journal article·2024-04

Multi-Objective Optimization for Turning Process of 304 Stainless Steel Based on Dung Beetle Optimizer-Back Propagation Neural Network and Improved Particle Swarm Optimization

Huan Xue, Tao Li, Jie Li, Yansong Zhang, Shiyao Huang, Yongchun Li, Chongwen Yang, Wenqian Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Austenite stainless steel of type 304 is one of the most difficult materials to process. During the machining process, parts easily generate higher surface residual stress in cutting direction (CD) and production costs. To solve the problem, a multi-objective optimization method that combined Dung Beetle Optimizer-Back Propagation Neural Network (DBO-BPNN) and Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (IPSO) algorithm was adopted. Firstly, BPNN, Genetic Algorithm-Back Propagation Neural Network (GA-BPNN) and DBO-BPNN were established to map the nonlinear relationship between surface residual stress in CD and turning parameters. Secondly, a dataset of surface residual stress in CD and material removal rate under different turning parameters was obtained through finite element method (FEM) turning simulation. The dataset was applied into neural network to establish a nonlinear mapping relationship between turning parameters and surface residual stress in CD. The turning parameters are used as variables, the surface residual stress in CD and material removal rate are applied as objective functions. The optimal Pareto solution set of the surface residual stress in CD and material removal rate was acquired by combining DBO-BPNN and IPSO. Finally, turning experiments were designed to verify the accuracy of the turning simulation. The study shows that the surface residual stress in CD decreased by 38.47%, and the material removal rate increased by 91.69%.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. S. Pal, S.S. Bhadauria, and P. Kumar, Studies on Stress Corrosion Cracking of F304 Stainless Steel in Boiling Magnesium Chloride Solution, J. Bio- Tribo-Corr., 2021, 7(2), p 62.10.1007/s40735-021-00498-4 ↗
2. A.H. Elsheikh, S. Shanmugan, T. Muthuramalingam, A.K. Thakur, F.A. Essa, A.M.M. Ibrahim, and A.O. Mosleh, A Comprehensive Review on Residual Stresses in Turning, Adv. Manufact., 2021, 10(2), p 287–312.10.1007/s40436-021-00371-0 ↗
3. B.P. Van, and H.T. Viet, Application of Bat Algorithm for Improvement of Surface Integrity in Turning of AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Korean Soc. Precision Eng., 2021, 38(4), p 237–244.10.7736/JKSPE.021.003 ↗
4. G.R. dos Santos Biasibetti, R.M. Nunes, L.C. de Cesaro Cavaler, G.V. Braga Lemos, A.d.S. Rocha, Turning parameters effects in residual stresses of AISI 1045 steel In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part b-Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 235(9), 1498-1506 (2021)10.1177/0954405421990118 ↗
5. X.T. Deng, M. Cheng, S.H. Zhang, H.W. Song, and M.A. Taha, Residual Stresses and Martensite Transformation in AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Res. Exp., 2019, 6(1), 016503.10.1088/2053-1591/aae292 ↗
6. W. Zhang, H. Wu, S. Wang, Y. Hu, K. Fang, and X. Wang, Investigation of Stress Corrosion Cracking Initiation in Machined 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel in Magnesium Chloride Environment, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2020, 29(1), p 191–204.10.1007/s11665-020-04558-7 ↗
7. C.M Smudde, C.R. D'Elia, C.W.S., Marchi, M.R. Hill, J.C. Gibeling, The Influence of Residual Stress on Fatigue Crack Growth Rates of Additively Manufactured Type 304L stainless steel, Int J Fatigue, 162, (2022) (in English)10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106954 ↗
8. H. Yahyaoui, N. Ben Moussa, C. Braham, N. Ben Fredj, and H. Sidhom, Role of Machining Defects and Residual Stress on the AISI 304 Fatigue Crack Nucleation, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct, 2015, 38(4), p 420–433.10.1111/ffe.12243 ↗
9. V. Sharma and P.M. Pandey, Optimization of Machining and Vibration Parameters for Residual Stresses Minimization in Ultrasonic Assisted Turning of 4340 Hardened Steel, Ultrasonics, 2016, 70, p 172–182.10.1016/j.ultras.2016.05.001 ↗
10. M. Sedlacek, B. Podgornik, and S. Milanovic, A Modified Heat Treatment to Improve the Properties of Double-layer Cast Rolls, Materiali in Tehnologije, 2014, 48(6), p 983–990.
