journal article·2017-08

Parameter Identification of GTN Model Using Response Surface Methodology for High-Strength Steel BR1500HS

Li-yong Wang, Le Li

Publisher page

Abstract

In order to investigate the damage evolution of ultra-high-strength steels at different temperatures, a series of the uniaxial tensile tests were carried out at different temperatures (20-800 °C) with a constant true strain rate (1 s−1). And then, two different deformation mechanisms were employed to describe the flow behaviors of BR1500HS. It is found that dynamic recrystallization (DRX) occurs during the deformation process at high temperatures (600-800 °C), while the tensile flow behaviors exhibit a very long work hardening period before a short flow softening stages without DRX at lower temperatures of 20-400 °C Furthermore, the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) damage model was employed in this work to evaluate the ductile damage phenomena of BR1500HS. To determine the four vital parameters in GTN model, several numerical simulations were designed by central composite design and conducted by finite element simulation, and then the error evaluation functions (R) were established using four GTN parameters. Thereafter, the four parameters of GTN model were determined along with four minimum values of R by use of response surface methodology (RSM) and least square method. The results show that temperature affects the microvoid volume fraction significantly. Additionally, the parameters of GTN model were applied in the finite element simulation model and a comparison between the simulation results and the scanning electron microscopic observations was conducted.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. H. Karbasian and A.E. Tekkaya, A Review on Hot Stamping, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2010, 210(15), p 2103–211810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.019 ↗
2. M. Naderi, A. Saeed-Akbari, and W. Bleck, The Effects of Non-isothermal Deformation on Martensitic Transformation in 22MnB5 Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 487(1–2), p 445–45510.1016/j.msea.2007.10.057 ↗
3. H.-H. Bok, S.N. Kim, D.W. Suh, F. Barlat, and M.-G. Lee, Non-isothermal Kinetics Model to Predict Accurate Phase Transformation and Hardness of 22MnB5 Boron Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 626, p 67–7310.1016/j.msea.2014.12.008 ↗
4. R.S. Lee, Y.K. Lin, and T.W. Chien, Experimental and Theoretical Studies on Formability of 22MnB5 at Elevated Temperatures by Gleeble Simulator, Proc. Eng., 2014, 81, p 1682–168810.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.213 ↗
5. M. Abbasi, B. Bagheri, M. Ketabchi et al., Application of Response Surface Methodology to Drive GTN Model Parameters and Determine the FLD of Tailor Welded Blank, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2012, 53(1), p 368–37610.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.020 ↗
6. D. Zhao, Y. Zhu, L. Ying et al., Numerical Simulation of Deformation Behavior of 22MnB5 Boron Steel at Elevated Temperatures and Experimental Verification, Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 2014, 27(6), p 579–58710.1016/S0894-9166(15)60003-9 ↗
7. B. Zhuang, Z. Shan, C. Jiang et al., Control Over Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of BR1500HS Hot-Stamped Parts, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2014, 21(6), p 606–61310.1016/S1006-706X(14)60094-7 ↗
8. J. Zhou, B. Wang, and M. Huang, Two Constitutive Descriptions of Boron Steel 22MnB5 at High Temperature, Mater. Des., 2014, 63, p 738–74810.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.008 ↗
9. G.Z. Quan, D. Wu, A. Mao et al., Constitutive Modeling for Tensile Behaviors of Ultra-High-Strength-Steel BR1500HS at Different Temperatures and Strain Rates, High Temp. Mater. Process. Lond., 2014, 34(5), p 407–416
10. C. Zhiying and D. Xianghuai, The GTN Damage Model Based on Hill’48 Anisotropic Yield Criterion and its Application in Sheet Metal Forming, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2009, 44(3), p 1013–102110.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.020 ↗
11. Abdelkader Slimanea, Benattou Bouchouichaa, Mohamed Benguediaba, and Sid-Ahmed Slimane, Parametric Study of the Ductile Damage by the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman Model of Structures in Carbon Steel A48-AP, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2015, 4(2), p 217–22310.1016/j.jmrt.2014.12.011 ↗
