Corrosion Resistances of Steel Pipe Coated with Two Types of Enamel by Two Coating Processes
Source abstract
Abstract
The corrosion behaviors of uncoated, enamel-coated, and epoxy-coated steel samples were evaluated in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution with open-circuit potential, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and potentiodynamic polarization tests. Two types of enamel (powder and slurry) were coated on steel samples in electrostatic and wet spraying processes, respectively. Twelve 25 mm × 25 mm steel samples were cut from an API 5L X65 pipe of 323.850 mm in outer diameter and 9.525 mm in wall thickness. They were divided into four groups of three identical samples. Each group represents one of the four conditions: uncoated, powder enamel-coated, slurry enamel-coated and epoxy-coated. Scanning electron microscopy images revealed that the powder and slurry enamel coatings were approximately 180 and 235 µm thick, respectively. The powder enamel coating has fewer but larger isolated pores than the slurry enamel coating. Electrochemical tests consistently indicated that the powder and slurry enamel coatings provided slightly better and worse corrosion protection to the coated steel samples, respectively, than the epoxy coating. The charge transfer resistances of all the coated samples are approximately 108 times larger than that of the uncoated samples. All the coated samples were unlikely corroded within 2 h of immersion.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. PHMSA: Stakeholder Communications—Internal Corrosion. < https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/FactSheets/FSInternalCorrosion.htm?nocache=2447 >
2. NACE International. Managing Corrosion of Pipelines That Transport Crude Oils. Pipeline and Gas Journal, March, 2013, vol. 240, no. 3. < https://pgjonline.com/2013/03/04/managing-corrosion-of-pipelines-that-transport-crude-oils/ >
3. S. Prabhu. Gas Pipelines: Internal Corrosion Protection and Fire Prevention. Corrosionpedia Newsletter. January 1, 2016.
4. A. Kehr, Fusion-Bonded Epoxy Internal Linings and External Coatings for Pipeline Corrosion Protection, Piping Handbook, NACE International, Houston, 200310.5006/37580 ↗
5. P.A. Schweitzer, Corrosion-Resistant Piping Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994, p 193
6. F. Tang, G. Chen, R.K. Brow, J.S. Volz, and M.L. Koenigstein, Corrosion Resistance and Mechanism of Steel Rebar Coated with Three Types of Enamel, Corros. Sci., 2012, 59, p 157–16810.1016/j.corsci.2012.02.024 ↗
7. S. Rossi, N. Parziani, and C. Zanella, Abrasion Resistance of Vitreous Enamel Coatings in Function of Frit Composition and Particles Presence, Wear, 2015, 332, p 702–70910.1016/j.wear.2015.01.058 ↗
8. A.P. Kozlova, N.I. Guba, and I.A. Drobot, Comparative Testing of One-Coat Enamels for Pipes, Glass Ceram., 2001, 58(1-2), p 72–7410.1023/A:1010957700836 ↗
9. O.R. Lazutkina, M.G. Kostenko, S.A. Komarova, and A.K. Kazak, Highly Reliable Energy-Efficient Glass Coatings for Pipes Transporting Energy Carriers, Liquids, and Gases, Glass Ceram., 2007, 64(3-4), p 93–9510.1007/s10717-007-0024-5 ↗
10. I.G. Berdzenishvili, Synthesis of Law-Melting Pipe Enamel Coatings and Their Chemical Durability, Am. J. Mater. Sci., 2016, 6(2), p 45–48
11. A.V. Ryabova, E.A. Yatsenko, V.V. Khoroshavina, and L.V. Klimova, Glass-Enamel Corrosion-Resistant Coatings for Steel Pipelines, Glass Ceram., 2017, 74(7-8), p 282–28710.1007/s10717-017-9980-6 ↗
12. H.H. Liu, Y. Shueh, F.S. Yang, and P. Shen, Microstructure of the Enamel-Steel Interface: Cross-Sectional TEM and Metallographic Studies, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1992, 149(2), p 217–22410.1016/0921-5093(92)90382-B ↗
13. X. Yang, A. Jha, R. Brydson, and R.C. Cochrane, An Analysis of the Microstructure and Interfacial Chemistry of Steel-Enamel Interface, Thin Solid Films, 2003, 443(1), p 33–4510.1016/S0040-6090(03)00973-8 ↗
