The Effect of Ultrasonic Peening on Service Life of the Butt-Welded High-Temperature Steel Pipes
Source abstract
Abstract
Residual stresses introduced by manufacturing processes such as casting, forming, machining, and welding have harmful effects on the mechanical behavior of the structures. In addition to the residual stresses, weld toe stress concentration can play a determining effect. There are several methods to improve the mechanical properties such as fatigue behavior of the welded structures. In this paper, the effects of ultrasonic peening on the fatigue life of the high-temperature seamless steel pipes, used in the petrochemical environment, have been investigated. These welded pipes are fatigued due to thermal and mechanical loads caused by the cycle of cooling, heating, and internal pressure fluctuations. Residual stress measurements, weld geometry estimation, electrochemical evaluations, and metallography investigations were done as supplementary examinations. Results showed that application of ultrasonic impact treatment has led to increased fatigue life, fatigue strength, and corrosion resistance of A106-B welded steel pipes in petrochemical corrosive environment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. D. Yin, D. Wang, H. Jing, and L. Huo, The Effects of Ultrasonic Peening Treatment on the Ultra-Long Life Fatigue Behavior of Welded Joints, Mater. Des., 2010, 31(7), p 3299–330710.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.006 ↗
2. H. Lee and S. Kang, The Relationship Between Residual Stresses and Transverse Weld Cracks in Thick Steel Plate, Weld. J., 2003, 82(8), p 225s–230s
3. P. Brand, T. De Keijser, and G. Den Ouden, Residual Stresses and Plastic Deformation in GTA-Welded Steel, Weld. J., 1993, 72(3), p 93s–100s
4. G. Pluvinage, Fracture and Fatigue Emanating from Stress Concentrators, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003
5. J.R. Davis, Corrosion of Weldments, ASM International, Materials Park, 200610.31399/asm.tb.cw.9781627083393 ↗
6. K. Oguri, Fatigue Life Enhancement of Aluminum Alloy for Aircraft by Fine Particle Shot Peening (FPSP), J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 211(8), p 1395–139910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.03.011 ↗
7. J. Zhou, S. Huang, L. Zuo, X. Meng, J. Sheng, Q. Tian, Y. Han, and W. Zhu, Effects of Laser Peening on Residual Stresses and Fatigue Crack Growth Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy, Opt. Lasers Eng., 2014, 52, p 189–19410.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.06.011 ↗
8. T. Roland, D. Retraint, K. Lu, and J. Lu, Fatigue Life Improvement Through Surface Nanostructuring of Stainless Steel by Means of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Scr. Mater., 2006, 54(11), p 1949–195410.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.049 ↗
9. V. Strizhalo, E. Zasimchuk, B. Morozov, N. Bega, Y.A. Kuzema, and A. Il’in, Effect of Sand Blasting on the Low Cycle Fatigue of Titanium Alloys, Strength Mater., 1974, 6(9), p 1083–108610.1007/BF01528268 ↗
10. L. Huo, D. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Investigation of the Fatigue Behaviour of the Welded Joints Treated by TIG Dressing and Ultrasonic Peening Under Variable-Amplitude Load, Int. J. Fatigue, 2005, 27(1), p 95–10110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.009 ↗
11. A. Abdullah, M. Malaki, and A. Eskandari, Strength Enhancement of the Welded Structures by Ultrasonic Peening, Mater. Des., 2012, 38, p 7–1810.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.040 ↗
12. A. Galtier and E. Statnikov, The Influence of Ultrasonic Impact Treatment on Fatigue Behaviour of Welded Joints in High-Strength Steel, Weld. World, 2004, 48(5-6), p 61–6610.1007/BF03266433 ↗
13. M. Shalvandi, Y. Hojjat, A. Abdullah, and H. Asadi, Influence of Ultrasonic Stress Relief on Stainless Steel 316 Specimens: A Comparison with Thermal Stress Relief, Mater. Des., 2013, 46, p 713–72310.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.023 ↗
14. E3-01 ASTM International, Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens, E3-01 ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2007
15. E384-99, ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials, E384-99, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 1999
16. G5-94, ASTM International, Standard Reference Test Method for Making Potentiostatic and Potentiodynamic Anodic Polarization Measurements, G5-94, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2004
17. G102-89, ASTM International, Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements, G102-89, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2004
18. S. Tsujikawa, A. Miyasaka, M. Ueda, S. Ando, T. Shibata, T. Haruna, M. Katahira, Y. Yamane, T. Aoki, and T. Yamada, Alternative for Evaluating Sour Gas Resistance of Low-Alloy Steels and Corrosion-Resistant Alloys, Corrosion, 1993, 49(5), p 409–41910.5006/1.3316068 ↗
19. E466-96, ASTM International, Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials, E466-96, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 1996
20. E8-04, ASTM International, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, E8-04, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2004
21. X. Ling and G. Ma, Effect of Ultrasonic Impact Treatment on the Stress Corrosion Cracking of 304 Stainless Steel Welded Joints, J. Press. Vessel Technol., 2009, 131(5), p 051502–05150710.1115/1.3147988 ↗
22. X. Niu and G. Glinka, The Weld Profile Effect on Stress Intensity Factors in Weldments, Int. J. Fract., 1987, 35(1), p 3–2010.1007/BF00034531 ↗
23. A.C. Nussbaumer, Course on Fatigue and Fractures Mechanics, Influenece of residual stresses and post-welding improvement methods, Document submitted in fullfilment of Article 8°, Alinea c) from the portugese decreto lei n° 239/2007 2008.
24. P. Rai, V. Pandey, K. Chattopadhyay, L. Singhal, and V. Singh, Effect of Ultrasonic Shot Peening on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High-Nitrogen Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23(11), p 4055–406410.1007/s11665-014-1180-8 ↗