journal article·2023-06

Heat Input Effect on Dissimilar Super Duplex Stainless Steel (UNS S32750) and Nitronic Steel (N 50) Gas Tungsten Arc Weld: Mechanism, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties

Anup Kumar Maurya, Rahul Chhibber, Chandan Pandey

Publisher page

Abstract

This research focuses on the effect of heat input of super duplex stainless steel (sDSS 2507) and nitronic steel (N50) dissimilar welded joints. Two heat input combinations selected as lower heat input (LHI) (0.62 kJ/mm) and higher heat input (HHI) (1.01 kJ/mm) were preferred during the operation of the gas tungsten arc welding process (GTAW) process using ER2594 filler. The macrosegregation like an island, peninsulas are observed in both weldments` HAZ and weld zone. The presence of secondary austenites (γ2) precipitation is observed in HAZ and root region of weldments. As heat input increases, the ferrite content of the weld zone in HHI decreases. Nevertheless, HHI had an advantageous effect on austenite nucleation in the HAZ. To ascertain the mechanical characteristics of the dissimilar metal welds (DMWs), tests such as the Vickers micro-hardness test, Charpy impact test, and tensile test were conducted. The mechanical evaluation reveals that the average hardness of LHI shows more hardness of 280 ± 4 Hv0.5 than HHI weldment of 270 ± 3 Hv0.5. Hence, weld zone, HAZ, and interface hardness do not indicate any significant change with the increment in heat input, which can be credited to the phase balance of ferrite/austenite. The tensile strength of LHI and HHI weldment is 895 ± 4 MPa and 900 ± 5 MPa, respectively, but LHI weldment displays better ductility. The Charpy impact test reveals that the impact toughness value decreases with increased heat input (i.e., 165 ± 5 J and 145 ± 3 J for LHI and HHI weldment, respectively) because of the secondary phase formation and increased grain size. However, the weld metal`s Charpy impact toughness was more than the ASME standard value (> 41 J) and the EN 1599:1997 standard value (> 47 J). The microstructural observation and mechanical characterization suggest that lower heat input could be beneficial for weld’s structural integrity.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. D. Peckner, I. Bernstein and D. Peckner, Handbook of Stainless Steels, Br. Corros. J., 1978, 13, p 56–56. https://doi.org/10.1179/00070597879831877410.1179/000705978798318774 ↗
2. M. Rahmani, A. Eghlimi and M. Shamanian, Evaluation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties in Dissimilar Austenitic/Super Duplex Stainless Steel Joint, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23, p 3745–3753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-1136-z10.1007/s11665-014-1136-z ↗
3. A. Eghlimi, M. Shamanian, M. Eskandarian, A. Zabolian and J.A. Szpunar, Characterization of Microstructure and Texture Across Dissimilar Super Duplex/Austenitic Stainless Steel Weldment Joint by Super Duplex Filler Metal, Mater. Charact., 2015, 106, p 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2015.05.01710.1016/j.matchar.2015.05.017 ↗
4. K. Devendranath Ramkumar, D. Mishra, B. Ganesh Raj, M.K. Vignesh, G. Thiruvengatam, S.P. Sudharshan et al., Effect of Optimal Weld Parameters in the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Autogeneous Gas Tungsten Arc Weldments of Super-Duplex Stainless Steel UNS S32750, Mater. Design, 2015, 1980–2015(66), p 356–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2014.10.08410.1016/J.MATDES.2014.10.084 ↗
5. W.N. Khan and R. Chhibber, Effect of Filler Metal on Solidification, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Super Duplex/Pipeline Steel GTA Weld, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2021, 803, p 140476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.14047610.1016/j.msea.2020.140476 ↗
6. L. Karlsson, Welding of Stainless Steels Duplex and superduplex steels, Weld. Int., 2000, 14, p 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950711000954913110.1080/09507110009549131 ↗
7. A.K. Maurya, C. Pandey and R. Chhibber, Dissimilar Welding of Duplex Stainless Steel with Ni Alloys: A Review, Int. J. Press. Vesse. Pip., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.10443910.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104439 ↗
8. N. Nissley, TD. Anderson, FF. Noecker, C. Roepke, M. Gallagher, M. Hukle. Dissimilar Metal Welding of Nitronic 50 HS® and 25% Cr Super Duplex Stainless Steel. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. (ASME) vol. 5, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-2470610.1115/OMAE2014-24706 ↗
9. N. Kumar, N. Arora and S.K. Goel, Study on Metallurgical and Mechanical Aspects of GMA Welded Nitronic Steel under the Influence of Weld Quenching, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 56, p 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2020.04.05010.1016/J.JMAPRO.2020.04.050 ↗
