Investigation of the Effect of Cryogenic Treatment Cubic Boron Nitride Turning Insert Tools
Source abstract
Abstract
Superalloys are difficult to process. For this reason, it is important to increase the surface quality of the material and reduce the tool consumption. In the present work, the shallow and deep cryogenically treated performance of cubic boron nitride (CBN) inserts in terms of surface roughness, tool wear, thrust force and chip formation under dry cutting conditions for finish turning of Hastelloy C22. The effect of CBN tools on cutting force, surface roughness, hardness and chip morphology was investigated by applying shallow and deep cryogenic treatment. With the surface roughness values obtained with the deep cryogenic-treated tools (DCT) tool, 137.1% and 73.8% improvements were achieved compared to the RT (Reference tools) and Shallow cryogenic-treated tools (SCT) tools, respectively. DCT and SCT tool were 31.58% and 5.5% lower than the cutting forces obtained with the RT cutting tools, respectively. According to ANOVA analysis, the most effective parameter affecting the surface roughness was determined as the feed with a 67.8% contribution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Advanced materials and composites · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. H. Bouchelaghem, M.A. Yallese, T. Mabrouki, A. Amirat, and J.F. Rigal, Experimental Investigation and Performance Analyses of cbn Insert in Hard Turning of Cold Work Tool Steel (D3), Mach. Sci. Technol., 2010, 14(4), p 471–50110.1080/10910344.2010.533621 ↗
2. S. Thamizhmanii, R. Mohideen, A. Zaidi, and S. Hasan, Surface Roughness and Tool Wear on Cryogenic Treated CBN Insert on Titanium and Inconel 718 Alloy Steel, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 2015, pp. 01205810.1088/1757-899X/100/1/012058 ↗
3. C. Sandvik, Modern Metal Cutting: A Practical Handbook, Sandvik Coromant, Sandviken, 1994
4. R. Pawade, S.S. Joshi, P. Brahmankar, and M. Rahman, An Investigation of Cutting Forces and Surface Damage in High-Speed Turning of Inconel 718, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2007, 192, p 139–14610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.049 ↗
5. F. Kara, A. Çiçek, and H. Demir, Multiple Regression and ANN Models for Surface Qualification of Cryogenically-Treated AISI 52100 bearing steel, 2013
6. F. Kara, M. Karabatak, M. Ayyıldız, and E. Nas, Effect of Machinability, Microstructure and Hardness of Deep Cryogenic Treatment in Hard Turning of AISI D2 Steel with Ceramic Cutting, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2020, 9(1), p 969–98310.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.037 ↗
7. F. Kara, U. Köklü, and U. Kabasakaloğlu, Taguchi Optimization of Surface Roughness in Grinding of Cryogenically Treated AISI 5140 Steel, Mater. Test., 2020, 62(10), p 1041–104710.1515/mt-2020-621013 ↗
8. V. Varghese, M. Ramesh, and D. Chakradhar, Influence of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on Performance of Cemented Carbide (WC-Co) Inserts During Dry End Milling of Maraging Steel, J. Manuf. Process., 2019, 37, p 242–25010.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.030 ↗
9. D.G. Fantineli, C.T. Parcianello, T.S. Rosendo, A. Reguly, and M.D. Tier, Effect of Heat and Cryogenic Treatment on Wear and Toughness of HSS AISI M2, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2020, 9(6), p 12354–1236310.1016/j.jmrt.2020.08.090 ↗
10. S. Arunram, M. Nishal, M. Thirumugham, and A. Raghunath, Effect of Deep and Shallow Cryogenic Treatment On High Speed Steel Grade M2 Drilling Tool, Materials Today: Proceedings, 202010.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.231 ↗
11. R. Periyasamy, V. Gopinath, G. Selvakumar, R. Kingslly, and S. Logeshwaran, Evaluation of the Effect of Cryogenic Treatment of HSS Drills in Drilling SS310, Materials Today: Proceedings, 202010.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.426 ↗
12. P. Cardoso, C. Israel, M. da Silva, G. Klein, and L. Soccol, Effects of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on Microstructure, Impact Toughness and Wear Resistance of an AISI D6 tool steel, Wear, 2020 456 20338210.1016/j.wear.2020.203382 ↗
