Statistical Analysis of Clad Geometry in Direct Energy Deposition of Inconel 718 Single Tracks
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study investigates and estimates the effect of process parameters on the clad geometry of Inconel 718 single tracks deposited using the direct energy deposition technique. Three major process parameters, i.e., laser power (P), scanning speed (V), and powder feed rate (F) are varied systematically at different levels and investigated their effect on clad geometry. The clad geometrical characteristics considered are clad width (w), clad height (h), penetration depth (b), and wetting angle (θ). Empirical models are developed with the help of multiple regression analysis based on the experimental results, to correlate the input parameters and output geometry. Analysis of variance is performed to check the influence of individual parameters and their interaction effects. The models are validated by the coefficient of determination value (R2) which is above 0.87 in all the cases and residuals are distributed within ± 10%. Further investigations revealed a linear relationship of the clad width with normalized surface enthalpy. The clad height and wetting angle have shown a linear variation with the line mass.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T.Q. Nguyen and D. Hui, Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges, Compos. Part B Eng., 2018, 143, p 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
2. J. Gardan, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: State of the Art and Trends, Int. J. Prod. Res., 2016, 54(10), p 3118–3132.10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909 ↗
3. J.P. Oliveira, A.D. LaLonde and J. Ma, Processing Parameters in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Metal Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Des., 2020, 193, p 108762.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108762 ↗
4. B. Blakey-Milner, P. Gradl, G. Snedden, M. Brooks, J. Pitot, E. Lopez, M. Leary, F. Berto and A. du Plessis, Metal Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace: A Review, Mater. Des., 2021, 209, p 110008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11000810.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008 ↗
5. N. Li, S. Huang, G. Zhang, R. Qin, W. Liu, H. Xiong, G. Shi and J. Blackburn, Progress in Additive Manufacturing on New Materials: A Review, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35, p 242–269.10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.002 ↗
6. D.G. Ahn, Direct Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes and Their Sustainable Applications for Green Technology: A Review, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. - Green Technol., 2016, 3(4), p 381–395.10.1007/s40684-016-0048-9 ↗
7. X. Niu, S. Singh, A. Garg, H. Singh, B. Panda, X. Peng and Q. Zhang, Review of Materials Used in Laser-Aided Additive Manufacturing Processes to Produce Metallic Products, Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(3), p 282–298.10.1007/s11465-019-0526-1 ↗
8. J.M. Wilson, C. Piya, Y.C. Shin, F. Zhao and K. Ramani, Remanufacturing of Turbine Blades by Laser Direct Deposition with Its Energy and Environmental Impact Analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 2014, 80, p 170–178.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.084 ↗
9. M. Marya, V. Singh, J.Y. Hascoet and S. Marya, A Metallurgical Investigation of the Direct Energy Deposition Surface Repair of Ferrous Alloys, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27(2), p 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-3117-510.1007/s11665-017-3117-5 ↗
10. D.G. Ahn, “Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Process: State of the Art, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00302-710.1007/s40684-020-00302-7 ↗
11. P. Kattire, S. Paul, R. Singh and W. Yan, Experimental Characterization of Laser Cladding of CPM 9V on H13 Tool Steel for Die Repair Applications, J. Manuf. Process., 2015, 20, p 492–499.10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.018 ↗
12. A. Dass and A. Moridi, State of the Art in Directed Energy Deposition: From Additive Manufacturing to Materials Design, Coatings, 2019, 9(7), p 418.10.3390/coatings9070418 ↗
13. T.A. Rodrigues, J.D. Escobar, J. Shen, V.R. Duarte, G.G. Ribamar, J.A. Avila, E. Maawad, N. Schell, T.G. Santos and J.P. Oliveira, Effect of Heat Treatments on 316 Stainless Steel Parts Fabricated by Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing: Microstructure and Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction Analysis, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 48, p 102428.
14. J.G. Lopes, C.M. Machado, V.R. Duarte, T.A. Rodrigues, T.G. Santos and J.P. Oliveira, Effect of Milling Parameters on HSLA Steel Parts Produced by Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM), J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 59, p 739–749.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.007 ↗
15. H. Lee, C.H.J. Lim, M.J. Low, N. Tham, V.M. Murukeshan and Y.J. Kim, Lasers in Additive Manufacturing: A Review, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. - Green Technol., 2017, 4(3), p 307–322.10.1007/s40684-017-0037-7 ↗
16. E. Hosseini and V.A. Popovich, A Review of Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Inconel 718, Addit. Manuf., 2019, 30, p 100877.
17. S. Azadian, L.Y. Wei and R. Warren, Delta Phase Precipitation in Inconel 718, Mater. Charact., 2004, 53(1), p 7–16.10.1016/j.matchar.2004.07.004 ↗
18. M.B. Henderson, D. Arrell, M. Heobel, R. Larsson, and G. Marchant, Nickel-Based Superalloy Welding Practices for Industrial Gas Turbine Applications, n.d.
