journal article·2014-08

Comparison of Some Neural Network and Multivariate Regression for Predicting Mechanical Properties of Investment Casting

Amit Sata, B. Ravi

Publisher page

Abstract

Investment casting enables producing complex shapes with good accuracy and surface finish. A key goal for investment castings used in automobile, aerospace, chemical, biomedical and other critical applications is to be free of internal defects and to possess mechanical properties within the desired range. At present, casting quality is ascertained by destructive testing at the end of production cycle, leading to the possibility of scrapping the entire batch. In this work, the mechanical properties of investment castings have been predicted based on process parameters and chemical composition, by employing artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariate regression (MVR). The data of related process parameters (wax making, shell making, dewaxing, melting etc.), chemical composition of the alloy, and the resulting mechanical properties (ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, and percentage elongation) for 800 heats were collected in an industrial investment casting foundry. Three different ANN models: back propagation, momentum and adaptive, and Levenberg-Marquardt, with varying number of neurons in the hidden layer (from 20 to 45 in steps of 5) were trained using a portion of the data and tested with remaining data. A prediction penalty index (PPI) was developed to compare the relative predictive capability of various neural network and MVR models. It is observed that both ANN and MVR could predict the mechanical properties well, though MVR gave slightly better results. For the ANN model, better results were produced when the number of neurons in the hidden layer was equal or slightly higher than the number of input parameters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Guo and M.T. Samonds, Microstructures and Mechanical Properties Prediction for Ti-Based Alloys, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2007, 16(6), p 680–68410.1007/s11665-007-9099-y ↗
2. S. Seifeddine, Use of Simulation to Predict Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of an Aluminum Cover Al-Si-Mg-Cu, 2008, p 26–32
3. Z. Zhou, Z.J. Xin, Y.Y. Jun, S. Xu, and S. Liang, The Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Gray Cast Iron Based on the Anatomy Experiment of the Engine Cylinder Head, Appl. Mech. Mater., 2012, 217–219, p 2341–234510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.217-219.2341 ↗
4. S. Seifeddine and I.L. Svensson, Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Cast Aluminium Components at Various Iron Contents, Mater. Des., 2010, 31, p S6–S1210.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.023 ↗
5. M. Schneider, W. Schaefer, E. Sjolander, S. Seiffeddine, and I.L. Svensson, Simulation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Components During Casting and Heat Treatment, IOP Conf. Ser., 2012, 33, p 1–810.1088/1757-899X/33/1/012002 ↗
6. M. Morinogo, R. Yukowo, and H. Ninomiyo, An Electronic Approach to the Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Magnesium and Other Light-Metal Alloys, Metall. Sci. Technol., 1998, 16(1–2), p 66–70
7. P.R. Goulart, J.E. Spinelli, W.R. Osorio, and A. Garcia, Mechanical Properties as a Function of Microstructure and Solidification Thermal Variable of Al-Si Castings, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2006, A421, p 245–25310.1016/j.msea.2006.01.050 ↗
8. L. Collini, G. Nicoletto, and R. Konecna, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Pearlitic Gray Cast Iron, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 488, p 529–53910.1016/j.msea.2007.11.070 ↗
9. N. Costa, N. Machado, and F.S. Silva, A New Method for Prediction of Nodular Cast Iron Fatigue Limit, Int. J. Fatigue, 2010, 32, p 988–99510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.11.005 ↗
10. P. Pucher, H. Kaufmann, H. Antrekowitsch, P.J. Uggowitzer, Mechanical Properties and Casting Characteristics of the Secondary Aluminum Alloy AlSi9Cu3(Fe) (A226), Supplemental Proc., 2011, 2, p 237–24410.1002/9781118062142.ch30 ↗
11. M.O. Shabani and A. Mazahery, Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Cast A356 Alloy as a Function of Microstructure and Cooling Rate, Arch. Metall. Mater., 2011, 56(3), p 671–67510.2478/v10172-011-0073-1 ↗
