journal article·2021-09Open access

A Computational Approach in Understanding the Low-Velocity Impact Behavior and Damage of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattice Structures

Abdalsalam Fadeel, Hasanain Abdulhadi, Raghavan Srinivasan, Ahsan Mian

Abstract

The remarkable mechanical characteristics of sandwich lattice structures have attracted the attention of many researchers and make it a good candidate for various applications. However, there is limited published research concerning the development of general-purpose dynamic models mimicking the impact behavior of lattice configurations made from polymeric materials. As such, the main focus of this research is to develop efficient computational finite element models simulating the dynamic impact behavior of various lattice configurations embedded in sandwich panels that are made from Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material. In this case, the sandwich panel consists of a 3D-printed polymer lattice core covered with the skin of a Kevlar sheet. Four designs with different configurations of lattice structures were investigated experimentally in previous studies. The first configuration was the basic body centered cubic (BCC) with unit cell dimensions of 5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm, and a strut diameter of 1 mm. The second configuration was produced by adding the vertical struts at alternative nodes layer by layer, referred to as BCCA. The third configuration was created by adding the struts with uniform gradient distributions, termed as BCCG. The last configuration was designed by adding vertical struts at all nodes on the BCC configuration, denoted as BCCV. In this research, the FEA software ABAQUS Explicit was used to model all four configurations under low-velocity impact loads. Then, the results from the FEA modeling of the four different sandwich structures were compared with the experimental observations. Significantly, the good agreement in the results between the FEA and the experimental work reveals the capability of the developed models to capture the dynamic impact behavior of various lattice configurations and is considered the main contribution of the current research. In addition, in situ deformation along with failure mechanisms, detailed information, visualization, and sufficient data of the lattice impact test has been obtained through the developed models. This in turn leads to saving human time and effort, providing better realization and deep analysis of impact deformation behavior reducing the size of the experimental work and the expenses associated with it.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. M. Al Rifaie, A. Mian, P. Katiyar, P. Majumdar and R. Srinivasan, Drop-Weight Impact Behavior of Three-Dimensional Printed Polymer Lattice Structures with Spatially Distributed Vertical Struts, J. Dyn. Behav. Mater., 2019, 5(4), p 387–395.10.1007/s40870-019-00199-7 ↗
2. J.J. Andrew, J. Schneider, J. Ubaid, R. Velmurugan, N.K. Gupta and S. Kumar, Energy Absorption Characteristics of Additively Manufactured Plate-Lattices Under Low- Velocity Impact Loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2020, 149, p 103768.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103768 ↗
3. S. Guessasma, S. Belhabib, D. Bassir, H. Nouri and S. Gomes, On the Mechanical Behaviour of Biosourced Cellular Polymer Manufactured using Fused Deposition Modelling, Polymers, 2020, 12(11), p 1–15.10.3390/polym12112651 ↗
4. J.A. Harris and G.J. McShane, Impact Response of Metallic Stacked Origami Cellular Materials, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2020, 147, p 103730.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103730 ↗
5. C. Tang, J. Liu, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, S. Jiang and W. Hao, Effect of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Lattice Structures, JCOMC, 2020, 3, p 100076.
6. C. Pan, Y. Han and J. Lu, Design and Optimization of Lattice Structures: A Review, Appl. Sci., 2020, 10(18), p 6374.10.3390/app10186374 ↗
7. S.K. Moon, Y.E. Tan, J. Hwang, J. Hwang and Y.J. Yoon, Application of 3D Printing Technology For Designing Light-Weight Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Wing Structures, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf-Green Tech., 2014, 1(3), p 223–228.10.1007/s40684-014-0028-x ↗
8. L. Magerramova, M. Volkov, A. Afonin, M. Svinareva, D. Kalinin, Application of light lattice structures for gas turbine engine fan blades. In, 31st Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 2018, pp. 1–10, 2018. https://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2018/data/papers/ICAS2018_0173_paper.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2021
9. A.S. Alagoz and V. Hasirci, 3D Printing of Polymeric Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Using Open-Source Fused Deposition Modeling, Emerg. Mater., 2020, 3(4), p 429–439.10.1007/s42247-019-00048-2 ↗
10. A. Forget, T. Derme, D. Mitterberger, M. Heiny, C. Sweeney, L. Mudili, T.R. Dargaville and V.P. Shastri, Architecture-Inspired Paradigm for 3D Bioprinting of Vessel-like Structures Using Extrudable Carboxylated Agarose Hydrogels, Emerg. Mater., 2019, 2(2), p 233–243.10.1007/s42247-019-00045-5 ↗
