journal article·2008-02

Controlling End-Grain Corrosion of Austenitic Stainless Steels

Kamlesh Chandra, Vivekanand Kain, Puppala Ganesh

Publisher page

Abstract

SS 304L is widely used as a structural material in applications handling nitric acid such as nuclear fuel processing plants and nuclear waste management facilities. Bar, wire, and tubular products of this material are especially susceptible to end-grain corrosion in nitric acid environment. Such an attack takes place on the tubular and forged surfaces that are perpendicular to the hot-working direction and occurs as localized pitting type attack. This study shows that the possible reasons for the directional nature of end-grain attack are the manganese sulfide inclusions aligned along the hot-working direction and/or segregation of chromium along the flow lines during the fabrication stage itself. It has been shown in this study that controlled solution annealing, laser surface remelting, and weld overlay can be used to avoid/minimize end-grain corrosion. Different annealing heat-treatments were carried out on two heats of SS 304L tube and susceptibility to corrosion was measured by ASTM A 262 practice C and electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation (EPR) test. Solution annealing at 950 °C for 90 min has been shown to increase the resistance to end-grain corrosion. Laser surface remelting using continuous wave CO2 laser under argon shield and weld deposition (overlay) using SS 308L material were done on the end faces of the tubes. These samples were completely resistant to end-grain corrosion in nitric acid environments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. R.L. Cowan and C.S. Tedmon, Intergranular Corrosion of Alloys: Advances in Corrosion Science and Technology, vol. 3, M.G. Fontana and R.W. Staehle, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1973, p 29310.1007/978-1-4615-8258-8_3 ↗
2. A.J. Sedricks, Corrosion of Stainless Steels, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1996, p 13
3. V. Kain, R.C. Prasad, P.K. De, Testing Sensitization and Predicting Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion and Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking, Corrosion, 2002, 58, pp. 15–3810.5006/1.3277301 ↗
4. C.L. Briant, R.A. Mulford, E.L. Hall, Sensitization of Austenitic Stainless Steels, 1. Controlled Purity Alloys, Corrosion, 1982, 38(9), pp. 468–47710.5006/1.3577362 ↗
5. V. Kain, S.S. Shinde, H.S. Gadiyar, Mechanism of Improved Corrosion Resistance of Type 304L Stainless Steel, Nitric Acid Grade, in Nitric Acid Environments, J. Mater. Eng. Perf., 1994, 3(6), pp. 699–70510.1007/BF02818368 ↗
6. V. Kain, P.K. De, Controlling Corrosion in the Back End of Fuel Cycle Using Nitric Acid Grade Stainless Steel, Inter. J. Nuclear Energy Sci. Technol., 2005, 1(2–3), pp. 222–231
7. R.D. Shaw, Corrosion Prevention and Control at Sellafield Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Plant, Br. Corros. J., 1990, 25, pp. 97–10710.1179/bcj.1990.25.2.97 ↗
8. V. Kain, P. Sengupta, P.K. De, S. Banerjee, Case Reviews on the Effect of Microstructures on the Corrosion Behavior of Austenitic Alloys for Processing and Storage of Nuclear Waste, Metall. Mat. Trans. A, 2005, 36A, pp. 1075–108410.1007/s11661-005-0201-5 ↗
9. G.O.H. Whillock, B.F. Dunnett, M. Takeuchi, Techniques for Measuring the End-Grain Corrosion Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steels, Corrosion, 2005, 61(1), pp. 58–6710.5006/1.3278161 ↗
10. V. Kain, S.S. Chouthai, H.S. Gadiyar, Performance of AISI 304L Stainless Steel with Exposed End Grain in Intergranular Corrosion Tests, Brit. Corr. J., 1992, 27(1), pp. 59–6510.1179/000705992798268819 ↗
11. J.Y. Jeng, B.E. Quayle, P.J. Modern, W.M. Steen, B.D. Bastow, Laser Surface Treatments to Improve the Intergranular Corrosion Resistance of 18/13/Nb and 304 in Nitric Acid, Corr. Sci., 1993, 35(5–8), pp. 1289–129610.1016/0010-938X(93)90350-P ↗
12. J. Stewart, D.E. Williams, The Initiation of Pitting Corrosion on Austenitic Stainless Steel: On the Role and Importance of Sulphide Inclusions, Corr. Sci., 1992, 33(3), pp. 457–47410.1016/0010-938X(92)90074-D ↗
13. Q.Y. Pan, W.D. Huang, R.G. Song, Y.H. Zhou, G.L. Zhang, The Improvement of Localized Corrosion Resistance in Sensitized Stainless Steel by Laser Surface Remelting, Surf. Coat. Tech., 1998, 102, pp. 245–25510.1016/S0257-8972(98)00358-2 ↗
14. “ASTM Designation A-262, Practice B” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 2005
15. “ASTM Designation G-108” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 2005
16. A.P. Mazidi, M.A. Streicher, Potentiodynamic Reactivation Method for Detecting Sensitization in AISI 304 and 304L Stainless Steels, Corrosion, 1984, 40(8), pp. 393–40810.5006/1.3593944 ↗
17. M.H. Brown, Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Evaluation Tests for the Detection of Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion, Corrosion, 1974, 30(1), pp. 1–1210.5006/0010-9312-30.1.1 ↗
18. M.P. Ryan, D.E. Williams, R.J. Chater, B.M. Hutton, D.S. McPhail, Why Stainless Steel Corrodes, Nature, 2002, 415, pp. 770–77410.1038/415770a ↗
19. Q. Meng, G.S. Frankel, H.O. Colijn, S.H. Goss, High-Resolution Characterization of the Region Around Manganese Sulfide Inclusions in Stainless Steel Alloys, Corrosion, 2004, 60(4), pp. 346–35510.5006/1.3287741 ↗
20. O.V. Akgun, O.T. Inal, Laser Surface Melting and Alloying of Type 304L Stainless Steel. Part I Microstructural Characterization, J. Mater. Sci., 1995, 30, pp. 6097–610410.1007/BF01151533 ↗
21. O.V. Akgun, O.T. Inal, Laser Surface Melting and Alloying of Type 304L Stainless Steel. Part II Corrosion and Wear Resistance Properties, J. Mater. Sci., 1995, 30, pp. 6105–611210.1007/BF01151534 ↗
22. J. Stewart, D.B. Wells, P.M. Scott, A.S. Brandsen, The Prevention of IGSCC in Sensitized Stainless Steel by Laser Surface Melting, Corrosion, 1990, 46(8), pp. 618–62110.5006/1.3585158 ↗