12. V. Shinde, B. Ravi, and K. Narasimhan, Solidification Behaviour and Mechanical Properties of Ductile Iron Castings with Varying Thickness, Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 2012, 25(6), p 364–37310.1179/1743133612Y.0000000024 ↗
13. Q. Dong, Y. Choi, J. Hong, and H. Hwang, Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Al Alloys with Change of Cooling Rate, China Foundry, 2012, 9(4), p 381–386
14. S. Calcaterraa, G. Campanab, and L. Tomesanib, Prediction of Mechanical Properties in Spheroidal Cast Iron by Neural Networks, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2000, 104, p 74–8010.1016/S0924-0136(00)00514-8 ↗
15. M. Perzyk and A. Kochan, Prediction of Ductile Cast Iron Quality by Artificial Neural Networks, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2001, 109(3), p 305–30710.1016/S0924-0136(00)00822-0 ↗
16. D. Emadi and M. Mahfoud, Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Regression Analysis Techniques in Predicting Mechanical Properties of A356 Alloy, Procedia Eng., 2011, 10, p 589–59410.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.098 ↗
17. M. Krupinski and T. Tanski, Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Cast Mg-Al-Zn Alloys, Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2012, 56(1), p 30–36
18. G. Zhang, B. Eddy Patuwo, and M.Y. Hu, Forecasting with Artificial Neural Networks: The State of the Art, Int. J. Forecast., 1998, 14, p 35–6210.1016/S0169-2070(97)00044-7 ↗
19. R. Noori, A. Karbassi, and M. Salman Sabahi, Evaluation of PCA and Gamma Test Techniques on ANN Operation for Weekly Solid Waste Prediction, J. Environ. Manag., 2010, 91, p 767–77110.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.007 ↗
20. R. Noori, M.A. Abdoli, G.M. Jalili, and R. Samieifard, Comparison of Neural Network and Principal Component-Regression Analysis to Predict the Solid Waste Generation in Tehran, Iran. J. Publ. Health, 2009, 38(1), p 74–84
21. M.Y. Riad, S. Shoukry, E. Sosa, and G. William, Prediction of Concrete Initial Setting Time in Field Conditions Through Multivariate Regression Analysis, Mater. Struct., 2011, 44, p 1063–107710.1617/s11527-010-9684-7 ↗
22. M.A. Razi and K. Athappilly, A Comparative Predictive Analysis of Neural Networks (NNs), Nonlinear Regression and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Models, Expert Syst. Appl., 2005, 29, p 65–7410.1016/j.eswa.2005.01.006 ↗
23. J.S. Armstrong and F. Collopy, Error Measures for Generalizing About Forecasting Methods: Empirical Comparisons, Int. J. Forecasting, 1992, 8, p 69–8010.1016/0169-2070(92)90008-W ↗
24. R. Teti and D. D’Addona, Intelligent Classification of Neural Network Models for Mild Steel Behaviour in Hot Forming, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B, 2004, 218, p 61910.1243/0954405041167176 ↗
25. A. Necat and K. Rasit, Use of Artificial Neural Network for Prediction of Physical Properties and Tensile Strengths in Particle Reinforced Alüminum Matrix Composites, J. Mater. Sci., 2005, 40, p 1767–177010.1007/s10853-005-0689-5 ↗
26. D.B. Karunakar and G.L. Datta, Prevention of Defects in Castings Using Back Propagation Neural Networks, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2008, 39, p 1111–112410.1007/s00170-007-1289-0 ↗
27. L.A. Dobrzanski and M. Krol, Neural Network Application for Prediction Mechanical Properties of Mg-Al-Zn Alloys, Arch. Comput. Mater. Sci. Surf. Eng., 2010, 2(4), p 181–188
28. M. Correa, C. Bielza, and J. Pamies-Teixeira, Comparison of Bayesian Networks and Artificial Neural Networks for Quality Detection in a Machining Process, Expert Syst. Appl., 2009, 36, p 7270–727910.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.024 ↗
29. P.K.D.V. Yarlagadda and E.C.W. Chiang, A Neural Network System for the Prediction of Process Parameters in Pressure Die Casting, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 1999, 89–90, p 583–59010.1016/S0924-0136(99)00071-0 ↗
30. A.C. Rencher, Methods of Multivariate Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2003
31. Standard Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products, ASTM A370, ASTM
32. L.A. Dobrzanski, R. Maniara, J.H. Sokolowski, and M. Krupiński, Modeling of Mechanical Properties of Al-Si-Cu Cast Alloys Using the Neural Network, JAMME, 2007, 20, 347–350