Effect of Wear on Surface Crack Propagation in Rail–Wheel Wet Contact
Source abstract
Abstract
The interaction between wear and rolling contact fatigue in wet contact was investigated by means of experiments on a two-disk test bench. Specimens of various railway wheel steels were coupled with specimens of the same rail steel, subjected to rolling and sliding wet contact with varying sliding/rolling ratio. Some tests with a dry rolling–sliding contact phase preceding wet contact were carried out as well (dry–wet tests). The pressurization of the fluid entrapped in the surface cracks was the cause of a rapid and severe damage in the dry–wet tests, due to the nucleation of surface cracks by ratcheting in the dry phase, which subsequently propagate in the wet phase. In the wet tests, the fluid pressurization effect was much mitigated due to the absence of initial surface cracks; the specimens subjected to higher sliding/rolling ratio showed the best performance against rolling contact fatigue, due to the effect of wear in reducing the length of surface cracks. A model for assessing the interaction between wear and rolling contact fatigue was proposed, based on the correction of the classical Paris law for crack propagation by taking into account the effect of wear on crack length reduction. The application of the model to the experimental tests allowed finding a correlation between the model predictions and the occurrence of fatigue failure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. B. Bhushan, Ed., Modern Tribology Handbook, Vol II, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001, p 1271–1326
2. R. Deuce, Wheel Tread Damage—An Elementary Guide, Report 100115000, Bombardier Transportation, Netphen, 2007
3. G. Trummer, C. Marte, P. Dietmaier, C. Sommitsch, and K. Six, Modeling Surface Rolling Contact Fatigue Crack Initiation Taking Severe Plastic Shear Deformation into Account, Wear, 2016, 352–353, p 136–14510.1016/j.wear.2016.02.008 ↗
4. S.L. Grassie, Squats and Squat-Type Defects in Rails: The Understanding to Date, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit., 2012, 226, p 235–24210.1177/0954409711422189 ↗
5. S.L. Grassie, Studs and Squats: The Evolving Story, Wear, 2016, 366–367, p 194–19910.1016/j.wear.2016.03.021 ↗
6. D.I. Fletcher and S.H. Sanusi, The Potential for Suppressing Rail Defect Growth Through Tailoring Rail Thermo-Mechanical Properties, Wear, 2016, 366–367, p 401–40610.1016/j.wear.2016.06.022 ↗
7. A. Ekberg and E. Kabo, Fatigue of Railway Wheels and Rails Under Rolling Contact and Thermal Loading—An Overview, Wear, 2005, 258(7–8), p 1288–130010.1016/j.wear.2004.03.039 ↗
8. S.J. Kwon, J.W. Seo, H.K. Jun, and D.H. Lee, Damage Evaluation Regarding to Contact Zones of High-Speed Train Wheel Subjected to Thermal Fatigue, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2015, 55, p 327–34210.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.07.021 ↗
9. X. Ren, F. Wu, F. Xiao, and B. Jiang, Corrosion Induced Fatigue Failure of Railway Wheels, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2015, 55, p 300–31610.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.06.009 ↗
10. G.N. Haidemenopoulos, P.I. Sarafoglou, P. Christopoulos, and A.D. Zervaki, Rolling Contact Fatigue Cracking in Rails Subjected to In-Service Loading, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2016, 39, p 1161–117210.1111/ffe.12432 ↗
11. C.A. Sciammarella, R.J.S. Chen, P. Gallo, F. Berto, and L. Lamberti, Experimental Evaluation of Rolling Contact Fatigue in Railroad Wheels, Int. J. Fatigue, 2016, 91, p 158–17010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.035 ↗
12. T. Makino, T. Kato, and K. Hirakawa, The Effect of Slip Ratio on the Rolling Contact Fatigue Property of Railway Wheel Steel, Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 36, p 68–7910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.014 ↗
13. G. Donzella, A. Mazzù, and C. Petrogalli, Competition Between Wear and Rolling Contact Fatigue at the Wheel-Rail Interface: Some Experimental Evidence on Rail Steel, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F, 2009, 223(1), p 31–4410.1243/09544097JRRT161 ↗
14. K. Farhangdoost and M. Kavoosi, Effect of Lubricant on Surface Rolling Contact Fatigue Cracks, Adv. Mater. Res. (Durnten-Zurich, Switz.), 2010, 97–101, p 793–79610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.793 ↗
15. Y. Zhou, S. Wang, T. Wang, Y. Xu, and Z. Li, Field and Laboratory Investigation of the Relationship Between Rail Head Check and Wear in a Heavy-Haul Railway, Wear, 2014, 315, p 68–7710.1016/j.wear.2014.04.004 ↗
