journal article·2024-11

Comparing the Predictability of Soft Computing and Statistical Techniques for the Prediction of Tensile Strength of Additively Manufactured Carbon Fiber Polylactic Acid Parts

Abhishek Raj, Bobby Tyagi, Ashish Goyal, Ankit Sahai, Rahul Swarup Sharma

Publisher page

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the influence of input factors, namely layer height (LH), print speed (PS), and infill line direction (ID), on the tensile strength (TS) of polymer components fabricated using fused deposition modelling. The primary objective of this study is to construct a robust prediction model for TS utilising soft computing methodologies, namely a two-layered feed-forward backpropagation algorithm and a hybrid neural network-integrated fuzzy interface system (FIS). The specimens utilised for analysis were fabricated using carbon fibre fibre-reinforced polylactic acid (CF-PLA) composites per the ASTM D638 standard. A dataset is generated using a C27 orthogonal array to capture variations in LH, PS, and ID techniques. In this study, two soft computing methodologies, namely an artificial neural network (ANN) and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), are employed to effectively describe the fused deposition process and accurately predict the TS of the printed objects. The performance of these strategies is evaluated in comparison to the response surface methodology (RSM). The findings imply an inverse correlation between the TS and the LH, indicating that decreasing the LH can improve the structural integrity of the printed components. Furthermore, The ID region’s effect depends on the tensile force’s orientation. Infill lines aligned at 0° had the highest TS, while those at 90° had the lowest. The results of this study show how input variables affect the strength of additively produced (AM) polymer components. Soft computing methods enable AM parameter optimisation and accurate TS forecasts. The ANFIS method predicted tensile strength better than ANN and RSM. The negative relationship between LH and TS emphasises the importance of choosing the right LH for mechanical qualities.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. A. Jain, S. Upadhyay, A. Sahai, and R.S. Sharma, Reinforcement-Material Effects on the Compression Behavior of Polymer Composites, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2023, 140(15), p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5372210.1002/app.53722 ↗
2. H.K. Dave and J.P. Davim, Fused deposition modeling based 3D printing, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68024-410.1007/978-3-030-68024-4 ↗
3. J.P.D. Juan Pou and A. Riveiro, Additive manufacturing, Elsevier, NJ, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-00910-X10.1016/C2018-0-00910-X ↗
4. M. Manjaiah, K. Raghavendra, N. Balashanmugam, and J.P. Davim, Additive manufacturing, a tool for industrial revolution 4.0, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-04429-910.1016/C2019-0-04429-9 ↗
5. S. Paul, Finite Element Analysis in Fused Deposition Modeling Research: A Literature Review, Measurement, 2021, 178, p 109320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10932010.1016/j.measurement.2021.109320 ↗
6. A. Jain, A. Sahai, and R.S. Sharma, Enhancing the Mechanical Behaviour of Fused Filament Fabricated Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Poly-Lactic Acid, J. Inst. Eng. Ser. D., 2023, 4, p 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-023-00498-310.1007/s40033-023-00498-3 ↗
7. N. Singh, R. Singh, I.P.S. Ahuja, I. Farina, and F. Fraternali, Metal Matrix Composite from Recycled Materials by Using Additive Manufacturing Assisted Investment Casting, Compos. Struct., 2019, 207, p 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.07210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.072 ↗
8. A. Jain, S. Kumar, A. Singh, A. Sahai, and R.S. Sharma, Comparative Study of Impact Behavior of Fused Filament Fabrication-Printed Polylactic Acid Composites, Nano World J., 2023, 9(S1), p 470–475.
