Influence of Cell Anisotropy and Relative Density on Compressive Deformation Responses of LM13-Cenosphere Hybrid Foam
Source abstract
Abstract
This article deals with closed-cell aluminum alloy LM13-cenosphere hybrid foams (ACHFs) with cell anisotropy prepared through stir casing technique. The compressive deformation behavior of hybrid foams in both transverse and longitudinal directions was measured at a strain rate of 0.01/s. The hybrid foam loaded in longitudinal direction (LD) shows higher plastic collapse stress than that in transverse direction (TD). The stress drop ratio is also observed to be higher in the LD. The plastic collapse stress and energy absorption capacity of ACHFs follow the power law relationship with relative density in both the directions. The plateau stress is higher in case of LD and densification strains are marginally higher in case of LD than that in TD.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Banhart, Manufacture, Characterisation and Application of Cellular Metals and Metal foams, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2001, 46, p 559–63210.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
2. M.F. Ashby, T. Evans, N.A. Fleck, J. Hutchinson, H. Wadley, and L. Gibson, Metal Foams: A Design Guide, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000
3. D.P. Mondal, N. Jha, B. Gull, S. Das, and A. Badkul, Microarchitecture and Compressive Deformation Behaviour of Al-alloy (LM13)–Cenosphere Hybrid Al-Foam Prepared Using CaCO3 as Foaming Agent, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 560, p 601–61010.1016/j.msea.2012.10.003 ↗
4. D.P. Mondal, M. Patel, S. Das, A.K. Jha, H. Jain, G. Gupta et al., Titanium Foam with Coarser Cell Size and Wide Range of Porosity Using Different Types of Evaporative Space Holders Through Powder Metallurgy Route, Mater. Des., 2014, 63, p 89–9910.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.054 ↗
5. S. Birla, D.P. Mondal, S. Das, A. Khare, and J.P. Singh, Effect of Cenosphere Particle Size and Relative Density on the Compressive Deformation Behavior of Aluminum-Cenosphere Hybrid Foam, Mater. Des., 2017, 117, p 168–17710.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.078 ↗
6. D.P. Mondal, J.D. Majumder, N. Jha, A. Badkul, S. Das, and A. Patel, Titanium-Cenosphere Syntactic Foam Made Through Powder Metallurgy Route, Mater. Des., 2012, 34, p 82–8910.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.055 ↗
7. A. Rabiei and M. Garcia-Avila, Effect of Various Parameters on Properties of Composite Steel Foams Under Variety of Loading Rates, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 564, p 539–54710.1016/j.msea.2012.11.108 ↗
8. A. Daoud, Effect of Strain Rate on Compressive Properties of Novel Zn12Al Based Composite Foams Containing Hybrid Pores, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 525, p 7–1710.1016/j.msea.2009.05.038 ↗
9. K. Kitazono, Y. Kikuchi, E. Sato, and K. Kuribayashi, Anisotropic Compressive Behavior of Al-Mg Alloy Foams Manufactured Through Accumulative Roll-Bonding Process, Mater. Lett., 2007, 61, p 1771–177410.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.127 ↗
10. P.K. Rohatgi, A. Daoud, B.F. Schultz, and T. Puri, Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of Die Casting AZ91D-Fly Ash Cenosphere Composites, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2009, 40, p 883–89610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.014 ↗
11. L. Licitra, D.D. Luong, O.M. Strbik Iii, and N. Gupta, Dynamic Properties of Alumina Hollow Particle Filled Aluminum Alloy A356 Matrix Syntactic Foams, Mater. Des., 2015, 66, p 504–51510.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.041 ↗
12. J. Banhart, Light-Metal Foams—History of Innovation and Technological Challenges, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2013, 15, p 82–11110.1002/adem.201200217 ↗
13. S. Birla, D.P. Mondal, S. Das, N. Prasanth, A.K. Jha, and ANCh Venkat, Compressive Deformation Behavior of Highly Porous AA2014-Cenosphere Closed Cell Hybrid Foam Prepared Using CaH2 as Foaming Agent: Comparison with Aluminum Foam and Syntactic Foam, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2017, 70(7), p 1827–184010.1007/s12666-016-0984-7 ↗
14. S. Birla, D.P. Mondal, S. Das, D.K. Kashyap, and ANCh Venkat, Effect of Cenosphere Content on the Compressive Deformation Behaviour of Aluminum-Cenosphere Hybrid Foam, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 685, p 213–22610.1016/j.msea.2016.12.131 ↗
15. A. Daoud, Compressive Response and Energy Absorption of Foamed A359-Al2O3 Particle Composites, J. Alloys Compd., 2009, 486, p 597–60510.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.013 ↗
16. D.K. Rajak, L.A. Kumaraswamidhas, S. Das, and S. Senthil Kumaran, Characterization and Analysis of Compression Load Behaviour of Aluminium Alloy Foam Under the Diverse Strain Rate, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 656, p 218–22510.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.255 ↗
17. D.K. Rajak, L.A. Kumaraswamidhas, and S. Das, Investigation of Mild Steel Thin-Wall Tubes in Unfilled and Foam-Filled Triangle, Square, and Hexagonal Cross Sections Under Compression Load, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27, p 1936–1944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3241-x10.1007/s11665-018-3241-x ↗
