journal article·2021-02

Effect of Surface Ultrasonic Rolling on Evolution of Surface Microstructure of EA4T Axle Steel

Pengtao Liu, Rui Wang, Xudong Liu, Ruiming Ren

Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of surface ultrasonic rolling (SUR) on the evolution of surface microstructure of EA4T axle steel is studied by using several microanalysis techniques. Fatigue life of samples after SUR is measured by means of rotary bending fatigue test. After SUR, the surface roughness of the sample is reduced, and the grain size in surface microstructure of the sample is obviously refined. With the increase in SUR passes, the fraction of high-angle grain boundary is increased and the size of ferrite grains is decreased. After SUR with 50 passes, the size of ferrite grains at sample surface is about 100 nm. The refinement mechanism of ferrite grains includes four steps: First, a large amount of dislocations is formed in ferrite. With the increase in strain, the tangled dislocations change into dislocation cells. As the strain continued to increase, the dislocation cells transform into low-angle grain boundary. Finally, the low-angle grain boundary gradually changes to high grain boundary to contribute to the refinement of ferrite grains. The fatigue life of the sample tested at 500 MPa after SUR with one pass is about 23 times higher than that of the sample after turning. However, after SUR with 10, 30 and 50 passes, the excessive plastic deformation reaches ductility limit to cause the surface damage during SUR. The surface damage, as the fatigue cracks initiation sites, can reduce fatigue life.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. R. Fajkoš, R. Zima, and B. Strnadel, Fatigue Limit of Induction Hardened Railway Axles, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2015, 38, p 1255–126410.1111/ffe.12337 ↗
2. T. Makino, T. Kato, and K. Hirakawa, Review of the Fatigue Damage Tolerance of High-Speed Railway Axles in Japan, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2011, 78, p 810–82510.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.12.013 ↗
3. E. Maleki, O. Unal, and K.R. Kashyzadeh, Surface Layer Nanocrystallization of Carbon Steels Subjected to Severe Shot Peening: Analysis and Optimization, Mater. Charact., 2019, 157, p 10987710.1016/j.matchar.2019.109877 ↗
4. E. Maleki, O. Unal, and K.R. Kashyzadeh, Efficiency Analysis of Shot Peening Parameters on Variations of Hardness, Grain Size and Residual Stress via Taguchi Approach, Met. Mater. Int., 2019, 25, p 1436–144710.1007/s12540-019-00290-7 ↗
5. E. Maleki, O. Unal, and K.R. Kashyzadeh, Effects of Conventional, Severe, Over, and Re-shot Peening Processes on the Fatigue Behavior of Mild Carbon Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2018, 334, p 62–7410.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.02.081 ↗
6. E. Maleki, O. Unal, and K.R. Kashyzadeha, Fatigue Behavior Prediction and Analysis of Shot Peened Mild Carbon Steels, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 116, p 48–6710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.06.004 ↗
7. Y.L. Zhang, F.Q. Lai, S.G. Qu, H.P. Liu, D.S. Jia, and S.F. Du, Effect of Ultrasonic Surface Rolling on Microstructure and Rolling Contact Fatigue Behavior of 17Cr2Ni2MoVNb Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2019, 366, p 321–33010.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.061 ↗
8. F. Jiao, S.L. Lan, B. Zhao, and Y. Wang, Theoretical Calculation and Experiment of the Surface Residual Stress in the Plane Ultrasonic Rolling, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 50, p 573–58010.1016/j.jmapro.2019.12.058 ↗
9. J. Yang, D.X. Liu, X.H. Zhang, M.X. Liu, W.D. Zhao, and C.S. Liu, The Effect of Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Process on the Fretting Fatigue Property of GH4169 Superalloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 133, p 10537310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105373 ↗
10. T. Wang, D. Wang, G. Liu, B.M. Gong, and N.X. Song, Investigations on the Nanocrystallization of 40Cr Using Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Processing, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2008, 255, p 1824–182910.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.034 ↗