9. A. Garg, K. Tai, and M.M. Savalani, State-of-the-Art in Empirical Modelling of Rapid Prototyping Processes, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2014, 20(2), p 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2012-007210.1108/RPJ-08-2012-0072 ↗
10. F. Ning, W. Cong, Y. Hu, and H. Wang, Additive Manufacturing of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Composites Using Fused Deposition Modeling: Effects of Process Parameters on Tensile Properties, J. Compos. Mater., 2017, 51(4), p 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831664616910.1177/0021998316646169 ↗
11. A. Jain, K. Kant, S.K. Singh, A. Sahai, and R.S. Sharma, Process Parameter Tailored Evaluation of FFF-Fabricated Carbon Fibre Based Poly-Lactic-Acid Composites, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705723115585810.1177/08927057231155858 ↗
12. A. Jain, A. Mishra, A.K. Dubey, A. Kumar, A. Sahai, and R.S. Sharma, Mechanical Characteristics and Failure Morphology of FFF-Printed Poly Lactic Acid Composites Reinforced with Carbon Fibre, Graphene and MWCNTs, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2022, 36, p 3618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705722113308910.1177/08927057221133089 ↗
13. I. Farina, R. Goodall, E. Hernández-Nava, A. di Filippo, F. Colangelo, and F. Fraternali, Design, Microstructure and Mechanical Characterization of Ti6Al4V Reinforcing Elements for Cement Composites with Fractal Architecture, Mater. Des., 2019, 172, p 107758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10775810.1016/j.matdes.2019.107758 ↗
14. T.N.A.T. Rahim, A.M. Abdullah, and H. Md Akil, Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and their Composites, Polym. Rev., 2019, 59(4), p 589–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.159788310.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 ↗
15. A. Jain, S. Upadhyay, A. Sahai, and R.S. Sharma, Comparing the Flexural and Morphological Properties of Dissimilar FFF-Fabricated Polymer Composites, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705723117079010.1177/08927057231170790 ↗
16. T. Sai, V.K. Pathak, and A.K. Srivastava, Modeling and Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process Through Printing PLA Implants Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) Model and Whale Optimization Algorithm, J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 2020, 42(12), p 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02699-310.1007/s40430-020-02699-3 ↗
17. N. Sandhya, V. Sowmya, C.R. Bandaru, and G. Raghu Babu, Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Steel Using Data Science Techniques, Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., 2019, 8(3), p 235–241. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C3952.09831910.35940/ijrte.C3952.098319 ↗
18. F. Khademi, M. Akbari, S.M. Jamal, and M. Nikoo, Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Network, and Fuzzy Logic Prediction of 28 Days Compressive Strength of Concrete, Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(1), p 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0363-910.1007/s11709-016-0363-9 ↗
19. P. Oehlmann, P. Osswald, J.C. Blanco, M. Friedrich, D. Rietzel, and G. Witt, Modeling Fused Filament Fabrication using Artificial Neural Networks, Prod. Eng., 2021, 15(3–4), p 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-021-01020-y10.1007/s11740-021-01020-y ↗
20. R. Agarwal, V. Gupta, and J. Singh, Additive Manufacturing-Based Design Approaches and Challenges for Orthopaedic Bone Screws: A State-of-the-Art Review, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03331-810.1007/s40430-021-03331-8 ↗
21. S. Sandeep, D. Chhabra, and R.K. Gupta, Optimization of FDM Printing Parameters for Surface Quality Improvement of Carbon Based Nylon (PA-CF) Composite Material Fabricated Parts Using Evolutionary Algorithm, J. Nano- Electron. Phys., 2021, 13(2), p 02004-1–02004-5. https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.13(2).0200410.21272/jnep.13(2).02004 ↗
22. V. M. Gayatri, A. Dave, and K. Chaganti, “Artificial Neural Network based Prediction of Tensile Strength of Hybrid Composites,” 2018. [Online]. Available: www.sciencedirect.comwww.materialstoday.com/proceedings2214-7853
23. J.-S.R. Jang, ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1993, 23(3), p 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.25654110.1109/21.256541 ↗
24. G. Özden, M.Ö. Öteyaka, and F.M. Cabrera, Modeling of Cutting Parameters in Turning of PEEK Composite Using Artificial Neural Networks and Adaptive-Neural Fuzzy Inference Systems, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705721101307010.1177/08927057211013070 ↗