19. A. Bansal, A.K. Sharma, S. Das and P. Kumar, On Microstructure and Strength Properties of Microwave Welded Inconel 718/ Stainless Steel (SS-316L), Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., 2016, 230(5), p 939–948.
20. C. Gullipalli, P. Burad, N. Thawari, J. Bhatt and T.V.K. Gupta, Microstructure Evolution in Direct Energy Deposited Multilayer Inconel 718, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05899-810.1007/s13369-021-05899-8 ↗
21. B. Onuike and A. Bandyopadhyay, Additive Manufacturing in Repair: Influence of Processing Parameters on Properties of Inconel 718, Mater. Lett., 2019, 252, p 256–259.10.1016/j.matlet.2019.05.114 ↗
22. D. Liu, J.C. Lippold, J. Li, S.R. Rohklin, J. Vollbrecht and R. Grylls, Laser Engineered Net Shape (LENS) Technology for the Repair of Ni-Base Superalloy Turbine Components, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., 2014, 45(10), p 4454–4469.10.1007/s11661-014-2397-8 ↗
23. S. Sui, J. Chen, R. Zhang, X. Ming, F. Liu and X. Lin, The Tensile Deformation Behavior of Laser Repaired Inconel 718 with a Non-Uniform Microstructure, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 688(February), p 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.11010.1016/j.msea.2017.01.110 ↗
24. A. Saboori, A. Aversa, G. Marchese, S. Biamino, M. Lombardi and P. Fino, Application of Directed Energy Deposition-Based Additive Manufacturing in Repair, Appl. Sci., 2019, 9(16), p 3316.10.3390/app9163316 ↗
25. A.N. Jinoop, C.P. Paul and K.S. Bindra, Laser-Assisted Directed Energy Deposition of Nickel Super Alloys: A Review, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., 2019, 233(11), p 2376–2400.
26. S. Sreekanth, E. Ghassemali, K. Hurtig, S. Joshi and J. Andersson, Effect of Direct Energy Deposition Process Parameters on Single-Track Deposits of Alloy 718, Metals (Basel), 2020, 10(1), p 96.10.3390/met10010096 ↗
27. T. Bhardwaj, M. Shukla, C.P. Paul and K.S. Bindra, Direct Energy Deposition - Laser Additive Manufacturing of Titanium-Molybdenum Alloy: Parametric Studies, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 787, p 1238–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.12110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.121 ↗
28. E.M. Lee, G.Y. Shin, H.S. Yoon and D.S. Shim, Study of the Effects of Process Parameters on Deposited Single Track of M4 Powder Based Direct Energy Deposition, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2017, 31(7), p 3411–3418.10.1007/s12206-017-0239-5 ↗
29. M. Alizadeh-Sh, S.P.H. Marashi, E. Ranjbarnodeh and R. Shoja-Razavi, Laser Cladding of Inconel 718 Powder on a Non-Weldable Substrate: Clad Bead Geometry-Solidification Cracking Relationship, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 56, p 54–62.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.045 ↗
30. G. Meng, L. Zhu, J. Zhang, Z. Yang and P. Xue, Statistical Analysis and Multi-Objective Process Optimization of Laser Cladding TiC-Inconel718 Composite Coating, Optik (Stuttg), 2021, 240, p 166828.10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166828 ↗
31. B. Tang, Y. Tan, Z. Zhang, T. Xu, Z. Sun and X. Li, Effects of Process Parameters on Geometrical Characteristics, Microstructure and Tribological Properties of TiB2 Reinforced Inconel 718 Alloy Composite Coatings by Laser Cladding, Coatings, 2020, 10(1), p 76.10.3390/coatings10010076 ↗
32. M. Alizadeh-Sh, S.P.H. Marashi, E. Ranjbarnodeh, R. Shoja-Razavi and J.P. Oliveira, Dissimilar Laser Cladding of Inconel 718 Powder on A-286 Substrate: Microstructural Evolution, J. Laser Appl., 2020, 32(2), p 022048.10.2351/1.5124932 ↗
33. S. Jelvani, R. Shoja Razavi, M. Barekat and M. Dehnavi, Empirical-Statistical Modeling and Prediction of Geometric Characteristics for Laser-Aided Direct Metal Deposition of Inconel 718 Superalloy, Met. Mater. Int., 2020, 26(5), p 668–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00355-710.1007/s12540-019-00355-7 ↗
34. J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Z. Chen, D. Li, W. Tong, J. Yao and V. Kovalenko, Experimental and Statistical Analyses of Geometry Characteristics of Inconel 718 Laser Clad Layer with Response Surface Methodology, J. Laser Appl., 2019, 31(3), p 032016.10.2351/1.5098044 ↗
35. M. Alizadeh-Sh, S.P.H. Marashi, E. Ranjbarnodeh, R. Shoja-Razavi and J.P. Oliveira, Prediction of Solidification Cracking by an Empirical-Statistical Analysis for Laser Cladding of Inconel 718 Powder on a Non-Weldable Substrate, Opt. Laser Technol., 2020, 128, p 106244.10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106244 ↗