10. N. Kumar, N. Arora and S.K. Goel, Weld Joint Properties of Nitrogen-Alloyed Austenitic Stainless Steel using Multi-Pass GMA Welding, Arch. Civil Mech. Eng.., 2020, 20(3), p 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43452-020-00087-110.1007/S43452-020-00087-1 ↗
11. J. Labanowski, D. Fydrych, G. Rogalski and K. Samson, Underwater Welding of Duplex Stainless Steel, Solid State Phenom., 2012, 183, p 101–106. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/SSP.183.10110.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/SSP.183.101 ↗
12. A. Świerczyńska, J. Łabanowski, J. Michalska and D. Fydrych, Corrosion Behavior of Hydrogen Charged Super Duplex Stainless Steel Welded Joints, Mater. Corros., 2017, 68, p 1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/MACO.20170941810.1002/MACO.201709418 ↗
13. R. Gunn, Duplex Stainless Steels Microstructure Properties and Applications, Anti-Corros. Methods Mater., 1998 https://doi.org/10.1108/acmm.1998.12845bae.00110.1108/acmm.1998.12845bae.001 ↗
14. V. Muthupandi, P. Bala Srinivasan, S.K. Seshadri and S. Sundaresan, Effect of Weld Metal Chemistry and Heat Input on the Structure and Properties of Duplex Stainless Steel Welds, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, 358, p 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5093(03)00077-710.1016/s0921-5093(03)00077-7 ↗
15. M. Yousefieh, M. Shamanian and A. Saatchi, Influence of Heat Input in Pulsed Current GTAW Process on Microstructure and Corrosion Resistance of Duplex Stainless Steel Welds, J. Iron. Steel Res. Int., 2011, 18, p 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(12)60036-310.1016/S1006-706X(12)60036-3 ↗
16. M. Yousefieh, M. Shamanian and A. Saatchi, Optimization of the Pulsed Current Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (PCGTAW) Parameters for Corrosion Resistance of Super Duplex Stainless Steel (UNS S32760) Welds using the Taguchi Method, J. Alloys Compd., 2011, 509, p 782–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.08710.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.087 ↗
17. M. Vahman, M. Shamanian, M.A. Golozar, A. Jalali, M.A. Sarmadi and J. Kangazian, The Effect of Welding Heat Input on the Structure-Property Relationship of a New Grade Super Duplex Stainless Steel, Steel Res. Int., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1002/SRIN.20190034710.1002/SRIN.201900347 ↗
18. V.A. Hosseini, K. Hurtig and L. Karlsson, Effect of Multipass TIG Welding on the Corrosion Resistance and Microstructure of a Super Duplex Stainless Steel, Mater. Corros., 2017, 68, p 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/MACO.20160910210.1002/MACO.201609102 ↗
19. P. Paulraj and R. Garg, Effect of Welding Parameters on Mechanical Properties of GTAW of UNS S31803 and UNS S32750 Weldments, Manuf. Rev. (Les Ulis), 2015, 2, p 29. https://doi.org/10.1051/MFREVIEW/201503210.1051/MFREVIEW/2015032 ↗
20. H. Tasalloti, P. Kah and J. Martikainen, Effect of Heat Input on Dissimilar Welds of Ultra High Strength Steel and Duplex Stainless Steel: Microstructural and Compositional Analysis, Mater. Charact., 2017, 123, p 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2016.11.01410.1016/J.MATCHAR.2016.11.014 ↗
21. S. Sirohi, A. Kumar, S. Soni, G. Dak, S. Kumar, Swierczy´nska A, et al., Influence of PWHT Parameters on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Behavior of Multi-Pass GTAW Joints of P92 Steel, Materials., 2022, 15, p 4045. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA1512404510.3390/MA15124045 ↗
22. G. Rogalski, A. Świerczyńska, M. Landowski and D. Fydrych, Mechanical and Microstructural Characterization of TIG Welded Dissimilar Joints between 304L Austenitic Stainless Steel and Incoloy 800HT Nickel Alloy, Metals., 2020, 10, p 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET1005055910.3390/MET10050559 ↗
23. A. Sauraw, A.K. Sharma, D. Fydrych, S. Sirohi, A. Gupta, A. Świerczyńska et al., Study on Microstructural Characterization, Mechanical Properties and Residual Stress of GTAW Dissimilar Joints of P91 and P22 Steels, Materials., 2021, 14, p 6591. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA1421659110.3390/MA14216591 ↗
24. M. Sabzi, S.H. Mousavi Anijdan, A.R. Eivani, N. Park and H.R. Jafarian, The Effect of Pulse Current Changes in PCGTAW on Microstructural Evolution, Drastic Improvement In Mechanical Properties, and Fracture Mode of Dissimilar Welded Joint of AISI 316L-AISI 310S Stainless steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2021, 823, p 141700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2021.14170010.1016/J.MSEA.2021.141700 ↗
