Uncertainties in the Swift Hardening Law Parameters and Their Influence on the Flow Stress and the Hole Expansion Behavior of Dual-Phase (DP600) Steel Specimens
Source abstract
Abstract
Swift hardening law is one of the widely used phenomenological model to describe the stress–strain behavior in sheet metal forming simulations. In the present study, a statistical approach was used to investigate the effect of the variation in material model parameters on estimated values of the stress–strain data obtained using Swift hardening law. This estimation employed values of the Swift hardening law parameters as reported in the literature and those from three uniaxial tensile tests conducted in this study. Uncertainties in the flow stress were estimated using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. A detailed sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the most sensitive parameter influencing the flow stress estimation. It was found that the sensitivity coefficients of the Swift hardening parameters are dependent on the true plastic strain. At lower plastic strains, (epsilon _0) was found to be most sensitive parameter whereas at larger pre-strains K was observed to be the critical parameter affecting the flow stress estimation. Further, computed hardening curves were used to simulate the deformation in hole expansion tests (HET) of dual phase steel (DP600) steel specimens using an explicit finite element analysis (FEA) technique. The effects of the material property variation on the thinning rate of the sheet with punch displacement were estimated with a mean ((mu)) and standard deviations ((sigma)) for determining (± 1 ± 2(sigma)) statistical limits. FEA predictions were compared with measured data obtained from HET conducted using specimens with holes fabricated with both drilling and boring processes. A reasonable agreement was achieved. Furthermore, the experimental values of the final sheet thicknesses were found to lie within the statistical limits using finite element simulations.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. J.-H. Kim, A. Serpantié, F. Barlat, F. Pierron, and M.-G. Lee, Characterization of the Post-necking Strain Hardening Behavior Using the Virtual Fields Method. Int. J. Solids Struct. 50(24), 3829–3842 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.018 ↗
2. K. Enami, The Effects of Compressive and Tensile Prestrain on Ductile Fracture Initiation in Steels. Eng. Fract. Mech. 72(7), 1089–1105 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.012 ↗
3. M.A. Iadicola, Uncertainties of digital image correlation due to pattern degradation at large strain, in Advance of Optional Methods Experiment Mechanics, vol. 3, ed. by H. Jin, S. Yoshida, L. Lamberti, M.-T. Lin (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp.247–253
4. V. Badadani, T.S. Sriranga, and S.R. Srivatsa, Analysis of uncertainty in digital image correlation technique for strain measurement. Materials Today: Proceedings International Conference on Smart Engineering Materials (ICSEM 2016), October 20-22, 2016 5(10, Part 1), 20912–20919 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.47910.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.479 ↗
5. T. Siebert, E. Hack, G. Lampeas, E.A. Patterson, and K. Splitthof, Uncertainty Quantification for DIC Displacement Measurements in Industrial Environments. Exp. Tech. 45, 685–694 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00447-310.1007/s40799-021-00447-3 ↗
6. S. Berbenni, V. Favier, and M. Berveiller, Impact of the Grain Size Distribution on the Yield Stress of Heterogeneous Materials. Int. J. Plastic. 23(1), 114–142 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.004 ↗
7. M. Weiss, B. Abeyrathna, B. Rolfe, A. Abee, and H. Wolfkamp, Effect of Coil Set on Shape Defects in Roll Forming Steel Strip. J. Manuf. Process. 25, 8–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.10.00510.1016/j.jmapro.2016.10.005 ↗
8. F. Aggogeri, G. Barbato, E.M. Barini, G. Genta, and R. Levi, Measurement Uncertainty Assessment of Coordinate Measuring Machines by Simulation and Planned Experimentation. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 4(1), 51–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.01.00710.1016/j.cirpj.2011.01.007 ↗
9. D.K. Banerjee, Uncertainties in Steel Temperatures During Fire. Fire Safety J. 61, 65–71 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.08.01210.1016/j.firesaf.2013.08.012 ↗
