Study of the Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, Residual Stresses, and Distortion in Type 316LN Stainless Steel Medium Thickness Plate Weld Joints
Source abstract
Abstract
A nuclear reactor that utilizes fast neutrons to produce more fissile nuclear fuels than they consume while generating power is called Fast Breeder Reactor (FBR). The FBR components are currently welded by multi-pass Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welding process. There are limitations associated with multi-pass TIG welding of 316LN SS plates. This research work on 316LN stainless plates will be valuable in extending the utilization of the advanced welding process for fabricating structural parts in FBRs. In the present study, weld joints of 5.6 mm thick 316LN stainless steel plates have been made using multi-pass TIG welding process and by autogenous Activated-TIG (ATIG) welding process. An in-depth comparative study on the effect of the above welding processes on the weld attributes of the weld joints such as bead geometry, microstructures, ferrite content, hardness, tensile, impact toughness properties, residual stress and distortion has been carried out. ATIG joint manifested narrow weld bead when compared with that of the TIG weld joint. Though ferrite content was low, there was no hot cracking in the weld due to lower restraint and hence reduced shrinkage strains. TIG weld exhibited higher hardness and strength properties than the base metal and ATIG weld joint due to the existence of higher δ ferrite. However, at high temperature, both weld joints have exhibited similar values of ultimate tensile strength and percentage total elongation. Moreover, ATIG joint has higher impact toughness than TIG joint due to the very low δ ferrite content. The distortion is almost negligible in ATIG weld joint in comparison with that of the TIG joint. With significant advantages, autogenous ATIG welding is recommended for welding of medium thickness plates of 316LN stainless steel.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. H. Vashishtha, R.V. Taiwade, S. Sharma and A.P. Patil, Effect of Welding Processes on Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Weldments between Conventional Austenitic and High Nitrogen Austenitic Stainless Steels, J. Manuf. Process., 2017, 25, p 49–59.10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.10.008 ↗
2. M. Vasudevan, Effect of A-TIG Welding Process on the Weld Attributes of Type 304LN and 316LN Stainless Steels, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017, 26(3), p 1325–1336.10.1007/s11665-017-2517-x ↗
3. D.S. Howse and W. Lucas, Investigation into Arc Constriction by Active Fluxes for Tungsten Inert Gas Welding, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2000, 5(3), p 189–193.10.1179/136217100101538191 ↗
4. S. Leconte, P. Paillard, P. Chapelle, G. Henrion and J. Saindrenan, Effect of Oxide Fluxes on Activation Mechanisms of Tungsten Inert Gas Process, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2006, 11(4), p 389–397.10.1179/174329306X129544 ↗
5. E. Ahmadi and A.R. Ebrahimi, Welding of 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel with Activated Tungsten Inert Gas Process, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, 24(2), p 1065–1071.10.1007/s11665-014-1336-6 ↗
6. K.-H. Tseng, Development and Application of Oxide-Based Flux Powder for Tungsten Inert Gas Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steels, Powder Technol., 2013, 233, p 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.03810.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.038 ↗
7. P. Vasantharaja and M. Vasudevan, Studies on A-TIG Welding of Low Activation Ferritic/Martensitic (LAFM) Steel, J. Nucl. Mater., 2012, 421(1–3), p 117–123.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.11.062 ↗
8. B. Arivazhagan and M. Vasudevan, Studies on A-TIG Welding of 2.25Cr-1Mo (P22) Steel, J. Manuf. Process., 2015, 18, p 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.12.00310.1016/j.jmapro.2014.12.003 ↗
9. A. Babbar, A. Kumar, V. Jain and D. Gupta, Enhancement of Activated Tungsten Inert Gas (A-TIG) Welding Using Multi-Component TiO2-SiO2-Al2O3 Hybrid Flux, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., 2019, 148, 106912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10691210.1016/j.measurement.2019.106912 ↗
10. S.G. Nayee and V.J. Badheka, Effect of Oxide-Based Fluxes on Mechanical and Metallurgical Properties of Dissimilar Activating Flux Assisted-Tungsten Inert Gas Welds, J. Manuf. Process., 2014, 16(1), p 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.11.00110.1016/j.jmapro.2013.11.001 ↗
11. T. Sakthivel, M. Vasudevan, K. Laha, P. Parameswaran, K.S. Chandravathi, M.D. Mathew and A.K. Bhaduri, Comparison of Creep Rupture Behaviour of Type 316L(N) Austenitic Stainless Steel Joints Welded by TIG and Activated TIG Welding Processes, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(22–23), p 6971–6980. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2011.05.05210.1016/J.MSEA.2011.05.052 ↗
12. T. Sándor and J. Dobránszky, The Experiences of Activated Tungsten Inert Gas (ATIG) Welding Applied on 1.4301 Type Stainless Steel Plates, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2007, 537–538, p 63–70.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.537-538.63 ↗
13. P. Vasantharaja, M. Vasudevan and P. Parameswaran, Effect of Welding Techniques on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Reduced Activation Ferritic-Martensitic (RAFM) Steel Weld Joints, Fusion Eng. Des., 2019, 148, p 111289.10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.111289 ↗
14. C.A.P. De Moraes, M. Chludzinski, R.M. Nunes, G.V.B. Lemos and A. Reguly, Residual Stress Evaluation in API 5L X65 Girth Welded Pipes Joined by Friction Welding and Gas Tungsten Arc Welding, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2019, 8(1), p 988–995.10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.009 ↗
15. P. Vasantharaja, M. Vasudevan and P. Palanichamy, Effect of Welding Processes on the Residual Stress and Distortion in Type 316LN Stainless Steel Weld Joints, J. Manuf. Process., 2015, 19, p 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.09.00410.1016/j.jmapro.2014.09.004 ↗
16. A.R. Pavan, B. Arivazhagan, M. Zubairuddin, S. Mahadevan and M. Vasudevan, Thermomechanical Analysis of A-TIG and MP-TIG Welding of 2.25Cr-1Mo Steel Considering Phase Transformation, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28(8), p 4903–4917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04243-410.1007/s11665-019-04243-4 ↗
17. S. Leconte, P. Paillard, P. Chapelle, G. Henrion and J. Saindrenan, Effects of Flux Containing Fluorides on TIG Welding Process, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2007, 12(2), p 120–126.10.1179/174329307X159810 ↗
18. P.J. Modenesi, The Chemistry of TIG Weld Bead Formation, Weld. Int., 2015, 29(10), p 771–782.10.1080/09507116.2014.932990 ↗
19. A. Bhattacharya, Revisiting Arc, Metal Flow Behavior in Flux Activated Tungsten Inert Gas Welding, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2016, 31(3), p 343–351.10.1080/10426914.2015.1070421 ↗
20. S. Tathgir and A. Bhattacharya, Activated-TIG Welding of Different Steels: Influence of Various Flux and Shielding Gas, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2016, 31(3), p 335–342.10.1080/10426914.2015.1037914 ↗
21. M. Kurtulmus, Activated Flux TIG Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steels, Emerg. Mater. Res., 2020, 9(4), p 1041–1055.10.1680/jemmr.18.00092 ↗
22. O. Hammar and U. Svensson, Solidification and Casting of Metals, in Proceedings of an International Conference on Solidification, University of Sheffield, England, 1979, p 401–410.