journal article·2021-07

Process Sensitivity and Significant Parameters Investigation in Metal Fused Filament Fabrication of Ti-6Al-4V

Mohammad Qasim Shaikh, Pierre-Yves Lavertu, Kunal H. Kate, Sundar V. Atre

Publisher page

Abstract

Metal fused filament fabrication (MF3) combines fused filament fabrication and sintering processes to fabricate complex metal components. To design for MF3, an understanding of part geometry, printing parameters and material properties' effects on processability, part quality and ensuing properties is required. However, such investigation is a complex problem having several linked geometry, process and material variables to be considered that influence the process outcome. Moreover, such investigations through the experimental trial-and-error approach are costly and time-consuming, and sometimes not even feasible due to so many input variables involved. This study investigated the sensitivity of key output parameters toward each of the input parameters in MF3. FEA-based thermomechanical process simulations were used to estimate the process outcome in response to variable inputs, and a systematic procedure for sensitivity analysis has been successfully developed for the printing phase of the MF3 process. Dimensionless sensitivity values for all output parameters were calculated in the response of each input parameter, which allows parameters with different units to be compared quantitatively with a single yardstick. Moreover, three different part geometries were studied to identify how the process sensitivity varies with part geometry. For each output parameter, the most influential input parameters were identified from the whole set of input parameters and their influence trends were evaluated for different part geometries. The present sensitivity analysis procedure is expected to be an invaluable tool not only for process parameters optimization but also for the development of material and part geometry for MF3, hence enabling design for MF3 (DfMF3).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. J.G. Gutierrez, S. Cano, S. Schuschnigg, C. Kukla, J. Sapkota and C. Holzer, Additive Manufacturing of Metallic and Ceramic Components by the Material Extrusion of Highly-Filled Polymers: A Review and Future Perspectives, Materials, 2018, 11(5), p 840.10.3390/ma11050840 ↗
2. P. Singh, Q. Shaikh, V.K. Balla, S.V. Atre and K.H. Kate, Estimating Powder-Polymer Material Properties Used in Design for Metal Fused Filament Fabrication (DfMF3), JOM, 2020, 72, p 485–495.10.1007/s11837-019-03920-y ↗
3. Y. Thompson, J.G. Gutierrez, C. Kukla and P. Felfer, Fused Filament Fabrication, Debinding and Sintering as a Low Cost Additive Manufacturing Method of 316L Stainless Steel, Addit. Manuf., 2019, 30, p 100861.
4. G. Wu, N.A. Langrana, R. Sadanji and S. Danforth, Solid Freeform Fabrication of Metal Components Using Fused Deposition of Metals, Mater. Des., 2002, 23(1), p 97–105.10.1016/S0261-3069(01)00079-6 ↗
5. W. Lengauer, I. Duretek, M. Fürst, V. Schwarz, J.G. Gutierrez, S. Schuschnigg, C. Kukla, M. Kitzmantel, E. Neubauer, C. Lieberwirth and V. Morrison, Fabrication and Properties of Extrusion-Based 3D-Printed Hardmetal and Cermet Components, Int. J. Refract Metal Hard Mater., 2019, 82, p 141–149.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.04.011 ↗
6. L. Ren, X. Zhou, Z. Song, C. Zhao, Q. Liu, J. Xue and X. Li, Process Parameter Optimization of Extrusion-Based 3D Metal Printing Utilizing PW–LDPE–SA Binder System, Materials, 2017, 10(3), p 305.10.3390/ma10030305 ↗
7. S. Ahn, S.J. Park, S. Lee, S.V. Atre and R.M. German, Effect of Powders and Binders on Material Properties and Molding Parameters in Iron and Stainless Steel Powder Injection Molding Process, Powder Technol., 2009, 193, p 162–169.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.010 ↗
8. A. Armillotta, M. Bellotti and M. Cavallaro, Warpage of FDM Parts: Experimental Tests and Analytic Model, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 2018, 50, p 140–152.10.1016/j.rcim.2017.09.007 ↗
9. P. Parandoush and D. Lin, A Review on Additive Manufacturing of Polymer-Fiber Composites, Compos. Struct., 2017, 182, p 36–53.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
10. R.Q. de Macedo and R.T. Ferreira, Residual thermal stress in fused deposition modelling, in ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, 24th edn., December 3–8, 2017, Curitiba, Brazil, COBEM-2017-0124
11. M.D. Espin, J.M. Forcada, A.A. Granada, J. Llumà, S. Borros and G. Reyes, Mechanical Property Characterization and Simulation of Fused Deposition Modeling Polycarbonate Parts, Mater. Des., 2015, 83, p 670–677.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.074 ↗