11. X. Zhao, B. Zhao, Y. Liu, Y. Cai, and C.H. Hu, Research on Friction and Wear Behavior of Gradient Nano-structured 40Cr Steel Induced by High Frequency Impacting and Rolling, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2018, 83, p 167–17710.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.09.012 ↗
12. A. Berg-Pollack, F.J. Voellmecke, and C.M. Sonsino, Fatigue Strength Improvement by Ultrasonic Impact Treatment of Highly Stressed Spokes of Cast Aluminium Wheels, Int. J. Fatigue, 2011, 33, p 513–51810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.017 ↗
13. S. Fintová, P. Pokorný, R. Fajkoš, and P. Hutařc, EA4T Railway Axle Steel Fatigue Behavior Under Very High-Frequency Fatigue Loading, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2020, 115, p 10466810.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104668 ↗
14. W.J. Chen, H. Chen, C.C. Li, X.L. Wang, and Q. Cai, Microstructure and Fatigue Crack Growth of EA4T Steel in Laser Cladding Remanufacturing, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2017, 79, p 120–12910.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.03.005 ↗
15. J.T. Maximov, A.P. Anchev, V.P. Dunchev, N. Ganev, G.V. Duncheva, and K.F. Selimov, Effect of Slide Burnishing Basic Parameters on Fatigue Performance of 2024-T3 High-Strength Aluminium Alloy, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2017, 00, p 1–12
16. H.W. Huang, Z.B. Wang, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Fatigue Behaviors of AISI, 316L Stainless Steel with a Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer, Acta Mater., 2015, 87, p 150–16010.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.057 ↗
17. C.P. Liu, P.T. Liu, J.Z. Pan, C.H. Chen, and R.M. Ren, Effect of Pre-wear on the Rolling Contact Fatigue Property of D2 Wheel Steel, Wear, 2020, 442–443, p 20315410.1016/j.wear.2019.203154 ↗
18. V.I. Izotov, V.A. Pozdnyakov, E.V. Luk’yanenko, O.Y. Usanova, and G.A. Filippov, Influence of the Pearlite Fineness on the Mechanical Properties, Deformation Behavior, and Fracture Characteristics of Carbon Steel, Phys. Met. Metallogr., 2007, 103, p 519–52910.1134/S0031918X07050122 ↗
19. N.R. Tao, Z.B. Wang, W.P. Tong, M.L. Sui, J. Lu, and K. Lu, An Investigation of Surface Nanocrystallization Mechanism in Fe Induced by Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Acta Mater., 2002, 50, p 4603–461610.1016/S1359-6454(02)00310-5 ↗
20. H.P. Klug and L.E. Alexander, X-Ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials, Wiley, New York, 1974
21. N. Petch, The Cleavage Strength of Polycrystals, Iron Steel Inst., 1953, 174, p 25–28
22. C. Acevedo and A. Nussbaumer, Effect of Tensile Residual Stresses on Fatigue Crack Growth and S-N Curves in Tubular Joints Loaded in Compression, Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 36, p 171–18010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.013 ↗
23. L. Wagner, C. Muller, and J.K. Gregory, Effect of Surface Rolling and Shot Peening on Notched Fatigue Strength in Al 2024, DGM, New Delhi, 1993, p 181–186
24. A.C. Batista, A.M. Dias, J.L. Lebrun, J.C. Le Flour, and G. Inglebert, Contact Fatigue of Automotive Gears: Evolution and Effects of Residual Stresses Introduced by Surface Treatments, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2000, 23, p 217–22810.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00268.x ↗
25. P.S. Song and C.C. Wen, Crack Closure and Crack Growth Behavior in Shot Peened Fatigued Specimen, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1999, 63, p 295–30410.1016/S0013-7944(99)00010-7 ↗
26. M.M. Mirzazadeh and A. Plumtree, High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Shot-Peened Steels, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2012, 43, p 2777–278410.1007/s11661-011-0830-9 ↗
27. H.O. Fuchs, The Effect of Self-Stresses on High Cycle Fatigue, J. Test. Eval. ASTM, 1982, 10, p 168–17310.1520/JTE11575J ↗
28. W.J. Harris, Metallic Fatigue, Pergamon, New York, 1961
29. K. Tanaka and T. Mura, A Dislocation Model for Fatigue Crack Initiation, J. Appl. Mech., 1981, 48, p 97–10310.1115/1.3157599 ↗