16. E. Magel, M. Roney, J. Kalousek, and P. Sroba, The Blending of Theory and Practice in Modern Rail Grinding, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2003, 26, p 921–92910.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00669.x ↗
17. G. Donzella, M. Faccoli, A. Mazzù, C. Petrogalli, and R. Roberti, Progressive Damage Assessment in the Near-Surface Layer of Railway Wheel–Rail Couple Under Cyclic Contact, Wear, 2011, 271(1–2), p 408–41610.1016/j.wear.2010.10.042 ↗
18. M. Lancini, I. Bodini, D. Vetturi, S. Pasinetti, A. Mazzù, L. Solazzi, C. Petrogalli, and M. Faccoli, Using Vibration Measurements to Detect High Wear Rates in Rolling Contact Fatigue Tests, Acta IMEKO, 2015, 4(4), p 66–7410.21014/acta_imeko.v4i4.237 ↗
19. A. Mazzù, C. Petrogalli, and M. Faccoli, An Integrated Model for Competitive Damage Mechanisms Assessment in Railway Wheel Steels, Wear, 2015, 322–323, p 181–19110.1016/j.wear.2014.11.013 ↗
20. A. Mazzù, A Simplified Non-linear Kinematic Hardening Model for Ratchetting and Wear Assessment in Rolling Contact, J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 2008, 43(5), p 349–36010.1243/03093247JSA405 ↗
21. A. Mazzù, Surface Plastic Strain in Contact Problems: Prediction by a Simplified Non-Linear Kinematic Hardening Model, J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 2009, 44(3), p 187–19910.1243/03093247JSA480 ↗
22. M. Dallago, M. Benedetti, S. Ancellotti, and V. Fontanari, The Role of Lubricating Fluid Pressurization and Entrapment on the Path of Inclined Edge Cracks Originated Under Rolling–Sliding Contact Fatigue: Numerical Analyses Versus Experimental Evidences, Int. J. Fatigue, 2016, 92, p 517–53010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.02.014 ↗
23. M. Faccoli, C. Petrogalli, M. Lancini, A. Ghidini, and A. Mazzù, Rolling Contact Fatigue and Wear Behavior of High-Performance Railway Wheel Steels Under Various Rolling-Sliding Contact Conditions, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017, 26, p 3271–328410.1007/s11665-017-2786-4 ↗
24. M. Beghini and C. Santus, An Application of the Weight Function Technique to Inclined Surface Cracks Under Rolling Contact Fatigue, Assessment and Parametric Analysis, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2013, 98, p 153–16810.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.10.024 ↗
25. J. Brouzoulis, Wear Impact on Rolling Contact Fatigue Crack Growth in Rails, Wear, 2014, 314, p 13–1910.1016/j.wear.2013.12.009 ↗
26. H.K. Jun, D.H. Lee, and D.S. Kim, Calculation of Minimum Crack Size for Growth Under Rolling Contact Between Wheel and Rail, Wear, 2015, 344–345, p 46–5710.1016/j.wear.2015.10.013 ↗
27. A. Ghidini, M. Diener, A. Gianni, and J. Schneider, SUPERLOS ® Innovative Steel by Lucchini RS for High-Speed Wheel Application, Lucchini RS, Lovere, 2012
28. A. Ghidini, M. Diener, and J. Schneider, Special Wheels for Mass Transit, Lucchini RS, Lovere, 2014
29. J.R. Yates, G. Shi, H.V. Atkinson, C.M. Sellars, and C.W. Anderson, Fatigue Tolerant Design of Steel Components Based on the Size of Large Inclusions, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2002, 25, p 667–67610.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00523.x ↗
30. C.Z. Wu and T.S. Shih, Effects of Inclusion Particles on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High Strength Austempered Ductile Iron, Mater. Trans., 2003, 44(5), p 995–100310.2320/matertrans.44.995 ↗
31. Y. Murakami and M. Endo, Effects of Defects, Inclusions and Inhomogeneities on Fatigue Strength, Int. J. Fatigue, 1994, 16, p 163–18210.1016/0142-1123(94)90001-9 ↗
32. Y. Murakami, Inclusion Rating by Statistic of Extreme Values and Its Application to Fatigue Strength Prediciton and Quality Control of Materials, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 1994, 99, p 345–35110.6028/jres.099.032 ↗
33. A. Mazzù, L. Solazzi, M. Lancini, C. Petrogalli, A. Ghidini, and M. Faccoli, An Experimental Procedure for Surface Damage Assessment in the Near-Surface Layer of Railway Wheel-Rail Couple Under Cyclic Contact, Wear, 2011, 271(1–2), p 408–416
34. G.R. Irwin, Analysis of Stresses and Strains Near the End of a Crack Transversing a Plate, J. Appl. Mech., 1957, 24, p 361–37010.1115/1.4011547 ↗
35. T. Xu, Y. Feng, S. Song, and D. Wang, Fatigue Crack Propagation Behaviour of Steels with Different Microstructures, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 551, p 110–11510.1016/j.msea.2012.04.103 ↗