12. H. Xia, J. Lu, S. Dabiri and G. Tryggvason, Fully Resolved Numerical Simulations of Fused Deposition Modeling. Part I: Fluid Flow, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2018, 24(2), p 463–476.10.1108/RPJ-12-2016-0217 ↗
13. Y. Zhou, G. Xiong, T. Nyberg, and D. Liu, Temperature analysis in the fused deposition modeling process, in International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering, 3rd edn., July 8–10, 2016, Beijing, China, 978-1-5090-2534-3/16
14. S.F. Costa, F.M. Duarte and J.A. Covas, Thermal Conditions Affecting Heat Transfer in FDM/FFE: A Contribution Towards the Numerical Modelling of the Process, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2015, 10(1), p 35–46.10.1080/17452759.2014.984042 ↗
15. Y. Zhang and Y.K. Chou, 3D FEA simulations of fused deposition modeling process, in ASME International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1st edn., October 8–11, 2006, 2006, Ypsilanti, MI, USA, MSEC2006-2113210.1115/MSEC2006-21132 ↗
16. A. Cattenone, S. Morganti, G. Alaimo and F. Auricchio, Finite Element Analysis of Additive Manufacturing Based on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): Distortions Prediction and Comparison with Experimental Data, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2019, 141(011010), p 1–17.
17. B. Barmore, Fused Filament Fabrication of Filled Polymers for Metal Additive Manufacturing. Master’s Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, Oregon State University, 2016
18. T.W. Kerekes, H. Lim, W.Y. Joe and G.J. Yun, Characterization of Process–Deformation/Damage Property Relationship of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed Specimens, Addit. Manuf., 2019, 25, p 532–544.
19. F. Górski, W. Kuczko and R. Wichniarek, Influence of Process Parameters on Dimensional Accuracy of Parts Manufactured Using Fused Deposition Modelling Technology, Adv. Sci. Technol., 2013, 7(19), p 27–35.
20. J. Giannatsis, K. Sofos, V. Canellidis, D. Karalekas, and V. Dedoussis, Investigating the influence of build parameters on the mechanical properties of FDM parts, in Innovative Developments in Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Dec 2011 (Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2011) ISBN 978-0-415-68418-7
21. G. Jothibabua and S.K. Gurunathanb, Surrogate Based Sensitivity Analysis of Part Strength due to Process Parameters in Fused Deposition Modelling, Proc. Comput. Sci., 2018, 133, p 772–778.10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.120 ↗
22. B.H. Lee, J. Abdullah and Z.A. Khan, Optimization of Rapid Prototyping Parameters for Production of Flexible ABS Object, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, 169, p 54–61.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.259 ↗
23. E.R. Fitzharris, N. Watanabe, D.W. Rosen and M.L. Shofner, Effects of Material Properties on Warpage in Fused Deposition Modeling Parts, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 95, p 2059–2070.10.1007/s00170-017-1340-8 ↗
24. B. Vasudevarao, D.P. Natarajan, M. Henderson, and A. Razdan, Sensitivity of RP Surface Finish to Process Parameter Variation, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2467464
25. S.V. Atre, S.J. Park, R. Zauner and R.M. German, Process Simulation of Powder Injection Moulding: Identification of Significant Parameters During Mould Filling Phase, Powder Metall., 2007, 50(1), p 76–85.10.1179/174329007X185607 ↗
26. A.E. Moumen, M. Tarfaoui and K. Lafdi, Modelling of the Temperature and Residual Stress Fields During 3D Printing of Polymer Composites, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 104, p 1661–1676.10.1007/s00170-019-03965-y ↗
27. e-Xstream, Digimat-AM Simulation Solution for Additive Manufacturing, https://www.e-xstream.com/product/digimat-am. Accessed 15 Sept 2020
28. P. Singh, V.K. Balla, A. Tofangchi, S.V. Atre and K.H. Kate, Printability Studies of Ti-6Al-4V by Metal Fused Filament Fabrication (MF3), Int. J. Refract Metal Hard Mater., 2020, 91, p 105249.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105249 ↗
29. Q. Sun, G.M. Rizvi, C.T. Bellehumeur and P. Gu, Effect of Processing Conditions on the Bonding Quality of FDM Polymer Filaments, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2008, 14(2), p 72–80.10.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
30. C. Bellehumeur, L. Li, Q. Sun and P. Gu, Modeling of Bond Formation Between Polymer Filaments in the Fused Deposition Modeling Process, SME J. Manuf. Process., 2004, 6, p 2.