Microstructural and Passivation Response of Severely Deformed AISI 304 Steel Surface: The Role of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study investigates the microstructural and passivation behavior of surface mechanical attrition treated (SMAT) AISI 304 stainless steel in a 0.6 M NaCl solution at room temperature. SMAT process, which is more advanced than the classical shot-peening, causes 2-3 times improvement in surface hardness of the steel. Ball size, a vital SMAT parameter, plays a significant role in controlling the microstructure and corrosion behavior of the steel. Larger diameter (6 mm) balls induce thicker deformed layer (450 μm), a higher proportion of deformation-induced martensite (~ 50%), a higher density of dislocations and twins, and higher lattice strain. TEM results confirm the presence of {111} twins throughout the deformed layer. SMAT enhances the corrosion properties of the steel. Specimen SMATed with 4-mm-diameter-balls displays the lowest corrosion rate (1.80 × 10−4 mmpy). SMAT increases the pitting resistance of the steel surface. XPS is utilized to understand the passivation mechanism of steel comprehensively. SMAT alters the proportion of Cr2O3, Cr(OH)3, Fe2O3, and FeO compounds in the passive layer. SMAT increases the thickness of the passive layer.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Erosion and Abrasive Machining · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. H.W. Zhang, Z.K. Hei, G. Liu, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Formation of Nanostructured Surface Layer on AISI, 304 Stainless Steel by Means of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Acta Mater., 2003, 51(7), p 1871–188110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00594-3 ↗
2. K. Lu and J. Lu, Nanostructured Surface Layer on Metallic Materials Induced by Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2004, 375(1–2), p 38–4510.1016/j.msea.2003.10.261 ↗
3. D.A. Lesyk, H. Soyama, B.N. Mordyuk, S. Martinez, N.I. Khripta, and A. Lamikiz, Mechanical Surface Treatments of AISI, 304 Stainless Steel: Effects on Surface Microrelief, Residual Stress, and Microstructure, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 5307–532210.1007/s11665-019-04273-y ↗
4. S. Kumar, K. Chattopadhyay, and V. Singh, Optimization of the Duration of Ultrasonic Shot Peening for Enhancement of Fatigue Life of the Alloy Ti-6Al-4V, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2020, 29, p 1214–122410.1007/s11665-020-04661-9 ↗
5. D.S. Bandla, P. Verma, K. Chattopadhyay, and V. Singh, Enhancement of Hot Corrosion Resistance of Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel Through Surface Nanostructuring and Pre-oxidation, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27, p 6443–645710.1007/s11665-018-3751-6 ↗
6. T. Roland, D. Retraint, K. Lu, and J. Lu, Fatigue Life Improvement Through Surface Nanostructuring of Stainless Steel by Means of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Scr. Mater., 2006, 54(11), p 1949–195410.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.049 ↗
7. A.Q. Lu, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, G. Liu, Q.H. Zang, and C.M. Liu, Effect of Nanocrystalline and Twin Boundaries on Corrosion Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Using SMAT, Acta Metall. Sin. Engl. Lett., 2006, 19(3), p 183–18910.1016/S1006-7191(06)60042-2 ↗
8. T.L.S.L. Wijesinghe and D.J. Blackwood, Characterisation of Passive Films on 300 Series Stainless Steels, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2006, 253(2), p 1006–100910.1016/j.apsusc.2006.03.081 ↗
9. K.D. Ralston, N. Birbilis, and C.H.J. Davies, Revealing the Relationship between Grain Size and Corrosion Rate of Metals, Scr. Mater., 2010, 63(12), p 1201–120410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.035 ↗
10. R.K. Gupta and N. Birbilis, The Influence of Nanocrystalline Structure and Processing Route on Corrosion of Stainless Steel: A Review, Corros. Sci., 2015, 92(3), p 1–1510.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.041 ↗
11. T. Balusamy, T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan, K. Ravichandran, I.S. Park, and M.H. Lee, Influence of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT) on the Corrosion Behaviour of AISI, 304 Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2013, 74(9), p 332–34410.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.056 ↗
12. J. Lv and H. Luo, Comparison of Corrosion Behavior between Coarse Grained and Nano/Ultrafine Grained 304 Stainless Steel by EWF, XPS and EIS, J. Nucl. Mater., 2014, 452(1–3), p 469–47310.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.05.041 ↗
13. G.T. Burstein and P.C. Pistorius, Surface Roughness and the Metastable Pitting of Stainless Steel in Chloride Solutions, Corrosion, 1995, 51(5), p 380–38510.5006/1.3293603 ↗
14. A.M. Gatey, S.S. Hosmani, and R.P. Singh, Surface Mechanical Attrition Treated AISI, 304L Steel: Role of Process Parameters, Surf. Eng., 2015, 32(1), p 69–7810.1179/1743294415Y.0000000056 ↗
15. A.K. De, D.C. Murdock, M.C. Mataya, J.G. Speer, and D.K. Matlock, Quantitative Measurement of Deformation-Induced Martensite in 304 Stainless Steel by X-ray Diffraction, Scr. Mater., 2004, 50(12), p 1445–144910.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.03.011 ↗
16. B. Arifvianto, Suyitno, and M. Mahardika, Effects of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT) on a Rough Surface of AISI, 316L Stainless Steel, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2012, 258(10), p 4538–454310.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.021 ↗
