Influence of Vacuum Support on the Fatigue Life of AlSi9Cu3(Fe) Aluminum Alloy Die Castings
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract High-pressure die casting (HPDC) is a near-net-shape process that produces high quality castings with narrow dimensional tolerances. The HPDC castings are being increasingly used due to good flexibility and high productivity, especially for the automotive industry. Depending on the location of the cast components, there are ever more complex geometries and increasing strength requirements that can be achieved by the application of vacuum-assisted die casting (VPDC). The most specific features of the HPDC process are the rapid mold filling, high cooling rate and intensification pressure. As a consequence of these highlighted features, the process generally leads to the formation of casting defects, such as gas porosity, shrinkage, and entrapped oxide films. However, the VPDC casting process is capable to significantly reduce the amount of these casting defects. The aim of this work is to compare the HPDC and VPDC castings’ high-cycle fatigue behavior and to describe how the casting defects affect the fatigue failure. Before the fatigue tests, the samples were investigated with non-destructive (NDT) materials testing methods such as hydrostatic weighing, x-ray, and computer tomography (CT) to characterize the gas pore and shrinkage pore populations of the material. The AlSi9Cu3(Fe) aluminum alloy castings have been subjected to constant amplitude load by uniaxial fatigue tests in the high-cycle fatigue region with a stress asymmetry ratios of R = −1 and R = 0.1. The resulting fracture surfaces are analyzed through light optical microscopy (LOM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). VPDC increased the number of cycles to fracture and decreased the scatter at the given load levels compared to conventional HPDC casting. Moreover, VPDC significantly decreased the porosity size and volume, and the occurrence of oxide flakes is also decreased, resulting in the improvement in the number of cycle to failure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Linder, A. Arvidsson, and J. Kron, The Influence of Porosity on the Fatigue Strength of High-Pressure Die Cast Aluminium, Mater. Struct., 2006, 29(5), p 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.00997.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.00997.x ↗
2. X. Dong, X. Zhu, and S. Ji, Effect of Super Vacuum Assisted High Pressure Die Casting on the Repeatability of Mechanical Properties of Al-Si-Mg-Mn Die-Cast Alloys, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 266, p 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.03010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.030 ↗
3. X. Cao and J. Campbell, Oxide inclusion defects in Al-Si-Mg cast alloys, Can. Metall. Q., 2005, 44(4), p 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1179/cmq.2005.44.4.43510.1179/cmq.2005.44.4.435 ↗
4. P. Szalva and N.I. Orbulov, The Effect of Vacuum on the Mechanical Properties of Die Cast Aluminum AlSi9Cu3(Fe) Alloy, Int. J. Metalcast., 2019, 2019, p 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-018-00302-z10.1007/s40962-018-00302-z ↗
5. A.K.M. AzizAhamed and H. Kato, Influence of Casting Defect on Tensile Properties of ADC12 Aluminum Alloy Die-Castings, Mater. Trans., 2008, 49(7), p 1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.F-MRA200881410.2320/matertrans.F-MRA2008814 ↗
6. L. Lattanzi, A. Fabrizi, A. Fortini, M. Merlin, and G. Timelli, Effect of Microstructure and Casting Defects on the Fatigue Behavior of the High-Pressure Die-Cast AlSi9Cu3(Fe) Alloy, Procedia Struct. Integr., 2017, 2017, p 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.11910.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.119 ↗
7. A. Rotella, Y. Nadot, M. Piellard, R. Augustin, and M. Fleuriot, Fatigue Limit of a Cast Al-Si-Mg Alloy (A357-T6) with Natural Casting Shrinkages Using ASTM Standard X-Ray Inspection, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 114, p 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.05.02610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.05.026 ↗
8. A. Rotella, Y. Nadot, S. Richard, S. L’Heritier, and A. Roy, Fatigue Life of Cast Al Component, Procedia Eng., 2015, 133, p 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.66110.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.661 ↗
9. J. Linder, A. Arvidsson, and J. Kron, The Influence of Porosity on the Fatigue Strength of High-Pressure Die Cast Aluminium, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2006, 29(5), p 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.00997.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.00997.x ↗
10. W. Hesse, Key to Aluminium Alloys, Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf, 2008, p 88
11. X. Lia, S.M. Xiong, and Z. Guo, Improved Mechanical Properties in Vacuum-Assist High Pressure Die Casting of AZ91D Alloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2016, 231, p 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.005 ↗
12. A. Zyska, Z. Konopka, M. Lagiewka, and M. Nadolski, Porosity of Castings Procedure by the Vacuum Assisted Pressure Die Casting Method, Foundry Eng., 2015, 15(1), p 125–13010.1515/afe-2015-0023 ↗
