Process Evaluation of AISI 4340 Steel Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) involves the consolidation of metal powder, layer by layer, through laser melting and solidification. In this study, process parameters are optimized for AISI 4340 steel to produce dense and homogeneous structures. The optimized process parameters produce mechanical properties at the center of the build plate that are comparable to wrought in the vertical and horizontal orientations after heat treatment and machining. Four subsequent builds are filled with specimens to evaluate the mechanical behavior as a function of location and orientation. Variations in the mechanical properties are likely due to recoater blade interactions with the powder and uneven gas flow. The results obtained in this study are analyzed to assess the reliability and reproducibility of the process. A different build evaluates the performance of near-net-shaped tensile specimens angled 35°-90° from the build plate surface (horizontal). Ductility measurements and surface roughness vary significantly as a function of the build angle. In the stress-relieved and as-built conditions, the mechanical behavior of vertically oriented specimens exhibits somewhat lower and more variable ductility than horizontally oriented specimens. Therefore, several process variables affect the mechanical properties of parts produced by the L-PBF process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. E. Jelis, M. Clemente, S. Kerwien, N.M. Ravindra, and M.R. Hespos, Metallurgical and Mechanical Evaluation of 4340 Steel Produced by Direct Metal Laser Sintering, JOM, 2015, 67(3), p 582–58910.1007/s11837-014-1273-8 ↗
2. T. Allison, J. Moore, A. M. Rimpel, J. C. Wilkes, R. Pelton, and K. Wygant, Manufacturing and Testing Experience with Direct Metal Laser Sintering for Closed Centrifugal Compressor Impellers, Pump and Turbo 2014, Houston, 2014
3. Incodema Group, DMLS Materials Comparison Chart, http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/DMLS-Materials-Chart.pdf . Accessed 23 September 2015.
4. M. Seifi, A. Salem, and J. Beuth, Overview of Materials Qualification Needs for Metal Additive Manufacturing, JOM, 2016, 3, p 747–76310.1007/s11837-015-1810-0 ↗
5. AMS 2759, Heat Treatment of Low-Alloy Steel Parts Minimum Tensile Strength 220 Ksi (1517 Mpa) and Higher, SAE International, Warrendale, 1984
6. ASTM E8/E8M, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, Conshohocken, 2015
7. ASTM E23, Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, Conshohocken, 2012
8. ASTM E399-12e3, Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness K IC of Metallic Materials, West Conshohocken, Conshocken
9. W. Wang and S. Kelly, A Metallurgical Evaluation of the Powder-Bed Laser Additive Manufactured 4140 Steel Material, JOM, 2016, 68(3), p 869–87510.1007/s11837-015-1804-y ↗
10. B. Ferrar, L. Mullen, E. Jones, R. Stamp, and C.J. Sutcliffe, Gas Flow Effects on Selective Laser Melting (SLM) Manufacturing Performance, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 212, p 355–36410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.020 ↗
11. A.S. Wu, D.W. Brown, M. Kumar, G.F. Gallegos, and W.E. King, An Experimental Investigation into Additive Manufacturing Induced Residual Stresses in 316L Stainless Steel, Metall. Mater. Trans., 2014, 45(13), p 6260–627010.1007/s11661-014-2549-x ↗
12. B. K. Foster, E. W. Reutzel, A. Nassar, B. T. Hall, S. Brown, and C. Dickman, Optical, Layerwise Monitoring of Powder Bed Fusion, Solid Freeform Fabrication, Austin, TX, 2015.
13. S. Kleszczynski, A. Ladewig, K. Friedberger, J. Zur Jacobsmühlen, D. Merhof, and G. Witt, Position Dependency of Surface Roughness in Parts from Laser Beam Melting Systems, Solid Freeform Fabrication, Austin, 2015.
14. J. Dilip, G. Janaki Ram, T.L. Starr, and B. Stucker, Selective Laser Melting of HY100 Steel: process Parameters, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties, Additive Manufacturing, 2017, 13, p 49–6010.1016/j.addma.2016.11.003 ↗
15. T.M. Mower and M.J. Long, Mechanical Behavior of Additive Manufactured-Powder-Bed Laser-Fused Materials, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, 651, p 198–21310.1016/j.msea.2015.10.068 ↗
16. V. Cain, L. Thijs, V. Humbeeck, J. Van, B. Van Hooreweder, and R. Knutsen, Crack Propagation and Fracture Toughness of Ti6Al4V Alloy Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Addit. Manuf., 2015, 5, p 68–7610.1016/j.addma.2014.12.006 ↗
17. J. Suryawanshi, K. Prasanth, S. Scudino, J. Eckert, and O. Prakash, Simultaneous Enhancements of Strength and Toughness in an Al-12Si Alloy Synthesized using Selective Laser Melting, Acta Mater., 2016, 115, p 285–29410.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.009 ↗