25. T. Reza Tabrizi, M. Sabzi, S.H. Mousavi Anijdan, A.R. Eivani, N. Park and H.R. Jafarian, Comparing the Effect of Continuous and Pulsed Current in the GTAW Process of AISI 316L Stainless Steel Welded Joint: Microstructural Evolution, Phase Equilibrium, Mechanical Properties and Fracture Mode, J. Market. Res., 2021, 15, p 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2021.07.15410.1016/J.JMRT.2021.07.154 ↗
26. A.K. Maurya, C. Pandey and R. Chhibber, Effect of Filler Metal Composition on Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of Dissimilar Welded Joint of Nitronic Steel and Super Duplex Stainless Steel, Arch. Civil Mech. Eng.., 2022, 22, p 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43452-022-00413-910.1007/S43452-022-00413-9 ↗
27. A.K. Maurya, C. Pandey and R. Chhibber, Influence of Heat Input on Weld Integrity of Weldments of Two Dissimilar Steels, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.207588910.1080/10426914.2022.2075889 ↗
28. AWS., D1. Structural Welding Code-Steel. Mar lin; (1978)
29. J.N. DuPont and A.R. Marder, Thermal Efficiency of Arc Welding Processes, Weld. J.Includ. Weld. Res. Suppl., 1995, 74, p 406s.
30. B. Jarvis, Gas Tungsten Arc Welding, New Developments in Advanced Welding. N. Ahmed Ed., CRC Press, USA, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439823729.ch310.1201/9781439823729.ch3 ↗
31. International A, Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens 1, ASTM Inter., 2012, 03(01), p 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0003-11R17.110.1520/E0003-11R17.1 ↗
32. S. Practic, Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys ASTM E-407;07:1–22. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1520/E0407-07R15E01.210.1520/E0407-07R15E01.2 ↗
33. ASTM E8. ASTM E8/E8M Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials 1. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 4:1–27. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1520/E000810.1520/E0008 ↗
34. ASTM E92–17. ASTM 2017standard, Standard Test Methods for Vickers Hardness and Knoop Hardness of Metallic Materials. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International. 1–27. (2017) https://doi.org/10.1520/E0092-17.2.10.1520/E0092-17.2 ↗
35. ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM E 23–12c, ASTM International, Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0023-1810.1520/E0023-18 ↗
36. A. Gupta, A. Kumar, T. Baskaran, S.B. Arya and R.K. Khatirkar, Effect of Heat Input on Microstructure and Corrosion Behavior of Duplex Stainless Steel Shielded Metal Arc Welds, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2018, 71, p 1595–1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12666-018-1294-Z/TABLES/610.1007/S12666-018-1294-Z/TABLES/6 ↗
37. J. C. Lippold, and D. J. Kotecki, Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels. 376. (2005)
38. N. Ouali, K. Khenfer, B. Belkessa, J. Fajoui, B. Cheniti, B. Idir et al., Effect of Heat Input on Microstructure, Residual Stress, and Corrosion Resistance of UNS 32101 Lean Duplex Stainless Steel Weld Joints, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 4252–4264. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11665-019-04194-W10.1007/S11665-019-04194-W ↗
39. M. Sadeghian, M. Shamanian and A. Shafyei, Effect of Heat Input on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Joints between Super Duplex Stainless Steel and High Strength Low Alloy Steel, Mater. Des., 2014, 60, p 678–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.05710.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.057 ↗
40. A.J. Ramirez, J.C. Lippold and S.D. Brandi, The Relationship between Chromium Nitride and Secondary Austenite Precipitation in Duplex Stainless Steels, Metall. Mater. Trans. A., 2003, 34, p 1575–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11661-003-0304-910.1007/S11661-003-0304-9 ↗
41. A. Eghlimi, M. Shamanian, M. Eskandarian, A. Zabolian, M. Nezakat and J.A. Szpunar, Evaluation of Microstructure and Texture Across the Welded Interface of Super Duplex Stainless Steel and High Strength Low Alloy Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2015, 264, p 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.06010.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.060 ↗
42. W.N. Khan, S. Mahajan and R. Chhibber, Investigations on Reformed Austenite in the Microstructure of Dissimilar Super Duplex/Pipeline Steel Weld, Mater. Lett., 2021, 285, p 129109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12910910.1016/j.matlet.2020.129109 ↗
43. Y. Ohmori, K. Nakai, H. Ohtsubo and Y. Isshiki, Mechanism of Widmanstätten Austenite Formation in a δ/γ Duplex Phase Stainless Steel, ISIJ Int., 1995, 35, p 969–975. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.35.96910.2355/isijinternational.35.969 ↗