11. M.K. Deshmukh, K. Chidambaram, M.B. Ahamed, K.K. Sadasivuni, D. Ponnamma, M.A.A. AlMaadeed, R.R. Deshmukh and S.K. Pasha, Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)/Polystyrene Sulfonic Acid (PSSA)/Carbon Black Nanocomposite for Flexible Energy Storage Device Applications, J. Mater. Sci. Mater., 2017, 28(8), p 6099–6111.10.1007/s10854-016-6287-2 ↗
12. T. Dayakar, K.V. Rao, K. Bikshalu, V. Malapati and K.K. Sadasivuni, Non-Enzymatic Sensing of Glucose Using Screen-Printed Electrode Modified with Novel Synthesized CeO2@CuO Core Shell Nanostructure, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2018, 111, p 166–173.10.1016/j.bios.2018.03.063 ↗
13. J. Gounder Thangamani, K. Deshmukh, K.K. Sadasivuni, D. Ponnamma, S. Goutham, K. Venkateswara Rao, K. Chidambaram, M. Basheer Ahamed, A. Nirmala Grace, M. Faisal and S.K. Khadheer Pasha, White Graphene Reinforced Polypyrrole and Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Blend Nanocomposites as Chemiresistive Sensors for Room Temperature Detection of Liquid Petroleum Gases, MCA, 2017, 184(10), p 3977–3987.
14. A. Nagaraj, K.K. Sadasivuni and M. Rajan, Investigation of Lanthanum Impregnated Cellulose, Derived from Biomass, as an Adsorbent for the Removal of Fluoride from Drinking Water, Carbohydr. Polym., 2017, 176, p 402–410.10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.089 ↗
15. Y. Shen, W. Cantwell, R. Mines and R. Li, Low-Velocity Impact Performance of Lattice Structure Core Based Sandwich Panel, J. Compos. Mater., 2014, 48, p 3153–3167.10.1177/0021998313507616 ↗
16. S.A. Galehdari, M. Kadkhodayan and S. Hadidi-Moud, Low Velocity Impact and Quasi-Static In-plane Loading on a Graded Honeycomb Structure; Experimental, Analytical and Numerical Study, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2015, 47, p 425–433.10.1016/j.ast.2015.10.010 ↗
17. J.A. Harris, R.E. Winter and G.J. McShane, Impact Response of Additively Manufactured Metallic Hybrid Lattice Materials, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2017, 104, p 177–191.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.007 ↗
18. B. Castanie´, C. Bouvet, Y. Aminanda, J.J. Barrau and P. Thevenet, Modelling of Low-Energy/Low-Velocity Impact on Nomex Honeycomb Sandwich Structures with Metallic Skins, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2008, 35(7), p 620–634.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.008 ↗
19. L.B. Hussain and I.A. Hakim, Recycling and Formulation of Aluminum Scrap Via Mass Balance Die Casting and Forming, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2007, 22(7), p 916–921.10.1080/10426910701451796 ↗
20. H. Abdulhadi and A. Mian, Effect of Strut Length and Orientation on Elastic Mechanical Response of Modified Body-Centered Cubic Lattice Structures, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. L -JMDA, 2019, 223(11), p 2219–2233.
21. A. Fadeel, A. Mian, M. Al Refaie and R. Srinivasan, Effect of Vertical Strut Arrangements on Compression Characteristics of 3D Printed Polymer Lattice Structures: Experimental and Computational Study, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 1, p 1–8.
22. R. Mines, S. Tsopanos, E. Shen, S. McKown, W. Cantwell, W. Brooks and C. Sutcliffe, On the Performance of Micro Lattice Structures as Core Materials in Sandwich Panels Subject to Low Velocity Impact, Department of Engineering The Quadrangle, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 2009.
23. J. Wang and B.V. Sankar, Fracture Toughness of Cellular Materials Using Finite Element Based Micromechanics, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2013, 53(9), p 1689–1699.10.1021/ci400322j ↗
24. K.R. Jagtap, S.Y. Ghorpade and A.L. Singh, Finite Element Simulation of Low Velocity Impact Damage in Composite Laminates, Mater. Today Proc., 2017, 4(2), p 2464–2469.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.098 ↗
25. Y. Bao and T. Wierzbicki, On Fracture Locus in the Equivalent Strain and Stress Triaxiality Space, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2004, 46(1), p 81–98.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
26. X. Wang and J. Shi, Validation of Johnson-Cook Plasticity and Damage Model Using Impact Experiment, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2013, 60, p 67–75.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.010 ↗
27. Abaqus CAE User's Guide, DS Simulia Abaqus 2016. http://abaqus.software.polimi.it/v2016/books/usi/default.htm. Accessed 15 May 2021.
28. H.S. Abdulhadi, Designing New Generations of BCC Lattice Structures and Developing Scaling Laws to Predict Compressive Mechanical Characteristics and Geometrical Parameters. Ph.D. dissertation, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, pp. 171, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1610335306482598. Accessed 15 May 2021.
29. A.J. Turner, M. Al Rifaie, A. Mian and R. Srinivasan, Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Sandwich Structures with Additively Manufactured Polymer Lattice Cores, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27(5), p 2505–2512.10.1007/s11665-018-3322-x ↗
30. J.J. Laureto and J.M. Pearce, Anisotropic Mechanical Property Variance Between ASTM D638–14 Type i and Type iv Fused Filament Fabricated Specimens, Poly. Test., 2018, 68, p 294–301.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.029 ↗