An Analysis Framework of Additively Manufactured Deterministic Porous Structures for Transpiration Cooling
Source abstract
Abstract
Transpiration cooling has seen a resurgence of interest for thermal protection in hypersonic flight, rocket engine liners, and gas turbines. To date, materials for transpiration cooling have been restricted to porous ceramic composites and sintered metal foams. Advances in additive manufacturing have enabled the creation of architected lattices, which have deterministic mesostructures. One such family of lattices are triply-periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS), which are continuous, analytically-defined, repeating 3D geometries. Additively-manufactured metal TPMS structures are already being studied for biomedical applications and it is proposed that they could offer several advantages for transpiration cooling as well: high surface area-to-volume ratio, pore inter-connectivity, and mechanical strength. In this work, the fluid flow behavior through a gyroid TPMS lattice is investigated through computational fluid dynamics simulation, using the lattice Boltzmann method. A comparison is made between ideal geometry and the as-printed geometry of a sample fabricated with laser powder bed fusion and characterized using x-ray computed tomography. The as-printed part matched the design porosity to within 1%, while the as-printed permeability was found to be 14.8% lower than that of the ideal geometry. The results of this research will assist in developing a methodology for the design optimization via performance simulation of these structures to meet fluid flow requirements for transpiration cooling applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. D. Greuel, A. Herbertz, and O. J. Haidn, et al. “Transpiration cooling applied to c/c liners of cryogenic liquid rocket engines”. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004
2. M. Kuhn and H. Hald, Application of transpiration cooling for hot structures, Respace – key technologies for reusable space systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, p 82–10310.1007/978-3-540-77819-6_6 ↗
3. N. Christopher, J.M.F. Peter, and M.J. Kloker et al., DNS of Turbulent Flat- Plate Flow with Transpiration Cooling, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2020, 157, p 119972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.11997210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119972 ↗
4. H. Bohrk, “Transpiration-cooling with porous ceramic composites in hypersonic flow”. In: Porous media in high temperature and high speed flows. NATO, 2016. URL: https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Educational%20Notes/STO-EN-AVT-261/EN-AVT-261-05.pdf.
5. Z. Min, G. Huang, and S.N. Parbat et al., Experimental Investigation on Additively Manufactured Transpiration and Film Cooling Structures, J. Turbomach., 2019, 141(3), p 031009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404200910.1115/1.4042009 ↗
6. M. Arai and T. Suidzu, Porous Ceramic Coating for Transpiration Cooling of Gas Turbine Blade, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2013, 22(5), p 690–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-013-9883-110.1007/s11666-013-9883-1 ↗
7. G. Huang, Z. Min, and L. Yang et al., Transpiration Cooling for Additive Manufactured Porous Plates with Partition Walls, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2018, 124, p 1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.11010.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.110 ↗
8. L. Yang, Z. Min, and S. N. Parbat, et al. “Effect of pore blockage on transpiration cooling with additive manufacturable perforate holes”. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2D: Turbo- machinery. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, June 2018, pp. 1–9. ISBN: 978-0- 7918-5102-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75310. URL: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/GT/proceedings/GT2018/51029/Oslo,%20Norway/272425.10.1115/GT2018-75310 ↗
9. Y.Q. Liu, P.X. Jiang, and Y.B. Xiong et al., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Transpiration Cooling for Sintered Porous Flat Plates, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2013, 50(1), p 997–1007.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.08.028 ↗
10. X. Guoqiang, Y. Liu, and X. Luo et al., Experimental Investigation of Transpiration Cooling for Sintered Woven Wire Mesh Structures, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2015, 91, p 898–907.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.060 ↗
11. G. Huang, Y. Zhu, and Z. Liao et al., Biomimetic Self-Pumping Transpiration Cooling for Additive Manufactured Porous Module with Tree-like Micro-Channel, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2019, 131, p 403–410.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.07.143 ↗
12. G. Huang, Y. Zhu, and Z.Y. Liao et al., Transpiration Cooling with Bio-Inspired Structured Surfaces, Bioinspir. Biomimetics, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748190/ab6bdf10.1088/1748190/ab6bdf ↗