44. C. García-Mateo and F.G. Caballero, The Role of Retained Austenite on Tensile Properties of Steels with Bainitic Microstructures, Mater. Trans., 2005, 46, p 1839–1846. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.46.183910.2320/matertrans.46.1839 ↗
45. H. Sieurin and R. Sandström, Austenite Reformation in the Heat-Affected Zone of Duplex Stainless Steel 2205, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 418, p 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2005.11.02510.1016/J.MSEA.2005.11.025 ↗
46. S. Kumar, C. Pandey and A. Goyal, A Microstructural and Mechanical Behavior Study of Heterogeneous P91 Welded Joint, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2020, 185, p 104128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.10412810.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104128 ↗
47. G. Dak and C. Pandey, A Critical Review on Dissimilar Welds Joint between Martensitic and Austenitic Steel for Power Plant Application, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 58, p 377–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.01910.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.019 ↗
48. Hsieh C, Research WW-IS undefined. Overview of Intermetallic Sigma (σ) Phase Precipitation in Stainless Steels. DownloadsHindawiCom n.d. (2012)10.5402/2012/732471 ↗
49. E.O. Hall and S.H. Algie, The Sigma Phase, Metall. Rev., 1966, 11, p 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1179/mtlr.1966.11.1.6110.1179/mtlr.1966.11.1.61 ↗
50. N. Llorca-Isern, H. López-Luque, I. López-Jiménez and M.V. Biezma, Identification of Sigma and Chi Phases in Duplex Stainless Steels, Mater. Charact., 2016, 112, p 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2015.12.00410.1016/j.matchar.2015.12.004 ↗
51. D.M. Fellicia, B.A. Sutarsis, D.W. Kurniawan, A. Purniawan and A.T. Wibisono, Study of Sigma Phase in Duplex SAF 2507, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, 202, p 012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/202/1/01203910.1088/1757-899X/202/1/012039 ↗
52. K. Nishimoto, K. Saida and O. Katsuyama, Prediction of Sigma Phase Precipitation in Super Duplex Stainless Steel Weldments, Weld. World, 2006, 50, p 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0326342910.1007/BF03263429 ↗
53. J. Nowacki and A. Łukojc, Microstructural Transformations of Heat Affected Zones in Duplex Steel Welded Joints, Mater. Charact., 2006, 56, p 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2006.02.00710.1016/J.MATCHAR.2006.02.007 ↗
54. Z. Zhang, H. Jing, L. Xu, Y. Han, L. Zhao, X. Lv et al., Influence of Heat Input in Electron Beam Process on Microstructure and Properties of Duplex Stainless Steel Welded Interface, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 435, p 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.11.12510.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.11.125 ↗
55. J.O. Nilsson, Super Duplex Stainless Steels, Mater. Sci. Technol., 1992, 8, p 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1992.8.8.68510.1179/mst.1992.8.8.685 ↗
56. D.M.E. Villanueva, F.C.P. Junior, R.L. Plaut and A.F. Padilha, Comparative Study on Sigma Phase Precipitation of Three Types of Stainless Steels: Austenitic, Superferritic and Duplex, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, 22, p 1098–1104. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328406X10923010.1179/174328406X109230 ↗
57. S. Kumar and A.S. Shahi, Effect of Heat Input on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Gas Tungsten Arc Welded AISI 304 Stainless Steel Joints, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 3617–3623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.01710.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.017 ↗
58. Y. Yang, B. Yan, J. Li and J. Wang, The Effect of Large Heat Input on the Microstructure and Corrosion Behaviour of Simulated Heat Affected Zone in 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53, p 3756–3763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.07.02210.1016/j.corsci.2011.07.022 ↗
59. M. Sabzi and S.M. Dezfuli, Post Weld Heat Treatment of Hypereutectoid Hadfield Steel: Characterization and Control of Microstructure, Phase Equilibrium, Mechanical Properties and Fracture Mode of Welding Joint, J. Manuf. Process., 2018, 34, p 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2018.06.00910.1016/J.JMAPRO.2018.06.009 ↗
60. M. Sabzi, S.H. Mousavi Anijdan, A.R.B. Chalandar, N. Park, H.R. Jafarian and A.R. Eivani, An Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Gas Tungsten Arc Welding Current Modes Upon the Microstructure, Mechanical, and Fractography Properties of Welded Joints of Two Grades of AISI 316L and AISI310S Alloy Metal Sheets, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2022, 840, p 142877. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2022.14287710.1016/J.MSEA.2022.142877 ↗