18. Z.G. Xu, J.W. Fu, T.J. Luo, and Y.S. Yang, Effects of Cell Size on Quasi-Static Compressive Properties of Mg Alloy Foams, Mater. Des., 2012, 34, p 40–4410.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.066 ↗
19. N.V. Ravi Kumar, N. Ramachandra Rao, and A.A. Gokhale, Effect of SiC Particle Content on Foaming and Mechanical Properties of Remelted and Diluted A356/Sic Composite, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 598, p 343–34910.1016/j.msea.2014.01.050 ↗
20. D.K. Rajak, L.A. Kumaraswamidhas, and S. Das, Investigation and Characterisation of Aluminium Alloy Foams With TiH2 as a Foaming Agent, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2016, 32, p 1338–134510.1080/02670836.2015.1123846 ↗
21. I.N. Orbulov and J. Ginsztler, Compressive Characteristics of Metal Matrix Syntactic Foams, Compos Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2012, 43, p 553–56110.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.008 ↗
22. M. Taherishargh, E. Linul, S. Broxtermann, and T. Fiedler, The Mechanical Properties of Expanded Perlite-Aluminium Syntactic Foam at Elevated Temperatures, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 737, p 590–59610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.083 ↗
23. E. Linul, N. Movahedi, and L. Marsavina, The Temperature and Anisotropy Effect on Compressive Behavior of Cylindrical Closed-Cell Aluminum-Alloy Foams, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 740, p 1172–117910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.102 ↗
24. I.N. Orbulov, Compressive Properties of Aluminium Matrix Syntactic Foams, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 555, p 52–5610.1016/j.msea.2012.06.032 ↗
25. Y. Mu, G. Yao, and H. Luo, Effect of Cell Shape Anisotropy on the Compressive Behavior of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foams, Mater. Des., 2010, 31, p 1567–156910.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.044 ↗
26. Q. Fang, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Wu, and Z. Gong, A 3D Mesoscopic Model for the Closed-Cell Metallic Foams Subjected to Static and Dynamic Loadings, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2015, 82, p 103–11210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.10.009 ↗
27. X. Xia, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, X. Chen, W. Zhao, and B. Liao, Effects of Porosity and Pore Size on the Compressive Properties of Closed-Cell Mg Alloy Foam, J. Magnes. Alloys, 2013, 1, p 330–33510.1016/j.jma.2013.11.006 ↗
28. W.-Y. Jang, W.-Y. Hsieh, C.-C. Miao, and Y.-C. Yen, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of ALPORAS Closed-Cell Aluminium Foam, Mater. Charact., 2015, 107, p 228–23810.1016/j.matchar.2015.07.012 ↗
29. D.P. Mondal, M.D. Goel, N. Bagde, N. Jha, S. Sahu, and A.K. Barnwal, Closed Cell ZA27-SiC Foam Made Through Stir-Casting Technique, Mater. Des., 2014, 57, p 315–32410.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.026 ↗
30. M.D. Goel, D.P. Mondal, M.S. Yadav, and S.K. Gupta, Effect of Strain Rate and Relative Density on Compressive Deformation Behavior of Aluminum Cenosphere Syntactic Foam, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 590, p 406–41510.1016/j.msea.2013.10.048 ↗
31. Y. Mu, G. Yao, L. Liang, H. Luo, and G. Zu, Deformation Mechanisms of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam in Compression, Scr. Mater., 2010, 63, p 629–63210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.041 ↗
32. C. Park and S.R. Nutt, Anisotropy and Strain Localization in Steel Foam, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, 299, p 68–7410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01418-0 ↗
33. L.J. Gibson and M.F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999
34. T.G. Nieh, K. Higashi, and J. Wadsworth, Effect of Cell Morphology on the Compressive Properties of Open-Cell Aluminum Foams, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 283, p 105–11010.1016/S0921-5093(00)00623-7 ↗
35. E. Amsterdam, H. Van Hoorn, J.T.M. De Hosson, and P.R. Onck, The Influence of Cell Shape Anisotropy on the Tensile Behavior of Open Cell Aluminum Foam, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2008, 10, p 877–88110.1002/adem.200800128 ↗
36. X. Badiche, S. Forest, T. Guibert, Y. Bienvenu, J.D. Bartout, and P. Ienny, Mechanical Properties and Non-Homogeneous Deformation of Open-Cell Nickel Foams: Application of the Mechanics of Cellular Solids and of Porous Materials, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 289, p 276–28810.1016/S0921-5093(00)00898-4 ↗
37. N. Chand, P. Sharma, and M. Fahim, Correlation of Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Organosilane Modified Cenosphere Filled High Density Polyethylene, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 5873–587810.1016/j.msea.2010.06.022 ↗
38. D.P. Mondal, S. Das, N. Ramakrishnan, and K. Uday Bhasker, Cenosphere Filled Aluminum Syntactic Foam Made Through Stir-Casting Technique, Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2009, 40, p 279–28810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.006 ↗
39. D.P. Mondal, N. Jha, A. Badkul, B. Gul, S. Rathod, and S. Das, Effect of Age Hardening on Compressive Deformation Behavior of Al-Alloy (LM13)–Cenosphere Hybrid Foam Prepared Using CaCo3 as a Foaming Agent, J. Mater. Res., 2013, 28, p 2528–253810.1557/jmr.2013.197 ↗