Experimental Analysis of the Crushing of Honeycomb Cores Under Compression
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental study of the compressive response of hexagonal honeycomb core from the initial elastic regime to a fully crushed state. To understand the crushing mechanism, aluminum honeycomb core was compressed quasi-statically between rigid platens under displacement control. Honeycomb test specimens made of aluminum alloy with different configurations such as cell size, cell number, core density, and specimen size have been tested. During the crushing, the cells buckle elastically and collapse at a higher stress due to inelastic action, after the cells crush by progressive formation of folds on cell walls. The response densifies when folds consume the whole panel height. The peak load recorded during tests corresponded to the buckling of honeycomb cells. The different specimens showed similar load/displacement curves, and the differences observed were only due to the influence of the core density, number of cells, and specimens size on mechanical behavior of hexagonal honeycomb core which has a very important role in the energy absorption capacity. In addition, this study allowed us to build a database of experimental tests for various configurations and allowed us to know the precise energy absorption capacity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. J.R. Vinson, Sandwich Structures: Past, Present, and Future, Springer, Dordrecht, 2005, p 3–12
2. O.A. Ganilova and J.J. Low, Application of Smart Honeycomb Structures for Automotive Passive Safety, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D: J. Automob. Eng., 2018, 232, p 797–81110.1177/0954407017708916 ↗
3. G. Lu and T. Yu, Energy Absorption of Structures And Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 200310.1533/9781855738584 ↗
4. W. Goldsmith and J.L. Sackman, An Experimental Study of Energy Absorption In Impact on Sandwich Plates, Int. J. Impact Eng, 1992, 12, p 241–26210.1016/0734-743X(92)90447-2 ↗
5. I. Ivañez, L.M. Fernandez-Cañadas, and S. Sanchez-Saez, Compressive Deformation and Energy-Absorption Capability of Aluminium Honeycomb Core, Compos. Struct., 2017, 174, p 123–13310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.056 ↗
6. J. Brentjes, Honeycomb as an Energy Absorbing Material, in 8th Structural dynamics and materials conference, ed: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1967.10.2514/6.1967-1149 ↗
7. R.K. Mc Farland, Hexagonal Cell Structures Under Post-Buckling Axial Load, AIAA J., 1963, 1, p 1380–138510.2514/3.1798 ↗
8. L.L. Hu and T.X. Yu, Dynamic Crushing Strength of Hexagonal Honeycombs, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2010, 37, p 467–47410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.12.001 ↗
9. Y. Tao, S. Duan, W. Wen, Y. Pei, and D. Fang, Enhanced Out-of-Plane Crushing Strength and Energy Absorption of In-Plane Graded Honeycombs, Compos. Part B: Eng., 2017, 118, p 33–4010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.002 ↗
10. E. Wu and W.-S. Jiang, Axial Crush of Metallic Honeycombs, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1997, 19, p 439–45610.1016/S0734-743X(97)00004-3 ↗
11. F. Cote, V. Deshpande, N. Fleck, and A. Evans, The Out-of-Plane Compressive Behavior of Metallic Honeycombs, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2004, 380, p 272–28010.1016/j.msea.2004.03.051 ↗
12. A. Partovi Meran, T. Toprak, and A. Muğan, Numerical and Experimental Study of Crashworthiness Parameters of Honeycomb Structures, Thin-Walled Struct., 2014, 78, p 87–9410.1016/j.tws.2013.12.012 ↗
13. X. Zhang, H. Zhang, and Z. Wen, Experimental and Numerical Studies on the Crush Resistance of Aluminum Honeycombs with Various Cell Configurations, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2014, 66, p 48–5910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.009 ↗
14. L.J. Gibson and M.F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999
15. J. Zhang and M.F. Ashby, The Out-of-Plane Properties of Honeycombs, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1992, 34, p 475–48910.1016/0020-7403(92)90013-7 ↗
16. A. Bentouhami and B. Keskes, Experimental Analysis and Modeling of the Buckling of a Loaded Honeycomb Sandwich Composite, Mater. Tehnol., 2015, 49, p 235–24210.17222/mit.2014.039 ↗
17. T. Wierzbicki, Crushing Analysis of Metal Honeycombs, Int. J. Impact Eng, 1983, 1, p 157–17410.1016/0734-743X(83)90004-0 ↗
18. J.W. Klintworth and W.J. Stronge, Elasto-plastic Yield Limits and Deformation Laws for Transversely Crushed Honeycombs, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1988, 30, p 273–29210.1016/0020-7403(88)90060-4 ↗
19. D. Mohr and M. Doyoyo, Experimental Investigation on the Plasticity of Hexagonal Aluminum Honeycomb Under Multiaxial Loading, J. Appl. Mech., 2004, 71, p 375–38510.1115/1.1683715 ↗
20. S. Thwaites and N.H. Clark, Non-destructive Testing of Honeycomb Sandwich Structures Using Elastic Waves, J. Sound Vib., 1995, 187, p 253–26910.1006/jsvi.1995.0519 ↗
21. C. Wu, C. Weeks, and C. Sun, Improving Honeycomb-Core Sandwich Structures for Impact Resistance, J. Adv. Mater., 1995, 26, p 41–47
22. I. Masters and K. Evans, Models for the Elastic Deformation of Honeycombs, Compos. Struct., 1996, 35, p 403–42210.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
23. Technical data sheet for aluminum honeycomb core. EURO-COMPOSITES. https://www.euro-composites.com/en/ . Accessed May 2016
24. ASTM-E8 M-04, Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials [Metric] (Withdrawn 2008), ed. West Conshohocken, 2008.