechanical and Wear Behavior of Electroless Assisted Silver Coated Al2O3–Cu Nanocomposites, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2021, 266, p 124562.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124562 ↗
5. G.S. Alsoruji, A.M. Sadoun, M.A. Elaziz, M.A. Al-Betar, A.W. Abdallah, and A. Fathy, On the Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Ultrafine Grain Al-TiO2 Nanocomposites Using a Modified Long-Short Term Memory Model with Beluga Whale Optimizer, J. Market. Res., 2023, 23, p 4075–4088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.21210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.212 ↗
6. A. Sadoun, A. Ibrahim, and A.W. Abdallah, Fabrication and Evaluation of Tribological Properties of Al2O3 Coated Ag Reinforced Copper Matrix Nanocomposite by Mechanical Alloying, J. Asian Ceram. Soc. Taylor Francis, 2020, 8(4), p 1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2020.184107310.1080/21870764.2020.1841073 ↗
7. A. Mohamed, M.M. Mohammed, A.F. Ibrahim, and O.A. El-Kady, Effect of Nano Al2O3 Coated Ag Reinforced Cu Matrix Nanocomposites on Mechanical and Tribological Behavior Synthesis by P/M Technique, J. Compos. Mater., 2020, 54(30), p 4921–4928. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199832093486010.1177/0021998320934860 ↗
8. A. Ramaswamy, Investigation on Mechanical Properties and Dry Sliding Wear Characterization of Stir Cast LM13 Aluminium Alloy-ZrB2-TiC Particulate Hybrid Composites, Mater. Res. Express, 2019, 6, p 066578.10.1088/2053-1591/ab0ef8 ↗
9. J.D.R. Selvam and I. Dinaharan, In Situ Formation of ZrB2 Particulates and Their Influence on Microstructure and Tensile Behavior of AA7075 Aluminum Matrix Composites, Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., 2017, 20(1), p 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.09.00610.1016/j.jestch.2016.09.006 ↗
10. D.N. Vithal, B.B. Krishna, and G.M. Krishna, Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Fracture Mechanisms of ZrB2 Ceramic Reinforced A7075 Composites Fabricated by Stir Casting, Mater. Today Commun., 2020, 25, p 101289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10128910.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101289 ↗
11. V.R. Rao, N. Ramanaiah,, and M.M.M. Sarcar, Dry Sliding Wear Behavior of TiC – AA7075 Metal Matrix Composites, 2016, (October 2015), p 27–37.
12. A. Dhulipalla, B. Uday Kumar, V. Akhil, J. Zhang, Z. Lu, H.Y. Park, Y.G. Jung, and J. Zhang, Synthesis and Machining Characteristics of Novel TiC Ceramic and MoS2 Soft Particulate Reinforced Aluminium Alloy 7075 Matrix Composites, Manuf. Lett. Soc. Manuf. Eng. (SME), 2020, 24, p 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.04.00110.1016/j.mfglet.2020.04.001 ↗
13. K.K. Patel, V. Kumar, R. Purohit, G.K. Gupta, and O.P. Modi, Effect of Ultrasonic Stirring on Changes in Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cast In-Situ Al 5083 Alloy Composites Containing 5 wt.% and 10 wt.% TiC Particles, Mater. Today Proc., 2017, 4(2), p 3494–3500.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.239 ↗
14. P. Saini and P.K. Singh, Fabrication and Characterization of SiC-Reinforced Al-4032 Metal Matrix Composites, Eng. Res. Express, 2022, 4(1), p 015004.10.1088/2631-8695/ac4831 ↗
15. V. Chakkravarthy, M. Lakshmanan, P. Manojkumar, and R. Prabhakaran, Crystallographic Orientation and Wear Characteristics of TiN, SiC, Nb Embedded Al7075 Composite, Mater. Lett., 2022, 306, p 130936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13093610.1016/j.matlet.2021.130936 ↗
16. K.R. Padmavathi, R. Ramakrishnan, L. Karthikeyan, S. Tamizhselvan, and S. Chezhian Babu, Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Micro/Nano SiC/TiO2 Reinforced Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites, Mater. Today Proc., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.31510.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.315 ↗
17. C. Fenghong, C. Chang, W. Zhenyu, T. Muthuramalingam, and G. Anbuchezhiyan, Effects of Silicon Carbide and Tungsten Carbide in Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites, Silicon, 2019, 11(6), p 2625–2632.10.1007/s12633-018-0051-6 ↗