10. L. Lazarescu, and D. Banabic, Influence of Material Property Variability on the Thickness in Sheet Metal Subjected to the Hydraulic Bulging. Adv. Eng. Forum. 8, 251–258 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.8-9.25110.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.8-9.251 ↗
11. K. Janssens, F. Lambert, S. Vanrostenberghe, and M. Vermeulen, Statistical Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Experimentally Characterised Forming Limits of Sheet Steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 112(2), 174–184 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00890-610.1016/S0924-0136(00)00890-6 ↗
12. D. Banabic, M. Vos, Modelling of the Forming Limit Band -a New Method to Increase the Robustness in the Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes. CIRP Annals 56(1), 249–252 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.05810.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.058 ↗
13. D. El Khoukhi, F. Morel, N. Saintier, D. Bellett, P. Osmond, and V.-D. Le, Probabilistic Modeling of the Size Effect and Scatter in High Cycle Fatigue Using a Monte-Carlo Approach: Role of the Defect Population in Cast Aluminum Alloys. Int. J. Fatigue 147, 106177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10617710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106177 ↗
14. M. Geiger, and M. Merklein, Characterising Material and Process Variation Effects on Springback Robustness for a Semi-Cylindrical Sheet Metal Forming Process. CIRP Annals 52(1), 213–216 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60568-X10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60568-X ↗
15. T. De Souza, and B.F. Rolfe, Characterising Material and Process Variation Effects on Springback Robustness for a Semi-Cylindrical Sheet Metal Forming Process. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 52(12), 1756–1766 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.09.00910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.09.009 ↗
16. T. De Souza, and B. Rolfe, Multivariate Modelling of Variability in Sheet Metal Forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 203(1), 1–12 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.07510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.075 ↗
17. V. Karthik, R.J. Comstock, D.L. Hershberger, and R.H. Wagoner, Variability of Sheet Formability and Formability Testing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 121(2), 350–362 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01219-510.1016/S0924-0136(01)01219-5 ↗
18. S. Basak, and S.K. Panda, Necking and Fracture Limit Analyses of Different Pre-Strained Sheet Materials in Polar Effective Plastic Strain Locus Using yld2000-2d Yield Model. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 267, 289–307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.00410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.004 ↗
19. A. Graf, and W. Hosford, The Influence of Strain-Path Changes on Forming Limit Diagrams of a1 6111 t4. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 36(10), 897–910 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(94)90053-110.1016/0020-7403(94)90053-1 ↗
20. Y.-M. Huang, and J.-W. Cheng, Influence of Lubricant on Limitation of Formability of Cylindrical Cup-Drawing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 63(1), 77–82 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02603-910.1016/S0924-0136(96)02603-9 ↗
21. K. Prasad, A. Gupta, U.C. Krishnaswamy, D.K. Banerjee, and M.-G. Lee, Does Friction Contribute to Formability Improvement Using Servo Press ? Friction (2022)10.1007/s40544-022-0698-2 ↗
22. R. Narayanasamy, and C.S. Narayanan, Experimental Analysis and Evaluation of Forming Limit Diagram for Interstitial Free Steels. Mater. Des. 28(5), 1490–1512 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.01010.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.010 ↗
23. K. Narasimhan, D. Zhou, and R.H. Wagoner, Application of the Monte Carlo and Finite Element Methods to Predict the Scatter Band in Forming Limit Strains. Scripta Metall. et Mater. 26, 41–46 (1992)10.1016/0956-716X(92)90365-L ↗
24. L. Durrenberger, X. Lemoine, and A. Molinari, Effects of Pre-Strain and Bake-Hardening on the Crash Properties of a Top-hat Section. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(12), 1937–1947 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.015 ↗