13. ISO 6892-1:2016: Metallic materials – Tensile testing – Part1, Method of test at Room Temperature, 2016.
14. N.A. Pratten, The Precise Measurement of the Density of Small Samples, J. Mater. Sci., 1981, 16(7), p 1737–174710.1007/BF00540619 ↗
15. ASTM E505-15: Standard Reference Radiographs for Inspection of Aluminum and Magnesium Die Castings, 2015.
16. EN 1706:2013-12: Aluminium and Aluminium Alloys – Castings: Chemical Composition and Mechanical Properties, 2013.
17. ITS-90 Density of Water Formulation for Volumetric Standards Calibration, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 1992, 97/3, p 336–340.10.6028/jres.097.013 ↗
18. BN-75/4051-10: Porosity of Casting by Hydrostatic Weighing, 1975.
19. C. Maierhofer, P. Myrach, M. Röllig, F. Jonietz, B. Illerhaus, D. Meinel, U. Richter, R. Miksche, Characterization of Pores in High Pressure Die Cast Aluminum Using Active Thermography and Computed Tomography, in 42nd Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 2016; p. 1–8, 2016.10.1063/1.4940580 ↗
20. VGStudioMAX 3.2 Software (VG.034-EN.v03_B I 11.2014), Volume Graphics GMBH, Heidelberg, Germany, 2014.
21. B. Oberdorfer, E. Kaschnitz, D. Habe, H. Holzer, G. Schindelbacher, P. Schumacher, New Method of Enhanced Quality Assessment for Al-Castings by Computed Tomography, in Proceedings 5th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography (iCT) 2014, Wels, Austria, Shaker Verlag 2014; 133
22. M. Wicke, A. Brueckner-Foit, T. Kristen, M. Zimmermann, F. Buelbuel, and H.-J. Christ, Near-Threshold Crack Extension Mechanism in an Aluminum Alloy Studied by SEM and X-Ray Tomography, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 119, p 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.02410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.024 ↗
23. D.C. Jiles, Introduction to the Principles of Materials Evaluation, Wolfson Center for Magnetic, Institute for Advanced Materials and Energy Systems, Cardiff University, UK, 2007, p 79–9710.1201/b15870 ↗
24. Y. Tijani, A. Heinrietz, W. Stets, and P. Voight, Detection and Influence of Shrinkage Pores and Nonmetallic Inclusions on Fatigue Life of Cast Aluminum Alloys, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2013, 44(12), p 5408–5415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-013-1773-010.1007/s11661-013-1773-0 ↗
25. I. Koutiri, D. Bellett, F. Morel, L. Augustins, and J. Adrien, High Cycle Fatigue Damage Mechanisms in Cast Aluminum Subject to Complex Loads, Int. J. Fatigue, 2013, 47, p 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.008 ↗
26. D. Roylance, K.C. Cohen, C.H. Jenkins, and S.K. Khana, Mech. Mater. A Mater. Sci. Perspect., 2001, 215(3), p 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1243/146442001154498710.1243/1464420011544987 ↗
27. J. Campbell, Castings, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2003, p 314–318
28. A. Ben Ahmed, M.I. Houria, R. Fathallah, and H. Sidhom, The Effect of Interacting Defects on the HCF Behavior of Al-Si-Mg Aluminum Alloys, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 779, p 618–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.28210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.282 ↗
29. K. Bangyikhan, Effect of Oxide Film, Fe-Rich Phase, Porosity and Their Interactions on Tensile Properties of Cast Al-Si-Mg Alloys (PhD thesis of the Faculty of Engineering of The University of Birmingham, 2005). p. 45.
30. Y. Tijani, A. Heinrietz, T. Bruder, and H. Hanselka, Quantitative Evaluation of Fatigue Life of Cast Aluminum Alloys by Non-destructive Testing and Parameter Model, Int. J. Fatigue, 2013, 57, p 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.05.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.05.017 ↗
31. P. Mu, Y. Nadot, C. Nadot-Martin, A. Chabod, I. Serrano-Munoz, and C. Verdu, Influence of Casting Defects on the Fatigue Behavior of Cast Aluminum AS7G06-T6, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2014, 131, p 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.08.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.08.007 ↗
32. W.D. Callister, Jr., Fundam. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2001, 2001, p 261–262