17. A.M. Gatey, S.S. Hosmani, C.A. Figueroa, S.B. Arya, and R.P. Singh, Role of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment and Chemical Etching on Plasma Nitriding Behavior of AISI, 304L Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2016, 304, p 413–42410.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.07.020 ↗
18. C. Hu and G. Hu, Effect of Deformation-Induced Martensite on the Pit Propagation Behavior of 304 Stainless Steel, Anti-Corros. Methods Mater., 2004, 51, p 381–38810.1108/00035590410560921 ↗
19. M.B. Leban and R. Tisu, The Effect of TiN Inclusions and Deformation-Induced Martensite on the Corrosion Properties of AISI, 321 Stainless Steel, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2013, 33, p 430–43810.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.06.021 ↗
20. A. Fattah-Alhosseini and S. Vafaeian, Comparison of Electrochemical Behavior between Coarse-Grained And Fine-Grained AISI, 430 Ferritic Stainless Steel by Mott-Schottky Analysis and EIS Measurements, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 639, p 301–30710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.142 ↗
21. F. Berthier, J.-P. Diard, B. Le Gorrec, and C. Montella, Method for Determining the Faradaic Impedance of an Electrode Reaction: Application to Metal Corrosion Rate Measurements, Corrosion, 1995, 51(2), p 105–11510.5006/1.3293582 ↗
22. R.T. Lot, Pitting Corrosion Evaluation of Austenitic Stainless Steel Type 304 in Acid Chloride Media, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 2013, 4(4), p 448–459
23. C. Pan, L. Liu, Y. Li, and F. Wang, Pitting Corrosion of 304ss Nanocrystalline Thin Film, Corros. Sci., 2013, 73(8), p 32–4310.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.022 ↗
24. X. Chunchun and H. Gang, Effect of Deformation-Induced Martensite on the Pit Propagation Behavior of 304 Stainless Steel, Anti-Corros. Methods Mater., 2004, 51(6), p 381–38810.1108/00035590410560921 ↗
25. F. Zhi, Y. Wu, L. Zhang, and J. Li, Effect of Deformation Induced Martensite on Electrochemical Behaviours of Type 304 Stainless Steel in the Active State, Corros. Sci. Technol. Prot., 1997, 9(1), p 3–88
26. H.F.G. de Abreu, S.S. de Carvalho, P. de Lima Neto, R.P. dos Santos, V.N. Freire, P.M. de O. Silva, and S.S.M. Tavares, Deformation Induced Martensite in an AISI, 301LN Stainless Steel: Characterization and Influence on Pitting Corrosion Resistance, Mater. Res., 2007, 10, p 359–36610.1590/S1516-14392007000400007 ↗
27. N. Li and N. Wang, The Effect of Duplex Surface Mechanical Attrition and Nitriding Treatment on Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel, Sci. Rep., 2018, 8(1), p 8454–846010.1038/s41598-018-26844-0 ↗
28. C.-O.O.A. Olsson and D. Landolt, Passive Films on Stainless Steels—Chemistry, Structure and Growth, Electrochim. Acta, 2003, 48(9), p 1093–110410.1016/S0013-4686(02)00841-1 ↗
29. M.C. Biesinger, C. Brown, J.R. Mycroft, R.D. Davidson, and N.S. McIntyre, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Studies of Chromium Compounds, Surf. Interface Anal., 2004, 36(12), p 1550–156310.1002/sia.1983 ↗
30. K. Asami and K. Hashimoto, The X-ray Photo-electron Spectra of Several Oxides of Iron and Chromium, Corros. Sci., 1977, 17(7), p 559–57010.1016/S0010-938X(77)80002-4 ↗
31. H. Kim, N. Kara, and K. Sugimoto, Dependence of Corrosion Resistance of Fe2O3-Cr2O3 Artificial Passivation Films on Crystal Structure and Chemical State of Constituent Elements of the Films, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1999, 146(10), p 3679–368510.1149/1.1392533 ↗
32. D. Singh, A.M. Gatey, R.S. Devan, V. Antunes, F. Alvarez, C.A. Figueroa, A.A. Joshi, and S.S. Hosmani, Surface Treatment Response of AISI, 2205 and AISI, 304L Steels: SMAT and Plasma-Nitriding, Surf. Eng., 2019, 35(3), p 205–21510.1080/02670844.2018.1516372 ↗
33. Y. Gui, Z.J. Zheng, and Y. Gao, The Bi-layer Structure and the Higher Compactness of a Passive Film on Nanocrystalline 304 Stainless Steel, Thin Solid Films, 2016, 599, p 64–7110.1016/j.tsf.2015.12.039 ↗
34. B. Diawara, Y.A. Beh, and P. Marcus, Nucleation and Growth of Oxide Layers on Stainless Steels (FeCr) Using a Virtual Oxide Layer Model, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114(45), p 19299–1930710.1021/jp909445x ↗
35. G. Palumbo, S.J. Thorpe, and K.T. Aust, On the Contribution of Triple Junctions to the Structure and Properties of Nanocrystalline Materials, Scr. Metall. Mater., 1990, 24(7), p 1347–135010.1016/0956-716X(90)90354-J ↗
36. J.K. Tien and F.S. Pettit, Mechanism of Oxide Adherence on Fe-25Cr-4Al (Y or Sc) Alloys, Metall. Trans., 1972, 3(6), p 1587–159910.1007/BF02643050 ↗
37. A. Balakrishnan, B.C. Lee, T.N. Kim, and B.B. Panigrahi, Corrosion Behaviour of Ultrafine Grained Titanium in Simulated Body Fluid for Implant Application, Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs, 2008, 22(1), p 54–60
38. S. Lozano-Perez, T. Yamada, T. Terachi, M. Schröder, C.A. English, G.D.W. Smith, C.R.M. Grovenor, and B.L. Eyre, Multi-scale Characterization of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Cold-Worked Stainless Steels and the Influence of Cr Content, Acta Mater., 2009, 57(18), p 5361–538110.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.040 ↗
39. C. Ma, E.H. Han, Q. Peng, and W. Ke, Effect of Polishing Process on Corrosion Behavior of 308L Stainless Steel in High Temperature Water, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, p 423–43610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.190 ↗