25. D. Bekar, E. Acar, F. Ozer, and M. Guler, Robust Springback Optimization of a Dual Phase Steel Seven-Flange Die Assembly. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 46, 425–444 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0771-y10.1007/s00158-012-0771-y ↗
26. D. Mohr, M. Dunand, and K.-H. Kim, Evaluation of Associated and Non-associated Quadratic Plasticity Models for Advanced High Strength Steel Sheets Under Multi-Axial Loading. Int. J. Plast. 26(7), 939–956 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.11.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2009.11.006 ↗
27. R. Padmanabhan, A.J. Baptista, M.C. Oliveira, and L.F. Menezes, Effect of Anisotropy on the Deep-Drawing of Mild Steel and Dual-Phase Steel Tailor-Welded Blanks. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 184(1), 288–293 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.05110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.051 ↗
28. S.K. Paul, M. Mukherjee, S. Kundu, and S. Chandra, Prediction of Hole Expansion Ratio for Automotive Grade Steels. Computat. Mater. Sci. 89, 189–197 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.03.04010.1016/j.commatsci.2014.03.040 ↗
29. K. Prasad, B. Venkatesh, H. Krishnaswamy, D.K. Banerjee, and U. Chakkingal, On the Interplay of Friction and Stress Relaxation to Improve Stretch-Flangeability of Dual Phase (DP600) Steel. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 32, 154–169 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.11.01410.1016/j.cirpj.2020.11.014 ↗
30. S.K. Paul, A Critical Review on Hole Expansion Ratio. Materialia 9, 100566 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10056610.1016/j.mtla.2019.100566 ↗
31. K. Prasad, A.S. Ebrahim, H. Krishnaswamy, U. Chakkingal, and D.K. Banerjee, Evaluation of Hole Expansion Formability of High Strength AA7075 Alloy Under Varying Temper Conditions. IOP Conf. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1238(1), 012038 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1238/1/01203810.1088/1757-899x/1238/1/012038 ↗
32. K. Prasad, H. Krisnaswamy, D. Banerjee, and U. Chakkingal. An investigation into the influence of interrupted loading in improving the stretch-flangeability of dual phase steel. In: Tribology in Manufacturing Processes. Defect and Diffusion Forum. Trans Tech Publications Ltd. 414: 81–87 (2022)10.4028/p-gi07rp ↗
33. ASTM E8 , E8M–16a, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. Technical report. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M-16A10.1520/E0008_E0008M-16A ↗
34. K.-H. Chung, W. Lee, J.H. Kim, C. Kim, S.H. Park, D. Kwon, and K. Chung, Characterization of Mechanical Properties by Indentation Tests and fe Analysis-Validation by Application to a Weld Zone of DP590 Steel. Int. J. Solids Struct. 46(2), 344–363 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.04110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.041 ↗
35. U. Reisgen, M. Schleser, O. Mokrov, and E. Ahmed, Uni- and bi-axial Deformation Behavior of Laser Welded Advanced High Strength Steel Sheets. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210(15), 2188–2196 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.00310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.003 ↗
36. S. Suttner, and A. Kuppert, Investigation of the Beginning of Plastic Yielding and the Hardening Behaviour Under Biaxial Tension. Adv. Mater. Res. 769, 197–204 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.769.19710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.769.197 ↗
37. E. Ahmed, U. Reisgen, M. Schleser, and O. Mokrov, Biaxial Behavior of Laser Welded DP/TRIP Steel Sheets. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 339, 1075–1082 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4898-910.1007/s00170-013-4898-9 ↗
38. K.Y. Choi, M.-G. Lee, and H.-A. Kim, Sheet Metal Forming Simulation Considering Die Deformation. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 14, 935–940 (2013)10.1007/s12239-013-0103-2 ↗
39. A. Taherizadeh, D.E. Green, and J.W. Yoon, A Non-associated Plasticity Model with Anisotropic and Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening for Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming. Int. J. Solids Struct. 69–70, 370–382 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.01310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.013 ↗
40. M.C. Cardoso, and L.P. Moreira, Forming Limit Analysis of DP600-800 Steels. Zenodo (2015). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.110850810.5281/zenodo.1108508 ↗
