Mechanical Behavior of Lead at High Strain Rates
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a study on the material behaviors and constitutive models of lead at high strain rates. Quasi-static compressive tests and split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests were conducted at room temperature. The results of the SHPB tests were verified by high-speed photography, and the error of strain is less than 3% at high strain rate (5000/s). Our results show that the yield stress and flow stress increase at high strain rates. This result indicates that lead is sensitive to the strain rate at high strain rates, but the dependence is not linear during 3000-5000/s. The strain-rate dependence of lead was fitted by a quadratic polynomial curve. To describe the nonlinear strain-rate relationship of lead, modified Johnson–Cook and Cowper–Symonds material models were used to fit the experimental stress–strain curves. The modified Cowper–Symonds model agrees better with the experimental results and can better describe the dynamic mechanical behavior of lead under high strain rates.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Y.M. Parulekar et al., Lead Extrusion Dampers for Reducing Seismic Response of Coolant Channel Assembly, Nucl. Eng. Des., 2004, 227(2), p 175–18310.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.09.006 ↗
2. K. Zeynali et al., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Lead-Rubber Dampers in Chevron Concentrically Braced Frames, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2018, 18(1), p 162–17810.1016/j.acme.2017.06.004 ↗
3. N. Loizou and R.B. Sims, The Yield Stress of Pure Lead in Compression, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1953, 1, p 234–24310.1016/0022-5096(53)90003-9 ↗
4. H. Kolsky, An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at Very High Rates of Loading, Proc. Phys. Soc. B, 1949, 62(11), p 676–70010.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
5. M. Malatyński and J. Klepaczko, Experimental Investigation of Plastic Properties of Lead Over a Wide Range of Strain Rates, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1980, 22(3), p 173–18310.1016/0020-7403(80)90066-1 ↗
6. J. Duffy, R.H. Hawley, and R.A. Frantz, The Deformation of Lead in Torsion at High Strain Rates, J. Appl. Mech., 1972, 39(3), p 65110.1115/1.3422765 ↗
7. G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook, A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain-Rates and High Temperatures, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands (1983), p 541–547.
8. G. Cowper and P. Symonds, Strain Hardening and Strain-Rate Effects in the Impact Loading of Cantilever Beams, Report No. 28, Brown University Division of Applied Mathematics (1957)10.21236/AD0144762 ↗
9. H. Huh and W.J. Kang, Crash-Worthiness Assessment of Thin-Walled Structures with the High-Strength Steel Sheet, Int. J. Veh. Des., 2002, 30(1–2), p 1–2110.1504/IJVD.2002.002022 ↗
10. T.J. Holmquist and G.R. Johnson, Determination of Constants and Comparison of Results for Various Constitutive Models. J. Phys. IV Colloq., 1991, 1(C3), p C3-853-C3-860
11. B.J. Tuazon et al., Integration of a New Data Acquisition/Processing Scheme in SHPB Test and Characterization of the Dynamic Material Properties of High-Strength Steels Using the Optional Form of Johnson-Cook Model, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2014, 28(9), p 3561–356810.1007/s12206-014-0817-8 ↗
12. A.A. Al Salahi and R. Othman, Constitutive Equations of Yield Stress Sensitivity to Strain Rate of Metals: A Comparative Study, J. Eng., 2016, 2016, p 1–710.1155/2016/3279047 ↗
13. T. Grunenwald, F. Llorca, and J. Farre, A Modeling of Visco-Plastic Behavior of Lead and a Lead Alloy Over a Wide Range of Strain Rate and Temperature, J. Phys. IV, 2003, 110, p 99–104
14. G.S. Sohoni, M.V. Walame, V. Tandon, R.S. Mahajan, and S. Raju. ASME 2005. Dynamic Dynamic Behavior Characterization of Lead at High Strain Rates Using High Speed Photography for Finite Element Simulation, in International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (2005).10.1115/IMECE2005-82693 ↗
15. G.T. Gray, Classic Split-Hopkinson Bar Testing, in ASM Handbook. Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, vol. 8 (ASM International, Detroit, 2000), p 1027–1067.
16. S. Li and H. Shisheng, Two-Wave and Three-Wave Method in SHPB Data Processing, Explos. Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4), p 368–373 ((in Chinese))
17. W. Chen and W. Chen. Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar (2011), p 180.10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7 ↗
18. M. Alves, Material Constitutive Law for Large Strains and Strain Rates, J. Eng. Mech., 2000, 126(2), p 215–21810.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:2(215) ↗
19. W.Q. Song, P. Beggs, and M. Easton, Compressive Strain-Rate Sensitivity of Magnesium–Aluminum Die Casting Alloys, Mater. Des., 2009, 30(3), p 642–64810.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.050 ↗
20. C. Zhi-jian, Y. Jian-hong, and Z. Yao, Impact Experiment Study of Ship Building Steel at 450 MPa Level and Constitutive Model of Cowper-Symonds, J. Ship Mech., 2007, 6(11), p 933–941