Optimization of the Duration of Ultrasonic Shot Peening for Enhancement of Fatigue Life of the Alloy Ti-6Al-4V
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present investigation, surface nanostructure was developed on the alloy Ti-6Al-4V using ultrasonic shot peening (USP) and its effect was studied on tensile strength and low-cycle fatigue (LCF) behavior. The gage section of tensile and LCF samples was ultrasonic-shot-peened (USPed) for durations of 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 min with hard steel shots of 3 mm diameter at constant frequency of 20 kHz using StressVoyager to modify the surface. The yield and tensile strength increased; however, ductility was marginally reduced due to USP. Some of the ultrasonic-shot-peened samples were stress-relieved (SR) at 400 °C for 1 h. LCF tests were conducted on the non-ultrasonic-shot-peened (non-USPed), USPed and USPed + SR samples at different total strain amplitudes (± Δet/2) of 0.95, 0.85, 0.75 and 0.65% at constant strain rate of 1 × 10−3 s−1. LCF life of the USPed samples was found to be higher than that of the non-USPed sample. LCF life of the USPed specimen at Δet/2 = ± 0.65% was enhanced by ~ 4 times that of the non-USPed sample. However, the enhanced LCF life of the USPed samples was reduced following stress relieving treatment at 400 °C due to relaxation of the associated compressive stress, though it was still higher than that of the non-USPed sample.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Erosion and Abrasive Machining
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. G.Q. Chen, J. Yan, T.Y. Tian, X.H. Zhang, Z.Q. Li, and W.L. Zhou, Effect of Wet Shot Peening on Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Treated by Ceramic Beads, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2014, 24, p 690–69610.1016/S1003-6326(14)63112-5 ↗
2. R.R. Boyer, An Overview on the Use of Titanium in the Aerospace Industry, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1996, 213, p 103–11410.1016/0921-5093(96)10233-1 ↗
3. C. Liu, D. Liu, X. Zhang, D. Liu, A. Ma, N. Ao, and X. Xu, Improving Fatigue Performance of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy via Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Process, J Mater Sci. Technol., 2019, 35, p 1555–156210.1016/j.jmst.2019.03.036 ↗
4. T. Akahori, M. Niinomi, K. Fukunaga, and I. Inagaki, Effects of Microstructure on the Short Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation Characteristics of Biomedical α/β Titanium Alloys, Metal Mater. Trans A, 2000, 31, p 1949–195810.1007/s11661-000-0222-z ↗
5. S.R. Thompson, J.J. Ruschau, and T. Nicholas, Influence of Residual Stresses on High Cycle Fatigue Strength of Ti-6Al-4V Subjected to Foreign Object Damage, Int. J Fatigue, 2001, 23, p 405–41210.1016/S0142-1123(01)00166-9 ↗
6. H. Yu, F. Li, Z. Wang, and X. Zeng, Fatigue Performances of Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: Influence of Surface Finishing, Hot Isostatic Pressing and Heat Treatments, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 120, p 175–18310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.019 ↗
7. J. Li, Y. Yang, Y. Ren, J. Dong, and K. Yang, Effect of Cold Deformation on Corrosion Fatigue Behavior of Nickel-Free High Nitrogen Austenitic Stainless Steel for Coronary Stent Application, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2018, 34, p 660–66510.1016/j.jmst.2017.10.002 ↗
8. Y.G. Liu, M.Q. Li, and H.J. Liu, Nanostructure and Surface Roughness in the Processed Surface Layer of Ti-6Al-4V via Shot Peening, Mater. Character, 2017, 123, p 83–9010.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.020 ↗
9. M. Thomas and M. Jackson, The Role of Temperature and Alloy Chemistry on Subsurface Deformation Mechanisms During Shot Peening of Titanium Alloys, Scr. Mater., 2012, 66, p 1065–106810.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.049 ↗
10. H. Mughrabi, H.W. Hoppel, and M. Kautz, Fatigue and Microstructure of Ultrafine-Grained Metals Produced by Severe Plastic Deformation, Scr. Mater., 2004, 51, p 807–81210.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.012 ↗
11. X. Li, T.F. Jing, M.M. Lu, R. Xu, B.Y. Liang, and J.W. Zhang, Fatigue Property of Nano-grained Delaminated Low-Carbon Steel Sheet, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2011, 27, p 364–36810.1016/S1005-0302(11)60075-3 ↗
12. O. Hatamleh, The Effects of Laser Peening and Shot Peening on Mechanical Properties in Friction Stir Welded 7075-T7351 Aluminum, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2008, 17, p 688–69410.1007/s11665-007-9163-7 ↗
13. K. Wu, X. Yuan, Z. Hu, H. Wang, T. Li, Z. Yu, and J. Luo, Improvement of Al/Steel Tungsten Inert Gas Welding-Brazing Joint by High-Energy Shot Peening, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 2937–294510.1007/s11665-019-04046-7 ↗
14. B.N. Mordyuk and G.I. Prokopenko, Fatigue Life Improvement of Alpha-Titanium by Novel Ultrasonically Assisted Technique, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 437, p 396–40510.1016/j.msea.2006.07.119 ↗
15. A. Amanov, I.S. Cho, D.E. Kim, and Y.S. Pyun, Fretting Wear and Friction Reduction of CP Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Alloy by Ultrasonic Nanocrystalline Surface Modification, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 207, p 135–14210.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.046 ↗
16. L. Xie, Y. Wen, K. Zhan, L. Wang, C. Jiang, and V. Ji, Characterization on Surface Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V After Shot Peening, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 666, p 65–7010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.119 ↗
