An Assessment of Fully Integrated Polymer Sandwich Structures Designed by Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
3D printing is an additive manufacturing technique (AM) widely used in the aerospace, shipbuilding, automotive and civil construction sectors to obtain lightweight sandwich structures made with complex core shapes to achieve excellent multifunctional properties, such as flexural stiffness, and high energy-absorption capabilities. This study shows an experimental analysis of the mechanical behavior of three types of core, including (i) out-of-plane and (ii) in-plane hexagonal honeycomb, and (iii) S-shape corrugated core. The fused deposition modeling method (FDM) is applied in the manufacture of fully integrated sandwich structures using polylactic acid (PLA) biopolymer filaments. Tensile, flexural and Charpy impact tests are used for the experimental investigation. The failure modes of polymeric structures are analyzed. The out-of-plane -comb and S-shape corrugated panels achieve similar mechanical behavior, however, superior tensile modulus, tensile strength, flexural modulus, flexural strength and energy absorbed are obtained in comparison with in-plane -comb core panels. Sandwich panels fabricated by AM achieve acceptable mechanical properties for secondary structural applications, especially when lightness is required.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. H.Y. Sarvestani, A.H. Akbarzadeha, H. Niknam and K. Hermenean, 3D Printed Architected Polymeric Sandwich Panels: Energy Absorption And Structural Performance, Mater. Des., 2018, 200, p 886–909.
2. A. Meram and M.E. Çetin, Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Core/Facing Interface Performance on the Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Honeycomb Sandwich Panels, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2020, 29, p 7408–7419.10.1007/s11665-020-05181-2 ↗
3. M. Bodaghi, A.R. Damanpack, G.F. Hu and W.H. Liao, Large Deformations of Soft Metamaterials Fabricated by 3D Printing, Mater. Des., 2017, 131, p 81–91.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.002 ↗
4. D. Mousanezhad, S. Babaee, H. Ebrahimi, R. Ghosh, A.S. Hamouda, K. Bertoldi and A. Vaziri, Hierarchical Honeycomb Auxetic Metamaterials, Sci. Rep., 2016, 5, p 18306.10.1038/srep18306 ↗
5. C. Qi, F. Jiang, A. Remennikov, L.-Z. Pei, J. Liu, J.-S. Wang, X.-W. Liao and S. Yang, Quasi- Static Crushing Behavior of Novel Re-entrant Circular Auxetic Honeycombs, Compos. B: Eng., 2020, 197, p 108117.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108117 ↗
6. B.F. Lizardo, L.M.G. Vieira, J.C. Campos Rubio, T.H. Panzera and J.P. Davim, An Assessment of Thermosetting Infiltrate in Powder-Based Composites Made by Additive Manufacturing, J. Compos. Mater., 2019, 53, p 873–882.10.1177/0021998318792296 ↗
7. L. Yang, S. Li, Y. Li, M. Yang and Q. Yuan, Experimental Investigations for Optimizing the Extrusion Parameters on FDM PLA Printed Parts, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 169–182.10.1007/s11665-018-3784-x ↗
8. A. Paolini, S. Kollmannsberger and E. Rank, Additive Manufacturing in Construction: A Review on Processes, Applications, and Digital Planning Methods, Addit. Manuf., 2019, 30, p 100894.
9. M. Wiese, S. Thiede and C. Herrmann, Rapid Manufacturing of Automotive Polymer Series Parts: A Systematic Review of Processes, Materials and Challenges, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 36, p 101582.
10. A. Fadeel, A. Mian, M. Al-Rifaie and R. Srinivasan, Effect of Vertical Strut Arrangements on Compression Characteristics of 3D Printed Polymer Lattice Structures: Experimental and Computational Study, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 709–716.10.1007/s11665-018-3810-z ↗
11. R.W. Geng, J. Du, Z.Y. Wei, G.X. Zhao and J.D. Ni, Multiscale Modeling of Microstructural Evolution in Fused-Coating Additive Manufacturing, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 6544–6553.10.1007/s11665-019-04375-7 ↗
12. A. Lanzotti, M. Grasso, G. Staiano and M. Martorelli, The Impact of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated in Pla with an Open-Source 3-D Printer, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2015, 21, p 604–617.10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135 ↗
13. S.M. Zaharia, L.A. Enescu and M.A. Pop, Mechanical Performances of Lightweight Sandwich Structures Produced by Material Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing, Polym., 2020, 12, p 1740.10.3390/polym12081740 ↗
14. G.X. Gu, M. Takaffoli and M.J. Buehler, Hierarchically Enhanced Impact Resistance of Bioinspired Composites, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, p 170060.10.1002/adma.201700060 ↗
15. S. Su, R. Kopitzky, S. Tolga and S. Kabasci, Polylactide (PLA) and Its Blends with Poly(Butylene Succinate) (PBS): A Brief Review, Polym., 2019, 11, p 1193.10.3390/polym11071193 ↗
16. H.B. Rebelo, D. Lecompte, C. Cismasiu, A. Jonet, B. Belkassem and A. Maazoun, Experimental and Numerical Investigation on 3D Printed PLA Sacrificial Honeycomb Cladding, Inter. J. Impact Eng., 2019, 131, p 162–173.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.013 ↗
17. T. Yao, J. Ye, Z. Deng, K. Zhang, Y. Ma and H. Ouyang, Tensile Failure Strength and Separation Angle of FDM 3D Printing PLA Material: Experimental and Theoretical Analyses, Compos. B Eng., 2020, 188, p 107894.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107894 ↗
18. M.R. Ayatollahi, A. Nabavi-Kivi, B. Bahrami and M.Y. Yahya, The Influence of In-plane Raster Angle on Tensile and Fracture Strengths of 3D-Printed PLA Specimens, Eng. Fract. Mesh., 2020, 237, p 107225.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107225 ↗
19. J.M. Chacón, M.A. Caminero, E. García-Plaza and P.J. Núñez, Additive Manufacturing of PLA Structures using Fused Deposition Modelling: Effect of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties and their Optimal Selection, Mater. Des., 2017, 124, p 143–157.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
20. S. Singh, G. Singh, C. Prakash, S. Ramakrishna, L. Lamberti and C.I. Pruncu, 3D Printed Biodegradable Composites: An Insight into Mechanical Properties of PLA/chitosan Scaffold, Polym. Test., 2020, 89, p 106722.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106722 ↗
21. M. Somireddy and A. Czekanski, Anisotropic Material Behavior of 3D Printed Composite Structures – Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Des., 2020, 195, p 108953.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108953 ↗
22. A.J. Turner, M.A. Rifaie, A. Mian and R. Srinivasan, Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Sandwich Structures with Additively Manufactured Polymer Lattice Cores, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27, p 2505–2512.10.1007/s11665-018-3322-x ↗
23. H.P.P. Desu, A. Rossi, G.K. Mankoo, K. Fayazbakhsh and Z. Fawaz, Experimental Characterization of 3D Printed Thermoplastic Plates Subjected to Low Velocity Impact, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 107, p 1659–1669.10.1007/s00170-020-05120-4 ↗
24. R.K. Pathipaka, K.K. Namala, N. Sunkara and C.R. Bandaru, Damage Characterization of Sandwich Composites Subjected to Impact Loading, J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., 2020, 22, p 2125–2138.10.1177/1099636218792717 ↗
25. M.R. Khosravani, A. Zolfagharian, M. Jennings and T. Reinicke, Structural Performance of 3D-Printed Composites Under Various Loads and Environmental Conditions, Polym. Test., 2020, 91, p 106770.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106770 ↗