journal article·2021-07

Optimization and Fabrication of Customized Scaffold Using Additive Manufacturing to Match the Property of Human Bone

S. Rashia Begum, M. Saravana Kumar, C. I. Pruncu, M. Vasumathi, P. Harikrishnan

Publisher page

Abstract

Additive manufacturing plays a major role in medical science. One of the applications is the development of bone scaffolds. During scaffold fabrication, obtaining the properties of the polyamide scaffolds to mimic the elastic properties of human subchondral bone is a challenging task. In order to overcome this challenge, the present numerical study validated by experimental routine allows optimizing, fabricating and automating the generation of open porous polyamide scaffolds. Human subchondral bone has an elastic modulus of 1.15 GPa and pore size of 800 μm which helps for cell ingrowth. The design parameters such as strut diameter (0.6-3 mm) and unit cell size (1.4-5 mm) were considered for this investigation. The optimized scaffold structure was fabricated using selective laser sintering method, one of the additive manufacturing (AM) processes and the structure was validated through uniaxial compression. Experimental test revealed a deviation in structural modulus of about 14, 10 and 17% for circular, square and hexagonal cross section, respectively. Optimized unit cell dimensions were found. The preliminary MTT (Methyl Thiazolyl diphenyl-Tetrazolium bromide) assay tests to evaluate the distributions of cells were performed, using in vitro perfusion culture experiments. It was found that the scaffold structure with square cross section has the maximum percentage of cell viability of 58.33%. A computer-aided design tool was developed using CATIA V5 Visual Basic program for modelling the bone scaffolds with better interconnectivity of unit blocks, porosity and compressive strength. This program facilitates automatic generation of optimized scaffold structure by providing necessary input parameters. The developed CAD tool was efficient enough to model the customized scaffold.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. H. de Amorim Almeida and P.J. da Silva Bártolo, Virtual Topological Optimisation of Scaffolds for Rapid Prototyping, Med. Eng. Phys., 2010, 32(7), p 775–78210.1016/j.medengphy.2010.05.001 ↗
2. A. Boccaccio, A. Ballini, C. Pappalettere, D. Tullo, S. Cantore, and A. Desiate, Finite Element Method (FEM), Mechanobiology and Biomimetic Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering, Int. J. Biol. Sci., 2011, 7(1), p 11210.7150/ijbs.7.112 ↗
3. C.M. Cheah, C.K. Chua, K.F. Leong, C.H. Cheong, and M.W. Naing, Automatic Algorithm for Generating Complex Polyhedral Scaffold Structures for Tissue Engineering, Tissue Eng., 2004, 10(3-4), p 595–61010.1089/107632704323061951 ↗
4. C.Y. Lin, N. Kikuchi, and S.J. Hollister, A Novel Method for Biomaterial Scaffold Internal Architecture Design to Match Bone Elastic Properties with Desired Porosity, J. Biomech., 2004, 37(5), p 623–63610.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.029 ↗
5. C.M. Cheah, C.K. Chua, K.F. Leong, and S.W. Chua, Development of a Tissue Engineering Scaffold Structure Library for Rapid Prototyping. Part 1: Investigation and Classification, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2003, 21(4), p 291–30110.1007/s001700300034 ↗
6. D.W. Hutmacher, Scaffold Design and Fabrication Technologies for Engineering Tissues—State of the Art and Future Perspectives, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 2001, 12(1), p 107–12410.1163/156856201744489 ↗
7. C.E. Holy, M.S. Shoichet, and J.E. Davies, Engineering Three-Dimensional Bone Tissue in vitro Using Biodegradable Scaffolds: Investigating Initial Cell-Seeding Density and Culture Period, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2000, 51(3), p 376–38210.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<376::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
8. R. Huiskes, H. Weinans, and B. Van Rietbergen, The Relationship Between Stress Shielding and Bone Resorption Around Total Hip Stems and the Effects of Flexible Materials, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1992, 274, p 124–13410.1097/00003086-199201000-00014 ↗
