Investigations on Mechanical Properties of Polyamide Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Sintering Process
Source abstract
Abstract
Duraform polyamide, a polymeric material, has grown extensive application in the fabrication of complex, light weight and solid parts for the aerospace and automotive industries. These end use parts require higher surface quality, strength, temperature capability and wear resistance. These parts can be easily fabricated with the use of selective laser sintering (SLS) and the adequacy of these selective laser-sintered parts for different applications depends on the mechanical properties. The mechanical properties of these parts can be governed by the setting of input parameters. In the present study, Duraform polyamide is used to fabricate different parts. A face-centered central composite design is used to optimize the process parameters in selective laser sintering. This design consists of five factors: laser power, bed temperature, layer thickness, scan spacing and orientation. With different set of experiments, the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), % elongation, yield strength (YS) and young’s modulus (YM) are measured as response measures. A set of different mathematical models are established using statistical analysis. ANOVA is employed to verify the feasibility of the different models. The optimal sintering parameters to enhance the mechanical properties are recognized with the application of desirability approach. Scan spacing was recognized as best relevant parameter that influences the UTS, % elongation, YS along with YM most significantly. From the experimentation, it can be further observed that parts fabricated with laser power of 40.71 W, bed temperature of 176°C, layer thickness of 0.09 mm, scan spacing of 0.15 mm and orientation of 90° will generates the parts having the maximum UTS, % elongation, YS and YM, respectively, and can be used as solid parts for the aerospace as well as the automotive industry.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. A.M. Kochnev, O.V. Stoyanov, G.E. Zaikov, and R.M. Akhmetkhanov, Compositional Analysis of Polymers: An Engineering Approach, Apple Academic Press, Inc, 2016.10.1201/b19870 ↗
2. K. Shah, A.J. Pinkerton, A. Salman, and L. Li, Effects of Melt Pool Variables and Process Parameters in Laser Direct Metal Deposition of Aerospace Alloys, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2010, 25(12), p 1372–1380.10.1080/10426914.2010.480999 ↗
3. C.K. Chua, K.F. Leong, and C.S. Lim, Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications, 3rd ed. World Scientific, 2010.10.1142/6665 ↗
4. J.D. Williams and C.R. Deckard, Emerald Article: Advances in Modeling the Effects of Selected Parameters on the SLS Process, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2011, 4(2), p 90–100.10.1108/13552549810210257 ↗
5. S. Singh, V.S. Sharma, A. Sachdeva, and S.K. Sinha, Optimization and Analysis of Mechanical Properties for Selective Laser Sintered Polyamide Parts, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28(2), p 163–172.10.1080/10426914.2012.677901 ↗
6. P.K. Jain, P.M. Pandey, and P.V.M. Rao, Experimental Investigations for Improving Part Strength in Selective Laser Sintering, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2008, 3(3), p 177–188.10.1080/17452750802065893 ↗
7. B. Caulfield, P.E. McHugh, and S. Lohfeld, Dependence of Mechanical Properties of Polyamide Components on Build Parameters in the SLS Process, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2007, 182(1–3), p 477–488.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.007 ↗
8. P.K. Jain, P.M. Pandey, and P.V.M. Rao, Effect of Delay Time on Part Strength in Selective Laser Sintering, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2009, 43(1–2), p 117–126.10.1007/s00170-008-1682-3 ↗
9. H.H. Zhu, J.Y.H. Fuh, and L. Lu, The Influence of Powder Apparent Density on the Density in Direct Laser-Sintered Metallic Parts, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2007, 47(2), p 294–298.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.019 ↗
10. A. Simchi, Direct Laser Sintering of Metal Powders: Mechanism, Kinetics and Microstructural Features, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 428(1–2), p 148–158.10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.117 ↗
