Generalization of the Ramberg–Osgood Model for Elastoplastic Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper dwells upon two plastic material models: the “inverse” and the modified Ramberg–Osgood laws. What makes the modified law different is that it postulates the existence of a strictly linear nonzero portion on a deformation curve, limited by the elastic limit point. The plastic strain portion begins beyond this point and ends with the ultimate stress point, which is another characteristic point of the strain curve. Strain curves corresponding to the inverse law and to the modified law have ben plotted on a sample consisting of 30 experimental Russian 20HGR-steel (Grade 900M SAE/USA) strain curve points. Standard error for the inverse law is sinvers = 0.45, while that for the modified law is an order of magnitude lower: smodif = 0.02. It is proven that the inverse law is a strict limit case of the modified law, where the elastic limit point converges to the origin and contracts the linear strain portion to a point, while the entire strain curve becomes a plastic strain curve.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Nadai, Plasticity and Destruction of Solids, Vol 1, Foreign Literature, Moscow, 1954, p 648
2. A. Nadai: Plastic. Mechanics of the plastic state of matter, Vol. 2, Joint Scientific and Technical Publishing House (ONTI) NKTP USSR. Main edition of general technical literature, Moscow (1936), p. 280.
3. A.A. Ilyushin, Plastic, Leningrad, OGIZ, Moscow, 1948, p 376
4. W. Ramberg, W.R. Osgood: Description of stress–strain curves by three parameters. National Advisory Committee For Aeronautics, Technical Note No. 902, Washington DC (1943).
5. R. Papirno, J. Meskall, and A. Hansen, Fracture in axial compression tests of cylinders, In STP808-EB, Compression Testing for Homogeneous Materials and Composites, R. Cheate and R. Papirno, Ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1983, 10.1520/stp36195s10.1520/stp36195s ↗
6. R. Papirno, Goodness-of-Fit of the Ramberg-Osgood Analytic Stress-Strain Curve to Tensile Test Data, J. Test. Eval., 1982, 10(6), p 263–268. 10.1520/JTE10264J10.1520/JTE10264J ↗
7. K. Rasmussen, Full-Range Stress-Strain Curves for Stainless Steel Alloys, J. Constr. Steel Res., 2003, 59(1), p 47–61. 10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00018-410.1016/S0143-974X(02)00018-4 ↗
8. H.S. Gao, Modeling Stress Strain Curves for Nonlinear Analysis, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2009, 575–578, p 539–544. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.575-578.53910.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.575-578.539 ↗
9. L. Gardner, The Continuous Strength Method, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build., 2008, 161(3), p 127–133. 10.1680/stbu.2008.161.3.12710.1680/stbu.2008.161.3.127 ↗
10. L. Gardner, X. Yun, L. Macorini, and M. Kucukler, Hot-Rolled Steel and Steel-Concrete Composite Design Incorporating Strain Hardening, Structures, 2017, 9, p 21–28. 10.1016/j.istruc.2016.08.00510.1016/j.istruc.2016.08.005 ↗
11. L. Gardner, X. Yun, A. Fieber, and L. Macorini, Steel Design by Advanced Analysis: Material Modeling and Strain Limits, Engineering, 2019, 5(2), p 243–249. 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.02610.1016/j.eng.2018.11.026 ↗
12. X. Yun and L. Gardner, The Continuous Strength Method for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Non-slender Tubular Cross-Sections, Eng. Struct., 2018, 175, p 549–564. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.07010.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.070 ↗
13. F. Walport, L. Gardner, E. Real, I. Arrayago, and D.A. Nethercot, Effects of Material Nonlinearity on the Global Analysis and Stability of Stainless Steel Frames, J. Constr. Steel Res., 2019, 152, p 173–182. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.04.01910.1016/j.jcsr.2018.04.019 ↗
14. I. Arrayago, E. Real, and L. Gardner, Description of Stress-Strain Curves for Stainless Steel Alloys, Mater. Des., 2015, 87, p 540–552. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.00110.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.001 ↗
15. P.A. Belov, S.A. Lurie, and M.Yu. Gavrikov, The Problem of Extrapolating PCM Low Cycle Fatique to a Resourse, Znanie, 2016, 36(1), p 29.
16. P.A. Belov, S.A. Lurie, M.Yu. Gavrikov, Extrapolation of PCM Low Cycle Fatigue to a Resource (Second Model), Sci. Europe, 2016, 2(6), p 10.
17. A. Mendelson, Plasticity: Theory, and Application, Krieger, Malabar, 1968
18. N.Y. Golovina: PhD thesis, Tyumen State Oil and Gas University (2002), http://www.dissercat.com/Thesespdfs/speck.pdf. Accessed 01 Dec 2018.
19. G. Brondino and G. Vicario, An Empirical Comparison of Estimating Methods for the Ramberg-Osgood EIV Model, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 2006, 35(2), p 407–417. 10.1080/0361091060059134710.1080/03610910600591347 ↗
20. C. Liu, Smoothing Elastoplastic Stress-Strain Curves Obtained by a Critical Modification of Conventional Models, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2003, 40(9), p 2121–214510.1016/S0020-7683(03)00025-8 ↗
21. W. Quach and J. Huang, Stress-Strain Models for Light Gauge Steels, Procedia Eng., 2011, 14, p 288–29610.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.035 ↗
22. Z. Zhang, W. Wu, D. Chen, Q. Sun, and W. Zhao, New Formula Relating the Yield Stress-Strain with the Strength Coefficient and the Strain-Hardening Exponent, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2004, 13, p 509–512. 10.1361/1059949042007010.1361/10599490420070 ↗
23. Makhutov, N.A.: Strength and safety: fundamental and applied research/N. A. Makhutov. Open Editors: K.V. Frolov, V.V. Moskvichev, M.M. Gadenin. - Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2008.-522 p., ISBN:978-5-02-023249-5
24. Makhutov N.A., Rachuk V.S., Gadenin M.M. and other stress-strain states of the rocket engine. - M.: Nauka, 2013.- 646 p (Studies of the stress and strength of rocket engines)