18. L. Poovazhagan, K. Kalaichelvan, V.R. Balaji, P. Ganesh, and A.K. Avudaiappan, Development of AA6061 / SiC p Metal Matrix Composites by Conventional Stir Casting and Ultrasonic Assisted Casting Routes – A Comparative Study, Adv. Mater. Res., 2014, 985, p 384–389.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.384 ↗
19. P. Madhukar, N. Selvaraj, C.S.P. Rao, and G.B. Veeresh Kumar, Enhanced Performance of AA7150-SiC Nanocomposites Synthesized by Novel Fabrication Process, Ceram. Int., 2020, 46, p 17103–17111.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.007 ↗
20. M.S. Surya and G. Prasanthi, Effect of Silicon Carbide Weight Percentage and Number of Layers on Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Al7075/SiC Functionally Graded Material, Silicon, 2022, 14(4), p 1339–1348.10.1007/s12633-020-00865-9 ↗
21. S. Basavarajappa, G. Chandramohan, K. Mukund, M. Ashwin, and M. Prabu, Dry Sliding Wear Behavior of Al 2219/SiCp-Gr Hybrid Metal Matrix Composites, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2006, 15(6), p 668–674.10.1361/105994906X150803 ↗
22. H. Ahmadian, A.M. Sadoun, A. Fathy, and T. Zhou, Utilizing a Unified Conceptual Dynamic Model for Prediction of Particle Size of Duel-Matrix Nanocomposites during Mechanical Alloying, Powder Technol., 2023, 418, p 118291.10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118291 ↗
23. B. Stojanović, S. Gajević, N. Kostić, S. Miladinović, and A. Vencl, Optimization of Parameters That Affect Wear of A356/Al2O3 Nanocomposites Using RSM, ANN, GA and PSO Methods, Ind. Lubr. Tribol., 2022, 74(3), p 350–359.10.1108/ILT-07-2021-0262 ↗
24. M. Nataraj, K. Balasubramanian, and D. Palanisamy, Optimization of Machining Parameters for CNC Turning of Al/Al2O3 MMC Using RSM Approach, Mater Today Proc., 2018, 5(6), p 14265–14272.10.1016/j.matpr.2018.03.008 ↗
25. D. Podder, S. Chakraborty, and U.K. Mandal, RSM Analysis of Impact Property and Characterization of Al6063-Cu-TiO2-ZrO2 Composites Fabricated by Stir Casting Process, Sādhanā, 2021, 46(2), p 72.10.1007/s12046-021-01583-7 ↗
26. S. Sivasankaran, K.R. Ramkumar, F.A. Al-Mufadi, and O.M. Irfan, Effect of TiB2/Gr Hybrid Reinforcements in Al 7075 Matrix on Sliding Wear Behavior Analyzed by Response Surface Methodology, Met. Mater. Int., 2021, 27(6), p 1739–1755.10.1007/s12540-019-00543-5 ↗
27. N. Bharat, A. Kumar, and P.S.C. Bose, A Study on Soft Computing Optimizing Techniques, Mater. Today Proc., 2022, 50, p 1193–1198.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.068 ↗
28. T.V. Sibalija, Particle Swarm Optimisation in Designing Parameters of Manufacturing Processes: A Review (2008–2018), Appl. Soft Comput., 2019, 84, 105743.10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105743 ↗
29. N.K. Kulkarni, S. Patekar, T. Bhoskar, O. Kulkarni, G.M. Kakandikar, and V.M. Nandedkar, Particle Swarm Optimization Applications to Mechanical Engineering- A Review, Mater. Today Proc., 2015, 2(4), p 2631–2639.10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.223 ↗
30. M.S. Alajmi and A.M. Almeshal, Prediction and Optimization of Surface Roughness in a Turning Process Using the ANFIS-QPSO Method, Materials, 2020, 13, p 2986.10.3390/ma13132986 ↗
31. A.R. Yildiz, Optimization of Cutting Parameters in Multi-Pass Turning Using Artificial Bee Colony-Based Approach, Inform. Sci., 2013, 220, p 399–407.10.1016/j.ins.2012.07.012 ↗
32. M.K. Das, K. Kumar, T.K. Barman, and P. Sahoo, Application of Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Optimization of MRR and Surface Roughness in EDM of EN31 Tool Steel, Proc. Mater. Sci., 2014, 6, p 741–751.10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.090 ↗
33. S. Suyanto, A.T. Wibowo, S. Al Faraby, S. Saadah, and R. Rismala, Evolutionary Rao Algorithm, J. Comput. Sci., 2021, 53, p 101368.10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101368 ↗
34. I. Najjar, A. Sadoun, M.N. Alam, and A. Fathy, Prediction of Wear Rates of Al-TiO2 Nanocomposites Using Artificial Neural Network Modified with Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, Mater. Today Commun., 2023, 35, 105743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10574310.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105743 ↗
35. A.A. Tofigh, M.R. Rahimipour, M.O. Shabani, and P. Davami, Application of the Combined Neuro-Computing, Fuzzy Logic and Swarm Intelligence for Optimization of Compocast Nanocomposites, J. Compos. Mater., 2014, 49(13), p 1653–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831453887110.1177/0021998314538871 ↗
