journal article·2009-11

Effect of Alloying Elements on Tensile Properties, Microstructure, and Corrosion Resistance of Reinforcing Bar Steel

B. K. Panigrahi, S. Srikanth, G. Sahoo

Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of copper, phosphorus, and chromium present in a semikilled reinforcing bar steel produced by in-line quenching [thermomechanical treatment (TMT)] process on the tensile properties, microstructure, and corrosion resistance of steel in simulated chloride environment has been investigated. The results have been compared with that of a semikilled C-Mn reinforcing bar steel without these alloying elements produced by the same process route. Though the amount of phosphorus (0.11 wt.%) was higher than that specified by ASTM A 706 standard, the Cu-P-Cr steel exhibited a composite microstructure, and good balance of yield stress, tensile stress, elongation, and ultimate tensile to yield stress ratio. Two conventional test methods, namely, the salt fog, and potentiodynamic polarization tests, were used for the corrosion test. The rust formed on Cu-P-Cr steel was adherent, and was of multiple colors, while the corrosion products formed on the C-Mn steel were weakly adherent and relatively darker blue. Also, the free corrosion potential of the Cu-P-Cr steel was nobler, and the corrosion current was markedly lower than that of a C-Mn rebar. The Cu-P-Cr steel did not develop any pits/deep grooves on its surface even after the prolonged exposure to salt fog. The improved corrosion resistance of the Cu-P-Cr steel has been attributed to the presence of copper, phosphorus, and small amount of chromium in the dense, adherent rust layer on the surface of reinforcing steel bar. A schematic mechanism of charge transfer has been proposed to explain the improved corrosion resistance of the Cu-P-Cr alloyed TMT rebar.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. J.E. Slater, Corrosion of Structures, Corrosion: Environments and Industries, ASM Handbook, Vol 13C, American Society of Metals, OH, 2006, p 105410.31399/asm.hb.v13c.a0004220 ↗
2. B.K. Panigrahi and S,K. Jain, Impact Toughness of High Strength Low Alloy TMT Reinforcement Rebar, Bulletin of Material Science, 2002, 25, p. 319–324.10.1007/BF02704125 ↗
3. C.A. Apostolopoulos, and D. Michalopoulos, Effect of Corrosion on Mass Loss, and High and Low Cycle Fatigue of Reinforcing Steel, Jl. of Materials Engineering and Performance,2006, 15, p. 742–749.10.1361/105994906X150867 ↗
4. C. Andrade and C. Alonso, Progress on Design and Residual Life Calculation with Regard to Rebar Corrosion of Reinforced Concrete, Techniques to Assess the Corrosion Activity of Steel Reinforced Concrete Structures, ASTM STP 1276, N.S. Berke, E. Escalante, C.K. Nmai, and D. Whiting, Eds. (Philadelphia), ASTM International, 1996, p 23–4010.1520/STP16965S ↗
5. J. Balma, D. Darwin, J.P. Browning, and C.E. Locke, Evaluation of Corrosion Resistance of Microalloyed Reinforcing Steel, Standard Engineering and Engineering Materials, SM Report No. 71, University of Kansas Center for Research Inc., Lawrence, KS, December, 2002
6. V. Kumar, Protection of Steel Reinforcement Cocrete-A Review, Corrosion Reviews, 1998, 16 (4), p. 317–358.10.1515/CORRREV.1998.16.4.317 ↗
7. A.B. Yur’ev, Y.F. Ivanov, V.E. Gromov and E.V. Kozlov, Structural–Phase State of Thermostrengthened Large Diameter Reinforcement, Steel in Translation, 2004, 34 (6), p. 69–72.
8. R.M. Cornell and U. Schwertmann, The Iron Oxides, 2nd edn., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.10.1002/3527602097 ↗
9. B.K. Panigrahi, S. Srikanth and J. Singh, Corrosion Failure of Steel in Sugar Industry-A Case Study, Jl. Failure Analysis and Prevention,2007, 7, p. 187–191.10.1007/s11668-007-9037-1 ↗
10. S. Szklarska-Smialowska, The Pitting of Iron-Chromium-Nickel Alloys, Localised Corrosion, NACE, Houston, 1981, p 312–341
11. S. Morooka, Y. Tomota and T. Kamiyama, Heterogenous Deformation Behavior Studied by in-Situ Neutron Diffraction During Tensile Deformation for Ferrite, Martensite, and Pearlite Steels, ISIJ Intl., 2008, 48 (4), p. 525–530.10.2355/isijinternational.48.525 ↗
12. M. Yamashita, H. Nagano, T. Misawa, and E. Townsend, Structure of Protective Rust Layers Formed on Weathering Steels by Long Term Exposures in the Industrial Atmosphere of Japan and North America, Iron and Steel Institute of Japan Intl., 1998, 38, p. 285–290.10.2355/isijinternational.38.285 ↗
13. K. Schwabe and W.D. Arnold, Behavior of Low Alloyed Steel, Proc. 5th Intl. Congress on Metallic Corrosion (Houston), NACE, 1971, p 760–763
14. J. Pilling, N. Ridley and D.J. Gooch, The Effect of Phosphorus on Creep in 2.5% Cr-1% Mo Steels, Acta. Metallurgica, 1982, 30, p. 1587–1595.10.1016/0001-6160(82)90179-1 ↗
15. H.J. Grabke, Effects of Impurities in Steels on Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Behavior, Steel Research, 1987, 58, p. 477–482.10.1002/srin.198700250 ↗
16. DECHEMA Corrosion Handbook, Vol 11, G. Kreyser and R. Eckermann, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1992, p 182
17. H. Okida, S. Sekino, Y. Hosoi, and T. Murata, Copper Containing Structural Steels, Copper in Iron and Steel, ed. LeMay, I., Shetky, I.M, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1982, p.83–93.
18. C.L. Briant and R.P. Messmer, An Electronic Model for the Effect of Alloying Elements on the Phosphorus Induced Grain Boundary Embrittlement of the Steel, Acta. Metallurgica,, 1982, 30, p. 1811–1818.10.1016/0001-6160(82)90097-9 ↗
19. L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd edn., Cornell Unuiversity Press, Ithaca, New York, 1960, p. 93.
20. J. Davalos, J.F. Marco, M. Garcia, and J.R. Gancedo, The Corrosion Products of Weathering Steel and Pure Iron in Simulated Wet-Dry Cycles, Hyper Interactions, 1991, 66, p. 63–70.10.1007/BF02395856 ↗