9. A.I. Itälä, H.O. Ylänen, C. Ekholm, K.H. Karlsson, and H.T. Aro, Pore Diameter of more than 100 μm is not Requisite for Bone Ingrowth in Rabbits, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2001, 58(6), p 679–68310.1002/jbm.1069 ↗
10. S. Yang, K.F. Leong, Z. Du, and C.K. Chua, The Design of Scaffolds for Use in Tissue Engineering. Part I. Traditional Factors, Tissue Eng., 2001, 7(6), p 679–68910.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
11. K. Choi, J.L. Kuhn, M.J. Ciarelli, and S.A. Goldstein, The Elastic Moduli of Human Subchondral, Trabecular, and Cortical Bone Tissue and the Size-Dependency of Cortical Bone Modulus, J. Biomech., 1990, 23(11), p 1103–111310.1016/0021-9290(90)90003-L ↗
12. K.F. Leong, C.M. Cheah, and C.K. Chua, Solid Freeform Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Engineering Replacement Tissues and Organs, Biomaterials, 2003, 24(13), p 2363–237810.1016/S0142-9612(03)00030-9 ↗
13. J.P. Li, P. Habibovic, M. van den Doel, C.E. Wilson, J.R. de Wijn, C.A. van Blitterswijk, and K. de Groot, Bone Ingrowth in Porous Titanium Implants Produced by 3D Fiber Deposition, Biomaterials, 2007, 28(18), p 2810–282010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.020 ↗
14. S.R. Begum and G. Arumaikkannu, Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis and Additive Manufacturing of Customised Bone Scaffolds, Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn. Int. J., 2015, 15(3), p 197–20110.1504/PCFD.2015.069590 ↗
15. M.A. Lopez-Heredia, E. Goyenvalle, E. Aguado, P. Pilet, C. Leroux, M. Dorget, P. Weiss, and P. Layrolle, Bone Growth in Rapid Prototyped Porous Titanium Implants, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 2008, 85(3), p 664–67310.1002/jbm.a.31468 ↗
16. M.H. Luxner, J. Stampfl, and H.E. Pettermann, Finite Element Modeling Concepts and Linear Analyses of 3D Regular Open Cell Structures, J. Mater. Sci., 2005, 40(22), p 5859–586610.1007/s10853-005-5020-y ↗
17. B. Vandenbroucke and J.P. Kruth, Selective Laser Melting of Biocompatible Metals for Rapid Manufacturing of Medical Parts, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2007, 13(4), p 196–20310.1108/13552540710776142 ↗
18. M.R. Dias, J.M. Guedes, C.L. Flanagan, S.J. Hollister, and P.R. Fernandes, Optimization of Scaffold Design for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Computational and Experimental Study, Med. Eng. Phys., 2014, 36(4), p 448–45710.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.010 ↗
19. D. Zhao, T. Zhu, J. Li, L. Cui, Z. Zhang, X. Zhuang, and J. Ding, Poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid)-Based Composite Bone-Substitute Materials, Bioact. Mater., 2020, 6(2), p 346–36010.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.016 ↗
20. L. Cui, J. Zhang, J. Zou, X. Yang, H. Guo, H. Tian, P. Zhang, Y. Wang, N. Zhang, X. Zhuang, and Z. Li, Electroactive Composite Scaffold with Locally Expressed Osteoinductive Factor for Synergistic Bone Repair Upon Electrical Stimulation, Biomaterials, 2020, 230, p 11961710.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119617 ↗
21. C. Shuai, W. Yang, P. Feng, S. Peng, and H. Pan, Accelerated Degradation of HAP/PLLA Bone Scaffold by PGA Blending Facilitates Bioactivity and Osteoconductivity, Bioact. Mater., 2020, 6(2), p 490–50210.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.001 ↗
22. C. Shuai, L. Yu, P. Feng, Y. Zhong, Z. Zhao, Z. Chen, and W. Yang, Organic Montmorillonite Produced an Interlayer Locking Effect in a Polymer Scaffold to Enhance Interfacial Bonding, Mater. Chem. Front., 2020, 4(8), p 2398–240810.1039/D0QM00254B ↗
23. T. Zhu, Y. Cui, M. Zhang, D. Zhao, G. Liu, and J. Ding, Engineered Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Enhanced Bone Regeneration in Osteonecrosis, Bioact. Mater., 2020, 5(3), p 584–60110.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.008 ↗
24. N. Sudarmadji, J.Y. Tan, K.F. Leong, C.K. Chua, and Y.T. Loh, Investigation of the Mechanical Properties and Porosity Relationships in Selective Laser-Sintered Polyhedral for Functionally Graded Scaffolds, Acta Biomater., 2011, 7(2), p 530–53710.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.024 ↗