36. M. Moradi, A. Hasani, Z. Pourmand and J. Lawrence, Direct Laser Metal Deposition Additive Manufacturing of Inconel 718 Superalloy: Statistical Modelling and Optimization by Design of Experiments, Opt. Laser Technol., 2021, 144, p 107380.10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107380 ↗
37. M. Nabhani, R.S. Razavi and M. Barekat, An Empirical-Statistical Model for Laser Cladding of Ti-6Al-4V Powder on Ti-6Al-4V Substrate, Opt. Laser Technol., 2018, 100, p 265–271.10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.10.015 ↗
38. M. Ansari, R. Shoja Razavi and M. Barekat, An Empirical-Statistical Model for Coaxial Laser Cladding of NiCrAlY Powder on Inconel 738 Superalloy, Opt. Laser Technol., 2016, 86, p 136–144.10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.06.014 ↗
39. U. de Oliveira, V. Ocelík and J.T.M. De Hosson, Analysis of Coaxial Laser Cladding Processing Conditions, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2005, 197(2–3), p 127–136.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.029 ↗
40. M. Mazzarisi, S.L. Campanelli, A. Angelastro and M. Dassisti, Phenomenological Modelling of Direct Laser Metal Deposition for Single Tracks, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 111(7–8), p 1955–1970.10.1007/s00170-020-06204-x ↗
41. M. Erfanmanesh, H. Abdollah-Pour, H. Mohammadian-Semnani and R. Shoja-Razavi, An Empirical-Statistical Model for Laser Cladding of WC-12Co Powder on AISI 321 Stainless Steel, Opt. Laser Technol., 2017, 97, p 180–186.10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.06.026 ↗
42. M. Alizadeh-Sh, S.P.H. Marashi, E. Ranjbarnodeh and R. Shoja-Razavi, Laser Cladding of Inconel 718 Powder on a Non-Weldable Substrate: Clad Bead Geometry-Solidification Cracking Relationship, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 56(April), p 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.04510.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.045 ↗
43. B. Bax, R. Rajput, R. Kellet and M. Reisacher, Systematic Evaluation of Process Parameter Maps for Laser Cladding and Directed Energy Deposition, Addit. Manuf., 2018, 21(January), p 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.04.002 ↗
44. D.J. Corbin, A.R. Nassar, E.W. Reutzel, A.M. Beese and N.A. Kistler, Effect of Directed Energy Deposition Processing Parameters on Laser Deposited Inconel ® 718: External Morphology, J. Laser Appl., 2017, 29(2), p 022001.10.2351/1.4977476 ↗
45. N.A. Kistler, A.R. Nassar, E.W. Reutzel, D.J. Corbin and A.M. Beese, Effect of Directed Energy Deposition Processing Parameters on Laser Deposited Inconel ® 718: Microstructure, Fusion Zone Morphology, and Hardness, J. Laser Appl., 2017, 29(2), p 022005.10.2351/1.4979702 ↗
46. J.L. Bennett, S.J. Wolff, G. Hyatt, K. Ehmann and J. Cao, Thermal Effect on Clad Dimension for Laser Deposited Inconel 718, J. Manuf. Process., 2017, 28, p 550–557.10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.04.024 ↗
47. C. Zhong, J. Kittel, A. Gasser and J.H. Schleifenbaum, Study of Nickel-Based Super-Alloys Inconel 718 and Inconel 625 in High-Deposition-Rate Laser Metal Deposition, Opt. Laser Technol., 2019, 109, p 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.00310.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.003 ↗
48. D.M. Goodarzi, J. Pekkarinen and A. Salminen, Effect of Process Parameters in Laser Cladding on Substrate Melted Areas and the Substrate Melted Shape, J. Laser Appl., 2015, 27(S2), p S29201. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.490637610.2351/1.4906376 ↗
49. E.R. Denlinger, J.C. Heigel, P. Michaleris and T.A. Palmer, Effect of Inter-Layer Dwell Time on Distortion and Residual Stress in Additive Manufacturing of Titanium and Nickel Alloys, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 215, p 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.03010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.030 ↗
50. N. Thawari, C. Gullipalli, J.K. Katiyar and T.V.K. Gupta, Effect of Multi-Layer Laser Cladding of Stellite 6 and Inconel 718 Materials on Clad Geometry, Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties, Mater. Today Commun., 2021, 28(June), p 102604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10260410.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102604 ↗
51. J.C. Heigel, M.F. Gouge, P. Michaleris and T.A. Palmer, Selection of Powder or Wire Feedstock Material for the Laser Cladding of Inconel® 625, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2016, 231, p 357–365.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.004 ↗