12. V. Uthaisangsuk, U. Prahl, S. Münstermann et al., Experimental and Numerical Failure Criterion for Formability Prediction in Sheet Metal Forming, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2008, 43(1), p 43–5010.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.036 ↗
13. U. Prahl, S. Papaefthymiou, V. Uthaisangsuk et al., Micromechanics-Based Modelling of Properties and Failure of Multiphase Steels, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2007, 39(1), p 17–2210.1016/j.commatsci.2006.01.023 ↗
14. D. Steglich and W. Brocks, Micromechanical Modelling of the Behavior of Ductile Materials Including Particles, Comput. Mater. Sci., 1997, 9(1), p 7–1710.1016/S0927-0256(97)00053-0 ↗
15. J. Fansi, T. Balan, X. Lemoine, E. Maire, C. Landron, O. Bouaziz, M. Ben, A. Bettaieb, and A.M. Habraken, Numerical Investigation and Experimental Validation of Physically Based Advanced GTN MODEl for DP Steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 569, p 1–1210.1016/j.msea.2013.01.019 ↗
16. G.-Z. Quan et al., Dynamic Recrystallization Kinetics of 42CrMo Steel During Compression at Different Temperatures and Strain Rates, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(13), p 4643–465110.1016/j.msea.2011.02.090 ↗
17. P. Hu, D. Shi, L. Ying et al., The Finite Element Analysis of Ductile Damage During Hot Stamping of 22MnB5 Steel, Mater. Des., 2015, 69, p 141–15210.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.044 ↗
18. F. Abbassi, T. Belhadj, S. Mistou et al., Parameter Identification of a Mechanical Ductile Damage Using Artificial Neural Networks in Sheet Metal Forming, Mater. Des., 2013, 45, p 605–61510.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.032 ↗
19. N. Bonora, D. Gentile, A. Pirondi et al., Ductile Damage Evolution Under Triaxial State of Stress: Theory and Experiments, Int. J. Plast., 2005, 21(5), p 981–100710.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.003 ↗
20. L.Z. Manzouri, H. Chalal, and F. Abed-Meraim, Ductility Limit Prediction Using a GTN Damage Model Coupled with Localization Bifurcation Analysis, Mech. Mater., 2014, 76(9), p 64–9210.1016/j.mechmat.2014.06.005 ↗
21. A. Slimane et al., Parametric Study of the Ductile Damage by the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman Model of Structures in Carbon Steel A48-AP, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2015, 99(2), p 217–22310.1016/j.jmrt.2014.12.011 ↗
22. A. Needleman and V. Tvergaard, An Analysis of Ductile Rupture in Notched Bars, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1984, 32(6), p 461–49010.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-0 ↗
23. N. Benseddiq and A. Imad, A Ductile Fracture Analysis Using a Local Damage Model, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2008, 85(4), p 219–22710.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.09.003 ↗
24. A. Kami, B.M. Dariani, A.S. Vanini et al., Numerical Determination of the Forming Limit Curves of Anisotropic Sheet Metals Using GTN Damage Model, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 216, p 472–48310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.017 ↗
25. W. Brocks and G. Bernauer, Determination of the Gurson parameters by numerical simulations, in: Second Griffith Conference Sheffield, 1995, 13–15th September
26. Zahra Bazrafshan, Maryam Ataeefard, and Farahnaz Nourmohammadian, Modeling the Effect of Pigments and Processing Parameters in Polymeric Composite for Printing Ink Application Using the Response Surface Methodology, Prog. Org. Coat., 2015, 82, p 68–7310.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.01.004 ↗
27. S.S. Khamis, M.A. Lajis, and R.A.O. Albert, A Sustainable Direct Recycling of Aluminum Chip (AA6061) in Hot Press Forging Employing Response Surface Methodology, Procedia CIRP, 2015, 26, p 477–48110.1016/j.procir.2014.07.023 ↗
28. J.R. Barber, Solid Mechanics and its Applications, Elasticity, 2004, 172, p 351–357
29. Guo-zheng Quan, An Mao, Gui-chang Luo, Jian-ting Liang, Wu Dong-sen, and Jie Zhou, Constitutive Modeling for the Dynamic Recrystallization Kinetics of As-Extruded 3Cr20Ni10W2 Heat-Resistant Alloy Based on Stress–Strain Data, Mater. Des., 2013, 52(24), p 98–10710.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.030 ↗