14. Y. Zuo, R. Pang, W. Li, J.P. Xiong, and Y.M. Tang, The Evaluation of Coating Performance by the Variations of Phase Angles in Middle and High Frequency Domains of EIS, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50(12), p 3322–332810.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.049 ↗
15. L. Fan, F. Tang, S.T. Reis, G. Chen, and M.L. Koenigstein, Corrosion Resistance of Transmission Pipeline Steel Coated with Five Types of Enamels, Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2017, 30, p 39010.1007/s40195-017-0554-y ↗
16. F. Tang, Y. Bao, Y. Chen, Y. Tang, and G. Chen, Impact and Corrosion Resistances of Duplex Epoxy/Enamel Coated Plates, Constr. Build. Mater., 2016, 112, p 7–1810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.170 ↗
17. M.R. Presa, R.I. Tucceri, M.I. Florit, and D. Posadas, Constant Phase Element Behavior in the Poly (o-toluidine) Impedance Response, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2001, 502(1), p 82–9010.1016/S0022-0728(00)00512-X ↗
18. Z. Yao, Z. Jiang, and F. Wang, Study on Corrosion Resistance and Roughness of Micro-Plasma Oxidation Ceramic Coatings on Ti Alloy by EIS Technique, Electrochim. Acta, 2007, 52(13), p 4539–454610.1016/j.electacta.2006.12.052 ↗
19. M.E. Orazem and B. Tribollet, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, 1st ed., Wiley, Hoboken, 2008, p 233 (ISBN: 978-0-470-04140-6)10.1002/9780470381588.ch13 ↗
20. C. Zhu, R. Xie, J. Xue, and L. Song, Studies of the Impedance Models and Water Transport Behaviors of Cathodically Polarized Coating, Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 56(16), p 5828–583510.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.068 ↗
21. B. Hirschorn, M.E. Orazem, B. Tribollet, V. Vivier, I. Frateur, and M. Musiani, Determination of Effective Capacitance and Film Thickness from Constant-Phase-Element Parameters, Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 55(21), p 6218–622710.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.065 ↗
22. P. Córdoba-Torres, T.J. Mesquita, O. Devos, B. Tribollet, V. Roche, and R.P. Nogueira, On the Intrinsic Coupling Between Constant-Phase Element Parameters α and Q in Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 72, p 172–17810.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.020 ↗
23. J. Zhang, J. Hu, J. Zhang, and C. Cao, Studies of Water Transport Behavior and Impedance Models of Epoxy-coated Metals in NaCl Solution by EIS, Prog. Org. Coat., 2004, 51(2), p 145–15110.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.08.001 ↗
24. G.W. Walter, A Review of Impedance Plot Methods Used for Corrosion Performance Analysis of Painted Metals, Corros. Sci., 1986, 26(9), p 681–70310.1016/0010-938X(86)90033-8 ↗
25. Y. Zuo, R. Pang, W. Li, J.P. Xiong, and Y.M. Tang, The Evaluation of Coating Performance by the Variations of Phase Angles in Middle and High Frequency Domains of EIS, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50(12), p 3322–332810.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.049 ↗
26. F. Tang, X. Cheng, G. Chen, R.K. Brow, J.S. Volz, and M.L. Koenigstein, Electrochemical Behavior of Enamel-Coated Carbon Steel in Simulated Concrete Pore Water Solution with Various Chloride Concentrations, Electrochim. Acta, 2013, 92, p 36–4610.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.125 ↗
27. H.H. Hassan, E. Abdelghani, and M.A. Amin, Inhibition of Mild Steel Corrosion in Hydrochloric Acid Solution by Triazole Derivatives: Part I. Polarization and EIS Studies, Electrochim. Acta, 2007, 52(22), p 6359–636610.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.046 ↗
28. F. Tang and G. Chen, Chemically Reactive Enamel Coating of Steel Rebar for Enhanced Durability of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Int. J. Struct. Eng., 2015, 6(1), p 56–7210.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2015.067992 ↗
29. X.L. Zhang, ZhH Jiang, ZhP Yao, Y. Song, and DWu Zh, Effects of Scan Rate on the Potentiodynamic Polarization Curve Obtained to Determine the Tafel Slopes and Corrosion Current Density, Corros. Sci., 2009, 51(3), p 581–58710.1016/j.corsci.2008.12.005 ↗