17. D. Gallitelli, D. Retraint, and E. Rouhaud, Comparison Between Conventional Shot Peening (SP) and Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT) on a Titanium Alloy, Adv. Mater. Res., 2014, 996, p 964–96810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.996.964 ↗
18. T. Roland, D. Retraint, K. Lu, and J. Lu, Fatigue Life Improvement Through Surface Nanostructuring of Stainless Steel by Means of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Scr. Mater., 2006, 54, p 1949–195410.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.049 ↗
19. Y.K. Gao and X.R. Wu, Experimental Investigation and Fatigue Life Prediction for 7475-T7351 Aluminum Alloy With and Without Shot Peening-Induced Residual Stresses, Acta Mater., 2011, 59, p 3737–374710.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.013 ↗
20. F.J. Gil, J.A. Planell, A. Padros, and C. Aparicio, The Effect of Shot Blasting and Heat Treatment on the Fatigue Behavior of Titanium for Dental Implant Applications, Dental Mater., 2007, 23, p 486–49110.1016/j.dental.2006.03.003 ↗
21. Y.G. Liu, M.Q. Li, and H.J. Liu, Surface Nanocrystallization and Gradient Structure Developed in the Bulk TC4 Alloy Processed by Shot Peening, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 685, p 186–19310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.295 ↗
22. T. Wang, J. Yu, and B. Dong, Surface Nanocrystallization Induced by Shot Peening and Its Effect on Corrosion Resistance of 1Cr18Ni9Ti Stainless Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 200, p 4777–478110.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.04.046 ↗
23. J.H. Hollomon, Tensile Deformation, Trans. AIME, 1945, 162, p 268–290
24. G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill book Company, Singapore, 1988, p 390–391
25. G. Liu, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Surface Nanocrystallization of 316L Stainless Steel Induced by Ultrasonic Shot Peening, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 286, p 91–9510.1016/S0921-5093(00)00686-9 ↗
26. K.Y. Zhu, A. Vassel, F. Brisset, K. Lu, and J. Lu, Nanostructure Formation Mechanism of α-Titanium Using SMAT, Acta Mater., 2004, 52, p 4101–411010.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.023 ↗
27. S. Kumar, K. Chattopadhyay, S.R. Singh, and V. Singh, Surface Nanostructuring of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Through Ultrasonic Shot Peening, Int. J. Surf. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11, p 23–3510.1504/IJSURFSE.2017.082949 ↗
28. T. Balusamy, T.S.N.S. Narayanan, and K. Ravichandran, Influence of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT) on the Corrosion Behaviour of AISI, 304 Stainless Steel, Corr. Sci., 2013, 74, p 332–34410.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.056 ↗
29. Y.W. Zhu, G. Zhang, W.S. Feng, L. Jun, and Y.Z. Feng, Effect of Surface Roughness on Evolution of Residual Stress Field Induced by Shot Peening, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2010, 18, p 523–527
30. B.X. Feng, X.N. Mao, G.J. Yang, L.L. Yu, and X.D. Wu, Residual Stress field and Thermal Relaxation Behavior of Shot-Peened TC4-DT Titanium Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 512, p 105–10810.1016/j.msea.2009.01.028 ↗
31. X.H. Chen, J. Lu, L. Lu, and K. Lu, Tensile Properties of a Nanocrystalline 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel, Scr. Mater., 2005, 52, p 1039–104410.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.023 ↗
32. O. Hatamleh, Effects of Peening on Mechanical Properties in Friction Stir Welded 2195 Aluminum Alloy Joints, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 492, p 168–17610.1016/j.msea.2008.03.017 ↗
33. S. Kumar, G.S. Rao, K. Chattopadhyay, G.S. Mahobia, N.C.S. Srinivas, and V. Singh, Effect of Surface Nanostructure on Tensile Behavior of Superalloy IN718, Mater. Des., 2014, 62, p 76–8210.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.084 ↗
34. S. Bagherifard and M. Guagliano, Fatigue Behavior of a Low-Alloy Steel with Nanostructured Surface Obtained by Severe Shot Peening, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2012, 81, p 56–6810.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.011 ↗
35. P.Q. Trung, N.W. Khun, and D.L. Butler, Effect of Shot Peening Process on the Fatigue Life of Shot Peened Low Alloy Steel, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2018, 140(208), p 01101310.1115/1.4037525 ↗
36. V. Pandey, K. Chattopadhyay, N.C.S. Srinivas, and V. Singh, Role of Ultrasonic Shot Peening on Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of 7075 Aluminium Alloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 103, p 426–43510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.033 ↗
37. N. Singh and V. Singh, Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Ti Alloy IMI, 834 at Room Temperature, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2002, 325, p 324–33210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01468-X ↗
38. Z.F. Zhang, H.C. Gu, and X.L. Tan, Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviors of Commercial-Purity Titanium, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1998, 252, p 85–9210.1016/S0921-5093(98)00650-9 ↗
39. J. Zhou, D. Retraint, Z. Sun, and P. Kanoute, Comparative Study of the Effects of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment and Conventional Shot Peening on Low Cycle Fatigue of a 316L Stainless Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2018, 349, p 556–56610.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.06.041 ↗
40. B. Sahoo, R.K. Satpathy, K. Prasad, S. Ahmed, and V. Kumar, Effect of Shot Peening on Low Cycle Fatigue Life of Compressor Disc of a Typical Fighter Class Aero-Engine, Procedia Eng., 2013, 55, p 144–14810.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.233 ↗
41. T. Dorr and L. Wagner, Fatigue Response of Various Titanium Alloys to Shot Peening, Trans. Eng. Sci., 1999, 25, p 349–357