25. A.L. Olivares, È. Marsal, J.A. Planell, and D. Lacroix, Finite Element Study of Scaffold Architecture Design and Culture Conditions for Tissue Engineering, Biomaterials, 2009, 30(30), p 6142–614910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.041 ↗
26. J. Parthasarathy, B. Starly, S. Raman, and A. Christensen, Mechanical Evaluation of Porous Titanium (Ti6Al4V) Structures with Electron Beam Melting (EBM), J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2010, 3(3), p 249–25910.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.10.006 ↗
27. S. Ponader, C. Von Wilmowsky, M. Widenmayer, R. Lutz, P. Heinl, C. Körner, and K.A. Schlegel, In vivo Performance of Selective Electron Beam-Melted Ti-6Al-4V Structures, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 2010, 92(1), p 56–6210.1002/jbm.a.32337 ↗
28. S. Rashia Begum and G. Arumaikkannu, Design, Analysis and Fabrication of Customised Bone Scaffold Using RP Technology, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol., 2013, 47(4), p 364–36910.1504/IJCAT.2013.055329 ↗
29. R. Langer and J.P. Vacanti, Tissue Engineering, Science, 1993, 260, p 920–92610.1126/science.8493529 ↗
30. T. Serra, J.A. Planell, and M. Navarro, High-Resolution PLA-Based Composite Scaffolds via 3-D Printing Technology, Acta Biomater., 2013, 9(3), p 5521–553010.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.041 ↗
31. E. Saito, Y. Liu, F. Migneco, and S.J. Hollister, Strut Size and Surface Area Effects on Long-Term in vivo Degradation in Computer Designed Poly (L-Lactic Acid) Three-Dimensional Porous Scaffolds, Acta Biomater., 2012, 8(7), p 2568–257710.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.028 ↗
32. P. Szymczyk, M.B. Łabowska, J. Detyna, I. Michalak, and P. Gruber, A Review of Fabrication Polymer Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications Using Additive Manufacturing Techniques, Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., 2020, 40(2), p 624–63810.1016/j.bbe.2020.01.015 ↗
33. L.E. Murr, Metallurgy Principles Applied to Powder Bed Fusion 3D Printing/Additive Manufacturing of Personalized and Optimized Metal and Alloy Biomedical Implants: An Overview, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2020, 9(1), p 1087–110310.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.015 ↗
34. M. Javaid and A. Haleem, Additive Manufacturing Applications in Medical Cases: A Literature Based Review, Alex. J. Med., 2018, 54(4), p 411–422
35. L. Yuan, S. Ding, and C. Wen, Additive Manufacturing Technology for Porous Metal Implant Applications and Triple Minimal Surface Structures: A Review, Bioact. Mater., 2019, 4, p 56–7010.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003 ↗
36. C. Shuai, Y. Cheng, Y. Yang, S. Peng, W. Yang, and F. Qi, Laser Additive Manufacturing of Zn-2Al Part for Bone Repair: Formability, Microstructure and Properties, J. Alloy. Compd., 2019, 798, p 606–61510.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.278 ↗
37. S. Singh, S. Ramakrishna, and R. Singh, Material Issues in Additive Manufacturing: A Review, J. Manuf. Process., 2017, 25, p 185–20010.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.006 ↗
38. T.M. Chu, J.W. Halloran, S.J. Hollister, and S.E. Feinberg, Hydroxyapatite Implants with Designed Internal Architecture, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2001, 12(6), p 471–47810.1023/A:1011203226053 ↗
39. M. Shieh, Control of Bone Cell Functions on Three-Dimensional Tissue ENGINEERING scaffolds, BUG J, 2000, 3, p 194–204
40. M. Borden, M. Attawia, Y. Khan, and C.T. Laurencin, Tissue Engineered Microsphere-Based Matrices for Bone Repair: Design and Evaluation, Biomaterials, 2002, 23(2), p 551–55910.1016/S0142-9612(01)00137-5 ↗
41. M. Lipowiecki and D. Brabazon, Design of Bone Scaffolds Structures for Rapid Prototyping with Increased Strength and Osteoconductivity, Adv. Mater. Res., 2010, 83, p 914–922
42. P. Kumar, M. Saini, B.S. Dehiya, A. Sindhu, V. Kumar, R. Kumar, and R. Thakur, Comprehensive Survey on Nanobiomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications, Nanomaterials, 2020, 10(10), p 201910.3390/nano10102019 ↗