13. I. Maskery, L. Sturm, and A.O. Aremu et al., Insights into the Mechanical Properties of Several Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattice Structures made by Polymer Additive Manufacturing, Polymer, 2018, 152, p 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.04910.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.049 ↗
14. L. Han and S. Che, An Overview of Materials with Triply Periodic Minimal Sur- faces and Related Geometry: From Biological Structures to Self-Assembled Systems, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(17), p 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170570810.1002/adma.201705708 ↗
15. J. Feng, J. Fu, and X. Yao et al., Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Porous Structures: From Multi-Scale Design, Precise Additive Manufacturing to Multidisciplinary Applications, Int. J. Extreme Manuf., 2022, 4(2), p 022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ac5be610.1088/2631-7990/ac5be6 ↗
16. D. Dickstein, D.D. Ko, and W. Nadvornick et al., Optimized Permeability of Microporous Foam for Transpiration Cooling in Hypersonic Leading Edge, J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., 2022 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.t647510.2514/1.t6475 ↗
17. C. Yan, L. Hao, A. and Hussein et al., Ti-6Al-4V Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Structures for Bone Implants Fabricated via Selective Laser Melting, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2015, 51, p 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.02410.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.024 ↗
18. B. Zhang, J. Huang, and W. Li et al., Synthesis and Characterization of Light-Weight Porous Ceramics used in the Transpiration Cooling, Acta Astronaut., 2020, 177, p 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.00810.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.008 ↗
19. J. Santos, T. Pires, and B.P. Gouveia et al., On the Permeability of TPMS Scaffolds, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2020, 110, p 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10393210.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103932 ↗
20. I. Echeta, X. Feng, and B. Dutton et al., Review of Defects in Lattice Structures Manufactured by Powder Bed Fusion, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 106, p 2649–2668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04753-410.1007/s00170-019-04753-4 ↗
21. I. Kaur and P. Singh, Flow and Thermal Transport Characteristics of Triply-Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS)-Based Gyroid and Schwarz-P Cellular Materials, Numer. Heat Transf. Part A Appl., 2021, 79(8), p 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2021.187226010.1080/10407782.2021.1872260 ↗
22. Y. Jung and S. Torquato, Fluid Permeabilities of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter. Phys., 2005, 72(5), p 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.05631910.1103/PhysRevE.72.056319 ↗
23. A. O. Aremu, I. Maskery, C. Tuck, et al. “A comparative finite element study of cubic unit cells for selective laser melting”. In: 2014 Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. 2014, pp. 1238–1249. URL: https://hdl.handle.net/2152/89271.
24. T. Maconachie, M. Leary, and B. Lozanovski et al., SLM Lattice Structures: Properties, Performance, Applications and Challenges, Mater. Des., 2019, 183, p 108137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10813710.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 ↗
25. C. Pauzon, T. Mishurova, and M. Fischer et al., Impact of Contour Scanning and Helium-Rich Process Gas on Performances of Alloy 718 Lattices Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Mater. Des., 2022, 215, p 110501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11050110.1016/j.matdes.2022.110501 ↗
26. M. Leary, M. Mazur, and H. Williams et al., Inconel 625 Lattice Structures Manufactured by Selective laser Melting (SLM): Mechanical Properties, Deformation and Failure Modes, Mater. Des., 2018, 157, p 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.01010.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010 ↗
27. H. Soni, M. Gor, and G.S. Rajput et al., A Comprehensive Review on Effect of Process Parameters and Heat Treatment on Tensile Strength of Additively Manufactured Inconel-625, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 47, p 4866–4871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.12610.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.126 ↗
28. K.D. Ramkumar, W.S. Abraham, and V. Viyash et al., Investigations on the Microstructure, Tensile Strength and High Temperature Corrosion Behaviour of Inconel 625 and Inconel 718 Dissimilar Joints, J. Manuf. Process., 2017, 25, p 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.12.01810.1016/j.jmapro.2016.12.018 ↗
29. N. Otsu, A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1979, 9, p 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