13. S. Akıncıoğlu, H. Gökkaya, and İ Uygur, The Effects of Cryogenic-Treated CARBIDE tools on Tool Wear and Surface Roughness of Turning of Hastelloy C22 Based on Taguchi Method, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 82(1), p 303–31410.1007/s00170-015-7356-z ↗
14. A. Çiçek, F. Kara, T. Kıvak, E. Ekici, and I. Uygur, Effects of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on the Wear Resistance and Mechanical Properties of AISI H13 Hot-Work Tool Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, 24(11), p 4431–443910.1007/s11665-015-1712-x ↗
15. S. Akincioğlu, H. Gökkaya, and İ Uygur, A Review of Cryogenic Treatment on Cutting Tools, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, 78(9), p 1609–162710.1007/s00170-014-6755-x ↗
16. M. Dogra, V.S. Sharma, A. Sachdeva, N.M. Suri and J.S. Dureja, Performance Evaluation of CBN, Coated Carbide, Cryogenically Treated Uncoated/Coated Carbide Inserts in Finish-Turning of Hardened Steel, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2011, 57(5), p 541–55310.1007/s00170-011-3320-8 ↗
17. E. Nas and N. AltanÖzbek, Optimization of the Machining Parameters in Turning of Hardened Hot Work Tool Steel Using Cryogenically Treated Tools, Surf. Rev. Lett., 2020, 27(05), p 195017710.1142/S0218625X19501774 ↗
18. S. Thamizhmanii, S. Hasan,, and E. Natarajan, Performance of Tool Wear Using Cryogenic Treated CBN Inserts, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 2017
19. S. Thamizhmanii, C. Yuvaraj, J. Senthilkumar, and I. Arun, Effect of Feed Rate on Difficult to Cut Metals on Surface Roughness and Tool Wear Using Surface Treated and Untreated Tools, Procedia Manuf., 2019, 30, p 216–22310.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.032 ↗
20. Haynes, HASTELLOY C-22 alloy, Haynes International, Kokomo, Indiana, USA, 2002, pp. 14–15
21. S.S. Gill, J. Singh, H. Singh, and R. Singh, Metallurgical and Mechanical Characteristics of Cryogenically Treated Tungsten Carbide (WC–Co), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2012, 58(1–4), p 119–13110.1007/s00170-011-3369-4 ↗
22. D. Candane, N. Alagumurthi, and K. Palaniradja, Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on Microstructure and Wear Characteristics of AISI M35 HSS, Int. J. Mater. Sci. Appl., 2013, 2(2), p 56–65
23. S. Kumar, M. Nagaraj, A. Bongale, and N.K. Khedkar, Effect of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of AISI D3 Tool Steel, Int. J. Mater. Eng. Innov., 2019, 10(2), p 98–11310.1504/IJMATEI.2019.099789 ↗
24. S.E. Vahdat, S. Nategh, and S. Mirdamadi, Effect of Microstructure Parameters on Tensile Toughness of Tool Steel After Deep Cryogenic treatment, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 2014, 15(3), p 497–50210.1007/s12541-014-0363-4 ↗
25. A. Saini, B. Pabla, and S. Dhami, Improvement in Performance of Cryogenically Treated Tungsten Carbide Tools in Face Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2020, 35(5), p 598–60710.1080/10426914.2019.1615079 ↗
26. Y. Huang, Y.K. Chou, and S.Y. Liang, CBN Tool Wear in Hard Turning: A Survey on Research Progresses, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2007, 35(5), p 443–45310.1007/s00170-006-0737-6 ↗
27. M.A. Davies, Y. Chou, and C.J. Evans, On Chip Morphology, Tool Wear and Cutting Mechanics in Finish Hard Turning, CIRP Ann., 1996, 45(1), p 77–8210.1016/S0007-8506(07)63020-0 ↗
28. T.S. Reddy, T. Sornakumar, M.V. Reddy, R. Venkatram, and A. Senthilkumar, Turning Studies of Deep Cryogenic Treated p-40 Tungsten Carbide CUTTING Tool Inserts–Technical Communication, Mach. Sci. Technol., 2009, 13(2), p 269–28110.1080/10910340902979754 ↗
29. W. Chen, Cutting Forces and Surface Finish When Machining Medium Hardness Steel Using CBN Tools, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2000, 40(3), p 455–46610.1016/S0890-6955(99)00011-5 ↗
30. H. Gökkaya and M. Nalbant, The Effects of Cutting Tool Geometry and Processing Parameters on the Surface Roughness of AISI 1030 Steel, Mater. Des., 2007, 28(2), p 717–72110.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.013 ↗
31. A.S. More, W. Jiang, W. Brown, and A.P. Malshe, Tool Wear and Machining Performance of cBN–TiN Coated Carbide Inserts and PCBN Compact Inserts in Turning AISI 4340 Hardened Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, 180(1–3), p 253–26210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.06.013 ↗