41. S. Basak, S.K. Panda, and Y.N. Zhou, Formability Assessment of Prestrained Automotive Grade Steel Sheets Using Stress Based and Polar Effective Plastic Strain-Forming Limit Diagram. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 137(4), 259 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030786.04100610.1115/1.4030786.041006 ↗
42. S. Basak, and S.K. Panda, Application of Barlat Yld-96 Yield Criterion for Predicting Formability of Pre-Strained Dual Phase Steel Sheets. Int. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Conf. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2016-875310.1115/MSEC2016-8753 ↗
43. K. Drotleff, S. Panich, M. Liewald, and V. Uthaisangsuk, Experimental and Numerical Formability Analysis of Advanced High Strength Steel for Deep Drawing Using the Nonlinear Strain Path Forming Limit. Form Technol. Forum. 16, 59–64 (2016)
44. S. Basak, and S. Panda. Application of Barlat yld-96 yield Criterion for Predicting Formability of Pre-Strained Dual Phase Steel Sheets, pp. 001–02063 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2016-875310.1115/MSEC2016-8753 ↗
45. L.C. Reis, M.C. Oliveira, A.D. Santos, and J.V. Fernandes, On the Determination of the Work Hardening Curve Using the Bulge Test. Int. J. Mechan. Sci. 105, 158–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.11.00910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.11.009 ↗
46. D.-S. Comsa, L. Lazarescu, and D. Banabic, Assessing the Formability of Metallic Sheets by Means of Localized and Diffuse Necking Models (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496362810.1063/1.4963628 ↗
47. K. Isik, G. Gerstein, F. Gutknecht, T. Clausmeyer, F. Nürnberger, H.J. Maier, and A.E. Tekkaya, Investigations of Ductile Damage in DP600 and dc04 Deep drawing Steel Sheets During Punching. Proced. Struct. Integ. 2, 673–680 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.08710.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.087 ↗
48. K. Bandyopadhyay, M.-G. Lee, S.K. Panda, P. Saha, and J. Lee, Formability Assessment and Failure Prediction of Laser Welded Dual Phase Steel Blanks Using Anisotropic Plastic Properties. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 126, 203–221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.03.02210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.03.022 ↗
49. S. Qin, R. McLendon, V. Oancea, and A.M. Beese, Micromechanics of Multiaxial Plasticity of DP600: Experiments and Microstructural Deformation Modeling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 721, 168–178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.07810.1016/j.msea.2018.02.078 ↗
50. J. Szabolcs and M. Tisza, Finite Element Modelling of Clinched Joints. Adv. Technol. Mater. 43, 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24867/ATM-2018-1-00110.24867/ATM-2018-1-001 ↗
51. R.O. Santos, L.B. da Silveira, L.P. Moreira, M.C. Cardoso, F.R.F. da Silva, A. dos Santos Paula, and D.A. Albertacci, Damage Identification Parameters of Dual-Phase 600–800 Steels Based on Experimental Void Analysis and Finite Element Simulations. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8(1), 644–659 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.04.01710.1016/j.jmrt.2018.04.017 ↗
52. T.A. Aksen, B. Sener, and M. Firat, Failure Prediction Capability of Generalized Plastic Work Criterion. Proced. Manuf. Int. Conf. Mater. Form. 47, 1235–1240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.19010.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.190 ↗
53. S. Qin, and A.M. Beese, Multiaxial Fracture of DP600: Experiments and Finite Element Modeling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 785, 139386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13938610.1016/j.msea.2020.139386 ↗
54. G. Béres, Z. Lukács, and M. Tisza, Springback Evaluation of Tailor Welded Blanks at v-die Bending Made of DP Steels. Proced. Manuf. 47, 1366–1373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.26610.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.266 ↗
55. C. Cheng, M. Wan, X.D. Wu, Z.Y. Cai, R. Zhao, and B. Meng, Effect of Yield Criteria on the Formability Prediction of Dual-phase Steel Sheets. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 133, 28–41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.03310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.033 ↗