30. S. Chen and G.D. Doolen, Lattice Boltzmann Method for Fluid Flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 1998, 30, p 329–364. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.32910.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.329 ↗
31. T. Kruger, H. Kusumaatmaja, and A. Kuzmin et al., The lattice boltzmann method principles and practice, Springer, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-44649-3 ↗
32. M.A. Gallivan, D.R. Noble, and J.G. Georgiadis et al., An Evaluation of the Bounce-Back Boundary Condition for lattice Boltzmann Simulations, J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 1997, 25(3), p 249–263.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19970815)25:3<249::AID-FLD546>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
33. D. Ali, M. Ozalp, S.B.G. Blanquer et al., Permeability and Fluid Flow- Induced Wall Shear Stress in Bone Scaffolds with TPMS and Lattice Architectures: A CFD Analysis, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids, 2020, 79, p 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.09.01510.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.09.015 ↗
34. T. Pires, J. Santos, and R.B. Ruben et al., Numerical-Experimental Analysis of the Permeability-Porosity Relationship in Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces Scaffolds, J. Biomech., 2021, 117, p 110263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.11026310.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110263 ↗
35. Z. Cheng, X. Li, and R. Xu et al., Investigations on Porous Media Customized by Triply Periodic Minimal Surface: Heat Transfer Correlations and Strength Performance, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2021, 129, p 105713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.10571310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105713 ↗
36. J. Latt, O. Malaspinas, and D. Kontaxakis et al., Palabos: Parallel Lattice Boltzmann Solver, Comput. Math. Appl., 2021, 81, p 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.03.02210.1016/j.camwa.2020.03.022 ↗
37. R. Mei, W. Shyy, and D. Yu et al., Lattice Boltzmann Method for 3-D Flows with Curved Boundary, J. Comput. Phys., 2000, 161(2), p 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.652210.1006/jcph.2000.6522 ↗
38. S.K. Kang and Y.A. Hassan, The Effect of Lattice Models Within the Lattice Boltzmann Method in the Simulation of Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows, J. Comput. Phys., 2013, 232(1), p 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.07.02310.1016/j.jcp.2012.07.023 ↗
39. M. Dallago, S. Raghavendra, and V. Luchin et al., Geometric Assessment of Lattice Materials Built Via Selective Laser Melting, Mater. Today Proc., 2019, 7, p 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.11.09610.1016/j.matpr.2018.11.096 ↗
40. H. Wang, P. Chen, and H. Wu et al., Comparative Evaluation of Printability and Compression Properties of Poly-ether-ether-ketone Triply Periodic Minimal surface Scaffolds Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 57, p 102961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10296110.1016/j.addma.2022.102961 ↗
41. A. El Elmi, D. Melancon, and M. Asgari et al., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Selective Laser Melting-Induced Defects in Ti-6Al-4V octet Truss Lattice Material: The Role of Material Microstructure and Morphological Variations, J. Mater. Res., 2020, 35(15), p 1900–1912. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2020.7510.1557/jmr.2020.75 ↗
42. E. Hernández-Nava, S. Tammas-Williams, and C. Smith et al., X-ray Tomography Characterisation of Lattice Structures Processed by Selective Electron Beam Melting, Metals, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3390/met708030010.3390/met7080300 ↗
43. S. Patel, A. Rogalsky, and M. Vlasea, Towards Understanding Side-Skin Surface Characteristics in Laser Powder Bed Fusion, J. Mater. Res., 2020, 35(15), p 2055–2064. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2020.12510.1557/jmr.2020.125 ↗
44. N. Soro, N. Saintier, and H. Attar et al., Surface and Morphological Modification of Selectively Laser Melted Titanium Lattices using a Chemical Post Treatment, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2020, 393, p 125794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12579410.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125794 ↗
45. Y. Hu, D. Li, and S. Shu et al., Simulation of Steady Fluid-Solid Conjugate Heat Transfer Problems via Immersed Boundary-Lattice Boltzmann Method, Comput. Math. Appl., 2015, 70(9), p 2227–2237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2015.08.02410.1016/j.camwa.2015.08.024 ↗
46. K.V. Sharma, R. Straka, and F.W. Tavares, Current Status of Lattice Boltzmann Methods Applied to Aerodynamic, Aeroacoustic, and Thermal Flows, Progr. Aerosp. Sci., 2020, 115, p 100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.10061610.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100616 ↗