11. M. Mia, P.R. Dey, M.S. Hossain, M.T. Arafat, M. Asaduzzaman, M.S. Ullah, and S.M.T. Zobaer, Taguchi S/N based optimization of machining parameters for surface roughness, tool wear and material removal rate in hard turning under MQL cutting condition, Measurement, 2018, 122, p 380–391.10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.016 ↗
12. Y. Su, G.Y. Zhao, Y.G. Zhao, J.B. Meng, and C.X. Li, Multi-Objective Optimization of Cutting Parameters in Turning AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Metals-Basel, 2020, 10(2), p 217. ((in English))10.3390/met10020217 ↗
13. R.A. Mahdavinejad and S. Saeedy, Investigation of the influential parameters of machining of AISI 304 stainless steel, Sadhana, 2011, 36(6), p 963–970.10.1007/s12046-011-0055-z ↗
14. V. Varghese, M.R. Ramesh, and D. Chakradhar, Experimental Investigation and Optimization of Machining Parameters for Sustainable Machining, Mater. Manuf. Process, 2018, 33(16), p 1782–1792. ((in English))10.1080/10426914.2018.1476760 ↗
15. S.E. Mirmohammadsadeghi and H. Amirabadi, High-pressure jet-assisted turning of AISI 304: Experimental and multi-objective optimization approach, P I Mech Eng E-J Pro, 2018, 232(6), p 734–750. ((in English))10.1177/0954408917738488 ↗
16. T. Zhou, L. He, J.X. Wu, F.L. Du, and Z.F. Zou, Prediction of Surface Roughness of 304 Stainless Steel and Multi-Objective Optimization of Cutting Parameters Based on GA-GBRT, Appl Sci-Basel, 2019, 9(18), p 3684. ((in English))10.3390/app9183684 ↗
17. M.S. Alajmi and A.M. Almeshal, Prediction and Optimization of Surface Roughness in a Turning Process Using the ANFIS-QPSO Method, Materials, 2020, 13(13), p 2986. ((in English))10.3390/ma13132986 ↗
18. F. Jafarian, M. Taghipour, and H. Amirabadi, Application of Artificial Neural Network and Optimization Algorithms for Optimizing Surface Roughness Tool Life and Cutting Forces in Turning Operation, J Mech Sci Technol, 2013, 27(5), p 1469–1477. ((in English))10.1007/s12206-013-0327-0 ↗
19. F. Wang, H. Zhang, and A.M. Zhou, A Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Mixed-variable Optimization Problems, Swarm Evol Comput, 2021, 60, p 100808. ((in English))10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100808 ↗
20. M. Mohammadi, S. Golabi, and B. Amirsalari, Determining Optimum Butt-Welding Parameters of 304 Stainless-Steel Plates Using Finite Element Particle Swarm and Artificial Neural Network, Ijst-T Mech Eng, 2021, 45(3), p 787–800. ((in English))
21. H.G. Zhou, W.B. Yang, L. Sun, X.W. Jing, G.C. Li, L.P. Cao, Reliability Optimization of Process Parameters for Marine Diesel Engine Block Hole System Machining using Improved PSO, Sci Rep-Uk, 11(1), (2021) (in English)10.1038/s41598-021-01567-x ↗
22. X.F. Zhang, R. Liu, J.X. Ren, and Q.L. Gui, Adaptive Fractional Image Enhancement Algorithm Based on Rough Set and Particle Swarm Optimization, Fractal Fract, 2022, 6(2), p 100. ((in English))10.3390/fractalfract6020100 ↗
23. M. Azadi Moghaddam, R. Golmezerji, and F. Kolahan, Simultaneous Optimization of Joint Edge Geometry and Process Parameters in Gas Metal Arc Welding using Integrated ANN-PSO Approach, Sci. Iran., 2017, 24(1), p 260–273. ((in English))
24. P. Kahhal, M. Ghasemi, M. Kashfi, H. Ghorbani-Menghari, J.H. Kim, A Multi-objective Optimization using Response Surface Model Coupled with Particle Swarm Algorithm on FSW Process Parameters, Sci Rep-Uk, 12(1), (2022) (in English)10.1038/s41598-022-06652-3 ↗
25. E. Capello, Residual Stresses in Turning: Part I: Influence of Process Parameters, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, 160(2), p 221–228.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.012 ↗
26. R. dos Santos Pereira, R. Droppa, M.C. Lopes de Oliveira and R.A. Antunes, Effect of Milling Parameters on the Stability of the Passive Film of AISI 304 Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Performan., 2021, 30, p 8131–8144. ((in English))10.1007/s11665-021-06064-w ↗
27. Y.Y. Chang, T. Sun and H.C. Wang, Experimental and FEM Study of Residual Stresses During Ultra-Precision Turning of Aluminum 2024–T3, Exp. Tech., 2018, 42(2), p 223–231.10.1007/s40799-017-0225-y ↗
28. J. Xue and B. Shen, Dung beetle Optimizer: a New Meta-heuristic Algorithm for Global Optimization, J. Supercomput., 2023, 79(7), p 7305–7336. ((in English))10.1007/s11227-022-04959-6 ↗
29. J. Huang and L. He, Application of Improved PSO - BP Neural Network in Customer Churn Warning, Proc. Comput. Sci., 2018, 131, p 1238–1246.10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.336 ↗
30. S. Katoch, S.S. Chauhan, and V. Kumar, A Review on Genetic Algorithm: Past, Present, and Future, Multimed. Tools Appl., 2021, 80(5), p 8091–8126.10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6 ↗
31. W. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Hu, and S. Wang, Predictive Modelling of Microstructure Changes, Micro-hardness and Residual Stress in Machining of 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2018, 130–131, p 36–48.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.03.008 ↗