11. L. Jyothish-Kumar, P.M. Pandey, and D.I. Wimpenny, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer Singapore, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0305-010.1007/978-981-13-0305-0 ↗
12. S. Negi, S. Dhiman, and R.K. Sharma, Determining the Effect of Sintering Conditions on Mechanical Properties of Laser Sintered Glass Filled Polyamide Parts Using RSM, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., 2015, 68, p 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.05710.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.057 ↗
13. T.L. Starr, T.J. Gornet, and J.S. Usher, The Effect of Process Conditions on Mechanical Properties of Laser-Sintered Nylon, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2011, 17(6), p 418–423.10.1108/13552541111184143 ↗
14. S. Dupin, O. Lame, C. Barrès, and J.Y. Charmeau, Microstructural Origin of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Polyamide 12 Processed by Laser Sintering, Eur. Polym. J., 2012, 48(9), p 1611–1621.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.06.007 ↗
15. Y. Ning, Y.S. Wong, and J.Y.H. Fuh, Effect and Control of Hatch Length on Material Properties in the Direct Metal Laser Sintering Process, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2005, 219(1), p 15–25.10.1243/095440505X7957 ↗
16. S. Singh, V.S. Sharma, and A. Sachdeva, Optimization and Analysis of Shrinkage in Selective Laser Sintered Polyamide Parts, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2012, 27(6), p 707–714.10.1080/10426914.2011.593247 ↗
17. S. Singh, V.S. Sharma, and A. Sachdeva, Progress in Selective Laser Sintering Using Metallic Powders: A Review, Mater. Sci. Technol. (United Kingdom), 2016, 32(8), p 760–772.10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000136 ↗
18. K. Senthilkumaran, P.M. Pandey, and P.V.M. Rao, Influence of Building Strategies on the Accuracy of Parts in Selective Laser Sintering, Mater. Des., 2009, 30(8), p 2946–2954.10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.009 ↗
19. F. Calignano, D. Manfredi, E.P. Ambrosio, L. Iuliano, and P. Fino, Influence of Process Parameters on Surface Roughness of Aluminum Parts Produced by DMLS, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2013, 67(9–12), p 2743–2751.10.1007/s00170-012-4688-9 ↗
20. https://www.3dsystems.com/materials/duraform-pa.
21. K. Dotchev and W. Yusoff, Recycling of Polyamide 12 Based Powders in the Laser Sintering Process, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2009, 15(3), p 192–203.10.1108/13552540910960299 ↗
22. ISO 527-3:2018(E), Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 3: Test Conditions for Films and Sheets, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2018.
23. V.S. Sharma, S. Singh, A. Sachdeva, and P. Kumar, Influence of Sintering Parameters on Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Selective Laser Sintered Parts, Int. J. Mater. Form., 2015, 8(1), p 157–166.10.1007/s12289-013-1158-3 ↗
24. V. Sharma, R. Chand, V.S. Sharma, A. Sachdeva, and S. Singh, Investigating Shrinkage: CAD, Thermal and Volumetric for Selective Laser Sintering of Polyamide Parts, Lasers Manuf. Mater. Process., 2021, 8(1), p 73–96.10.1007/s40516-020-00136-w ↗
25. D. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, 2013.
26. C.M.A. Cook, R.H. Myers, and D.C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, Wiley, New York, 2008.
27. C.K. Ch’ng, S.H. Quah, and H.C. Low, A New Approach for Multiple-Response Optimization, Qual. Eng., 2005, 17(4), p 621–626.10.1080/08982110500225505 ↗
28. N.R. Costa, J. Lourenço, and Z.L. Pereira, Desirability Function Approach: A Review and Performance Evaluation in Adverse Conditions, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2011, 107(2), p 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.04.00410.1016/j.chemolab.2011.04.004 ↗
29. I.S. Kim, K.J. Son, Y.S. Yang, and P.K.D.V. Yaragada, Sensitivity Analysis for Process Parameters in GMA Welding Processes Using a Factorial Design Method, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2003, 43(8), p 763–769.10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00054-3 ↗