25. S. Chopra, G. Dhiman, A. Sharma, M. Shabaz, P. Shukla, and M. Arora, Taxonomy of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System in Modern Engineering Sciences, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2021, 2021, p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/645559210.1155/2021/6455592 ↗
26. N. E. Karkalos and A. P. Markopoulos, “Modeling of hard machining,” in Computational Methods and Production Engineering, 2017,Elsevier pp. 171–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-85709-481-0.00006-9.10.1016/B978-0-85709-481-0.00006-9 ↗
27. T. Singh and M. Pal, (2021) Prediction of lateral and oblique load for batter pile group using GRNN NN and ANFIS, in Modeling in Geotechnical Engineering, Elsevier: NJ pp 37–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821205-9.00008-3.10.1016/B978-0-12-821205-9.00008-3 ↗
28. A.K. Lakshminarayanan and V. Balasubramanian, Comparison of RSM with ANN in Predicting Tensile Strength of Friction Stir Welded AA7039 Aluminium Alloy Joints, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2009, 19(1), p 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60221-610.1016/S1003-6326(08)60221-6 ↗
29. S. Sathiyamurthy, A. Syed, A. Thaheer, and & S. Jayabal, Prediction and optimization of mechanical properties of particles filled coir-polyester composites using ANN and RSM algorithms,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264384979
30. M. Mishra and M. Srivastava, A view of Artificial Neural Network, in 2014 international conference on advances in engineering & technology research (ICAETR - 2014), 2014, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAETR.2014.7012785.10.1109/ICAETR.2014.7012785 ↗
31. M. Madhiarasan and M. Louzazni, Analysis of Artificial Neural Network: Architecture, Types, and Forecasting Applications, J. Electr. Comput. Eng., 2022, 2022, p 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/541672210.1155/2022/5416722 ↗
32. E. Grossi and M. Buscema, Introduction to Artificial Neural Networks, Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 2007, 19(12), p 1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f198a010.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f198a0 ↗
33. X. Qi, G. Chen, Y. Li, X. Cheng, and C. Li, Applying Neural-Network-Based Machine Learning to Additive Manufacturing: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives, Engineering, 2019, 5(4): 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.012.10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.012 ↗
34. S. Nasiri and M.R. Khosravani, Machine Learning in Predicting Mechanical Behavior of Additively Manufactured Parts, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, 14, p 1137–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.004 ↗
35. M. Kumari and S.K. Gupta, Response Surface Methodological (RSM) Approach for Optimizing the Removal of Trihalomethanes (THMs) and its Precursor’s by Surfactant Modified Magnetic Nanoadsorbents (sMNP): An Endeavor to Diminish Probable Cancer Risk, Sci. Rep., 2019, 9(1), p 18339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54902-810.1038/s41598-019-54902-8 ↗
36. S.K. Behera, H. Meena, S. Chakraborty, and B.C. Meikap, Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Optimization of Leaching Parameters for Ash Reduction from Low-Grade Coal, Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2018, 28(4), p 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.04.01410.1016/j.ijmst.2018.04.014 ↗
37. R.L.L. Pambi and P. Musonge, Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in the Treatment of Final Effluent from the Sugar Industry using CHITOSAN, Water Pollut. XIII, 2016, 1, p 209–219. https://doi.org/10.2495/wp16019110.2495/wp160191 ↗
38. K.A. Mohamad Said and M.A. Mohamed Amin, Overview on the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in Extraction Processes, J. Appl. Sci. Process Eng., 2016, 2(1), p 8–17. https://doi.org/10.33736/jaspe.161.201510.33736/jaspe.161.2015 ↗
39. J. Paulo Davim, Computational methods and production engineering, Elsevier, New Jersey, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-16281-210.1016/C2013-0-16281-2 ↗
40. J.P. Davim, Design of experiments in production engineering, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23838-810.1007/978-3-319-23838-8 ↗
41. J.P. Davim, Statistical and computational techniques in manufacturing, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25859-610.1007/978-3-642-25859-6 ↗
42. ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics 1 (ASTM D638-10), 2010. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-10.10.1520/D0638-10 ↗