Fatigue Behavior of L-PBF Metals: Cost-Effective Characterization via Specimen Miniaturization
Source abstract
Abstract
High-performance metal parts are presently produced by the powder bed fusion (PBF) technology. When considered for structural applications, a key ingredient that would promote technology acceptance in industry is know-how on fatigue properties of PBF metals. The typical approach of published fatigue characterizations uses specimens of standard geometry with machined gage sections. However, surface machining of PBF parts should be minimal to be competitive with conventional fabrication technologies while the influence of rough as-built surfaces on fatigue performance should be experimentally quantified to overcome unacceptable trial-and-error approach to part design and qualification. To support this critical task, an original testing approach based on drastic specimen miniaturization to reduce cost and increase flexibility (i.e., the specimen is 22 mm long and 5 × 5 mm2 in minimum cross section) and plane cyclic bending to highlight the role of surface state. The method has been first published in 2017 and since then it has successfully applied to the fatigue characterization of L-PBF metals under a variety of surface conditions, surface orientations and surface finish. Factors such as as-built versus machined surfaces, surface orientation with respect to reference build direction, geometrical notches have been investigated for different L-PBF metals. The paper presents this cost-effective test method and reviews its recent applications to the fatigue characterization of Ti6Al4V, AlSi10Mg and In718 under different L-PBF processing and surface finishing conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. W.E. Frazier, Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23, p 1917–192810.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
2. M. Seifi, A. Salem, J. Beuth, O. Harrysson, and J.J. Lewandoski, Overview of Materials Qualification Needs for Metal Additive Manufacturing, JOM, 2016, 68(3), p 747–76410.1007/s11837-015-1810-0 ↗
3. A. Yadollahi and N. Shamsaei, Additive Manufacturing of Fatigue Resistant Materials: Challenges and Opportunities, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 98, p 14–3110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.001 ↗
4. H. K. Rafi, N. V. Karthik, H. Gong, T. L. Starr, and B. E. Stucker, Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2013, 22 (12), p 3872–388310.1007/s11665-013-0658-0 ↗
5. SAE, Aerospace Material Specification: AMS 5662, SAE International, Warrendale, 2009
6. ASTM, ASTM Standard. E466—Standard Practice for Conducting Force-Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials, ASTM, West Conshohocken, 2012
7. G. Nicoletto, Anisotropic High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Obtained by PowderBed Laser Fusion, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 94(Part 2, Cover date: January 2017), p 255–26210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.032 ↗
8. G. Nicoletto, Directional and Notch Effects on the Fatigue Behavior of As-Built DMLS Ti6Al4V, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 106(Cover date: January 2018), p 124–13110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.004 ↗
9. G. Nicoletto, Directional and Notch Effects on the Fatigue Behavior of As-Built SLM Inconel 718, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 128, p 10521110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105211 ↗
10. G. Nicoletto, An Efficient Test Method for the Quantification of Technology-Dependent Factors Affecting the Fatigue Behavior of Metallic AM Components, in Proceedings of ASTM Symposium on Structural Integrity of Additive Manufactured Parts, STP 1620 (2020), pp. 484–50610.1520/STP162020180081 ↗
11. J. Dzugan, M. Seifi, R. Prochazka, M. Rund, P. Podany, P. Konopik, and J.J. Lewandowski, Effects of thickness and orientation on the small scale fracture behaviour of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Mater. Charact., 2018, 143, p 94–10910.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.003 ↗
12. R. Juvinall and K.M. Marshek, Fundamentals of Machine Component Design, Wiley, New York, 2012
13. M. Kahlin, H. Ansell, and J.J. Moverare, Fatigue Behaviour of Notched Additive Manufactured Ti6Al4V with As-Built Surfaces, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 101, p 51–6010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.04.009 ↗
14. X. Zha, F. Jiang, and X. Xu, Investigating the High Frequency Fatigue Failure Mechanisms of Mono and Multilayer PVD Coatings by the Cyclic Impact Tests, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2018, 344, p 689–70110.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.03.101 ↗
15. T.M. Mower and M.J. Long, Mechanical Behavior of Additive Manufactured, Powder-Bed Laser-Fused Materials, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, 651, p 198–21310.1016/j.msea.2015.10.068 ↗
16. D. Wells, Overview of Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Performance of Powder Bed Fusion Alloy N07718. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (2016)
17. G. Nicoletto, Influence of Rough As-Built Surfaces on Smooth and Notched Fatigue Behavior of L-PBF AlSi10Mg, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 34, p 101251