56. K. Bandyopadhyay, S. Basak, S.K. Panda, and P. Saha, Use of Stress Based Forming Limit Diagram to Predict Formability in Two-stage Forming of Tailor Welded Blanks. Mater. Des. 67, 558–570 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.08910.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.089 ↗
57. D.M. Neto, M.C. Oliveira, A.D. Santos, J.L. Alves, and L.F. Menezes, Influence of Boundary Conditions on the Prediction of Springback and Wrinkling in Sheet Metal Forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 122, 244–254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.03710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.037 ↗
58. K.S. Pandya, V. Grolleau, C.C. Roth, and D. Mohr, Fracture Response of Resistance Spot Welded Dual Phase Steel Sheets: Experiments and Modeling. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 187, 105869 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10586910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105869 ↗
59. J. He, Z. Cedric Xia, D. Zeng, and S. Li, Forming Limits of a Sheet Metal After Continuous-Bending-Under-Tension Loading. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 135(3), 031009 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402367610.1115/1.4023676 ↗
60. S. Marcadet and D. Mohr, Critical Hardening Rate Model for Predicting Path-dependent Ductile Fracture. Int. J. Fract 200, 77–98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0130-x10.1007/s10704-016-0130-x ↗
61. W. Shenghua, N. Song, A. Santos, F. Andrade Pires, and R. Amaral. Formability Prediction for Dual Phase Steel Sheets. pp. 1–13 (2016)
62. G. Gerstein, K. Isik, F. Gutknecht, P. Sieczkarek, J. Ewert, A.E. Tekkaya, T. Clausmeyer, and F. Nürnberger, Microstructural Characterization and Simulation of Damage for Geared Sheet Components. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 896, 012076 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/896/1/01207610.1088/1742-6596/896/1/012076 ↗
63. R. Hashemi and A. Assempour, E.M.K. Abad, Implementation of the Forming Limit Stress Diagram to Obtain Suitable Load Path in Tube Hydroforming Considering m-k Model. Mater. Des. 30(9), 3545–3553 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.00210.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.002 ↗
64. A. Bui-Van, S. Allain, X. Lemoine, and O. Bouaziz, An Improved Physically Based Behaviour Law for Ferritic Steels and its Application to Crash Modelling. Int. J. Mater. Form. 2, 527–530 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0539-010.1007/s12289-009-0539-0 ↗
65. N. Pathak, C. Butcher, and M.J. Worswick, Experimental Techniques for Finite Shear Strain Measurement Within Two Advanced High Strength Steels. Exp. Mech. 59, 125–148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-00448-110.1007/s11340-018-00448-1 ↗
66. R. Padmanabhan and M.C. Oliveira, L.F. Menezes, Deep Drawing of Aluminium-Steel Tailor-Welded Blanks. Mater. Des. 29(1), 154–160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.00710.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.007 ↗
67. A.E. Marques, P.A. Prates, A.F.G. Pereira, M.C. Oliveira, and J.V. Fernandes, B.M. Ribeiro, Performance Comparison of Parametric and Non-parametric Regression Models for Uncertainty Analysis of Sheet Metal Forming Processes. Metals (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/met1004045710.3390/met10040457 ↗
68. MATLAB: R2019b. The Math Works, Inc. Natick, MA (2019)
69. T. Lafarge and A. Possolo, The NIST Uncertainty Machine. NCSLI Measure 10(3), 20–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/19315775.2015.1172173210.1080/19315775.2015.11721732 ↗
70. F. Islam, S. Joannès, and L. Laiarinandrasana, Evaluation of Critical Parameters in Tensile Strength Measurement of Single Fibres. J. Compos. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs303006910.3390/jcs3030069 ↗
71. ABAQUS Documentation: Version 6.14. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corporation. 651(6.2) (2014)
72. C. Butcher, L.T. Kortenaar, and M. Worswick, Experimental characterization of the sheared edge formability of boron steel (IDDRG, Paris, France, 2014)
73. MATLAB: Statistics Toolbox, Distribution Fitting Tool, R2019b (2019)
74. C. Krempaszky, P. Larour, J. Freudenthaler, and E. Werner, Towards more efficient hole expansion testing (IDDRG, Paris, France, 2014)
75. S. Miranda, D. Cruz, R. Amaral, A. Santos, J.C. de Sá, and J. Fernandes, Assessment of Scatter on Material Properties and its Influence on Formability in Hole Expansion. Proc. Institut. Mech. Eng. Part L. J. Mater. Des. Appl. 235(6), 1262–1270 (2021)10.1177/1350650120972294 ↗