journal article·2022-08

Improving Productivity in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Inconel 718 by Increasing Layer Thickness: Effects on Mechanical Behavior

Paul Paradise, Dhiraj Patil, Nicole Van Handel, Samuel Temes, Anushree Saxena, Daniel Bruce, Austin Suder, Shawn Clonts, Mandar Shinde, Cameron Noe, Donald Godfrey, Rakesh Hota, Dhruv Bhate

Publisher page

Abstract

Build time is a critical contributor to overall part cost in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) process, which in turn plays an important role in whether a part is made with this process or not. While there are many ways to improve productivity in the L-PBF process, this work focuses on one specific approach in the context of L-PBF of Inconel 718: increasing layer thickness, which reduces the number of slices for a given part, but is accompanied with the potential for a degradation in mechanical properties. The study is separated into two parts: the first establishes an optimal process at each of three different layer thicknesses (30, 60 and 80 µm). Having developed an optimum process, the study then obtains density, surface roughness and mechanical property data on specimens fabricated with the selected processes, along with SEM micrographs. Half the specimens are characterized and tested in the as-built condition, the other half go through a heat treatment process that includes Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP). This study of a total of 600 specimens across six builds confirms that an increase in layer thickness has no significant effect on elastic modulus, but does show reductions in density and strength, along with slight increases in surface roughness. Microstructural studies show no significant differences in grain size and orientation, with a slight increase in carbides and delta precipitates with increasing thickness. Post-heat treatment mechanical strength for all thicknesses is comparable to forged values for Inconel 718, and limited data suggest improvements in excess of forged values can be obtained if specimens are machined prior to testing, with a narrowing of the differences attributable to layer thickness. This study also showed correlations between strength and density and revealed build location dependence for UTS.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. D. Bhate, Design for Additive Manufacturing: Concepts and Considerations for the Aerospace Industry, SAE International, Warrendale, 2018.10.4271/PT-188 ↗
2. C. Lindemann, U. Jahnke, M. Moi, and R. Koch, Analyzing Product Lifecycle Costs for a Better Understanding of Cost Drivers in Additive Manufacturing, 2012.
3. L. Rickenbacher, A. Spierings and K. Wegener, An Integrated Cost-Model for Selective Laser Melting (SLM), Rapid Prototyp. J., 2013 https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254131131220110.1108/13552541311312201 ↗
4. L. Yang, K. Hsu, B. Baughman, D. Godfrey, M. Medina, F. Menon and S. Wiener, Additive Manufacturing of Metals: The Technology, Materials, Design and Production, 1st ed. Springer, Berlin, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-55128-9 ↗
5. C.U. Brown et al., The Effects of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters on Material Hardness and Density for Nickel Alloy 625, NIST Adv. Manuf. Ser., 2018 https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-1910.6028/NIST.AMS.100-19 ↗
6. J.P. Oliveira, A. LaLonde and J. Ma, Processing Parameters in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Metal Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Des., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10876210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108762 ↗
7. J.P. Oliveira, T.G. Santos and R.M. Miranda, Progress in Materials Science Revisiting Fundamental Welding Concepts to Improve Additive Manufacturing: From Theory to Practice, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2020, 107(2018), p 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10059010.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100590 ↗
8. S. Dingal, T.R. Pradhan, J.K.S. Sundar, A.R. Choudhury and S.K. Roy, The Application of Taguchi’s Method in the Experimental Investigation of the Laser Sintering Process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2008, 38(9–10), p 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1154-110.1007/s00170-007-1154-1 ↗
9. K. Kempen, E. Yasa, L. Thijs, J.P. Kruth and J. Van Humbeeck, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Selective Laser Melted 18Ni-300 Steel, Phys. Procedia, 2011, 12(Part 1), p 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.03310.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.033 ↗
10. J. Delgado, J. Ciurana and C.A. Rodríguez, Influence of Process Parameters on Part Quality and Mechanical Properties for DMLS and SLM with Iron-Based Materials, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2012, 60(5–8), p 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3643-510.1007/s00170-011-3643-5 ↗
11. J. Sun, Y. Yang and D. Wang, Parametric Optimization of Selective Laser Melting for Forming Ti6Al4V Samples by Taguchi Method, Opt. Laser Technol., 2013, 49, p 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.12.00210.1016/j.optlastec.2012.12.002 ↗
12. Q.B. Nguyen, D.N. Luu, S.M.L. Nai, Z. Zhu, Z. Chen and J. Wei, The Role of Powder Layer Thickness on the Quality of SLM Printed Parts, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2018, 18(3), p 948–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2018.01.01510.1016/j.acme.2018.01.015 ↗
13. ASTM International, Standard Test Methods for Density of Compacted or Sintered Powder Metallurgy (PM) Products Using Archimedes’ Principle, Astm B962-13, 2013, i, p 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/B0962-13.210.1520/B0962-13.2 ↗
14. A.B. Spierings, M. Schneider and R. Eggenberger, Comparison of Density Measurement Techniques for Additive Manufactured Metallic Parts, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2011 https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254111115650410.1108/13552541111156504 ↗
15. Q.B. Nguyen, M.L.S. Nai, Z. Zhu, C.N. Sun, J. Wei and W. Zhou, Characteristics of Inconel Powders for Powder-Bed Additive Manufacturing, Engineering, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.01210.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.012 ↗
16. “In718-0405 powder for additive manufacturing Process specification Powder description Nickel alloy powder,” 2017. [Online]. Available: www.renishaw.com/contact.