36. V. Mohanavel and M. Ravichandran, Optimization of Parameters to Improve the Properties of AA7178/Si3N4 Composites Employing Taguchi Approach, Silicon, 2021, p 1381–1394.10.1007/s12633-020-00917-0 ↗
37. S.D. Kumar, M. Ravichandran, A. Jeevika, B. Stalin, C. Kailasanathan, and A. Karthick, Effect of ZrB2 on Microstructural, Mechanical and Corrosion Behaviour of Aluminium (AA7178) Alloy Matrix Composite Prepared by the Stir Casting Route, Ceram. Int., 2021, 47(9), p 12951–12962.10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.158 ↗
38. P. Chattoraj, P. Prabhakar, V. Koti, N.S. Natarajan, M. Lakshminarayana, K. Arul, M. Venkatachalapathy, M. Ahamed, M. Karnan, and S.P. Kumar, Optimization on Tribological Behaviour of AA7178/Nano Titanium Diboride Hybrid Composites Employing Taguchi Techniques, J. Nanomater., 2022, 2022, p 1619923. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/161992310.1155/2022/1619923 ↗
39. V. Mohanavel, K. Yoganandam, V.N. Kumar, A. Chandrashekar, and S. Prasath, Evaluation of Tribological Behaviour of AA7178/Gr Composites Using Taguchi Optimization Technique, Mater. Today Proc., 2020, 33, p 4691–4695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.34610.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.346 ↗
40. V.K. Reddy, B. Kuriachen, J. Joshy, and M.L. Joy, Influence of Areal Surface Parameters on the Tribological Behavior of Ti6Al4V under Lubricated Condition, Tribol. Int., 2023, 179, p 108147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2022.10814710.1016/j.triboint.2022.108147 ↗
41. S. Senthil Kumar, T.S. Senthilkumar, P. Pitchipoo, Y.D. Dwivedi, N. Nagaprasad, K.K. Saxena, S. Rathinavel, S.M. Eldin, and K. Ramaswamy, Grey Relational Analysis and Surface Texture Analysis of Al-Based Metal Matrix Composites, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2023, 24, p 5372–5388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.11810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.118 ↗
42. B. Stalin, P. Ramesh Kumar, M. Ravichandran, M. Siva Kumar, and M. Meignanamoorthy, Optimization of Wear Parameters Using Taguchi Grey Relational Analysis and ANN-TLBO Algorithm for Silicon Nitride Filled AA6063 Matrix Composites, Mater. Res. Express, 2019, 6(10), p 106590. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab3d9010.1088/2053-1591/ab3d90 ↗
43. M. Ravichandran, S.V. Alagarsamy, V. Dhinakaran, M. Abdul Samad, and J.K. Katiyar, Optimization of Tribological Process Parameters of Titanium Carbide Reinforced Copper Matrix Composites, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 2022, 236(9), p 1737–1751. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650122108505510.1177/13506501221085055 ↗
44. N. Radhika, K.T. Vijaykarthik, and P. Shivaram, Adhesive Wear Behaviour of Aluminium Hybrid Metal Matrix Composites Using Genetic Algorithm, J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2015, 10, p 258–268.
45. N. Yusup, A.M. Zain, and S.Z.M. Hashim, Evolutionary Techniques in Optimizing Machining Parameters: Review and Recent Applications (2007–2011), Expert Syst. Appl., 2012, 39(10), p 9909–9927.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.109 ↗
46. R.V. Rao, Rao Algorithms: Three Metaphor-Less Simple Algorithms for Solving Optimization Problems, Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput., 2020, 11(1), p 107–130.
47. A. Farah, F. Benabdallah, A. Belazi, A. Almalaq, M. Chtourou, and M.A. Abido, An Improved Rao-1 Algorithm for Parameter Estimation of Photovoltaic Models, Optik (Stuttg), 2022, 260, p 168938.10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168938 ↗
48. N. Yusup, A.M. Zain, and S.Z.M. Hashim, Overview of PSO for Optimizing Process Parameters of Machining, Proc. Eng., 2012, 29, p 914–923.10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.064 ↗
49. V. Gopan, K.L.D. Wins, G. Evangeline, and A. Surendran, Experimental Investigation for the Multi-Objective Optimization of Machining Parameters on AISI D2 Steel Using Particle Swarm Optimization Coupled with Artificial Neural Network, J. Adv. Manuf. Syst., 2020, 19(03), p 589–606.10.1142/S0219686720500286 ↗