17. U. Scipioni, A.J. Wolfer, M.J. Matthews, J.R. Delplanque and J.M. Schoenung, On the limitations of Volumetric Energy Density as a design parameter for Selective Laser Melting, JMADE, 2017, 113, p 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.03710.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037 ↗
18. G.F. Vander Voort and E.P. Manilova, Metallographic Techniques for Superalloys, Microsc. Microanal., 2004, 10(SUPPL. 2), p 690–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S143192760488344210.1017/S1431927604883442 ↗
19. ASTM International, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. pp. 1–27.
20. Keyence Corporation of America. https://www.keyence.com/.
21. INSTRON North America. www.instron.com.
22. E. Chlebus, K. Gruber, B. Kuźnicka, J. Kurzac and T. Kurzynowski, Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 Processed by Selective Laser Melting, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 639, p 647–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.03510.1016/j.msea.2015.05.035 ↗
23. W. Huang, Z. Wang, J. Yang, H. Yang, and X. Zeng, Effects of Process Parameters and Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Selective Laser Melted Inconel 718.
24. D. Deng, R.L. Peng, H. Brodin and J. Moverare, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 Produced by Selective Laser Melting: Sample Orientation Dependence and Effects of Post Heat Treatments, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2018, 713, p 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.04310.1016/j.msea.2017.12.043 ↗
25. W.M. Tucho, P. Cuvillier, A. Sjolyst-Kverneland and V. Hansen, Microstructure and Hardness Studies of Inconel 718 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting Before and After Solution Heat Treatment, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 689, p 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.02.06210.1016/j.msea.2017.02.062 ↗
26. K. Moussaoui, W. Rubio, M. Mousseigne, T. Sultan and F. Rezai, Effects of Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Parameters of Inconel 718 on Porosity, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.03710.1016/j.msea.2018.08.037 ↗
27. F. Caiazzo, V. Alfieri, G. Corrado and P. Argenio, Laser Powder-Bed Fusion of Inconel 718 to Manufacture Turbine Blades, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 93(9–12), p 4023–4031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0839-310.1007/s00170-017-0839-3 ↗
28. Z. Wang, K. Guan, M. Gao, X. Li, X. Chen and X. Zeng, The Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Deposited-IN718 by Selective Laser Melting, J. Alloys Compd., 2012, 513, p 518–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.10.10710.1016/j.jallcom.2011.10.107 ↗
29. L.M. Sochalski-Kolbus et al., Comparison of Residual Stresses in Inconel 718 Simple Parts Made by Electron Beam Melting and Direct Laser Metal Sintering, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., 2015, 46(3), p 1419–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2722-210.1007/s11661-014-2722-2 ↗
30. J.P. Choi et al., Densification and Microstructural Investigation of Inconel 718 Parts Fabricated0. by Selective Laser Melting, Powder Technol., 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.01.03010.1016/j.powtec.2017.01.030 ↗
31. M. Xia, D. Gu, G. Yu, D. Dai, H. Chen and Q. Shi, Influence of Hatch Spacing on Heat and Mass Transfer, Thermodynamics and Laser Processability During Additive Manufacturing of Inconel 718 Alloy, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2016, 109, p 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.07.01010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.07.010 ↗
32. W. Tillmann, C. Schaak, J. Nellesen, M. Schaper, M.E. Aydinöz and K.P. Hoyer, Hot Isostatic Pressing of IN718 Components Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting, Addit. Manuf., 2017, 13, p 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.00610.1016/j.addma.2016.11.006 ↗
33. A. Alafaghani, A. Qattawi and M.A.G. Castañón, Effect of Manufacturing Parameters on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Metal Laser Sintering Parts of Precipitate Hardenable Metals, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 99(9–12), p 2491–2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2586-510.1007/s00170-018-2586-5 ↗
34. P. Kelley, Fatigue Behavior of Direct Metal Laser Sintered (DMLS) Inconel 718, 2016.10.1115/IMECE2015-50937 ↗
35. V.A. Popovich, E.V. Borisov, A.A. Popovich, V.S. Sufiiarov, D.V. Masaylo and L. Alzina, Functionally Graded Inconel 718 Processed by Additive Manufacturing: Crystallographic Texture, Anisotropy of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties, Mater. Des., 2017, 114, p 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.07510.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.075 ↗
36. V.S. Sufiiarov, E.V. Borisov and I.A. Polozov, Selective Laser Melting of the Inconel 718 Nickel Superalloy, Appl. Mech. Mater., 2014, 698, p 333–338. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.698.33310.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.698.333 ↗
37. K.N. Amato et al., Microstructures and Mechanical Behavior of Inconel 718 Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting, Acta Mater., 2012, 60(5), p 2229–2239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.03210.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.032 ↗
38. Q. Jia and D. Gu, Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufactured Inconel 718 Superalloy Parts: High-Temperature Oxidation Property and Its Mechanisms, Opt. Laser Technol., 2014, 62, p 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.03.00810.1016/j.optlastec.2014.03.008 ↗
39. M. Sadowski, L. Ladani, W. Brindley and J. Romano, Optimizing Quality of Additively Manufactured Inconel 718 Using Powder Bed Laser Melting Process, Addit. Manuf., 2016, 11, p 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.03.00610.1016/j.addma.2016.03.006 ↗
40. P. Karimi, T. Raza, J. Andersson and L.E. Svensson, Influence of Laser Exposure Time and Point Distance on 75-μm-Thick Layer of Selective Laser Melted Alloy 718, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1019-110.1007/s00170-017-1019-1 ↗
41. Y.L. Kuo, S. Horikawa and K. Kakehi, Effects of Build Direction and Heat Treatment on Creep Properties of Ni-Base Superalloy Built Up by Additive Manufacturing, Scr. Mater., 2017, 129, p 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.03510.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.035 ↗
42. Q. Jia and D. Gu, Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing of Inconel 718 Superalloy Parts: Densification, Microstructure and Properties, J. Alloys Compd., 2014, 585, p 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.17110.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.171 ↗